- 13 4月, 2010 8 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Add RT3090 specific register initializations to rt2x00, based on the latest Ralink rt3090 vendor driver. Untested as I don't actually own an RT3090 based device, but given experiences on rt3070/rt3071 very hopeful that this will actually work.. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Add RT3071 specific register initializations to rt2x00, based on the latest Ralink rt3070 vendor driver. With this patch my RT3071 based devices start showing a sign of life. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
rt2x00 had preliminary support for RT3070 based devices, but the support was incomplete. Update the RT3070 register initialization to be similar to the latest Ralink vendor driver. With this patch my rt3070 based devices start showing a sign of life. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Align the rt2800 register initializations with the latest versions of the Ralink vendor driver. This patch is also preparation for the addition of support for RT3070 / RT3071 / RT3090 / RT3390 based devices. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
The rt2800 version constants are inconsistent, and the version number don't mean a lot of things anyway. Refactor the constants to have some more meaningful names, and introduce and use some new helpers to check these chipset revisions. At the same time rename to revision, as they are more revision numbers rather than version numbers. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Only include definitions for RT chipsets that are also used inside the Ralink vendor drivers. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Definitions taken from the latest rt2860 / rt2870 / rt3070 / rt3090 Ralink vendor drivers. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
It seems that the distinction between RF channel switch method is solely based on the RF chipset that is used. Refactor the channel switch decision to just take the RF chipset into account, thereby greatly simplifying the check. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 09 4月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Helmut Schaa 提交于
rt2872 needs the same rf register setup as rt3070 and rt3090, hence use rt2800_config_channel_rt3x instead of rt2800_config_channel_rt2x. This change allows me to actually switch channels and hence scan all configured channels on the RT305x SoC platform (which uses a rt2872) here. Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Tested-by: NLuis Correia <luis.f.correia@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 07 4月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
In all drivers ensure that auto wakeup is disabled before waking up the device. This is needed to prevent connection stability issues and problems in waking up the device. Based upon a patch from Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org> Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Cc: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 31 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 16 2月, 2010 3 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
The recent rt2800 devices are no longer really identified by their PCI ID's, but rather by the contents of their CSR0 register. Also for the other chipsets is the contents of this CSR0 register important. Change the chipset determination logic to be more aligned with the rt2800 model. Preparation for the support of rt3070 / rt3090 based devices. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Don't set the RT chipset for a device from within the generic PCI/SOC code, but rather from the individual drivers, so that individual drivers have more control over what RT chipset is set. Preparation for chip handling updates for rt2800 devices. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Introduce the SoC interface type to detect SoC devices, instead of having them mimic being PCI devices. This allows for easier detection of SoC devices. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 09 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kalle Valo 提交于
get_tx_stats() will be removed from mac80211. Compile-tested only. Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 13 1月, 2010 3 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
It is only used within the rt2800lib module itself. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
The rt2800pci_wait_wpdma_ready and rt2800usb_wait_wpdma_ready functions are exactly the same, so unify them into rt200lib. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
The RF3052 chipset is now also being integrated onto USB devices, so allow the RF chipset and don't treat it as PCI/SOC only. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 06 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
rt2800_blink_set uses an illegal value to set the LED_CFG_G_LED_MODE field of the LED_CFG register. This field is only 2 bits large, so should be initialized with value that fits. Use default value from the vendor driver. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 29 12月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Let each of them take a struct rt2x00_dev pointer as argument instead of a mixture of struct rt2x00_chip and struct rt2x00_dev pointers. Preparation for further clean ups in the rt2x00 chip handling, especially for rt2800 devices. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
rt2800lib currently checks whether RT2800USB is enabled in the configuration. Strictly speaking this is not necessary, it only needs to know whether the generic rt2x00usb library functions are available. Therefore check for RT2X00_LIB_USB instead. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 22 12月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
I noticed yesterday, because Jeff had noticed a speed regression, cf. bug http://bugzilla.intellinuxwireless.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2138 that the SM PS settings for peers were wrong. Instead of overwriting the SM PS settings with the local bits, we need to keep the remote bits. The bug was part of the original HT code from over two years ago, but unfortunately nobody noticed that it makes no sense -- we shouldn't be overwriting the peer's setting with our own but rather keep it intact when masking the peer capabilities with our own. While fixing that, I noticed that the masking of capabilities is completely useless for most of the bits, so also fix those other bits. Finally, I also noticed that PSMP_SUPPORT no longer exists in the final 802.11n version, so also remove that. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
We've had many reports of rt61pci failures with powersaving enabled. Therefore, as a stop-gap measure, disable powersaving of the rt61pci until we have found a proper solution. Also disable powersaving on rt2800pci as it most probably will show the same problem. Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
sizeof(iv16) and sizeof(iv32) are the sizes of pointers. Change them to the size of the copied data. Furthermore, iveiv_entry is a local structure that has just been initialized and is not visible outside this function. Thus, there would seem to be no point to copy data into it. The order of the arguments is thus changed to copy the data into the parameters, which are provided as pointers, suggesting in this case that they should be used to return values. A simplified version of the semantic patch that finds the first problem is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression *x; expression f; type T; @@ *f(...,(T)x,...) // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 15 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
rt2800lib incorrectly detected whether RT2800USB was enabled because it didn't account for a modularized RT2800USB driver. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 29 11月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Set the value of extra_tx_headroom in a central place, rather than in each of the drivers. This is preparatory for taking alignment space into account in the TX headroom requested by rt2x00. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
RT chipsets are unique across both PCI and USB busses, and don't overlap. Therefore there is no need to test for bus type when only checking for chipset type. Remove the redundant checks. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Some RT28xx/RT30xx devices don't support 802.11n, when they are combined with the RF2020 chipset. Ensure that HT is disabled for these devices. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 17 11月, 2009 5 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Please be gentle, I'm a fs developer and this is my first foray into drivers, as I'm tired of building ralinks driver everytime I update my kernel. Whenever I load the rt2800pci driver my box bogs down, and a few printk's later I discovered its because I was getting 10's of thousands of TBTT interrupts a second. I discovered this was because we were setting the beacon timer to 0, which is apparently what TBTT keys off of. It seems to me that we should only be enabling TBTT when we are in a beacon transmitting mode, which from what I can tell is in AD-HOC and other such modes where the mac80211 layer would have given us a proper beacon_int to set the beacon timer to instead of 0. So this is my fix, only enable TBTT if our sync mode is for beacon. This makes it so my box doesn't die everytime I load the rt2800pci driver. Let me know if this is acceptable, I just learned all these terms about 15 minutes ago via wikipedia, so I really am not familiar with how this stuff is supposed to work. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Current tree hits a BUG_ON in rt2x00_regbusy_read, because the eFuse EEPROM reading code of rt2800lib uses the function without the csr_mutex locked. Fix this by locking the csr_mutex for the of the EEPROM reading cycly and using the _lock variants of the register reading and writing functions. This also introcudes the register_read_lock function pointer in the rt2800_ops structure. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Some drivers (rt2800* most notably) cannot set the RF and RT chipset in the correct order to have the information logging in rt2x00_set_chip be correct. Fix this by decoupling the setting of the chipset information from the logging of the chipset information so that drivers can determine themselves when all information is set. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Ensure RF302x and RF2020 chipsets are handled properly in rt2800lib for the rt3090 chipset. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Mirror the legacy Ralink driver with respect to rt2800 RF register programming. Execute rt2800_config_channel_rt3x for all RF2020, RF3020, RF3021 & RF3022 chipsets when operating on RT3070 devices. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 14 11月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
fix some typos and punctuation in comments Signed-off-by: NThadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@holoscopio.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> [bart: ported the change from the older patch for rt2800usb & rt61pci] Signed-off-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Allow rt2800usb to properly detect RT307X based devices, and set the appropriate chipset values. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingede <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 12 11月, 2009 5 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Fix a type in rt2800_config_channel_rt3x. The second write to RF register 2 should be to RF register 3. This is confirmed by the legacy Ralink code. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
As mentioned on the linux-wireless mailing list, the current copyright statements in the rt2x00 are meaningless, as the rt2x00 project is not even a formal legal entity. Therefore it is better to replace the existing copyright statements with copyright statements for the people that actually wrote the code. Note: Updated to the best of my knowledge with respect to who contributed considerable amounts of code. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> CC: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
eFuse EEPROM is used also by USB chips (i.e. RT3070) so move the needed code from rt2800pci to rt2800lib. Signed-off-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Add rf_vals tables and rt2800_probe_hw_mode() to rt2800lib. Signed-off-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Add rt2800_validate_eeprom() and rt2800_init_eeprom() to rt2800lib. Signed-off-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-