1. 13 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  2. 12 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 07 3月, 2014 4 次提交
  4. 03 3月, 2014 1 次提交
    • V
      bonding: send arp requests even if there's no route to them · 28572760
      Veaceslav Falico 提交于
      Currently we're only sending arp requests if we have a route to the target
      (and, thus, can find out the source ip address).
      
      There are some use cases, however, where we don't want/need to set an ip
      address (or set up a specific route) for bonding to use arp monitoring *for
      traffic generation*. We can easily send arp probes (arp requests with src
      ip == 0) to generate arp broadcast responses from the target ip and use
      them for determining if the target is up.
      
      This, obviously, won't work with arp validation - because we don't have the
      ip address set and, thus, will filter out the responses. So in that case -
      print a warning.
      
      CC: François CACHEREUL <f.cachereul@alphalink.fr>
      CC: Zhenjie Chen <zhchen@redhat.com>
      CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
      CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
      Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      28572760
  5. 27 2月, 2014 4 次提交
    • J
      bonding: disallow enslaving a bond to itself · 09a89c21
      Jiri Bohac 提交于
      Enslaving a bond to itself leads to an endless loop and hangs the kernel.
      Signed-off-by: NJiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
      Tested-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      09a89c21
    • N
      bonding: fix a div error caused by the slave release path · ee6154e1
      Nikolay Aleksandrov 提交于
      There's a bug in the slave release function which leads the transmit
      functions which use the bond->slave_cnt to a div by 0 because we might
      just have released our last slave and made slave_cnt == 0 but at the same
      time we may have a transmitter after the check for an empty list which will
      fetch it and use it in the slave id calculation.
      Fix it by moving the slave_cnt after synchronize_rcu so if this was our
      last slave any new transmitters will see an empty slave list which is
      checked after rcu lock but before calling the mode transmit functions
      which rely on bond->slave_cnt.
      
      Fixes: 278b2083 ("bonding: initial RCU conversion")
      
      CC: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
      CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
      CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
      CC: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      ee6154e1
    • D
      bonding: Fix RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/rtnetlink.c for ab arp monitor · b0929915
      dingtianhong 提交于
      Veaceslav has reported and fix this problem by commit f2ebd477
      (bonding: restructure locking of bond_ab_arp_probe()). According Jay's
      opinion, the current solution is not very well, because the notification
      is to indicate that the interface has actually changed state in a meaningful
      way, but these calls in the ab ARP monitor are internal settings of the flags
      to allow the ARP monitor to search for a slave to become active when there are
      no active slaves. The flag setting to active or backup is to permit the ARP
      monitor's response logic to do the right thing when deciding if the test
      slave (current_arp_slave) is up or not.
      
      So the best way to fix the problem is that we should not send a notification
      when the slave is in testing state, and check the state at the end of the
      monitor, if the slave's state recover, avoid to send pointless notification
      twice. And RTNL is really a big lock, hold it regardless the slave's state
      changed or not when the current_active_slave is null will loss performance
      (every 100ms), so we should hold it only when the slave's state changed and
      need to notify.
      
      I revert the old commit and add new modifications.
      
      Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
      Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
      Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      b0929915
    • D
      bonding: Fix RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/rtnetlink.c for 802.3ad mode · 5e5b0665
      dingtianhong 提交于
      The problem was introduced by the commit 1d3ee88a
      (bonding: add netlink attributes to slave link dev).
      The bond_set_active_slave() and bond_set_backup_slave()
      will use rtmsg_ifinfo to send slave's states, so these
      two functions should be called in RTNL.
      
      In 802.3ad mode, acquiring RTNL for the __enable_port and
      __disable_port cases is difficult, as those calls generally
      already hold the state machine lock, and cannot unconditionally
      call rtnl_lock because either they already hold RTNL (for calls
      via bond_3ad_unbind_slave) or due to the potential for deadlock
      with bond_3ad_adapter_speed_changed, bond_3ad_adapter_duplex_changed,
      bond_3ad_link_change, or bond_3ad_update_lacp_rate.  All four of
      those are called with RTNL held, and acquire the state machine lock
      second.  The calling contexts for __enable_port and __disable_port
      already hold the state machine lock, and may or may not need RTNL.
      
      According to the Jay's opinion, I don't think it is a problem that
      the slave don't send notify message synchronously when the status
      changed, normally the state machine is running every 100 ms, send
      the notify message at the end of the state machine if the slave's
      state changed should be better.
      
      I fix the problem through these steps:
      
      1). add a new function bond_set_slave_state() which could change
          the slave's state and call rtmsg_ifinfo() according to the input
          parameters called notify.
      
      2). Add a new slave parameter which called should_notify, if the slave's state
          changed and don't notify yet, the parameter will be set to 1, and then if
          the slave's state changed again, the param will be set to 0, it indicate that
          the slave's state has been restored, no need to notify any one.
      
      3). the __enable_port and __disable_port should not call rtmsg_ifinfo
          in the state machine lock, any change in the state of slave could
          set a flag in the slave, it will indicated that an rtmsg_ifinfo
          should be called at the end of the state machine.
      
      Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
      Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
      Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      5e5b0665
  6. 25 2月, 2014 3 次提交
  7. 21 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  8. 20 2月, 2014 3 次提交
  9. 19 2月, 2014 11 次提交
  10. 18 2月, 2014 1 次提交
    • J
      bonding: 802.3ad: make aggregator_identifier bond-private · 163c8ff3
      Jiri Bohac 提交于
      aggregator_identifier is used to assign unique aggregator identifiers
      to aggregators of a bond during device enslaving.
      
      aggregator_identifier is currently a global variable that is zeroed in
      bond_3ad_initialize().
      
      This sequence will lead to duplicate aggregator identifiers for eth1 and eth3:
      
      create bond0
      change bond0 mode to 802.3ad
      enslave eth0 to bond0 		//eth0 gets agg id 1
      enslave eth1 to bond0 		//eth1 gets agg id 2
      create bond1
      change bond1 mode to 802.3ad
      enslave eth2 to bond1		//aggregator_identifier is reset to 0
      				//eth2 gets agg id 1
      enslave eth3 to bond0 		//eth3 gets agg id 2
      
      Fix this by making aggregator_identifier private to the bond.
      Signed-off-by: NJiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
      Acked-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      163c8ff3
  11. 17 2月, 2014 5 次提交
  12. 15 2月, 2014 5 次提交