1. 15 2月, 2014 5 次提交
  2. 13 2月, 2014 28 次提交
  3. 06 2月, 2014 3 次提交
  4. 05 2月, 2014 4 次提交
    • M
      cfg80211: consider existing DFS interfaces · 9e0e2961
      Michal Kazior 提交于
      It was possible to break interface combinations in
      the following way:
      
       combo 1: iftype = AP, num_ifaces = 2, num_chans = 2,
       combo 2: iftype = AP, num_ifaces = 1, num_chans = 1, radar = HT20
      
      With the above interface combinations it was
      possible to:
      
       step 1. start AP on DFS channel by matching combo 2
       step 2. start AP on non-DFS channel by matching combo 1
      
      This was possible beacuse (step 2) did not consider
      if other interfaces require radar detection.
      
      The patch changes how cfg80211 tracks channels -
      instead of channel itself now a complete chandef
      is stored.
      Signed-off-by: NMichal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      9e0e2961
    • A
      cfg80211: fix channel configuration in IBSS join · fe94f3a4
      Antonio Quartulli 提交于
      When receiving an IBSS_JOINED event select the BSS object
      based on the {bssid, channel} couple rather than the bssid
      only.
      With the current approach if another cell having the same
      BSSID (but using a different channel) exists then cfg80211
      picks up the wrong BSS object.
      The result is a mismatching channel configuration between
      cfg80211 and the driver, that can lead to any sort of
      problem.
      
      The issue can be triggered by having an IBSS sitting on
      given channel and then asking the driver to create a new
      cell using the same BSSID but with a different frequency.
      By passing the channel to cfg80211_get_bss() we can solve
      this ambiguity and retrieve/create the correct BSS object.
      All the users of cfg80211_ibss_joined() have been changed
      accordingly.
      
      Moreover WARN when cfg80211_ibss_joined() gets a NULL
      channel as argument and remove a bogus call of the same
      function in ath6kl (it does not make sense to call
      cfg80211_ibss_joined() with a zero BSSID on ibss-leave).
      
      Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
      Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
      Cc: Bing Zhao <bzhao@marvell.com>
      Cc: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@iki.fi>
      Cc: libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org
      Acked-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAntonio Quartulli <antonio@open-mesh.com>
      [minor code cleanup in ath6kl]
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      fe94f3a4
    • J
      nl80211: fix scheduled scan RSSI matchset attribute confusion · ea73cbce
      Johannes Berg 提交于
      The scheduled scan matchsets were intended to be a list of filters,
      with the found BSS having to pass at least one of them to be passed
      to the host. When the RSSI attribute was added, however, this was
      broken and currently wpa_supplicant adds that attribute in its own
      matchset; however, it doesn't intend that to mean that anything
      that passes the RSSI filter should be passed to the host, instead
      it wants it to mean that everything needs to also have higher RSSI.
      
      This is semantically problematic because we have a list of filters
      like [ SSID1, SSID2, SSID3, RSSI ] with no real indication which
      one should be OR'ed and which one AND'ed.
      
      To fix this, move the RSSI filter attribute into each matchset. As
      we need to stay backward compatible, treat a matchset with only the
      RSSI attribute as a "default RSSI filter" for all other matchsets,
      but only if there are other matchsets (an RSSI-only matchset by
      itself is still desirable.)
      
      To make driver implementation easier, keep a global min_rssi_thold
      for the entire request as well. The only affected driver is ath6kl.
      
      I found this when I looked into the code after Raja Mani submitted
      a patch fixing the n_match_sets calculation to disregard the RSSI,
      but that patch didn't address the semantic issue.
      Reported-by: NRaja Mani <rmani@qti.qualcomm.com>
      Acked-by: NLuciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      ea73cbce
    • J
      mac80211: remove module handling from rate control ops · cc01f9b5
      Johannes Berg 提交于
      There's not a single rate control algorithm actually in
      a separate module where the module refcount would be
      required. Similarly, there's no specific rate control
      module.
      
      Therefore, all the module handling code in rate control
      is really just dead code, so remove it.
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      cc01f9b5