Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 06 6月, 2016 4 次提交
  3. 01 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 30 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  7. 27 5月, 2016 2 次提交
    • C
      Btrfs: fix handling of faults from btrfs_copy_from_user · 56244ef1
      由 Chris Mason 提交于 
      When btrfs_copy_from_user isn't able to copy all of the pages, we need
to adjust our accounting to reflect the work that was actually done.

Commit 2e78c927 changed around the decisions a little and we ended up
skipping the accounting adjustments some of the time.  This commit makes
sure that when we don't copy anything at all, we still hop into
the adjustments, and switches to release_bytes instead of write_bytes,
since write_bytes isn't aligned.

The accounting errors led to warnings during btrfs_destroy_inode:

[   70.847532] WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 514 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:9350 btrfs_destroy_inode+0x2b3/0x2c0
[   70.847536] Modules linked in: i2c_piix4 virtio_net i2c_core input_leds button led_class serio_raw acpi_cpufreq sch_fq_codel autofs4 virtio_blk
[   70.847538] CPU: 10 PID: 514 Comm: umount Tainted: G        W 4.6.0-rc6_00062_g2997da1-dirty #23
[   70.847539] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.9.0-1.fc24 04/01/2014
[   70.847542]  0000000000000000 ffff880ff5cafab8 ffffffff8149d5e9 0000000000000202
[   70.847543]  0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff880ff5cafb08
[   70.847547]  ffffffff8107bdfd ffff880ff5cafaf8 000024868120013d ffff880ff5cafb28
[   70.847547] Call Trace:
[   70.847550]  [<ffffffff8149d5e9>] dump_stack+0x51/0x78
[   70.847551]  [<ffffffff8107bdfd>] __warn+0xfd/0x120
[   70.847553]  [<ffffffff8107be3d>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
[   70.847555]  [<ffffffff8139c9e3>] btrfs_destroy_inode+0x2b3/0x2c0
[   70.847556]  [<ffffffff812003a1>] ? __destroy_inode+0x71/0x140
[   70.847558]  [<ffffffff812004b3>] destroy_inode+0x43/0x70
[   70.847559]  [<ffffffff810b7b5f>] ? wake_up_bit+0x2f/0x40
[   70.847560]  [<ffffffff81200c68>] evict+0x148/0x1d0
[   70.847562]  [<ffffffff81398ade>] ? start_transaction+0x3de/0x460
[   70.847564]  [<ffffffff81200d49>] dispose_list+0x59/0x80
[   70.847565]  [<ffffffff81201ba0>] evict_inodes+0x180/0x190
[   70.847566]  [<ffffffff812191ff>] ? __sync_filesystem+0x3f/0x50
[   70.847568]  [<ffffffff811e95f8>] generic_shutdown_super+0x48/0x100
[   70.847569]  [<ffffffff810b75c0>] ? woken_wake_function+0x20/0x20
[   70.847571]  [<ffffffff811e9796>] kill_anon_super+0x16/0x30
[   70.847573]  [<ffffffff81365cde>] btrfs_kill_super+0x1e/0x130
[   70.847574]  [<ffffffff811e99be>] deactivate_locked_super+0x4e/0x90
[   70.847576]  [<ffffffff811e9e61>] deactivate_super+0x51/0x70
[   70.847577]  [<ffffffff8120536f>] cleanup_mnt+0x3f/0x80
[   70.847579]  [<ffffffff81205402>] __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20
[   70.847581]  [<ffffffff81098358>] task_work_run+0x68/0xa0
[   70.847582]  [<ffffffff810022b6>] exit_to_usermode_loop+0xd6/0xe0
[   70.847583]  [<ffffffff81002e1d>] do_syscall_64+0xbd/0x170
[   70.847586]  [<ffffffff817d4dbc>] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25

This is the test program I used to force short returns from
btrfs_copy_from_user

void *dontneed(void *arg)
{
	char *p = arg;
	int ret;

	while(1) {
		ret = madvise(p, BUFSIZE/4, MADV_DONTNEED);
		if (ret) {
			perror("madvise");
			exit(1);
		}
	}
}

int main(int ac, char **av) {
	int ret;
	int fd;
	char *filename;
	unsigned long offset;
	char *buf;
	int i;
	pthread_t tid;

	if (ac != 2) {
		fprintf(stderr, "usage: dammitdave filename\n");
		exit(1);
	}

	buf = mmap(NULL, BUFSIZE, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
		   MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
	if (buf == MAP_FAILED) {
		perror("mmap");
		exit(1);
	}
	memset(buf, 'a', BUFSIZE);
	filename = av[1];

	ret = pthread_create(&tid, NULL, dontneed, buf);
	if (ret) {
		fprintf(stderr, "error %d from pthread_create\n", ret);
		exit(1);
	}

	ret = pthread_detach(tid);
	if (ret) {
		fprintf(stderr, "pthread detach failed %d\n", ret);
		exit(1);
	}

	while (1) {
		fd = open(filename, O_RDWR | O_CREAT, 0600);
		if (fd < 0) {
			perror("open");
			exit(1);
		}

		for (i = 0; i < ROUNDS; i++) {
			int this_write = BUFSIZE;

			offset = rand() % MAXSIZE;
			ret = pwrite(fd, buf, this_write, offset);
			if (ret < 0) {
				perror("pwrite");
				exit(1);
			} else if (ret != this_write) {
				fprintf(stderr, "short write to %s offset %lu ret %d\n",
					filename, offset, ret);
				exit(1);
			}
			if (i == ROUNDS - 1) {
				ret = sync_file_range(fd, offset, 4096,
				    SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WRITE);
				if (ret < 0) {
					perror("sync_file_range");
					exit(1);
				}
			}
		}
		ret = ftruncate(fd, 0);
		if (ret < 0) {
			perror("ftruncate");
			exit(1);
		}
		ret = close(fd);
		if (ret) {
			perror("close");
			exit(1);
		}
		ret = unlink(filename);
		if (ret) {
			perror("unlink");
			exit(1);
		}

	}
	return 0;
}
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reported-by: NDave Jones <dsj@fb.com>
Fixes: 2e78c927
cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.6
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      56244ef1
    • C
      Merge branch 'for-chris-4.7' of... · 9257b4ca
      由 Chris Mason 提交于 
      Merge branch 'for-chris-4.7' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linus-4.7
      9257b4ca
  9. 26 5月, 2016 7 次提交
  11. 18 5月, 2016 2 次提交
  13. 16 5月, 2016 5 次提交
  15. 13 5月, 2016 14 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: add semaphore to synchronize direct IO writes with fsync · 5f9a8a51
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      Due to the optimization of lockless direct IO writes (the inode's i_mutex
is not held) introduced in commit 38851cc1 ("Btrfs: implement unlocked
dio write"), we started having races between such writes with concurrent
fsync operations that use the fast fsync path. These races were addressed
in the patches titled "Btrfs: fix race between fsync and lockless direct
IO writes" and "Btrfs: fix race between fsync and direct IO writes for
prealloc extents". The races happened because the direct IO path, like
every other write path, does create extent maps followed by the
corresponding ordered extents while the fast fsync path collected first
ordered extents and then it collected extent maps. This made it possible
to log file extent items (based on the collected extent maps) without
waiting for the corresponding ordered extents to complete (get their IO
done). The two fixes mentioned before added a solution that consists of
making the direct IO path create first the ordered extents and then the
extent maps, while the fsync path attempts to collect any new ordered
extents once it collects the extent maps. This was simple and did not
require adding any synchonization primitive to any data structure (struct
btrfs_inode for example) but it makes things more fragile for future
development endeavours and adds an exceptional approach compared to the
other write paths.

This change adds a read-write semaphore to the btrfs inode structure and
makes the direct IO path create the extent maps and the ordered extents
while holding read access on that semaphore, while the fast fsync path
collects extent maps and ordered extents while holding write access on
that semaphore. The logic for direct IO write path is encapsulated in a
new helper function that is used both for cow and nocow direct IO writes.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      5f9a8a51
    • F
      Btrfs: fix race between block group relocation and nocow writes · f78c436c
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      Relocation of a block group waits for all existing tasks flushing
dellaloc, starting direct IO writes and any ordered extents before
starting the relocation process. However for direct IO writes that end
up doing nocow (inode either has the flag nodatacow set or the write is
against a prealloc extent) we have a short time window that allows for a
race that makes relocation proceed without waiting for the direct IO
write to complete first, resulting in data loss after the relocation
finishes. This is illustrated by the following diagram:

           CPU 1                                     CPU 2

 btrfs_relocate_block_group(bg X)

                                               direct IO write starts against
                                               an extent in block group X
                                               using nocow mode (inode has the
                                               nodatacow flag or the write is
                                               for a prealloc extent)

                                               btrfs_direct_IO()
                                                 btrfs_get_blocks_direct()
                                                   --> can_nocow_extent() returns 1

   btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(bg X)
     --> turns block group into RO mode

   btrfs_wait_ordered_roots()
     --> returns and does not know about
         the DIO write happening at CPU 2
         (the task there has not created
          yet an ordered extent)

   relocate_block_group(bg X)
     --> rc->stage == MOVE_DATA_EXTENTS

     find_next_extent()
       --> returns extent that the DIO
           write is going to write to

     relocate_data_extent()

       relocate_file_extent_cluster()

         --> reads the extent from disk into
             pages belonging to the relocation
             inode and dirties them

                                                   --> creates DIO ordered extent

                                                 btrfs_submit_direct()
                                                   --> submits bio against a location
                                                       on disk obtained from an extent
                                                       map before the relocation started

   btrfs_wait_ordered_range()
     --> writes all the pages read before
         to disk (belonging to the
         relocation inode)

   relocation finishes

                                                 bio completes and wrote new data
                                                 to the old location of the block
                                                 group

So fix this by tracking the number of nocow writers for a block group and
make sure relocation waits for that number to go down to 0 before starting
to move the extents.

The same race can also happen with buffered writes in nocow mode since the
patch I recently made titled "Btrfs: don't do unnecessary delalloc flushes
when relocating", because we are no longer flushing all delalloc which
served as a synchonization mechanism (due to page locking) and ensured
the ordered extents for nocow buffered writes were created before we
called btrfs_wait_ordered_roots(). The race with direct IO writes in nocow
mode existed before that patch (no pages are locked or used during direct
IO) and that fixed only races with direct IO writes that do cow.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      f78c436c
    • F
      Btrfs: fix race between fsync and direct IO writes for prealloc extents · 0b901916
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      When we do a direct IO write against a preallocated extent (fallocate)
that does not go beyond the i_size of the inode, we do the write operation
without holding the inode's i_mutex (an optimization that landed in
commit 38851cc1 ("Btrfs: implement unlocked dio write")). This allows
for a very tiny time window where a race can happen with a concurrent
fsync using the fast code path, as the direct IO write path creates first
a new extent map (no longer flagged as a prealloc extent) and then it
creates the ordered extent, while the fast fsync path first collects
ordered extents and then it collects extent maps. This allows for the
possibility of the fast fsync path to collect the new extent map without
collecting the new ordered extent, and therefore logging an extent item
based on the extent map without waiting for the ordered extent to be
created and complete. This can result in a situation where after a log
replay we end up with an extent not marked anymore as prealloc but it was
only partially written (or not written at all), exposing random, stale or
garbage data corresponding to the unwritten pages and without any
checksums in the csum tree covering the extent's range.

This is an extension of what was done in commit de0ee0ed ("Btrfs: fix
race between fsync and lockless direct IO writes").

So fix this by creating first the ordered extent and then the extent
map, so that this way if the fast fsync patch collects the new extent
map it also collects the corresponding ordered extent.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      0b901916
    • F
      Btrfs: fix number of transaction units for renames with whiteout · 5062af35
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      When we do a rename with the whiteout flag, we need to create the whiteout
inode, which in the worst case requires 5 transaction units (1 inode item,
1 inode ref, 2 dir items and 1 xattr if selinux is enabled). So bump the
number of transaction units from 11 to 16 if the whiteout flag is set.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      5062af35
    • F
      Btrfs: pin logs earlier when doing a rename exchange operation · 376e5a57
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      The btrfs_rename_exchange() started as a copy-paste from btrfs_rename(),
which had a race fixed by my previous patch titled "Btrfs: pin log earlier
when renaming", and so it suffers from the same problem.

We pin the logs of the affected roots after we insert the new inode
references, leaving a time window where concurrent tasks logging the
inodes can end up logging both the new and old references, resulting
in log trees that when replayed can turn the metadata into inconsistent
states. This behaviour was added to btrfs_rename() in 2009 without any
explanation about why not pinning the logs earlier, just leaving a
comment about the posibility for the race. As of today it's perfectly
safe and sane to pin the logs before we start doing any of the steps
involved in the rename operation.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      376e5a57
    • F
      Btrfs: unpin logs if rename exchange operation fails · 86e8aa0e
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      If rename exchange operations fail at some point after we pinned any of
the logs, we end up aborting the current transaction but never unpin the
logs, which leaves concurrent tasks that are trying to sync the logs (as
part of an fsync request from user space) blocked forever and preventing
the filesystem from being unmountable.

Fix this by safely unpinning the log.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      86e8aa0e
    • F
      Btrfs: fix inode leak on failure to setup whiteout inode in rename · c9901618
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      If we failed to fully setup the whiteout inode during a rename operation
with the whiteout flag, we ended up leaking the inode, not decrementing
its link count nor removing all its items from the fs/subvol tree.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      c9901618
    • D
      btrfs: add support for RENAME_EXCHANGE and RENAME_WHITEOUT · cdd1fedf
      由 Dan Fuhry 提交于 
      Two new flags, RENAME_EXCHANGE and RENAME_WHITEOUT, provide for new
behavior in the renameat2() syscall. This behavior is primarily used by
overlayfs. This patch adds support for these flags to btrfs, enabling it to
be used as a fully functional upper layer for overlayfs.

RENAME_EXCHANGE support was written by Davide Italiano originally
submitted on 2 April 2015.
Signed-off-by: NDavide Italiano <dccitaliano@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDan Fuhry <dfuhry@datto.com>
[ remove unlikely ]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      cdd1fedf
    • F
      Btrfs: pin log earlier when renaming · c4aba954
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      We were pinning the log right after the first step in the rename operation
(inserting inode ref for the new name in the destination directory)
instead of doing it before. This behaviour was introduced in 2009 for some
reason that was not mentioned neither on the changelog nor any comment,
with the drawback of a small time window where concurrent log writers can
end up logging the new inode reference for the inode we are renaming while
the rename operation is in progress (so that we can end up with a log
containing both the new and old references). As of today there's no reason
to not pin the log before that first step anymore, so just fix this.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      c4aba954
    • F
      Btrfs: unpin log if rename operation fails · 3dc9e8f7
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      If rename operations fail at some point after we pinned the log, we end
up aborting the current transaction but never unpin the log, which leaves
concurrent tasks that are trying to sync the log (as part of an fsync
request from user space) blocked forever and preventing the filesystem
from being unmountable.

Fix this by safely unpinning the log.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      3dc9e8f7
    • F
      Btrfs: don't do unnecessary delalloc flushes when relocating · 9cfa3e34
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      Before we start the actual relocation process of a block group, we do
calls to flush delalloc of all inodes and then wait for ordered extents
to complete. However we do these flush calls just to make sure we don't
race with concurrent tasks that have actually already started to run
delalloc and have allocated an extent from the block group we want to
relocate, right before we set it to readonly mode, but have not yet
created the respective ordered extents. The flush calls make us wait
for such concurrent tasks because they end up calling
filemap_fdatawrite_range() (through btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() ->
__start_delalloc_inodes() -> btrfs_alloc_delalloc_work() ->
btrfs_run_delalloc_work()) which ends up serializing us with those tasks
due to attempts to lock the same pages (and the delalloc flush procedure
calls the allocator and creates the ordered extents before unlocking the
pages).

These flushing calls not only make us waste time (cpu, IO) but also reduce
the chances of writing larger extents (applications might be writing to
contiguous ranges and we flush before they finish dirtying the whole
ranges).

So make sure we don't flush delalloc and just wait for concurrent tasks
that have already started flushing delalloc and have allocated an extent
from the block group we are about to relocate.

This change also ends up fixing a race with direct IO writes that makes
relocation not wait for direct IO ordered extents. This race is
illustrated by the following diagram:

        CPU 1                                       CPU 2

 btrfs_relocate_block_group(bg X)

                                           starts direct IO write,
                                           target inode currently has no
                                           ordered extents ongoing nor
                                           dirty pages (delalloc regions),
                                           therefore the root for our inode
                                           is not in the list
                                           fs_info->ordered_roots

                                           btrfs_direct_IO()
                                             __blockdev_direct_IO()
                                               btrfs_get_blocks_direct()
                                                 btrfs_lock_extent_direct()
                                                   locks range in the io tree
                                                 btrfs_new_extent_direct()
                                                   btrfs_reserve_extent()
                                                     --> extent allocated
                                                         from bg X

   btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(bg X)

   btrfs_start_delalloc_roots()
     __start_delalloc_inodes()
       --> does nothing, no dealloc ranges
           in the inode's io tree so the
           inode's root is not in the list
           fs_info->delalloc_roots

   btrfs_wait_ordered_roots()
     --> does not find the inode's root in the
         list fs_info->ordered_roots

     --> ends up not waiting for the direct IO
         write started by the task at CPU 2

   relocate_block_group(rc->stage ==
     MOVE_DATA_EXTENTS)

     prepare_to_relocate()
       btrfs_commit_transaction()

     iterates the extent tree, using its
     commit root and moves extents into new
     locations

                                                   btrfs_add_ordered_extent_dio()
                                                     --> now a ordered extent is
                                                         created and added to the
                                                         list root->ordered_extents
                                                         and the root added to the
                                                         list fs_info->ordered_roots
                                                     --> this is too late and the
                                                         task at CPU 1 already
                                                         started the relocation

     btrfs_commit_transaction()

                                                   btrfs_finish_ordered_io()
                                                     btrfs_alloc_reserved_file_extent()
                                                       --> adds delayed data reference
                                                           for the extent allocated
                                                           from bg X

   relocate_block_group(rc->stage ==
     UPDATE_DATA_PTRS)

     prepare_to_relocate()
       btrfs_commit_transaction()
         --> delayed refs are run, so an extent
             item for the allocated extent from
             bg X is added to extent tree
         --> commit roots are switched, so the
             next scan in the extent tree will
             see the extent item

     sees the extent in the extent tree

When this happens the relocation produces the following warning when it
finishes:

[ 7260.832836] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 7260.834653] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 6765 at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4318 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x245/0x2a1 [btrfs]()
[ 7260.838268] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor ppdev raid6_pq psmouse sg acpi_cpufreq evdev i2c_piix4 tpm_tis serio_raw tpm i2c_core pcspkr parport_pc
[ 7260.850935] CPU: 5 PID: 6765 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 4.5.0-rc6-btrfs-next-28+ #1
[ 7260.852998] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[ 7260.852998]  0000000000000000 ffff88020bf57bc0 ffffffff812648b3 0000000000000000
[ 7260.852998]  0000000000000009 ffff88020bf57bf8 ffffffff81051608 ffffffffa03c1b2d
[ 7260.852998]  ffff8800b2bbb800 0000000000000000 ffff8800b17bcc58 ffff8800399dd000
[ 7260.852998] Call Trace:
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff812648b3>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff81051608>] warn_slowpath_common+0x99/0xb2
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffffa03c1b2d>] ? btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x245/0x2a1 [btrfs]
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff810516d4>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffffa03c1b2d>] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x245/0x2a1 [btrfs]
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffffa039d9de>] btrfs_relocate_chunk.isra.29+0x66/0xdb [btrfs]
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffffa039f314>] btrfs_balance+0xde1/0xe4e [btrfs]
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff8127d671>] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x19
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffffa03a9583>] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x255/0x2d3 [btrfs]
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffffa03ac96a>] btrfs_ioctl+0x11e0/0x1dff [btrfs]
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff811451df>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x443/0xd63
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff81491817>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x44
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff8108b36a>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff811876ab>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff81187cb2>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff81190c30>] ? __fget_light+0x4d/0x71
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff81187d77>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff81492017>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6b
[ 7260.893268] ---[ end trace eb7803b24ebab8ad ]---

This is because at the end of the first stage, in relocate_block_group(),
we commit the current transaction, which makes delayed refs run, the
commit roots are switched and so the second stage will find the extent
item that the ordered extent added to the delayed refs. But this extent
was not moved (ordered extent completed after first stage finished), so
at the end of the relocation our block group item still has a positive
used bytes counter, triggering a warning at the end of
btrfs_relocate_block_group(). Later on when trying to read the extent
contents from disk we hit a BUG_ON() due to the inability to map a block
with a logical address that belongs to the block group we relocated and
is no longer valid, resulting in the following trace:

[ 7344.885290] BTRFS critical (device sdi): unable to find logical 12845056 len 4096
[ 7344.887518] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 7344.888431] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:1833!
[ 7344.888431] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[ 7344.888431] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor ppdev raid6_pq psmouse sg acpi_cpufreq evdev i2c_piix4 tpm_tis serio_raw tpm i2c_core pcspkr parport_pc
[ 7344.888431] CPU: 0 PID: 6831 Comm: od Tainted: G        W       4.5.0-rc6-btrfs-next-28+ #1
[ 7344.888431] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[ 7344.888431] task: ffff880215818600 ti: ffff880204684000 task.ti: ffff880204684000
[ 7344.888431] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa037c88c>]  [<ffffffffa037c88c>] btrfs_merge_bio_hook+0x54/0x6b [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431] RSP: 0018:ffff8802046878f0  EFLAGS: 00010282
[ 7344.888431] RAX: 00000000ffffffea RBX: 0000000000001000 RCX: 0000000000000001
[ 7344.888431] RDX: ffff88023ec0f950 RSI: ffffffff8183b638 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
[ 7344.888431] RBP: ffff880204687908 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 7344.888431] R10: ffff880204687770 R11: ffffffff82f2d52d R12: 0000000000001000
[ 7344.888431] R13: ffff88021afbfee8 R14: 0000000000006208 R15: ffff88006cd199b0
[ 7344.888431] FS:  00007f1f9e1d6700(0000) GS:ffff88023ec00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 7344.888431] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 7344.888431] CR2: 00007f1f9dc8cb60 CR3: 000000023e3b6000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
[ 7344.888431] Stack:
[ 7344.888431]  0000000000001000 0000000000001000 ffff880204687b98 ffff880204687950
[ 7344.888431]  ffffffffa0395c8f ffffea0004d64d48 0000000000000000 0000000000001000
[ 7344.888431]  ffffea0004d64d48 0000000000001000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
[ 7344.888431] Call Trace:
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa0395c8f>] submit_extent_page+0xf5/0x16f [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa03970ac>] __do_readpage+0x4a0/0x4f1 [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa039680d>] ? btrfs_create_repair_bio+0xcb/0xcb [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa037eeb4>] ? btrfs_writepage_start_hook+0xbc/0xbc [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff8108df55>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa039728c>] __do_contiguous_readpages.constprop.26+0xc2/0xe4 [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa037eeb4>] ? btrfs_writepage_start_hook+0xbc/0xbc [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa039739b>] __extent_readpages.constprop.25+0xed/0x100 [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff81129d24>] ? lru_cache_add+0xe/0x10
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa0397ea8>] extent_readpages+0x160/0x1aa [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa037eeb4>] ? btrfs_writepage_start_hook+0xbc/0xbc [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff8115daad>] ? alloc_pages_current+0xa9/0xcd
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa037cdc9>] btrfs_readpages+0x1f/0x21 [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff81128316>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x168/0x1fc
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff811285a0>] ondemand_readahead+0x1f6/0x207
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff811285a0>] ? ondemand_readahead+0x1f6/0x207
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff8111cf34>] ? pagecache_get_page+0x2b/0x154
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff8112870e>] page_cache_sync_readahead+0x3d/0x3f
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff8111dbf7>] generic_file_read_iter+0x197/0x4e1
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff8117773a>] __vfs_read+0x79/0x9d
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff81178050>] vfs_read+0x8f/0xd2
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff81178a38>] SyS_read+0x50/0x7e
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff81492017>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6b
[ 7344.888431] Code: 8d 4d e8 45 31 c9 45 31 c0 48 8b 00 48 c1 e2 09 48 8b 80 80 fc ff ff 4c 89 65 e8 48 8b b8 f0 01 00 00 e8 1d 42 02 00 85 c0 79 02 <0f> 0b 4c 0
[ 7344.888431] RIP  [<ffffffffa037c88c>] btrfs_merge_bio_hook+0x54/0x6b [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431]  RSP <ffff8802046878f0>
[ 7344.970544] ---[ end trace eb7803b24ebab8ae ]---
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      9cfa3e34
    • F
      Btrfs: don't wait for unrelated IO to finish before relocation · 578def7c
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      Before the relocation process of a block group starts, it sets the block
group to readonly mode, then flushes all delalloc writes and then finally
it waits for all ordered extents to complete. This last step includes
waiting for ordered extents destinated at extents allocated in other block
groups, making us waste unecessary time.

So improve this by waiting only for ordered extents that fall into the
block group's range.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      578def7c
    • F
      Btrfs: fix empty symlink after creating symlink and fsync parent dir · 3f9749f6
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      If we create a symlink, fsync its parent directory, crash/power fail and
mount the filesystem, we end up with an empty symlink, which not only is
useless it's also not allowed in linux (the man page symlink(2) is well
explicit about that).  So we just need to make sure to fully log an inode
if it's a symlink, to ensure its inline extent gets logged, ensuring the
same behaviour as ext3, ext4, xfs, reiserfs, f2fs, nilfs2, etc.

Example reproducer:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
  $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
  $ mkdir /mnt/testdir
  $ sync
  $ ln -s /mnt/foo /mnt/testdir/bar
  $ xfs_io -c fsync /mnt/testdir
  <power fail>
  $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
  $ readlink /mnt/testdir/bar
  <empty string>

A test case for fstests follows soon.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      3f9749f6
    • F
      Btrfs: fix for incorrect directory entries after fsync log replay · 657ed1aa
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      If we move a directory to a new parent and later log that parent and don't
explicitly log the old parent, when we replay the log we can end up with
entries for the moved directory in both the old and new parent directories.
Besides being ilegal to have directories with multiple hard links in linux,
it also resulted in the leaving the inode item with a link count of 1.
A similar issue also happens if we move a regular file - after the log tree
is replayed the file has a link in both the old and new parent directories,
when it should be only at the new directory.

Sample reproducer:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
  $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt
  $ mkdir /mnt/x
  $ mkdir /mnt/y
  $ touch /mnt/x/foo
  $ mkdir /mnt/y/z
  $ sync
  $ ln /mnt/x/foo /mnt/x/bar
  $ mv /mnt/y/z /mnt/x/z
  < power fail >
  $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt
  $ ls -1Ri /mnt
  /mnt:
  257 x
  258 y

  /mnt/x:
  259 bar
  259 foo
  260 z

  /mnt/x/z:

  /mnt/y:
  260 z

  /mnt/y/z:

  $ umount /dev/sdc
  $ btrfs check /dev/sdc
  Checking filesystem on /dev/sdc
  UUID: a67e2c4a-a4b4-4fdc-b015-9d9af1e344be
  checking extents
  checking free space cache
  checking fs roots
  root 5 inode 260 errors 2000, link count wrong
        unresolved ref dir 257 index 4 namelen 1 name z filetype 2 errors 0
        unresolved ref dir 258 index 2 namelen 1 name z filetype 2 errors 0
  (...)

Attempting to remove the directory becomes impossible:

  $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt
  $ rmdir /mnt/y/z
  $ ls -lh /mnt/y
  ls: cannot access /mnt/y/z: No such file or directory
  total 0
  d????????? ? ? ? ?            ? z
  $ rmdir /mnt/x/z
  rmdir: failed to remove ‘/mnt/x/z’: Stale file handle
  $ ls -lh /mnt/x
  ls: cannot access /mnt/x/z: Stale file handle
  total 0
  -rw-r--r-- 2 root root 0 Apr  6 18:06 bar
  -rw-r--r-- 2 root root 0 Apr  6 18:06 foo
  d????????? ? ?    ?    ?            ? z

So make sure that on rename we set the last_unlink_trans value for our
inode, even if it's a directory, to the value of the current transaction's
ID and that if the new parent directory is logged that we fallback to a
transaction commit.

A test case for fstests is being submitted as well.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      657ed1aa
  17. 12 5月, 2016 2 次提交
    • D
      btrfs: build fixup for qgroup_account_snapshot · 2c1984f2
      由 David Sterba 提交于 
      The macro btrfs_std_error got renamed to btrfs_handle_fs_error in an
independent branch for the same merge target (4.7). To make the code
compilable for bisectability reasons, add a temporary stub.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      2c1984f2
    • Q
      btrfs: qgroup: Fix qgroup accounting when creating snapshot · 6426c7ad
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      Current btrfs qgroup design implies a requirement that after calling
btrfs_qgroup_account_extents() there must be a commit root switch.

Normally this is OK, as btrfs_qgroup_accounting_extents() is only called
inside btrfs_commit_transaction() just be commit_cowonly_roots().

However there is a exception at create_pending_snapshot(), which will
call btrfs_qgroup_account_extents() but no any commit root switch.

In case of creating a snapshot whose parent root is itself (create a
snapshot of fs tree), it will corrupt qgroup by the following trace:
(skipped unrelated data)
======
btrfs_qgroup_account_extent: bytenr = 29786112, num_bytes = 16384, nr_old_roots = 0, nr_new_roots = 1
qgroup_update_counters: qgid = 5, cur_old_count = 0, cur_new_count = 1, rfer = 0, excl = 0
qgroup_update_counters: qgid = 5, cur_old_count = 0, cur_new_count = 1, rfer = 16384, excl = 16384
btrfs_qgroup_account_extent: bytenr = 29786112, num_bytes = 16384, nr_old_roots = 0, nr_new_roots = 0
======

The problem here is in first qgroup_account_extent(), the
nr_new_roots of the extent is 1, which means its reference got
increased, and qgroup increased its rfer and excl.

But at second qgroup_account_extent(), its reference got decreased, but
between these two qgroup_account_extent(), there is no switch roots.
This leads to the same nr_old_roots, and this extent just got ignored by
qgroup, which means this extent is wrongly accounted.

Fix it by call commit_cowonly_roots() after qgroup_account_extent() in
create_pending_snapshot(), with needed preparation.

Mark: I added a check at the top of qgroup_account_snapshot() to skip this
code if qgroups are turned off. xfstest btrfs/122 exposes this problem.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      6426c7ad
  19. 10 5月, 2016 2 次提交