- 02 5月, 2013 40 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The bio_iter and bio_seg fields in a message are no longer used, we use the cursor instead. So get rid of them and the functions that operate on them them. This is related to: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4428Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Replace the use of the information in con->in_msg_pos for incoming bio data. The old in_msg_pos and the new cursor mechanism do basically the same thing, just slightly differently. The main functional difference is that in_msg_pos keeps track of the length of the complete bio list, and assumed it was fully consumed when that many bytes had been transferred. The cursor does not assume a length, it simply consumes all bytes in the bio list. Because the only user of bio data is the rbd client, and because the length of a bio list provided by rbd client always matches the number of bytes in the list, both ways of tracking length are equivalent. In addition, for in_msg_pos the initial bio vector is selected as the initial value of the bio->bi_idx, while the cursor assumes this is zero. Again, the rbd client always passes 0 as the initial index so the effect is the same. Other than that, they basically match: in_msg_pos cursor ---------- ------ bio_iter bio bio_seg vec_index page_pos page_offset The in_msg_pos field is initialized by a call to init_bio_iter(). The bio cursor is initialized by ceph_msg_data_cursor_init(). Both now happen in the same spot, in prepare_message_data(). The in_msg_pos field is advanced by a call to in_msg_pos_next(), which updates page_pos and calls iter_bio_next() to move to the next bio vector, or to the next bio in the list. The cursor is advanced by ceph_msg_data_advance(). That isn't currently happening so add a call to that in in_msg_pos_next(). Finally, the next piece of data to use for a read is determined by a bunch of lines in read_partial_message_bio(). Those can be replaced by an equivalent ceph_msg_data_bio_next() call. This partially resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4428Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
All of the data types can use this, not just the page array. Until now, only the bio type doesn't have it available, and only the initiator of the request (the rbd client) is able to supply the length of the full request without re-scanning the bio list. Change the cursor init routines so the length is supplied based on the message header "data_len" field, and use that length to intiialize the "resid" field of the cursor. In addition, change the way "last_piece" is defined so it is based on the residual number of bytes in the original request. This is necessary (at least for bio messages) because it is possible for a read request to succeed without consuming all of the space available in the data buffer. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4427Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The value passed for "pages" in read_partial_message_pages() is always the pages pointer from the incoming message, which can be derived inside that function. So just get rid of the parameter. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
When the last reference to a ceph message is dropped, ceph_msg_last_put() is called to clean things up. For "normal" messages (allocated via ceph_msg_new() rather than being allocated from a memory pool) it's sufficient to just release resources. But for a mempool-allocated message we actually have to re-initialize the data fields in the message back to initial state so they're ready to go in the event the message gets reused. Some of this was already done; this fleshes it out so it's done more completely. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4540Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An osd expects the transaction ids of arriving request messages from a given client to a given osd to increase monotonically. So the osd client needs to send its requests in ascending tid order. The transaction id for a request is set at the time it is registered, in __register_request(). This is also where the request gets placed at the end of the osd client's unsent messages list. At the end of ceph_osdc_start_request(), the request message for a newly-mapped osd request is supplied to the messenger to be sent (via __send_request()). If any other messages were present in the osd client's unsent list at that point they would be sent *after* this new request message. Because those unsent messages have already been registered, their tids would be lower than the newly-mapped request message, and sending that message first can violate the tid ordering rule. Rather than sending the new request only, send all queued requests (including the new one) at that point in ceph_osdc_start_request(). This ensures the tid ordering property is preserved. With this in place, all messages should now be sent in tid order regardless of whether they're being sent for the first time or re-sent as a result of a call to osd_reset(). This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4392Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
In __map_request(), when adding a request to an osd client's unsent list, add it to the tail rather than the head. That way the newest entries (with the highest tid value) will be last. Maintain an osd's request list in order of increasing tid also. Finally--to be consistent--maintain an osd client's "notarget" list in that order as well. This partially resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4392Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The osd expects incoming requests for a given object from a given client to arrive in order, with the tid for each request being greater than the tid for requests that have already arrived. This patch fixes two places the osd client might not maintain that ordering. For the osd client, the connection fault method is osd_reset(). That function calls __reset_osd() to close and re-open the connection, then calls __kick_osd_requests() to cause all outstanding requests for the affected osd to be re-sent after the connection has been re-established. When an osd is reset, any in-flight messages will need to be re-sent. An osd client maintains distinct lists for unsent and in-flight messages. Meanwhile, an osd maintains a single list of all its requests (both sent and un-sent). (Each message is linked into two lists--one for the osd client and one list for the osd.) To process an osd "kick" operation, the request list for the *osd* is traversed, and each request is moved off whichever osd *client* list it was on (unsent or sent) and placed onto the osd client's unsent list. (It remains where it is on the osd's request list.) When that is done, osd_reset() calls __send_queued() to cause each of the osd client's unsent messages to be sent. OK, with that background... As the osd request list is traversed each request is prepended to the osd client's unsent list in the order they're seen. The effect of this is to reverse the order of these requests as they are put (back) onto the unsent list. Instead, build up a list of only the requests for an osd that have already been sent (by checking their r_sent flag values). Once an unsent request is found, stop examining requests and prepend the requests that need re-sending to the osd client's unsent list. Preserve the original order of requests in the process (previously re-queued requests were reversed in this process). Because they have already been sent, they will have lower tids than any request already present on the unsent list. Just below that, traverse the linger list in forward order as before, but add them to the *tail* of the list rather than the head. These requests get re-registered, and in the process are give a new (higher) tid, so the should go at the end. This partially resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4392Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Since we no longer drop the request mutex between registering and mapping an osd request in ceph_osdc_start_request(), there is no chance of a race with kick_requests(). We can now therefore map and send the new request unconditionally (but we'll issue a warning should it ever occur). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
One of the first things ceph_osdc_start_request() does is register the request. It then acquires the osd client's map semaphore and request mutex and proceeds to map and send the request. There is no reason the request has to be registered before acquiring the map semaphore. So hold off doing so until after the map semaphore is held. Since register_request() is nothing more than a wrapper around __register_request(), call the latter function instead, after acquiring the request mutex. That leaves register_request() unused, so get rid of it. This partially resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4392Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
The auth code is called from a variety of contexts, include the mon_client (protected by the monc's mutex) and the messenger callbacks (currently protected by nothing). Avoid chaos by protecting all auth state with a mutex. Nothing is blocking, so this should be simple and lightweight. Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
Use wrapper functions that check whether the auth op exists so that callers do not need a bunch of conditional checks. Simplifies the external interface. Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
Currently the messenger calls out to a get_authorizer con op, which will create a new authorizer if it doesn't yet have one. In the meantime, when we rotate our service keys, the authorizer doesn't get updated. Eventually it will be rejected by the server on a new connection attempt and get invalidated, and we will then rebuild a new authorizer, but this is not ideal. Instead, if we do have an authorizer, call a new update_authorizer op that will verify that the current authorizer is using the latest secret. If it is not, we will build a new one that does. This avoids the transient failure. This fixes one of the sorry sequence of events for bug http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4282Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
We were invalidating the authorizer by removing the ticket handler entirely. This was effective in inducing us to request a new authorizer, but in the meantime it mean that any authorizer we generated would get a new and initialized handler with secret_id=0, which would always be rejected by the server side with a confusing error message: auth: could not find secret_id=0 cephx: verify_authorizer could not get service secret for service osd secret_id=0 Instead, simply clear the validity field. This will still induce the auth code to request a new secret, but will let us continue to use the old ticket in the meantime. The messenger code will probably continue to fail, but the exponential backoff will kick in, and eventually the we will get a new (hopefully more valid) ticket from the mon and be able to continue. Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
We maintain a counter of failed auth attempts to allow us to retry once before failing. However, if the second attempt succeeds, the flag isn't cleared, which makes us think auth failed again later when the connection resets for other reasons (like a socket error). This is one part of the sorry sequence of events in bug http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4282Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
This is an old protocol extension that allows the client and server to avoid resending old messages after a reconnect (following a socket error). Instead, the exchange their sequence numbers during the handshake. This avoids sending a bunch of useless data over the socket. It has been supported in the server code since v0.22 (Sep 2010). Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
-
由 Henry C Chang 提交于
We should advance the user data pointer by _len_ instead of _written_. _len_ is the data length written in each iteration while _written_ is the accumulated data length we have writtent out. Signed-off-by: NHenry C Chang <henry.cy.chang@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NGreg Farnum <greg@inktank.com> Tested-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Yan, Zheng 提交于
Current ceph code tracks directory's completeness in two places. ceph_readdir() checks i_release_count to decide if it can set the I_COMPLETE flag in i_ceph_flags. All other places check the I_COMPLETE flag. This indirection introduces locking complexity. This patch adds a new variable i_complete_count to ceph_inode_info. Set i_release_count's value to it when marking a directory complete. By comparing the two variables, we know if a directory is complete Signed-off-by: NYan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Basically all cases in write_partial_msg_pages() use the cursor, and as a result we can simplify that function quite a bit. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The wart that is the ceph message trail can now be removed, because its only user was the osd client, and the previous patch made that no longer the case. The result allows write_partial_msg_pages() to be simplified considerably. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The osd trail is a pagelist, used only for a CALL osd operation to hold the class and method names, along with any input data for the call. It is only currently used by the rbd client, and when it's used it is the only bit of outbound data in the osd request. Since we already support (non-trail) pagelist data in a message, we can just save this outbound CALL data in the "normal" pagelist rather than the trail, and get rid of the trail entirely. The existing pagelist support depends on the pagelist being dynamically allocated, and ownership of it is passed to the messenger once it's been attached to a message. (That is to say, the messenger releases and frees the pagelist when it's done with it). That means we need to dynamically allocate the pagelist also. Note that we simply assert that the allocation of a pagelist structure succeeds. Appending to a pagelist might require a dynamic allocation, so we're already assuming we won't run into trouble doing so (we're just ignore any failures--and that should be fixed at some point). This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4407Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Add support for recording a ceph pagelist as data associated with an osd request. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The length of outgoing data in an osd request is dependent on the osd ops that are embedded in that request. Each op is encoded into a request message using osd_req_encode_op(), so that should be used to determine the amount of outgoing data implied by the op as it is encoded. Have osd_req_encode_op() return the number of bytes of outgoing data implied by the op being encoded, and accumulate and use that in ceph_osdc_build_request(). As a result, ceph_osdc_build_request() no longer requires its "len" parameter, so get rid of it. Using the sum of the op lengths rather than the length provided is a valid change because: - The only callers of osd ceph_osdc_build_request() are rbd and the osd client (in ceph_osdc_new_request() on behalf of the file system). - When rbd calls it, the length provided is only non-zero for write requests, and in that case the single op has the same length value as what was passed here. - When called from ceph_osdc_new_request(), (it's not all that easy to see, but) the length passed is also always the same as the extent length encoded in its (single) write op if present. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4406Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Implement and use cursor routines for page array message data items for outbound message data. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Implement and use cursor routines for bio message data items for outbound message data. (See the previous commit for reasoning in support of the changes in out_msg_pos_next().) Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Switch to using the message cursor for the (non-trail) outgoing pagelist data item in a message if present. Notes on the logic changes in out_msg_pos_next(): - only the mds client uses a ceph pagelist for message data; - if the mds client ever uses a pagelist, it never uses a page array (or anything else, for that matter) for data in the same message; - only the osd client uses the trail portion of a message data, and when it does, it never uses any other data fields for outgoing data in the same message; and finally - only the rbd client uses bio message data (never pagelist). Therefore out_msg_pos_next() can assume: - if we're in the trail portion of a message, the message data pagelist, data, and bio can be ignored; and - if there is a page list, there will never be any a bio or page array data, and vice-versa. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This just inserts some infrastructure in preparation for handling other types of ceph message data items. No functional changes, just trying to simplify review by separating out some noise. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This patch lays out the foundation for using generic routines to manage processing items of message data. For simplicity, we'll start with just the trail portion of a message, because it stands alone and is only present for outgoing data. First some basic concepts. We'll use the term "data item" to represent one of the ceph_msg_data structures associated with a message. There are currently four of those, with single-letter field names p, l, b, and t. A data item is further broken into "pieces" which always lie in a single page. A data item will include a "cursor" that will track state as the memory defined by the item is consumed by sending data from or receiving data into it. We define three routines to manipulate a data item's cursor: the "init" routine; the "next" routine; and the "advance" routine. The "init" routine initializes the cursor so it points at the beginning of the first piece in the item. The "next" routine returns the page, page offset, and length (limited by both the page and item size) of the next unconsumed piece in the item. It also indicates to the caller whether the piece being returned is the last one in the data item. The "advance" routine consumes the requested number of bytes in the item (advancing the cursor). This is used to record the number of bytes from the current piece that were actually sent or received by the network code. It returns an indication of whether the result means the current piece has been fully consumed. This is used by the message send code to determine whether it should calculate the CRC for the next piece processed. The trail of a message is implemented as a ceph pagelist. The routines defined for it will be usable for non-trail pagelist data as well. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Group the types of message data into an abstract structure with a type indicator and a union containing fields appropriate to the type of data it represents. Use this to represent the pages, pagelist, bio, and trail in a ceph message. Verify message data is of type NONE in ceph_msg_data_set_*() routines. Since information about message data of type NONE really should not be interpreted, get rid of the other assertions in those functions. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
A ceph message has a data payload portion. The memory for that data (either the source of data to send or the location to place data that is received) is specified in several ways. The ceph_msg structure includes fields for all of those ways, but this mispresents the fact that not all of them are used at a time. Specifically, the data in a message can be in: - an array of pages - a list of pages - a list of Linux bios - a second list of pages (the "trail") (The two page lists are currently only ever used for outgoing data.) Impose more structure on the ceph message, making the grouping of some of these fields explicit. Shorten the name of the "page_alignment" field. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Define and use macros ceph_msg_has_*() to determine whether to operate on the pages, pagelist, bio, and trail fields of a message. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Factor out a common block of code that updates a CRC calculation over a range of data in a page. This and the preceding patches are related to: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4403Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Define a new function ceph_tcp_recvpage() that behaves in a way comparable to ceph_tcp_sendpage(). Rearrange the code in both read_partial_message_pages() and read_partial_message_bio() so they have matching structure, (similar to what's in write_partial_msg_pages()), and use this new function. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Pull the code that reads the data portion into a message into a separate function read_partial_msg_data(). Rename write_partial_msg_pages() to be write_partial_message_data() to match its read counterpart, and to reflect its more generic purpose. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Define local variables page_offset and length to represent the range of bytes within a page that will be sent by ceph_tcp_sendpage() in write_partial_msg_pages(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
In prepare_write_message_data(), various fields are initialized in preparation for writing message data out. Meanwhile, in read_partial_message(), there is essentially the same block of code, operating on message variables associated with an incoming message. Generalize prepare_write_message_data() so it works for both incoming and outcoming messages, and use it in both spots. The did_page_crc is not used for input (so it's harmless to initialize it). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There are several places where a message's out_msg_pos or in_msg_pos field is used repeatedly within a function. Use a local pointer variable for this purpose to unclutter the code. This and the upcoming cleanup patches are related to: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4403Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
At one time it was necessary to clear a message's bio_iter field to avoid a bad pointer dereference in write_partial_msg_pages(). That no longer seems to be the case. Here's why. The message's bio fields represent (in this case) outgoing data. Between where the bio_iter is made NULL in prepare_write_message() and the call in that function to prepare_message_data(), the bio fields are never used. In prepare_message_data(), init-bio_iter() is called, and the result of that overwrites the value in the message's bio_iter field. Because it gets overwritten anyway, there is no need to set it to NULL. So don't do it. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4402Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The mds client no longer tries to assign zero-length message data, and the osd client no longer sets its data info more than once. This allows us to activate assertions in the messenger to verify these things never happen. This resolves both of these: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4263 http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4284Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NGreg Farnum <greg@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
When an incoming message is destined for the osd client, the messenger calls the osd client's alloc_msg method. That function looks up which request has the tid matching the incoming message, and returns the request message that was preallocated to receive the response. The response message is therefore known before the request is even started. Between the start of the request and the receipt of the response, the request and its data fields will not change, so there's no reason we need to hold off setting them. In fact it's preferable to set them just once because it's more obvious that they're unchanging. So set up the fields describing where incoming data is to land in a response message at the beginning of ceph_osdc_start_request(). Define a helper function that sets these fields, and use it to set the fields for both outgoing data in the request message and incoming data in the response. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4284Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-