Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 10 6月, 2020 1 次提交
    • M
      drm/i915/rkl: RKL uses ABOX0 for pixel transfers · 62afef28
      由 Matt Roper 提交于 
      Rocket Lake uses the same 'abox0' mechanism to handle pixel data
transfers from memory that gen11 platforms used, rather than the
abox1/abox2 interfaces used by TGL/DG1.  For the most part this is a
hardware implementation detail that's transparent to driver software,
but we do have to program a couple of tuning registers (MBUS_ABOX_CTL
and BW_BUDDY registers) according to which ABOX instances are used by a
platform.  Let's track the platform's ABOX usage in the device info
structure and use that to determine which instances of these registers
to program.

As an exception to this rule is that even though TGL/DG1 use ABOX1+ABOX2
for data transfers, we're still directed to program the ABOX_CTL
register for ABOX0; so we'll handle that as a special case.

v2:
 - Store the mask of platform-specific abox registers in the device
   info structure.
 - Add a TLB_REQ_TIMER() helper macro.  (Aditya)

v3:
 - Squash ABOX and BW_BUDDY patches together and use a single mask for
   both of them, plus a special-case for programming the ABOX0 instance
   on all gen12.  (Ville)

Bspec: 50096
Bspec: 49218
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Aditya Swarup <aditya.swarup@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200606025740.3308880-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.comReviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      62afef28
  3. 20 5月, 2020 1 次提交
  5. 19 5月, 2020 1 次提交
  7. 16 5月, 2020 3 次提交
  9. 23 4月, 2020 1 次提交
  11. 21 4月, 2020 2 次提交
    • J
      drm/i915: drop a bunch of superfluous inlines · 81b55ef1
      由 Jani Nikula 提交于 
      Remove a number of inlines from .c files, and let the compiler decide
what's best. There's more to do, but need to start somewhere, and need
to start setting the example.
Acked-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200420140438.14672-2-jani.nikula@intel.com
      81b55ef1
    • M
      drm/i915: Use single set of AUX powerwell ops for gen11+ · 89e01caa
      由 Matt Roper 提交于 
      AUX power wells sometimes need additional handling besides just
programming the specific power well registers:
 * Type-C PHY's also require additional Type-C register programming
 * ICL combo PHY's require additional workarounds
 * TGL & EHL combo PHY's can be treated like any other power well

Today we have dedicated aux ops for the ICL combo PHY and Type-C cases.
This works fine, but means that when a new platform shows up with
identical general power well handling, but different types of PHYs on
its outputs, we have to define an entire new power well table for that
platform and can't just re-use the table from the earlier platform -- as
an example, see ehl_power_wells[], which is a subset of
icl_power_wells[], *except* that we need to specify different AUX ops
for the third display.

If we instead create a single set of top-level aux ops that will check
the PHY type and then dispatch to the appropriate handlers, we can get
more reuse out of our power well definitions.  This allows us to
immediately eliminate ehl_power_wells[] and simply reuse the ICL table;
if future platforms follow the same general power well assignments as
either ICL or TGL, we'll be able to re-use those tables in the same way.

Note that I've only changed ICL+ platforms over to using the new icl_aux
ops; at this point it's unlikely that we'll have any new platforms that
re-use gen9 or earlier power well configurations.

v2:
 - ICL_AUX_PW_TO_PHY() won't return the proper PHY for TBT AUX power
   wells.  But we know those wells will only used on Type-C outputs
   anyway, so we can just check is is_tc_tbt flag in the condition.
   (Jose).

Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200415233435.3064257-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
      89e01caa
  13. 18 4月, 2020 7 次提交
  15. 17 4月, 2020 2 次提交
  17. 16 4月, 2020 1 次提交
  19. 26 3月, 2020 1 次提交
    • J
      drm/i915/display_power: use struct drm_device based logging · 3c4e3870
      由 Jani Nikula 提交于 
      Convert all the DRM_* logging macros to the struct drm_device based
macros to provide device specific logging.

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch, originally written by
Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@gmail.com>, with manual fixups on top:

@@
identifier fn, T;
@@

fn(...,struct drm_i915_private *T,...) {
<+...
(
-DRM_INFO(
+drm_info(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_NOTE(
+drm_notice(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_ERROR(
+drm_err(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_WARN(
+drm_warn(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER(
+drm_dbg(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_KMS(
+drm_dbg_kms(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC(
+drm_dbg_atomic(&T->drm,
...)
)
...+>
}

@@
identifier fn, T;
@@

fn(...) {
...
struct drm_i915_private *T = ...;
<+...
(
-DRM_INFO(
+drm_info(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_NOTE(
+drm_notice(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_ERROR(
+drm_err(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_WARN(
+drm_warn(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER(
+drm_dbg(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_KMS(
+drm_dbg_kms(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC(
+drm_dbg_atomic(&T->drm,
...)
)
...+>
}

Cc: Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/25e56d1b7df3b1e91024eb969fb839fdcbdcb35e.1584714939.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
      3c4e3870
  21. 02 3月, 2020 2 次提交
  23. 27 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  25. 23 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  27. 22 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  29. 21 2月, 2020 2 次提交
  31. 19 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  33. 16 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  35. 06 2月, 2020 3 次提交
    • S
      drm/i915: Manipulate DBuf slices properly · 0f0f9aee
      由 Stanislav Lisovskiy 提交于 
      Start manipulating DBuf slices as a mask,
but not as a total number, as current approach
doesn't give us full control on all combinations
of slices, which we might need(like enabling S2
only can't enabled by setting enabled_slices=1).

Removed wrong code from intel_get_ddb_size as
it doesn't match to BSpec. For now still just
use DBuf slice until proper algorithm is implemented.

Other minor code refactoring to get prepared
for major DBuf assignment changes landed:
- As now enabled slices contain a mask
  we still need some value which should
  reflect how much DBuf slices are supported
  by the platform, now device info contains
  num_supported_dbuf_slices.
- Removed unneeded assertion as we are now
  manipulating slices in a more proper way.

v2: Start using enabled_slices in dev_priv

v3: "enabled_slices" is now "enabled_dbuf_slices_mask",
    as this now sits in dev_priv independently.

v4: - Fixed debug print formatting to hex(Matt Roper)
    - Optimized dbuf slice updates to be used only
      if slice union is different from current conf(Matt Roper)
    - Fixed some functions to be static(Matt Roper)
    - Created a parameterized version for DBUF_CTL to
      simplify DBuf programming cycle(Matt Roper)
    - Removed unrequred field from GEN10_FEATURES(Matt Roper)

v5: - Removed redundant programming dbuf slices helper(Ville Syrjälä)
    - Started to use parameterized loop for hw readout to get slices
      (Ville Syrjälä)
    - Added back assertion checking amount of DBUF slices enabled
      after DC states 5/6 transition, also added new assertion
      as starting from ICL DMC seems to restore the last DBuf
      power state set, rather than power up all dbuf slices
      as assertion was previously expecting(Ville Syrjälä)

v6: - Now using enum for DBuf slices in this patch (Ville Syrjälä)
    - Removed gen11_assert_dbuf_enabled and put gen9_assert_dbuf_enabled
      back, as we really need to have a single unified assert here
      however currently enabling always slice 1 is enforced by BSpec,
      so we will have to OR enabled slices mask with 1 in order
      to be consistent with BSpec, that way we can unify that
      assertion and against the actual state from the driver, but
      not some hardcoded value.(concluded with Ville)
    - Remove parameterized DBUF_CTL version, to extract it to another
      patch.(Ville Syrjälä)
v7:
    - Removed unneeded hardcoded return value for older gens from
      intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_mask - this now is handled in a
      unified manner since device info anyway returns max dbuf slices
      as 1 for older platforms(Matthew Roper)
    - Now using INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->num_supported_dbuf_slices instead
      of intel_dbuf_max_slices function as it is trivial(Matthew Roper)

v8: - Fixed icl_dbuf_disable to disable all dbufs still(Ville Syrjälä)

v9: - Renamed _DBUF_CTL_S to DBUF_CTL_S(Ville Syrjälä)
    - Now using power_domain mutex to protect from race condition, which
      can occur because intel_dbuf_slices_update might be running in
      parallel to gen9_dc_off_power_well_enable being called from
      intel_dp_detect for instance, which causes assertion triggered by
      race condition, as gen9_assert_dbuf_enabled might preempt this
      when registers were already updated, while dev_priv was not.
Reviewed-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NStanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200202230630.8975-6-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com
      0f0f9aee
    • S
      drm/i915: Introduce parameterized DBUF_CTL · 2570b7e3
      由 Stanislav Lisovskiy 提交于 
      Now start using parameterized DBUF_CTL instead
of hardcoded, this would allow shorter access
functions when reading or storing entire state.

Tried to implement it in a MMIO_PIPE manner, however
DBUF_CTL1 address is higher than DBUF_CTL2, which
implies that we have to now subtract from base
rather than add.

v2: - Removed unneeded DBUF_CTL_DIST and DBUF_CTL_ADDR
      macros. Started to use _PICK construct as suggested
      by Matt Roper.

v3: - _DBUF_CTL_S* to DBUF_CTL_S*, changed X to "slice"
      in macro(Ville Syrjälä)
    - Introduced enum for enumerating DBUF slices(Ville Syrjälä)
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NStanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200202230630.8975-5-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com
      2570b7e3
    • S
      drm/i915: Remove skl_ddl_allocation struct · 072fcc30
      由 Stanislav Lisovskiy 提交于 
      Current consensus that it is redundant as
we already have skl_ddb_values struct out there,
also this struct contains only single member
which makes it unnecessary.

v2: As dirty_pipes soon going to be nuked away
    from skl_ddb_values, evacuating enabled_slices
    to safer in dev_priv.

v3: Changed "enabled_slices" to be "enabled_dbuf_slices_num"
    (Matt Roper)

v4: - Wrapped the line getting number of dbuf slices(Matt Roper)
    - Removed indeed redundant skl_ddb_values declaration(Matt Roper)
Reviewed-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NStanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200202230630.8975-2-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com
      072fcc30
  37. 04 2月, 2020 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915/display: Defer application of initial chv_phy_control · 1a2466fe
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      To write to the DISPLAY_PHY_CONTROL requires holding the powerwells,
which during early resume we have not yet acquired until later in
intel_display_power_init_hw(). So compute the initial chv_phy_control,
but leave the HW unset until we first acquire the powerwell.

<7> [120.055984] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_power_domains_init_hw [i915]] rawclk rate: 200000 kHz
<4> [120.056381] ------------[ cut here ]------------
<4> [120.056621] i915 0000:00:02.0: Unclaimed write to register 0x1e0100
<4> [120.056924] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 164 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:1166 __unclaimed_reg_debug+0x69/0x80 [i915]
<4> [120.056935] Modules linked in: vgem snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic btusb btrtl btbcm btintel i915 bluetooth coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul snd_hda_intel snd_intel_dspcfg snd_hda_codec ghash_clmulni_intel snd_hwdep ecdh_generic ecc snd_hda_core r8169 snd_pcm lpc_ich realtek pinctrl_cherryview i2c_designware_pci prime_numbers
<4> [120.057027] CPU: 1 PID: 164 Comm: kworker/u4:3 Tainted: G     U            5.5.0-CI-CI_DRM_7854+ #1
<4> [120.057038] Hardware name:  /NUC5CPYB, BIOS PYBSWCEL.86A.0055.2016.0812.1130 08/12/2016
<4> [120.057058] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
<4> [120.057275] RIP: 0010:__unclaimed_reg_debug+0x69/0x80 [i915]
<4> [120.057289] Code: 48 8b 78 18 48 8b 5f 50 48 85 db 74 2d e8 1f a0 3f e1 45 89 e8 48 89 e9 48 89 da 48 89 c6 48 c7 c7 00 8c 48 a0 e8 67 82 df e0 <0f> 0b 83 2d ce e2 2b 00 01 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d c3 48 8b 1f eb ce 66
<4> [120.057301] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000bcfd08 EFLAGS: 00010082
<4> [120.057315] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888079919b60 RCX: 0000000000000003
<4> [120.057326] RDX: 0000000080000003 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
<4> [120.057336] RBP: ffffffffa04c9f4e R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
<4> [120.057348] R10: 0000000025c3d560 R11: 000000006815f798 R12: 0000000000000000
<4> [120.057359] R13: 00000000001e0100 R14: 0000000000000286 R15: ffffffff8234a76b
<4> [120.057371] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888074b00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
<4> [120.057382] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
<4> [120.057393] CR2: 000055f4197df0d8 CR3: 000000006f326000 CR4: 00000000001006e0
<4> [120.057404] Call Trace:
<4> [120.057635]  fwtable_write32+0x114/0x1d0 [i915]
<4> [120.057892]  intel_power_domains_init_hw+0x4ff/0x650 [i915]
<4> [120.058150]  intel_power_domains_resume+0x3d/0x70 [i915]
<4> [120.058363]  i915_drm_resume_early+0x97/0xd0 [i915]
<4> [120.058575]  ? i915_resume_switcheroo+0x30/0x30 [i915]
<4> [120.058594]  dpm_run_callback+0x64/0x280
<4> [120.058626]  device_resume_early+0xa7/0xe0
<4> [120.058652]  async_resume_early+0x14/0x40

v2: Write our expected value of DISPLAY_PHY_CONTROL during sync_hw, so
that it should always match the driver state after resume.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1089Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200203145016.216692-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      1a2466fe
  39. 31 1月, 2020 2 次提交
  41. 29 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  43. 25 1月, 2020 1 次提交
    • W
      drm/i915/power: convert to struct drm_device macros in display/intel_display_power.c · 569caa65
      由 Wambui Karuga 提交于 
      Converts various instances of the printk based logging macros in
i915/display/intel_display_power.c to the struct drm_device based
logging macros using the following coccinelle script:
@rule1@
identifier fn, T;
@@

fn(...,struct drm_i915_private *T,...) {
<+...
(
-DRM_INFO(
+drm_info(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_ERROR(
+drm_err(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_WARN(
+drm_warn(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG(
+drm_dbg(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER(
+drm_dbg(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_KMS(
+drm_dbg_kms(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC(
+drm_dbg_atomic(&T->drm,
...)
)
...+>
}

@rule2@
identifier fn, T;
@@

fn(...) {
...
struct drm_i915_private *T = ...;
<+...
(
-DRM_INFO(
+drm_info(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_ERROR(
+drm_err(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_WARN(
+drm_warn(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG(
+drm_dbg(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_KMS(
+drm_dbg_kms(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER(
+drm_dbg(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC(
+drm_dbg_atomic(&T->drm,
...)
)
...+>
}

Checkpatch warnings were fixed manually.
Signed-off-by: NWambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122110844.2022-4-wambui.karugax@gmail.com
      569caa65
  45. 14 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  47. 16 12月, 2019 2 次提交