- 02 5月, 2013 29 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Add a flag to distinguish between object requests being done on standalone objects and requests being sent for objects representing rbd image data (i.e., object requests that are the result of image request). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
We're going to need some more Boolean values for object requests, so create a flags bit field and use it to record whether the request is done. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Encapsulate the code that completes processing of an object request that's part of an image request. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Define a flag indicating whether an image request is for a layered image (one with a parent image to which requests will be redirected if the target object of a request does not exist). The code that checks this flag will be added shortly. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Define a flag indicating whether an image request originated from the Linux block layer (from blk_fetch_request()) or whether it was initiated in order to satisfy an object request for a child image of a layered rbd device. For image requests initiated by objects of child images we'll save a pointer to the object request rather than the Linux block request. For now, only block requests are used. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There are several Boolean values we'll be maintaining for image requests. Switch from the single write_request field to a general-purpose flags field, and use one if its bits to represent the direction of I/O for the image request. Define helper functions for setting and testing that flag. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
For an image object request we will need to know what offset within the rbd image the request covers. Record that when the object request gets created. Update the I/O error warnings so they use this so what's reported is more informative. Rename a local variable to fit the convention used everywhere else. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Compute the total number of bytes transferred for an image request--the sum across each of the request's object requests. To avoid contention do it only when all object requests are complete, in rbd_img_request_complete(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
If any image object request produces a non-zero result, preserve that as the result of the overall image request. If multiple objects have non-zero results, save only the first one. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There is a new rbd feature bit defined for "fancy striping." Add it to the ones defined in the kernel client. Change RBD_FEATURES_ALL so it represents the set of all feature bits (rather than just the ones we support). Define a new symbol RBD_FEATURES_SUPPORTED to indicate the supported ones. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Right now the data for a method call is specified via a pointer and length, and it's copied--along with the class and method name--into a pagelist data item to be sent to the osd. Instead, encode the data in a data item separate from the class and method names. This will allow large amounts of data to be supplied to methods without copying. Only rbd uses the class functionality right now, and when it really needs this it will probably need to use a page array rather than a page list. But this simple implementation demonstrates the functionality on the osd client, and that's enough for now. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4104Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This ends up being a rather large patch but what it's doing is somewhat straightforward. Basically, this is replacing two calls with one. The first of the two calls is initializing a struct ceph_osd_data with data (either a page array, a page list, or a bio list); the second is setting an osd request op so it associates that data with one of the op's parameters. In place of those two will be a single function that initializes the op directly. That means we sort of fan out a set of the needed functions: - extent ops with pages data - extent ops with pagelist data - extent ops with bio list data and - class ops with page data for receiving a response We also have define another one, but it's only used internally: - class ops with pagelist data for request parameters Note that we *still* haven't gotten rid of the osd request's r_data_in and r_data_out fields. All the osd ops refer to them for their data. For now, these data fields are pointers assigned to the appropriate r_data_* field when these new functions are called. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This patch just trivially moves around some code for consistency. In preparation for initializing osd request data fields in ceph_osdc_build_request(), I wanted to verify that rbd did in fact call that immediately before it called ceph_osdc_start_request(). It was true (although image requests are built in a group and then started as a group). But I made the changes here just to make it more obvious, by making all of the calls follow a common sequence: osd_req_op_<optype>_init(); ceph_osd_data_<type>_init() osd_req_op_<optype>_<datafield>() rbd_osd_req_format() ... ret = rbd_obj_request_submit() I moved the initialization of the callback for image object requests into rbd_img_request_fill_bio(), again, for consistency. To avoid a forward reference, I moved the definition of rbd_img_obj_callback() up in the file. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The osd data for a request is currently initialized inside rbd_osd_req_create(), but that assumes an object request's data belongs in the osd request's data in or data out field. There are only three places where requests with data are set up, and it turns out it's easier to call just the osd data init routines directly there rather than handling it in rbd_osd_req_create(). (The real motivation here is moving toward getting rid of the osd request in and out data fields.) Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Currently an object request has its osd request's data field set in rbd_osd_req_format_op(). That assumes a single osd op per object request, and that won't be the case for long. Move the code that sets this out and into the caller. Rename rbd_osd_req_format_op() to be just rbd_osd_req_format(), removing the notion that it's doing anything op-specific. This and the next patch resolve: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4658Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An osd request now holds all of its source op structures, and every place that initializes one of these is in fact initializing one of the entries in the the osd request's array. So rather than supplying the address of the op to initialize, have caller specify the osd request and an indication of which op it would like to initialize. This better hides the details the op structure (and faciltates moving the data pointers they use). Since osd_req_op_init() is a common routine, and it's not used outside the osd client code, give it static scope. Also make it return the address of the specified op (so all the other init routines don't have to repeat that code). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An extent type osd operation currently implies that there will be corresponding data supplied in the data portion of the request (for write) or response (for read) message. Similarly, an osd class method operation implies a data item will be supplied to receive the response data from the operation. Add a ceph_osd_data pointer to each of those structures, and assign it to point to eithre the incoming or the outgoing data structure in the osd message. The data is not always available when an op is initially set up, so add two new functions to allow setting them after the op has been initialized. Begin to make use of the data item pointer available in the osd operation rather than the request data in or out structure in places where it's convenient. Add some assertions to verify pointers are always set the way they're expected to be. This is a sort of stepping stone toward really moving the data into the osd request ops, to allow for some validation before making that jump. This is the first in a series of patches that resolve: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4657Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An osd request keeps a pointer to the osd operations (ops) array that it builds in its request message. In order to allow each op in the array to have its own distinct data, we will need to keep track of each op's data, and that information does not go over the wire. As long as we're tracking the data we might as well just track the entire (source) op definition for each of the ops. And if we're doing that, we'll have no more need to keep a pointer to the wire-encoded version. This patch makes the array of source ops be kept with the osd request structure, and uses that instead of the version encoded in the message in places where that was previously used. The array will be embedded in the request structure, and the maximum number of ops we ever actually use is currently 2. So reduce CEPH_OSD_MAX_OP to 2 to reduce the size of the structure. The result of doing this sort of ripples back up, and as a result various function parameters and local variables become unnecessary. Make r_num_ops be unsigned, and move the definition of struct ceph_osd_req_op earlier to ensure it's defined where needed. It does not yet add per-op data, that's coming soon. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4656Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Define rbd_osd_req_format_op(), which encapsulates formatting an osd op into an object request's osd request message. Only one op is supported right now. Stop calling ceph_osdc_build_request() in rbd_osd_req_create(). Instead, call rbd_osd_req_format_op() in each of the callers of rbd_osd_req_create(). This is to prepare for the next patch, in which the source ops for an osd request will be held in the osd request itself. Because of that, we won't have the source op to work with until after the request is created, so we can't format the op until then. This an the next patch resolve: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4656Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Define and use functions that encapsulate the initializion of a ceph_osd_data structure. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
When rbd creates an object request containing an object method call operation it is passing 0 for the size. I originally thought this was because the length was not needed for method calls, but I think it really should be supplied, to describe how much space is available to receive response data. So provide the supplied length. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4659Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
When assigning a bio pointer to an osd request, we don't have an efficient way of knowing the total length bytes in the bio list. That information is available at the point it's set up by the rbd code, so record it with the osd data when it's set. This and the next patch are related to maintaining the length of a message's data independent of the message header, as described here: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4589Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The rbd code has a function that allocates and populates a ceph_osd_req_op structure (the in-core version of an osd request operation). When reviewed, Josh suggested two things: that the big varargs function might be better split into type-specific functions; and that this functionality really belongs in the osd client rather than rbd. This patch implements both of Josh's suggestions. It breaks up the rbd function into separate functions and defines them in the osd client module as exported interfaces. Unlike the rbd version, however, the functions don't allocate an osd_req_op structure; they are provided the address of one and that is initialized instead. The rbd function has been eliminated and calls to it have been replaced by calls to the new routines. The rbd code now now use a stack (struct) variable to hold the op rather than allocating and freeing it each time. For now only the capabilities used by rbd are implemented. Implementing all the other osd op types, and making the rest of the code use it will be done separately, in the next few patches. Note that only the extent, cls, and watch portions of the ceph_osd_req_op structure are currently used. Delete the others (xattr, pgls, and snap) from its definition so nobody thinks it's actually implemented or needed. We can add it back again later if needed, when we know it's been tested. This (and a few follow-on patches) resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3861Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Move some definitions for max integer values out of the rbd code and into the more central "decode.h" header file. These really belong in a Linux (or libc) header somewhere, but I haven't gotten around to proposing that yet. This is in preparation for moving some code out of rbd.c and into the osd client. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The length of outgoing data in an osd request is dependent on the osd ops that are embedded in that request. Each op is encoded into a request message using osd_req_encode_op(), so that should be used to determine the amount of outgoing data implied by the op as it is encoded. Have osd_req_encode_op() return the number of bytes of outgoing data implied by the op being encoded, and accumulate and use that in ceph_osdc_build_request(). As a result, ceph_osdc_build_request() no longer requires its "len" parameter, so get rid of it. Using the sum of the op lengths rather than the length provided is a valid change because: - The only callers of osd ceph_osdc_build_request() are rbd and the osd client (in ceph_osdc_new_request() on behalf of the file system). - When rbd calls it, the length provided is only non-zero for write requests, and in that case the single op has the same length value as what was passed here. - When called from ceph_osdc_new_request(), (it's not all that easy to see, but) the length passed is also always the same as the extent length encoded in its (single) write op if present. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4406Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Record the byte count for an osd request rather than the page count. The number of pages can always be derived from the byte count (and alignment/offset) but the reverse is not true. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An osd request defines information about where data to be read should be placed as well as where data to write comes from. Currently these are represented by common fields. Keep information about data for writing separate from data to be read by splitting these into data_in and data_out fields. This is the key patch in this whole series, in that it actually identifies which osd requests generate outgoing data and which generate incoming data. It's less obvious (currently) that an osd CALL op generates both outgoing and incoming data; that's the focus of some upcoming work. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4127Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An osd request uses either pages or a bio list for its data. Use a union to record information about the two, and add a data type tag to select between them. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Pull the fields in an osd request structure that define the data for the request out into a separate structure. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
- 18 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
It's possible that the reference to the object request dropped inside the loop in rbd_img_request_submit() will be the last one, in which case the content of the object pointer can't be trusted. Use a safe form of the object request list traversal to avoid problems. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4705Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
- 30 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
A result of ENOENT from a read request for an object that's part of an rbd image indicates that there is a hole in that portion of the image. Similarly, a short read for such an object indicates that the remainder of the read should be interpreted a full read with zeros filling out the end of the request. This behavior is not correct for objects that are not backing rbd image data. Currently rbd_img_obj_request_callback() assumes it should be done for all objects. Change rbd_img_obj_request_callback() so it only does this zeroing for image objects. Encapsulate that special handling in its own function. Add an assertion that the image object request is a bio request, since we assume that (and we currently don't support any other types). This resolves a problem identified here: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4559 The regression was introduced by bf0d5f50. Reported-by: NDan van der Ster <dan@vanderster.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
- 27 2月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
Use the new version of the encoding for osd requests and replies. In the process, update the way we are tracking request ops and reply lengths and results in the struct ceph_osd_request. Update the rbd and fs/ceph users appropriately. The main changes are: - we keep pointers into the request memory for fields we need to update each time the request is sent out over the wire - we keep information about the result in an array in the request struct where the users can easily get at it. Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The only thing type-specific osd completion functions do with their osd op parameter is (in some cases) extract the number of bytes transferred from it. In the other cases, the xferred bytes field is not used, and total message data transfer byte count (which may well be zero) is used. Just set the object request transfer count in the main osd request callback function and provide that to the other routines. There is then no longer any need to pass the op pointer to the type-specific completion routines, so drop those parameters. Stop doing anything with the total message data length. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This function is slightly out of place, probably the result of an errant automatic merge or something. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
- 26 2月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Fengguang Wu reminded me that there were outstanding sparse reports in the ceph and rbd code. This patch fixes these problems in rbd that lead to those reports: - Convert functions that are never referenced externally to have static scope. - Add a lockdep annotation to rbd_request_fn(), because it releases a lock before acquiring it again. This partially resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4184Reported-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Add dout() calls to facilitate tracing of image and object requests. Change a few existing calls so they use __func__ rather than the hard-coded function name. Have calls always add ":" after the name of the function, and prefix pointer values with a consistent tag indicating what it represents. (Note that there remain some older dout() calls that are left untouched by this patch.) Issue a warning if rbd_osd_write_callback() ever gets a short write. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4235Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Let's go shopping! I'm afraid this may not have gotten it right: 07741308 rbd: add barriers near done flag operations The smp_wmb() should have been done *before* setting the done flag, to ensure all other data was valid before marking the object request done. Switch to use atomic_inc_return() here to set the done flag, which allows us to verify we don't mark something done more than once. Doing this also implies general barriers before and after the call. And although a read memory barrier might have been sufficient before reading the done flag, convert this to a full memory barrier just to put this issue to bed. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4238Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The old request code simply ignored zero-length requests. We should still operate that same way to avoid any changes in behavior. We can implement handling for special zero-length requests separately (see http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4236). Add some assertions based on this new constraint. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4237Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
- 20 2月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The return values provided for ceph_copy_to_page_vector() and ceph_copy_from_page_vector() serve no purpose, so get rid of them. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The result of ceph_copy_from_page_vector() is simply the length argument it is provided. This is called by rbd_obj_method_sync(), which returns the result if it's non-negative. But we always either ignore or overwrite that return value. So explicitly ignore what's returned by the copy function, and have rbd_obj_method_sync() always return either a negative errno or 0. We also return the result of ceph_copy_from_page_vector() in rbd_obj_read_sync(). There we still want to return the number of bytes transferred, but we can use the value we already have in hand rather than what ceph_copy_from_page_vector() provides. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-