- 18 8月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The Bluetooth entries for the MAINTAINERS file are a little bit too much. Consolidate them into two entries. One for Bluetooth drivers and another one for the Bluetooth subsystem. Also the MODULE_AUTHOR should indicate the current maintainer of the module and actually not the original author. Fix all Bluetooth modules to provide current maintainer information. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The Bluetooth adapters and connections are best presented via a class in sysfs. The removal of the links inside the Bluetooth class broke assumptions by userspace programs on how to find attached adapters. This patch creates adapters and connections as part of the Bluetooth class, but it uses different device types to distinguish them. The userspace programs can now easily navigate in the sysfs device tree. The unused platform device and bus have been removed to keep the code simple and clean. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 08 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The Bluetooth qualification for PAN demands testing with BNEP header compression disabled. This is actually pretty stupid and the Linux implementation outsmarts the test system since it compresses whenever possible. So to pass qualification two need parameters have been added to control the compression of source and destination headers. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 22 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
Don't create symlinks in a class to a device that is not owned by the class. If the bluetooth subsystem really wants to point to all of the devices it controls, it needs to create real devices, not fake symlinks. Cc: Maxim Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com> Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
- 21 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alan Cox 提交于
Move the line disciplines towards a conventional ->ops arrangement. For the moment the actual 'tty_ldisc' struct in the tty is kept as part of the tty struct but this can then be changed if it turns out that when it all settles down we want to refcount ldiscs separately to the tty. Pull the ldisc code out of /proc and put it with our ldisc code. Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 15 7月, 2008 26 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When requested the L2CAP layer will now enforce authentication and encryption on outgoing connections. The usefulness of this feature is kinda limited since it will not allow proper connection ownership tracking until the authentication procedure has been finished. This is a limitation of Bluetooth 2.0 and before and can only be fixed by using Simple Pairing. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
It has been reported that some eSCO capable headsets are not able to connect properly. The real reason for this is unclear at the moment. So for easier testing add a module parameter to disable eSCO connection creation. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When using the HIDP or BNEP kernel support, the user-space needs to know if the connection has been terminated for some reasons. Wake up the application if that happens. Otherwise kernel and user-space are no longer on the same page and weird behaviors can happen. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When an incoming RFCOMM socket connection gets converted into a TTY, it can happen that packets are lost. This mainly happens with the Handsfree profile where the remote side starts sending data right away. The problem is that these packets are in the socket receive queue. So when creating the TTY make sure to copy all pending packets from the socket receive queue to a private queue inside the TTY. To make this actually work, the flow control on the newly created TTY will be disabled and only enabled again when the TTY is opened by an application. And right before that, the pending packets will be put into the TTY flip buffer. Signed-off-by: NDenis Kenzior <denis.kenzior@trolltech.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When switching a RFCOMM socket to a TTY, the remote modem status might be needed later. Currently it is lost since the original configuration is done via the socket interface. So store the modem status and reply it when the socket has been converted to a TTY. Signed-off-by: NDenis Kenzior <denis.kenzior@trolltech.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
While the RFCOMM TTY emulation can act like a real serial port, in reality it is not used like this. So to not mess up stupid applications, use the non-canonical mode by default. Signed-off-by: NDenis Kenzior <denis.kenzior@trolltech.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
With all the Bluetooth 2.1 changes and the support for Simple Pairing, it is important to update the Bluetooth core version number. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When attaching Bluetooth low-level connections to the bus, the bus name is constructed from the remote address since at that time the connection handle is not assigned yet. This has worked so far, but also caused a lot of troubles. It is better to postpone the creation of the sysfs entry to the time when the connection actually has been established and then use its connection handle as unique identifier. This also fixes the case where two different adapters try to connect to the same remote device. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Almost every protocol family supports the TIOCOUTQ and TIOCINQ ioctls and even Bluetooth could make use of them. When implementing audio streaming and integration with GStreamer or PulseAudio they will allow a better timing and synchronization. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Enable the common timestamp functionality that the network subsystem provides for L2CAP, RFCOMM and SCO sockets. It is possible to either use SO_TIMESTAMP or the IOCTLs to retrieve the timestamp of the current packet. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
With the Simple Pairing support, the authentication requirements are an explicit setting during the bonding process. Track and enforce the requirements and allow higher layers like L2CAP and RFCOMM to increase them if needed. This patch introduces a new IOCTL that allows to query the current authentication requirements. It is also possible to detect Simple Pairing support in the kernel this way. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
With Bluetooth 2.1 and Simple Pairing the requirement is that any new connection needs to be authenticated and that encryption has been switched on before allowing L2CAP to use it. So make sure that all the requirements are fulfilled and otherwise drop the connection with a minimal disconnect timeout of 10 milliseconds. This change only affects Bluetooth 2.1 devices and Simple Pairing needs to be enabled locally and in the remote host stack. The previous changes made sure that these information are discovered before any kind of authentication and encryption is triggered. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The Bluetooth technology introduces new features on a regular basis and for some of them it is important that the hardware on both sides support them. For features like Simple Pairing it is important that the host stacks on both sides have switched this feature on. To make valid decisions, a config stage during ACL link establishment has been introduced that retrieves remote features and if needed also the remote extended features (known as remote host features) before signalling this link as connected. This change introduces full reference counting of incoming and outgoing ACL links and the Bluetooth core will disconnect both if no owner of it is present. To better handle interoperability during the pairing phase the disconnect timeout for incoming connections has been increased to 10 seconds. This is five times more than for outgoing connections. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Since the remote Simple Pairing mode is stored together with the inquiry cache, it makes sense to show it together with the other information. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The Simple Pairing process can only be used if both sides have the support enabled in the host stack. The current Bluetooth specification has three ways to detect this support. If an Extended Inquiry Result has been sent during inquiry then it is safe to assume that Simple Pairing is enabled. It is not allowed to enable Extended Inquiry without Simple Pairing. During the remote name request phase a notification with the remote host supported features will be sent to indicate Simple Pairing support. Also the second page of the remote extended features can indicate support for Simple Pairing. For all three cases the value of remote Simple Pairing mode is stored in the inquiry cache for later use. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The Simple Pairing feature is optional and needs to be enabled by the host stack first. The Linux kernel relies on the Bluetooth daemon to either enable or disable it, but at any time it needs to know the current state of the Simple Pairing mode. So track any changes made by external entities and store the current mode in the HCI device structure. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
During the Simple Pairing process the HCI disconnect timer must be disabled. The way to do this is by holding a reference count of the HCI connection. The Simple Pairing process on both sides starts with an IO Capabilities Request and ends with Simple Pairing Complete. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The class of device value can only be retrieved via inquiry or during an incoming connection request. Outgoing connections can't ask for the class of device. To compensate for this the value is stored and copied via the inquiry cache, but currently only updated via inquiry. This update should also happen during an incoming connection request. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Some minor cosmetic cleanups to the HCI event handling to make the code easier to read and understand. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The Bluetooth specification supports the default link policy settings on a per host controller basis. For every new connection the link manager would then use these settings. It is better to use this instead of bothering the controller on every connection setup to overwrite the default settings. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The connection packet type can be changed after the connection has been established and thus needs to be properly tracked to ensure that the host stack has always correct and valid information about it. On incoming connections the Bluetooth core switches the supported packet types to the configured list for this controller. However the usefulness of this feature has been questioned a lot. The general consent is that every Bluetooth host stack should enable as many packet types as the hardware actually supports and leave the decision to the link manager software running on the Bluetooth chip. When running on Bluetooth 2.0 or later hardware, don't change the packet type for incoming connections anymore. This hardware likely supports Enhanced Data Rate and thus leave it completely up to the link manager to pick the best packet type. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When trying to establish an eSCO link between two devices then it can happen that the remote device falls back to a SCO link. Currently this case is not handled correctly and the message dispatching will break since it is looking for eSCO packets. So in case the configured link falls back to SCO overwrite the link type with the correct value. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The authentication status is not communicated to both parties. This is actually a flaw in the Bluetooth specification. Only the requesting side really knows if the authentication was successful or not. This piece of information is however needed on the other side to know if it has to trigger the authentication procedure or not. Worst case is that both sides will request authentication at different times, but this should be avoided since it costs extra time when setting up a new connection. For Bluetooth encryption it is required to authenticate the link first and the encryption status is communicated to both sides. So when a link is switched to encryption it is possible to update the authentication status since it implies an authenticated link. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The Bluetooth specification allows to enable or disable the encryption of an ACL link at any time by either the peer or the remote device. If a L2CAP or RFCOMM connection requested an encrypted link, they will now disconnect that link if the encryption gets disabled. Higher protocols that don't care about encryption (like SDP) are not affected. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Recent tests with various Bluetooth headsets have shown that some of them don't enforce authentication and encryption when connecting. All of them leave it up to the host stack to enforce it. Non of them should allow unencrypted connections, but that is how it is. So in case the link mode settings require authentication and/or encryption it will now also be enforced on outgoing RFCOMM connections. Previously this was only done for incoming connections. This support has a small drawback from a protocol level point of view since the host stack can't really tell with 100% certainty if a remote side is already authenticated or not. So if both sides are configured to enforce authentication it will be requested twice. Most Bluetooth chips are caching this information and thus no extra authentication procedure has to be triggered over-the-air, but it can happen. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Getting the remote L2CAP features mask is really important, but doing this as less intrusive as possible is tricky. To play nice with older systems and Bluetooth qualification testing, the features mask is now only retrieved in two specific cases and only once per lifetime of an ACL link. When trying to establish a L2CAP connection and the remote features mask is unknown, the L2CAP information request is sent when the ACL link goes into connected state. This applies only to outgoing connections and also only for the connection oriented channels. The second case is when a connection request has been received. In this case a connection response with the result pending and the information request will be send. After receiving an information response or if the timeout gets triggered, the normal connection setup process with security setup will be initiated. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 12 6月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Bunk 提交于
This patch removes CVS keywords that weren't updated for a long time from comments. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 04 6月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Young 提交于
There's logic in __rfcomm_dlc_close: rfcomm_dlc_lock(d); d->state = BT_CLOSED; d->state_changed(d, err); rfcomm_dlc_unlock(d); In rfcomm_dev_state_change, it's possible that rfcomm_dev_put try to take the dlc lock, then we will deadlock. Here fixed it by unlock dlc before rfcomm_dev_get in rfcomm_dev_state_change. why not unlock just before rfcomm_dev_put? it's because there's another problem. rfcomm_dev_get/rfcomm_dev_del will take rfcomm_dev_lock, but in rfcomm_dev_add the lock order is : rfcomm_dev_lock --> dlc lock so I unlock dlc before the taken of rfcomm_dev_lock. Actually it's a regression caused by commit 1905f6c7 ("bluetooth : __rfcomm_dlc_close lock fix"), the dlc state_change could be two callbacks : rfcomm_sk_state_change and rfcomm_dev_state_change. I missed the rfcomm_sk_state_change that time. Thanks Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> for the effort in commit 4c8411f8 ("bluetooth: fix locking bug in the rfcomm socket cleanup handling") but he missed the rfcomm_dev_state_change lock issue. Signed-off-by: NDave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 5月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arjan van de Ven 提交于
in net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c, rfcomm_sk_state_change() does the following operation: if (parent && sock_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED)) { /* We have to drop DLC lock here, otherwise * rfcomm_sock_destruct() will dead lock. */ rfcomm_dlc_unlock(d); rfcomm_sock_kill(sk); rfcomm_dlc_lock(d); } } which is fine, since rfcomm_sock_kill() will call sk_free() which will call rfcomm_sock_destruct() which takes the rfcomm_dlc_lock()... so far so good. HOWEVER, this assumes that the rfcomm_sk_state_change() function always gets called with the rfcomm_dlc_lock() taken. This is the case for all but one case, and in that case where we don't have the lock, we do a double unlock followed by an attempt to take the lock, which due to underflow isn't going anywhere fast. This patch fixes this by moving the stragling case inside the lock, like the other usages of the same call are doing in this code. This was found with the help of the www.kerneloops.org project, where this deadlock was observed 51 times at this point in time: http://www.kerneloops.org/search.php?search=rfcomm_sock_destructSigned-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 5月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Harvey Harrison 提交于
Signed-off-by: NHarvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 02 4月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Young 提交于
Lockdep warning will be trigged while rfcomm connection closing. The locks taken in rfcomm_dev_add: rfcomm_dev_lock --> d->lock In __rfcomm_dlc_close: d->lock --> rfcomm_dev_lock (in rfcomm_dev_state_change) There's two way to fix it, one is in rfcomm_dev_add we first locking d->lock then the rfcomm_dev_lock The other (in this patch), remove the locking of d->lock for rfcomm_dev_state_change because just locking "d->state = BT_CLOSED;" is enough. [ 295.002046] ======================================================= [ 295.002046] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 295.002046] 2.6.25-rc7 #1 [ 295.002046] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 295.002046] krfcommd/2705 is trying to acquire lock: [ 295.002046] (rfcomm_dev_lock){-.--}, at: [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] but task is already holding lock: [ 295.002046] (&d->lock){--..}, at: [<f899c533>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x43/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] -> #1 (&d->lock){--..}: [ 295.002046] [<c0149b23>] check_prev_add+0xd3/0x200 [ 295.002046] [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0 [ 295.002046] [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320 [ 295.002046] [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760 [ 295.002046] [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0 [ 295.002046] [<c03d6b99>] _spin_lock+0x39/0x80 [ 295.002046] [<f89a01c0>] rfcomm_dev_add+0x240/0x360 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f89a047e>] rfcomm_create_dev+0x6e/0xe0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f89a0823>] rfcomm_dev_ioctl+0x33/0x60 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899facc>] rfcomm_sock_ioctl+0x2c/0x50 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c0363d38>] sock_ioctl+0x118/0x240 [ 295.002046] [<c0194196>] vfs_ioctl+0x76/0x90 [ 295.002046] [<c0194446>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x56/0x140 [ 295.002046] [<c0194569>] sys_ioctl+0x39/0x60 [ 295.002046] [<c0104faa>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb [ 295.002046] [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] -> #0 (rfcomm_dev_lock){-.--}: [ 295.002046] [<c0149a84>] check_prev_add+0x34/0x200 [ 295.002046] [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0 [ 295.002046] [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320 [ 295.002046] [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760 [ 295.002046] [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0 [ 295.002046] [<c03d6639>] _read_lock+0x39/0x80 [ 295.002046] [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899c548>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x58/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899d44f>] rfcomm_recv_ua+0x6f/0x120 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899e061>] rfcomm_recv_frame+0x171/0x1e0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899e357>] rfcomm_run+0xe7/0x550 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c013c18c>] kthread+0x5c/0xa0 [ 295.002046] [<c0105c07>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 [ 295.002046] [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] other info that might help us debug this: [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] 2 locks held by krfcommd/2705: [ 295.002046] #0: (rfcomm_mutex){--..}, at: [<f899e2eb>] rfcomm_run+0x7b/0x550 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] #1: (&d->lock){--..}, at: [<f899c533>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x43/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] stack backtrace: [ 295.002046] Pid: 2705, comm: krfcommd Not tainted 2.6.25-rc7 #1 [ 295.002046] [<c0128a38>] ? printk+0x18/0x20 [ 295.002046] [<c014927f>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x6f/0x80 [ 295.002046] [<c0149a84>] check_prev_add+0x34/0x200 [ 295.002046] [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0 [ 295.002046] [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320 [ 295.002046] [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760 [ 295.002046] [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0 [ 295.002046] [<f89a090a>] ? rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c03d6639>] _read_lock+0x39/0x80 [ 295.002046] [<f89a090a>] ? rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899c548>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x58/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899d44f>] rfcomm_recv_ua+0x6f/0x120 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899e061>] rfcomm_recv_frame+0x171/0x1e0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c014abd9>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb9/0x130 [ 295.002046] [<c03d6e89>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x39/0x70 [ 295.002046] [<f899e357>] rfcomm_run+0xe7/0x550 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c03d4559>] ? __sched_text_start+0x229/0x4c0 [ 295.002046] [<c0120000>] ? cpu_avg_load_per_task+0x20/0x30 [ 295.002046] [<f899e270>] ? rfcomm_run+0x0/0x550 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c013c18c>] kthread+0x5c/0xa0 [ 295.002046] [<c013c130>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0 [ 295.002046] [<c0105c07>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 [ 295.002046] ======================= Signed-off-by: NDave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Dave Young 提交于
'rfcomm connect' will trigger lockdep warnings which is caused by locking diffrent kinds of bluetooth sockets at the same time. So using sub-classes per AF_BLUETOOTH sub-type for lockdep. Thanks for the hints from dave jones. --- > From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:21:56 -0400 > > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: Pid: 3611, comm: obex-data-serve Not tainted 2.6.25-0.121.rc5.git4.fc9 #1 > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [__lock_acquire+2287/3089] __lock_acquire+0x8ef/0xc11 > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [sched_clock+8/11] ? sched_clock+0x8/0xb > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [lock_acquire+106/144] lock_acquire+0x6a/0x90 > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [<f8bd9321>] ? l2cap_sock_bind+0x29/0x108 [l2cap] > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [lock_sock_nested+182/198] lock_sock_nested+0xb6/0xc6 > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [<f8bd9321>] ? l2cap_sock_bind+0x29/0x108 [l2cap] > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [security_socket_post_create+22/27] ? security_socket_post_create+0x16/0x1b > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [__sock_create+388/472] ? __sock_create+0x184/0x1d8 > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [<f8bd9321>] l2cap_sock_bind+0x29/0x108 [l2cap] > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [kernel_bind+10/13] kernel_bind+0xa/0xd > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [<f8dad3d7>] rfcomm_dlc_open+0xc8/0x294 [rfcomm] > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [lock_sock_nested+187/198] ? lock_sock_nested+0xbb/0xc6 > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [<f8dae18c>] rfcomm_sock_connect+0x8b/0xc2 [rfcomm] > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [sys_connect+96/125] sys_connect+0x60/0x7d > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [__lock_acquire+1370/3089] ? __lock_acquire+0x55a/0xc11 > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [sys_socketcall+140/392] sys_socketcall+0x8c/0x188 > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [syscall_call+7/11] syscall_call+0x7/0xb --- Signed-off-by: NDave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Robert P. J. Day 提交于
The older RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED macros defeat lockdep state tracing so replace them with the newer __RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED macros. Signed-off-by: NRobert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki 提交于
Introduce per-sock inlines: sock_net(), sock_net_set() and per-inet_timewait_sock inlines: twsk_net(), twsk_net_set(). Without CONFIG_NET_NS, no namespace other than &init_net exists. Let's explicitly define them to help compiler optimizations. Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
-
- 06 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tobias Klauser 提交于
bnep_sock_cleanup() always returns 0 and its return value isn't used anywhere in the code. Signed-off-by: NTobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-