Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 10 2月, 2018 1 次提交
  3. 31 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  5. 30 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  7. 19 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  9. 13 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  11. 01 12月, 2017 2 次提交
  13. 30 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  15. 28 11月, 2017 2 次提交
  17. 25 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Use exponential backoff for wait_for() · a54b1873
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Instead of sleeping for a fixed 1ms (roughly, depending on timer slack),
start with a small sleep and exponentially increase the sleep on each
cycle.

A good example of a beneficiary is the guc mmio communication channel.
Typically we expect (and so spin) for 10us for a quick response, but this
doesn't cover everything and so sometimes we fallback to the millisecond+
sleep. This incurs a significant delay in time-critical operations like
preemption (igt/gem_exec_latency), which can be improved significantly by
using a small sleep after the spin fails.

We've made this suggestion many times, but had little experimental data
to support adding the complexity.

v2: Bump the minimum usleep to 10us on advice of
Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt (Tvrko)
v3: Specify min, max range for usleep intervals -- some code may
crucially depend upon and so want to specify the sleep pattern.

References: 1758b90e ("drm/i915: Use a hybrid scheme for fast register waits")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171124130031.20761-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      a54b1873
  19. 22 11月, 2017 4 次提交
  21. 17 11月, 2017 3 次提交
  23. 14 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  25. 12 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  27. 10 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • V
      drm/i915: Nuke intel_digital_port->port · 8f4f2797
      由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于 
      Remove intel_digital_port->port and replace its users with
intel_encoder->port. intel_encoder->port is a superset of
intel_digital_port->port, and it works correctly even for
MST encoders.

v2: Eliminate a few dp_to_dig_port()->base.port cases too (DK)

Performed with cocci:
@@
@@
struct intel_digital_port {
       ...
-       enum port port;
       ...
}

@@
struct intel_digital_port *D;
expression E;
@@
- D->port = E;

@@
struct intel_digital_port *D;
@@
- D->port
+ D->base.port

@
expression E;
@@
(
- dp_to_dig_port(E)->port
+ dp_to_dig_port(E)->base.port
|
- enc_to_dig_port(E)->port
+ to_intel_encoder(E)->port
)

@@
expression E;
@@
- to_intel_encoder(&E->base)
+ E

@@
struct intel_digital_port *D;
identifier I, M;
@@
  I = &D->base
<...
(
- D->base.M
+ I->M
|
- &D->base
+ I
)
...>

@@
identifier D;
expression E;
identifier M;
@@
 D = enc_to_dig_port(&E->base)
<...
(
- D->base.M
+ E->M
|
- &D->base
+ E
)
...>

@@
identifier D, DP;
expression E;
identifier M;
@@
 DP = enc_to_intel_dp(&E->base)
<...
(
- dp_to_dig_port(DP)->base.M
+ E->M
|
- &dp_to_dig_port(DP)->base
+ E
)
...>

@@
expression E;
identifier M;
@@
(
- enc_to_dig_port(&E->base)->base.M
+ E->M
|
- enc_to_dig_port(&E->base)->base
+ E
|
- enc_to_mst(&E->base)->primary->base.port
+ E->port
)

@@
expression E;
identifier D;
@@
- struct intel_digital_port *D = E;
... when != D

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171109152434.32074-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
      8f4f2797
  29. 01 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  31. 31 10月, 2017 4 次提交
  33. 27 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  35. 25 10月, 2017 3 次提交
  37. 19 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  39. 18 10月, 2017 4 次提交
  41. 17 10月, 2017 2 次提交
  43. 13 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  45. 12 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  47. 11 10月, 2017 1 次提交