The submission tasklet operates on i915_sched_engine, thus it is the
correct place for it.

v3:
 (Jason Ekstrand)
  Change sched_engine->engine to a void* private data pointer
  Add kernel doc
v4:
 (Daniele)
  Update private_data comment
  Set queue_priority_hint in kick_execlists
v5:
 (CI)
  Rebase and fix build error
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210618010638.98941-9-matthew.brost@intel.com

This was done by the following semantic patch:

	@@ expression i915; @@
	- INTEL_GEN(i915)
	+ GRAPHICS_VER(i915)

	@@ expression i915; expression E; @@
	- INTEL_GEN(i915) >= E
	+ GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= E

	@@ expression dev_priv; expression E; @@
	- !IS_GEN(dev_priv, E)
	+ GRAPHICS_VER(dev_priv) != E

	@@ expression dev_priv; expression E; @@
	- IS_GEN(dev_priv, E)
	+ GRAPHICS_VER(dev_priv) == E

	@@
	expression dev_priv;
	expression from, until;
	@@
	- IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
	+ IS_GRAPHICS_VER(dev_priv, from, until)

	@def@
	expression E;
	identifier id =~ "^gen$";
	@@
	- id = GRAPHICS_VER(E)
	+ ver = GRAPHICS_VER(E)

	@@
	identifier def.id;
	@@
	- id
	+ ver

It also takes care of renaming the variable we assign to GRAPHICS_VER()
so to use "ver" rather than "gen".
Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210605155356.4183026-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com

Determine the possible coherent map type based on object location,
and if target has llc or if user requires an always coherent
mapping.

Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Suggested-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVenkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210427085417.120246-2-matthew.auld@intel.com

Since we are not using any internal priority levels, and in the next few
patches will introduce a new index for which the optimisation is not so
lear cut, discard the small table within the priolist.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210120121439.17600-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Convert normal functions to unlocked versions where needed.
Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210323155059.628690-54-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com

This should be done as part of the ww loop, in order to remove a
i915_vma_pin that needs ww held.

Now only i915_ggtt_pin() callers remaining.
Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210323155059.628690-25-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com

AFter detecting a register mismatch between the protocontext and the
image generated by HW, immediately break out of the double loop.
Otherwise we end up with a second confusing error message.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210106123939.18435-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

In generating the reference LRC, we want a page-aligned address for
simplicity in computing the offsets within. This then shares the
computation for the HW LRC which is mapped and so page aligned, making
the comparison straightforward. It seems that kmalloc(4k) is not always
returning from a 4k-aligned slab cache (which would give us a page aligned
address) so force alignment by explicitly allocating a page.
Reported-by: N"Gote, Nitin R" <nitin.r.gote@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: "Gote, Nitin R" <nitin.r.gote@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200923114156.17749-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Rather than having special case code for opportunistically calling
process_csb() and performing a direct submit while holding the engine
spinlock for submitting the request, simply call the tasklet directly.
This allows us to retain the direct submission path, including the CS
draining to allow fast/immediate submissions, without requiring any
duplicated code paths, and most importantly greatly simplifying the
control flow by removing reentrancy. This will enable us to close a few
races in the virtual engines in the next few patches.

The trickiest part here is to ensure that paired operations (such as
schedule_in/schedule_out) remain under consistent locking domains,
e.g. when pulled outside of the engine->active.lock

v2: Use bh kicking, see commit 3c53776e ("Mark HI and TASKLET
softirq synchronous").
v3: Update engine-reset to be tasklet aware
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201224135544.1713-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

When waiting for the submit, before checking the status of the request,
kick the tasklet to make sure we are processing the submission. This
speeds up submission if we are using any tasklet suppression for
secondary requests.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201222113536.3775-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Make sure that the request has been submitted to HW before we begin our
wait. This reduces our reliance on the semaphore yield interrupt driving
the preemption request.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201222113536.3775-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Primarily used by selftests, but also by runtime debugging of engine
w/a, is a routine to create a temporarily bound buffer for readback.
Almagamate the duplicated routines into one.
Suggested-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201219020343.22681-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Split the definition, construction and updating of the Logical Ring
Context from the execlist submission interface. The LRC is used by the
HW, irrespective of our different submission backends.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201219020343.22681-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We want to separate the utility functions for controlling the logical
ring context from the execlists submission mechanism (which is an
overgrown scheduler).

This is similar to Daniele's work to split up the files, but being
selfish I wanted to base it after my own changes to intel_lrc.c petered
out.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201209233618.4287-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

This function does not use intel_context_create_request, so it has
to use the same locking order as normal code. This is required to
shut up lockdep in selftests.
Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200819140904.1708856-20-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

As a preparation step for full object locking and wait/wound handling
during pin and object mapping, ensure that we always pass the ww context
in i915_gem_execbuffer.c to i915_vma_pin, use lockdep to ensure this
happens.

This also requires changing the order of eb_parse slightly, to ensure
we pass ww at a point where we could still handle -EDEADLK safely.
Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200819140904.1708856-15-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

I915_GEM_THROTTLE dates back to the time before contexts where there was
just a single engine, and therefore a single timeline and request list
globally. That request list was in execution/retirement order, and so
walking it to find a particular aged request made sense and could be
split per file.

That is no more. We now have many timelines with a file, as many as the
user wants to construct (essentially per-engine, per-context). Each of
those run independently and so make the single list futile. Remove the
disordered list, and iterate over all the timelines to find a request to
wait on in each to satisfy the criteria that the CPU is no more than 20ms
ahead of its oldest request.

It should go without saying that the I915_GEM_THROTTLE ioctl is no
longer used as the primary means of throttling, so it makes sense to push
the complication into the ioctl where it only impacts upon its few
irregular users, rather than the execbuf/retire where everybody has to
pay the cost. Fortunately, the few users do not create vast amount of
contexts, so the loops over contexts/engines should be concise.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200728152010.30701-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Since the engines belong to the GT, move the runtime-updated list of
available engines to the intel_gt struct. The original mask has been
renamed to indicate it contains the maximum engine list that can be
found on a matching device.

In preparation for other info being moved to the gt in follow up patches
(sseu), introduce an intel_gt_info structure to group all gt-related
runtime info.

v2: s/max_engine_mask/platform_engine_mask (tvrtko), fix selftest
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Cc: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> #v1
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200708003952.21831-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

A couple of very simple tests to ensure that the basic properties of
per-engine busyness accounting [0% and 100% busy] are faithful.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200617130916.15261-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

There is a spelling mistake in a pr_err message. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200617085207.167552-1-colin.king@canonical.com

Like live_unlite_ring, but instead of simply looking at the impact of
intel_ring_direction(), check that preemption more generally works with
different depths of queued requests in the ring.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200616233733.18050-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Rather than mixing [012] and (A1, A2, B2) for the request indices, use
the enums throughout.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200616185518.11948-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Not too long ago, we realised we had issues with a rolling back a
context so far for a preemption request we considered the resubmit not
to be a rollback but a forward roll. This means we would issue a lite
restore instead of forcing a full restore, continuing execution of the
old requests rather than causing a preemption. Add a selftest to
exercise such a far rollback, such that if we were to skip the full
restore, we would execute invalid instructions in the ring and hang.

Note that while I was able to confirm that this causes us to do a
lite-restore preemption rollback (with commit e36ba817 ("drm/i915/gt:
Incrementally check for rewinding") disabled), it did not trick the HW
into rolling past the old RING_TAIL. Myybe on other HW.

References: e36ba817 ("drm/i915/gt: Incrementally check for rewinding")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200616185518.11948-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Fix inconsistent IS_ERR and PTR_ERR in live_timeslice_nopreempt().

The proper pointer to be passed as argument to PTR_ERR() is ce.

This bug was detected with the help of Coccinelle.

Fixes: b72f02d7 ("drm/i915/gt: Prevent timeslicing into unpreemptable requests")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200616145452.GA25291@embeddedor

We have a I915_REQUEST_NOPREEMPT flag that we set when we must prevent
the HW from preempting during the course of this request. We need to
honour this flag and protect the HW even if we have a heartbeat request,
or other maximum priority barrier, pending. As such, restrict the
timeslicing check to avoid preempting into the topmost priority band,
leaving the unpreemptable requests in blissful peace running
uninterrupted on the HW.

v2: Set the I915_PRIORITY_BARRIER to be less than
I915_PRIORITY_UNPREEMPTABLE so that we never submit a request
(heartbeat or barrier) that can legitimately preempt the current
non-premptable request.

Fixes: 2a98f4e6 ("drm/i915: add infrastructure to hold off preemption on a request")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200527162418.24755-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit b72f02d7)
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Since we temporarily disable the heartbeat and restore back to the
default value, we can use the stored defaults on the engine and avoid
using a local.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200519063123.20673-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 3a230a55)
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Since the heartbeat may cause a preemption event, disable it over the
preemption suppression tests.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200615165013.22973-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Reduce the smoke depth by trimming the number of contexts, repetitions
and wait times. This is in preparation for a less greedy scheduler that
tries to be fair across contexts, resulting in a great many more context
switches. A thousand context switches may be 50-100ms, causing us to
timeout as the HW is not fast enough to complete the deep smoketests.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200607222108.14401-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

With the removal of the internal wait-priority boosting, we can also
remove the selftest to ensure that those waits were being suppressed
from causing preemptions.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200607222108.14401-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Use the plain msec_to_jiffies() rather than the _timeout variant so we
round down and do not add an extra jiffy to our interval. For example,
with timeslicing we do not want to err on the longer side as any
fairness depends on catching hogging contexts on the GPU. Bring on
CFS.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200604135938.3975-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We have a I915_REQUEST_NOPREEMPT flag that we set when we must prevent
the HW from preempting during the course of this request. We need to
honour this flag and protect the HW even if we have a heartbeat request,
or other maximum priority barrier, pending. As such, restrict the
timeslicing check to avoid preempting into the topmost priority band,
leaving the unpreemptable requests in blissful peace running
uninterrupted on the HW.

v2: Set the I915_PRIORITY_BARRIER to be less than
I915_PRIORITY_UNPREEMPTABLE so that we never submit a request
(heartbeat or barrier) that can legitimately preempt the current
non-premptable request.

Fixes: 2a98f4e6 ("drm/i915: add infrastructure to hold off preemption on a request")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200527162418.24755-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Use intel_engine_flush_submission() when we want to ensure that the
tasklet is run. tasklet_kill(), while it may ensure that an ongoing
tasklet is completed, also prevents the tasklet from running if it's
already scheduled and hasn't yet been run.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/1874Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200521124304.3157692-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Make sure that we can execute a virtual request on an already busy
engine, and conversely that we can execute a normal request if the
engines are already fully occupied by virtual requests.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200519132046.22443-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

When we look at i915_request_is_started() we must be careful in case we
are using a request that does not have the initial-breadcrumb and
instead the is-started is being compared against the end of the previous
request. This will make wait_for_submit() declare that a request has
been already submitted too early.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200519063123.20673-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Since we temporarily disable the heartbeat and restore back to the
default value, we can use the stored defaults on the engine and avoid
using a local.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200519063123.20673-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Check for integer overflow in the priority chain, rather than against a
type-constricted max-priority check.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200519063123.20673-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Tvrtko spotted that some selftests were using 'break' not 'continue',
which will fail for discontiguous engine layouts such as on Icelake
(which may have vcs0 and vcs2).
Reported-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200518102911.3463-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

If we find ourselves waiting on a MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT, either within the
user batch or in our own preamble, the engine raises a
GT_WAIT_ON_SEMAPHORE interrupt. We can unmask that interrupt and so
respond to a semaphore wait by yielding the timeslice, if we have
another context to yield to!

The only real complication is that the interrupt is only generated for
the start of the semaphore wait, and is asynchronous to our
process_csb() -- that is, we may not have registered the timeslice before
we see the interrupt. To ensure we don't miss a potential semaphore
blocking forward progress (e.g. selftests/live_timeslice_preempt) we mark
the interrupt and apply it to the next timeslice regardless of whether it
was active at the time.

v2: We use semaphores in preempt-to-busy, within the timeslicing
implementation itself! Ergo, when we do insert a preemption due to an
expired timeslice, the new context may start with the missed semaphore
flagged by the retired context and be yielded, ad infinitum. To avoid
this, read the context id at the time of the semaphore interrupt and
only yield if that context is still active.

Fixes: 8ee36e04 ("drm/i915/execlists: Minimalistic timeslicing")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200407130811.17321-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit c4e8ba73)
(cherry picked from commit cd60e4ac4738a6921592c4f7baf87f9a3499f0e2)
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

As we only restore the default context state upon banning a context, we
only need enough of the state to run the ring and nothing more. That is
we only need our bare protocontext.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200504180745.15645-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The older arches did not convert MI_STORE_DATA_IMM to using the GTT, but
left them writing to a physical address. The notes suggest that the
primary reason would be so that the writes were cache coherent, as the
CPU cache uses physical tagging. As such we did not implement the
legacy variant of MI_STORE_DATA_IMM and so left all the relocations
synchronous -- but with a small function to convert from the vma address
into the physical address, we can implement asynchronous relocs on these
older arches, fixing up a few tests that require them.

In order to be able to test the legacy paths, refactor the gpu
relocations so that we can hook them up to a selftest.

v2: Use an array of offsets not enum labels for the selftest
v3: Refactor the common igt_hexdump()

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/757Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200504140629.28240-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk