* tip/sched/arm64: (785 commits)
  Documentation: arm64: describe asymmetric 32-bit support
  arm64: Remove logic to kill 32-bit tasks on 64-bit-only cores
  arm64: Hook up cmdline parameter to allow mismatched 32-bit EL0
  arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs
  arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system
  arm64: exec: Adjust affinity for compat tasks with mismatched 32-bit EL0
  arm64: Implement task_cpu_possible_mask()
  sched: Introduce dl_task_check_affinity() to check proposed affinity
  sched: Allow task CPU affinity to be restricted on asymmetric systems
  sched: Split the guts of sched_setaffinity() into a helper function
  sched: Introduce task_struct::user_cpus_ptr to track requested affinity
  sched: Reject CPU affinity changes based on task_cpu_possible_mask()
  cpuset: Cleanup cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() use in select_fallback_rq()
  cpuset: Honour task_cpu_possible_mask() in guarantee_online_cpus()
  cpuset: Don't use the cpu_possible_mask as a last resort for cgroup v1
  sched: Introduce task_cpu_possible_mask() to limit fallback rq selection
  sched: Cgroup SCHED_IDLE support
  sched/topology: Skip updating masks for non-online nodes
  Linux 5.14-rc6
  lib: use PFN_PHYS() in devmem_is_allowed()
  ...

* for-next/entry:
  : More entry.S clean-ups and conversion to C.
  arm64: entry: call exit_to_user_mode() from C
  arm64: entry: move bulk of ret_to_user to C
  arm64: entry: clarify entry/exit helpers
  arm64: entry: consolidate entry/exit helpers

Merge branches 'for-next/mte', 'for-next/misc' and 'for-next/kselftest', remote-tracking branch 'arm64/for-next/perf' into for-next/core

* arm64/for-next/perf:
  arm64/perf: Replace '0xf' instances with ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF

* for-next/mte:
  : Miscellaneous MTE improvements.
  arm64/cpufeature: Optionally disable MTE via command-line
  arm64: kasan: mte: remove redundant mte_report_once logic
  arm64: kasan: mte: use a constant kernel GCR_EL1 value
  arm64: avoid double ISB on kernel entry
  arm64: mte: optimize GCR_EL1 modification on kernel entry/exit
  Documentation: document the preferred tag checking mode feature
  arm64: mte: introduce a per-CPU tag checking mode preference
  arm64: move preemption disablement to prctl handlers
  arm64: mte: change ASYNC and SYNC TCF settings into bitfields
  arm64: mte: rename gcr_user_excl to mte_ctrl
  arm64: mte: avoid TFSRE0_EL1 related operations unless in async mode

* for-next/misc:
  : Miscellaneous updates.
  arm64: Do not trap PMSNEVFR_EL1
  arm64: mm: fix comment typo of pud_offset_phys()
  arm64: signal32: Drop pointless call to sigdelsetmask()
  arm64/sve: Better handle failure to allocate SVE register storage
  arm64: Document the requirement for SCR_EL3.HCE
  arm64: head: avoid over-mapping in map_memory
  arm64/sve: Add a comment documenting the binutils needed for SVE asm
  arm64/sve: Add some comments for sve_save/load_state()
  arm64: replace in_irq() with in_hardirq()
  arm64: mm: Fix TLBI vs ASID rollover
  arm64: entry: Add SYM_CODE annotation for __bad_stack
  arm64: fix typo in a comment
  arm64: move the (z)install rules to arch/arm64/Makefile
  arm64/sve: Make fpsimd_bind_task_to_cpu() static
  arm64: unnecessary end 'return;' in void functions
  arm64/sme: Document boot requirements for SME
  arm64: use __func__ to get function name in pr_err
  arm64: SSBS/DIT: print SSBS and DIT bit when printing PSTATE
  arm64: cpufeature: Use defined macro instead of magic numbers
  arm64/kexec: Test page size support with new TGRAN range values

* for-next/kselftest:
  : Kselftest additions for arm64.
  kselftest/arm64: signal: Add a TODO list for signal handling tests
  kselftest/arm64: signal: Add test case for SVE register state in signals
  kselftest/arm64: signal: Verify that signals can't change the SVE vector length
  kselftest/arm64: signal: Check SVE signal frame shows expected vector length
  kselftest/arm64: signal: Support signal frames with SVE register data
  kselftest/arm64: signal: Add SVE to the set of features we can check for
  kselftest/arm64: pac: Fix skipping of tests on systems without PAC
  kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix misleading output when skipping tests
  kselftest/arm64: Add a TODO list for floating point tests
  kselftest/arm64: Add tests for SVE vector configuration
  kselftest/arm64: Validate vector lengths are set in sve-probe-vls
  kselftest/arm64: Provide a helper binary and "library" for SVE RDVL
  kselftest/arm64: Ignore check_gcr_el1_cswitch binary

Commit 31c00d2a ("arm64: Disable fine grained traps on boot") zeroed
the fine grained trap registers to prevent unwanted register traps from
occuring. However, for the PMSNEVFR_EL1 register, the corresponding
HDFG{R,W}TR_EL2.nPMSNEVFR_EL1 fields must be 1 to disable trapping. Set
both fields to 1 if FEAT_SPEv1p2 is detected to disable read and write
traps.

Fixes: 31c00d2a ("arm64: Disable fine grained traps on boot")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.13.x
Signed-off-by: NAlexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210824154523.906270-1-alexandru.elisei@arm.comSigned-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Fix a typo in the comment of macro pud_offset_phys().
Signed-off-by: NXujun Leng <lengxujun2007@126.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210825150526.12582-1-lengxujun2007@126.comSigned-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Commit 77097ae5 ("most of set_current_blocked() callers want
SIGKILL/SIGSTOP removed from set") extended set_current_blocked() to
remove SIGKILL and SIGSTOP from the new signal set and updated all
callers accordingly.

Unfortunately, this collided with the merge of the arm64 architecture,
which duly removes these signals when restoring the compat sigframe, as
this was what was previously done by arch/arm/.

Remove the redundant call to sigdelsetmask() from
compat_restore_sigframe().
Reported-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210825093911.24493-1-will@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Currently we "handle" failure to allocate the SVE register storage by
doing a BUG_ON() and hoping for the best. This is obviously not great and
the memory allocation failure will already be loud enough without the
BUG_ON(). As the comment says it is a corner case but let's try to do a bit
better, remove the BUG_ON() and add code to handle the failure in the
callers.

For the ptrace and signal code we can return -ENOMEM gracefully however
we have no real error reporting path available to us for the SVE access
trap so instead generate a SIGKILL if the allocation fails there. This
at least means that we won't try to soldier on and end up trying to
access the nonexistant state and while it's obviously not ideal for
userspace SIGKILL doesn't allow any handling so minimises the ABI
impact, making it easier to improve the interface later if we come up
with a better idea.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210824153417.18371-1-broonie@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

It is amazing that we never documented this absolutely basic
requirement: if you boot the kernel at EL2, you'd better
enable the HVC instruction from EL3.

Really, just do it.
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210812190213.2601506-6-maz@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

The `compute_indices` and `populate_entries` macros operate on inclusive
bounds, and thus the `map_memory` macro which uses them also operates
on inclusive bounds.

We pass `_end` and `_idmap_text_end` to `map_memory`, but these are
exclusive bounds, and if one of these is sufficiently aligned (as a
result of kernel configuration, physical placement, and KASLR), then:

* In `compute_indices`, the computed `iend` will be in the page/block *after*
  the final byte of the intended mapping.

* In `populate_entries`, an unnecessary entry will be created at the end
  of each level of table. At the leaf level, this entry will map up to
  SWAPPER_BLOCK_SIZE bytes of physical addresses that we did not intend
  to map.

As we may map up to SWAPPER_BLOCK_SIZE bytes more than intended, we may
violate the boot protocol and map physical address past the 2MiB-aligned
end address we are permitted to map. As we map these with Normal memory
attributes, this may result in further problems depending on what these
physical addresses correspond to.

The final entry at each level may require an additional table at that
level. As EARLY_ENTRIES() calculates an inclusive bound, we allocate
enough memory for this.

Avoid the extraneous mapping by having map_memory convert the exclusive
end address to an inclusive end address by subtracting one, and do
likewise in EARLY_ENTRIES() when calculating the number of required
tables. For clarity, comments are updated to more clearly document which
boundaries the macros operate on.  For consistency with the other
macros, the comments in map_memory are also updated to describe `vstart`
and `vend` as virtual addresses.

Fixes: 0370b31e ("arm64: Extend early page table code to allow for larger kernels")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.16.x
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210823101253.55567-1-mark.rutland@arm.comSigned-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

At some point it would be nice to avoid the need to manually encode SVE
instructions, add a note of the binutils version required to save looking
it up.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210816125024.8112-1-broonie@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

The use of macros for the actual function bodies means legibility is always
going to be a bit of a challenge, especially while we can't rely on SVE
support in the toolchain, but this helps a little.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210812201143.35578-1-broonie@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Note down a few gaps in our coverage.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819134245.13935-7-broonie@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Currently this doesn't actually verify that the register contents do the
right thing, it just verifes that a SVE context with appropriate size
appears.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819134245.13935-6-broonie@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

We do not support changing the SVE vector length as part of signal return,
verify that this is the case if the system supports multiple vector lengths.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819134245.13935-5-broonie@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

As a basic check that the SVE signal frame is being set up correctly
verify that the vector length in the signal frame is the vector length
that the process has.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819134245.13935-4-broonie@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

A signal frame with SVE may validly either be a bare struct sve_context or
a struct sve_context followed by vector length dependent register data.
Support either in the generic helpers for the signal tests, and while we're
at it validate the SVE vector length reported.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819134245.13935-3-broonie@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Allow testcases for SVE signal handling to flag the dependency and be
skipped on systems without SVE support.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819134245.13935-2-broonie@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Replace the obsolete and ambiguos macro in_irq() with new
macro in_hardirq().
Signed-off-by: NChangbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210814005405.2658-1-changbin.du@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

The PAC tests check to see if the system supports the relevant PAC features
but instead of skipping the tests if they can't be executed they fail the
tests which makes things look like they're not working when they are.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819165723.43903-1-broonie@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Document support for running 32-bit tasks on asymmetric 32-bit systems
and its impact on the user ABI when enabled.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210730112443.23245-17-will@kernel.org

The scheduler now knows enough about these braindead systems to place
32-bit tasks accordingly, so throw out the safety checks and allow the
ret-to-user path to avoid do_notify_resume() if there is nothing to do.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210730112443.23245-16-will@kernel.org

Allow systems with mismatched 32-bit support at EL0 to run 32-bit
applications based on a new kernel parameter.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210730112443.23245-15-will@kernel.org

Since 32-bit applications will be killed if they are caught trying to
execute on a 64-bit-only CPU in a mismatched system, advertise the set
of 32-bit capable CPUs to userspace in sysfs.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210730112443.23245-14-will@kernel.org

If we want to support 32-bit applications, then when we identify a CPU
with mismatched 32-bit EL0 support we must ensure that we will always
have an active 32-bit CPU available to us from then on. This is important
for the scheduler, because is_cpu_allowed() will be constrained to 32-bit
CPUs for compat tasks and forced migration due to a hotplug event will
hang if no 32-bit CPUs are available.

On detecting a mismatch, prevent offlining of either the mismatching CPU
if it is 32-bit capable, or find the first active 32-bit capable CPU
otherwise.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210730112443.23245-13-will@kernel.org

When exec'ing a 32-bit task on a system with mismatched support for
32-bit EL0, try to ensure that it starts life on a CPU that can actually
run it.

Similarly, when exec'ing a 64-bit task on such a system, try to restore
the old affinity mask if it was previously restricted.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NQuentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210730112443.23245-12-will@kernel.org

Provide an implementation of task_cpu_possible_mask() so that we can
prevent 64-bit-only cores being added to the 'cpus_mask' for compat
tasks on systems with mismatched 32-bit support at EL0,
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210730112443.23245-11-will@kernel.org

In preparation for restricting the affinity of a task during execve()
on arm64, introduce a new dl_task_check_affinity() helper function to
give an indication as to whether the restricted mask is admissible for
a deadline task.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210730112443.23245-10-will@kernel.org

Asymmetric systems may not offer the same level of userspace ISA support
across all CPUs, meaning that some applications cannot be executed by
some CPUs. As a concrete example, upcoming arm64 big.LITTLE designs do
not feature support for 32-bit applications on both clusters.

Although userspace can carefully manage the affinity masks for such
tasks, one place where it is particularly problematic is execve()
because the CPU on which the execve() is occurring may be incompatible
with the new application image. In such a situation, it is desirable to
restrict the affinity mask of the task and ensure that the new image is
entered on a compatible CPU. From userspace's point of view, this looks
the same as if the incompatible CPUs have been hotplugged off in the
task's affinity mask. Similarly, if a subsequent execve() reverts to
a compatible image, then the old affinity is restored if it is still
valid.

In preparation for restricting the affinity mask for compat tasks on
arm64 systems without uniform support for 32-bit applications, introduce
{force,relax}_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(), which respectively restrict
and restore the affinity mask for a task based on the compatible CPUs.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NValentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NQuentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210730112443.23245-9-will@kernel.org

In preparation for replaying user affinity requests using a saved mask,
split sched_setaffinity() up so that the initial task lookup and
security checks are only performed when the request is coming directly
from userspace.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NValentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210730112443.23245-8-will@kernel.org

In preparation for saving and restoring the user-requested CPU affinity
mask of a task, add a new cpumask_t pointer to 'struct task_struct'.

If the pointer is non-NULL, then the mask is copied across fork() and
freed on task exit.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NValentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210730112443.23245-7-will@kernel.org

Reject explicit requests to change the affinity mask of a task via
set_cpus_allowed_ptr() if the requested mask is not a subset of the
mask returned by task_cpu_possible_mask(). This ensures that the
'cpus_mask' for a given task cannot contain CPUs which are incapable of
executing it, except in cases where the affinity is forced.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NValentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NQuentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210730112443.23245-6-will@kernel.org

select_fallback_rq() only needs to recheck for an allowed CPU if the
affinity mask of the task has changed since the last check.

Return a 'bool' from cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() to indicate whether
the affinity mask was updated, and use this to elide the allowed check
when the mask has been left alone.

No functional change.
Suggested-by: NValentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NValentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210730112443.23245-5-will@kernel.org

Asymmetric systems may not offer the same level of userspace ISA support
across all CPUs, meaning that some applications cannot be executed by
some CPUs. As a concrete example, upcoming arm64 big.LITTLE designs do
not feature support for 32-bit applications on both clusters.

Modify guarantee_online_cpus() to take task_cpu_possible_mask() into
account when trying to find a suitable set of online CPUs for a given
task. This will avoid passing an invalid mask to set_cpus_allowed_ptr()
during ->attach() and will subsequently allow the cpuset hierarchy to be
taken into account when forcefully overriding the affinity mask for a
task which requires migration to a compatible CPU.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NValentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210730112443.23245-4-will@kernel.org

If the scheduler cannot find an allowed CPU for a task,
cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() will widen the affinity to cpu_possible_mask
if cgroup v1 is in use.

In preparation for allowing architectures to provide their own fallback
mask, just return early if we're either using cgroup v1 or we're using
cgroup v2 with a mask that contains invalid CPUs. This will allow
select_fallback_rq() to figure out the mask by itself.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NValentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NQuentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210730112443.23245-3-will@kernel.org

Asymmetric systems may not offer the same level of userspace ISA support
across all CPUs, meaning that some applications cannot be executed by
some CPUs. As a concrete example, upcoming arm64 big.LITTLE designs do
not feature support for 32-bit applications on both clusters.

On such a system, we must take care not to migrate a task to an
unsupported CPU when forcefully moving tasks in select_fallback_rq()
in response to a CPU hot-unplug operation.

Introduce a task_cpu_possible_mask() hook which, given a task argument,
allows an architecture to return a cpumask of CPUs that are capable of
executing that task. The default implementation returns the
cpu_possible_mask, since sane machines do not suffer from per-cpu ISA
limitations that affect scheduling. The new mask is used when selecting
the fallback runqueue as a last resort before forcing a migration to the
first active CPU.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NValentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NQuentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210730112443.23245-2-will@kernel.org

This extends SCHED_IDLE to cgroups.

Interface: cgroup/cpu.idle.
 0: default behavior
 1: SCHED_IDLE

Extending SCHED_IDLE to cgroups means that we incorporate the existing
aspects of SCHED_IDLE; a SCHED_IDLE cgroup will count all of its
descendant threads towards the idle_h_nr_running count of all of its
ancestor cgroups. Thus, sched_idle_rq() will work properly.
Additionally, SCHED_IDLE cgroups are configured with minimum weight.

There are two key differences between the per-task and per-cgroup
SCHED_IDLE interface:

  - The cgroup interface allows tasks within a SCHED_IDLE hierarchy to
    maintain their relative weights. The entity that is "idle" is the
    cgroup, not the tasks themselves.

  - Since the idle entity is the cgroup, our SCHED_IDLE wakeup preemption
    decision is not made by comparing the current task with the woken
    task, but rather by comparing their matching sched_entity.

A typical use-case for this is a user that creates an idle and a
non-idle subtree. The non-idle subtree will dominate competition vs
the idle subtree, but the idle subtree will still be high priority vs
other users on the system. The latter is accomplished via comparing
matching sched_entity in the waken preemption path (this could also be
improved by making the sched_idle_rq() decision dependent on the
perspective of a specific task).

For now, we maintain the existing SCHED_IDLE semantics. Future patches
may make improvements that extend how we treat SCHED_IDLE entities.

The per-task_group idle field is an integer that currently only holds
either a 0 or a 1. This is explicitly typed as an integer to allow for
further extensions to this API. For example, a negative value may
indicate a highly latency-sensitive cgroup that should be preferred
for preemption/placement/etc.
Signed-off-by: NJosh Don <joshdon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210730020019.1487127-2-joshdon@google.com

The scheduler currently expects NUMA node distances to be stable from
init onwards, and as a consequence builds the related data structures
once-and-for-all at init (see sched_init_numa()).

Unfortunately, on some architectures node distance is unreliable for
offline nodes and may very well change upon onlining.

Skip over offline nodes during sched_init_numa(). Track nodes that have
been onlined at least once, and trigger a build of a node's NUMA masks
when it is first onlined post-init.
Reported-by: NGeetika Moolchandani <Geetika.Moolchandani1@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NValentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210818074333.48645-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com

When skipping the tests due to a lack of system support for MTE we
currently print a message saying FAIL which makes it look like the test
failed even though the test did actually report KSFT_SKIP, creating some
confusion. Change the error message to say SKIP instead so things are
clearer.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819172902.56211-1-broonie@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>