Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 28 2月, 2019 2 次提交
    • A
      bpf: expose program stats via bpf_prog_info · 5f8f8b93
      由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于 
      Return bpf program run_time_ns and run_cnt via bpf_prog_info
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      5f8f8b93
    • A
      bpf: enable program stats · 492ecee8
      由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于 
      JITed BPF programs are indistinguishable from kernel functions, but unlike
kernel code BPF code can be changed often.
Typical approach of "perf record" + "perf report" profiling and tuning of
kernel code works just as well for BPF programs, but kernel code doesn't
need to be monitored whereas BPF programs do.
Users load and run large amount of BPF programs.
These BPF stats allow tools monitor the usage of BPF on the server.
The monitoring tools will turn sysctl kernel.bpf_stats_enabled
on and off for few seconds to sample average cost of the programs.
Aggregated data over hours and days will provide an insight into cost of BPF
and alarms can trigger in case given program suddenly gets more expensive.

The cost of two sched_clock() per program invocation adds ~20 nsec.
Fast BPF progs (like selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c) will slow down
from ~10 nsec to ~30 nsec.
static_key minimizes the cost of the stats collection.
There is no measurable difference before/after this patch
with kernel.bpf_stats_enabled=0
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      492ecee8
  3. 26 2月, 2019 7 次提交
    • D
      Merge branch 'bpf-libbpf-af-xdp' · 143bdc2e
      由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于 
      Magnus Karlsson says:

====================
This patch proposes to add AF_XDP support to libbpf. The main reason
for this is to facilitate writing applications that use AF_XDP by
offering higher-level APIs that hide many of the details of the AF_XDP
uapi. This is in the same vein as libbpf facilitates XDP adoption by
offering easy-to-use higher level interfaces of XDP
functionality. Hopefully this will facilitate adoption of AF_XDP, make
applications using it simpler and smaller, and finally also make it
possible for applications to benefit from optimizations in the AF_XDP
user space access code. Previously, people just copied and pasted the
code from the sample application into their application, which is not
desirable.

The proposed interface is composed of two parts:

* Low-level access interface to the four rings and the packet
* High-level control plane interface for creating and setting up umems
  and AF_XDP sockets. This interface also loads a simple XDP program
  that routes all traffic on a queue up to the AF_XDP socket.

The sample program has been updated to use this new interface and in
that process it lost roughly 300 lines of code. I cannot detect any
performance degradations due to the use of this library instead of the
previous functions that were inlined in the sample application. But I
did measure this on a slower machine and not the Broadwell that we
normally use.

The rings are now called xsk_ring and when a producer operates on
it. It is xsk_ring_prod and for a consumer it is xsk_ring_cons. This
way we can get some compile time error checking that the rings are
used correctly.

Comments and contenplations:

* The current behaviour is that the library loads an XDP program (if
  requested to do so) but the clean up of this program is left to the
  application. It would be possible to implement this cleanup in the
  library, but it would require state to be kept on netdev level,
  which there is none at the moment, and the synchronization of this
  between processes. All this adding complexity. But when we get an
  XDP program per queue id, then it becomes trivial to also remove the
  XDP program when the application exits. This proposal from Jesper,
  Björn and others will also improve the performance of libbpf, since
  most of the XDP program code can be removed when that feature is
  supported.

* In a future release, I am planning on adding a higher level data
  plane interface too. This will be based around recvmsg and sendmsg
  with the use of struct iovec for batching, without the user having
  to know anything about the underlying four rings of an AF_XDP
  socket. There will be one semantic difference though from the
  standard recvmsg and that is that the kernel will fill in the iovecs
  instead of the application. But the rest should be the same as the
  libc versions so that application writers feel at home.

Patch 1: adds AF_XDP support in libbpf
Patch 2: updates the xdpsock sample application to use the libbpf functions
Patch 3: Documentation update to help first time users

Changes v5 to v6:
  * Fixed prog_fd bug found by Xiaolong Ye. Thanks!
Changes v4 to v5:
  * Added a FAQ to the documentation
  * Removed xsk_umem__get_data and renamed xsk_umem__get_dat_raw to
    xsk_umem__get_data
  * Replaced the netlink code with bpf_get_link_xdp_id()
  * Dynamic allocation of the map sizes. They are now sized after
    the max number of queueus on the netdev in question.
Changes v3 to v4:
  * Dropped the pr_*() patch in favor of Yonghong Song's patch set
  * Addressed the review comments of Daniel Borkmann, mainly leaking
    of file descriptors at clean up and making the data plane APIs
    all static inline (with the exception of xsk_umem__get_data that
    uses an internal structure I do not want to expose).
  * Fixed the netlink callback as suggested by Maciej Fijalkowski.
  * Removed an unecessary include in the sample program as spotted by
    Ilia Fillipov.
Changes v2 to v3:
  * Added automatic loading of a simple XDP program that routes all
    traffic on a queue up to the AF_XDP socket. This program loading
    can be disabled.
  * Updated function names to be consistent with the libbpf naming
    convention
  * Moved all code to xsk.[ch]
  * Removed all the XDP program loading code from the sample since
    this is now done by libbpf
  * The initialization functions now return a handle as suggested by
    Alexei
  * const statements added in the API where applicable.
Changes v1 to v2:
  * Fixed cleanup of library state on error.
  * Moved API to initial version
  * Prefixed all public functions by xsk__ instead of xsk_
  * Added comment about changed default ring sizes, batch size and umem
    size in the sample application commit message
  * The library now only creates an Rx or Tx ring if the respective
    parameter is != NULL
====================
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      143bdc2e
    • M
      xsk: add FAQ to facilitate for first time users · 0f4a9b7d
      由 Magnus Karlsson 提交于 
      Added an FAQ section in Documentation/networking/af_xdp.rst to help
first time users with common problems. As problems are getting
identified, entries will be added to the FAQ.
Signed-off-by: NMagnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      0f4a9b7d
    • M
      samples/bpf: convert xdpsock to use libbpf for AF_XDP access · 248c7f9c
      由 Magnus Karlsson 提交于 
      This commit converts the xdpsock sample application to use the AF_XDP
functions present in libbpf. This cuts down the size of it by nearly
300 lines of code.

The default ring sizes plus the batch size has been increased and the
size of the umem area has decreased. This so that the sample application
will provide higher throughput. Note also that the shared umem code
has been removed from the sample as this is not supported by libbpf
at this point in time.
Tested-by: NBjörn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMagnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      248c7f9c
    • M
      libbpf: add support for using AF_XDP sockets · 1cad0788
      由 Magnus Karlsson 提交于 
      This commit adds AF_XDP support to libbpf. The main reason for this is
to facilitate writing applications that use AF_XDP by offering
higher-level APIs that hide many of the details of the AF_XDP
uapi. This is in the same vein as libbpf facilitates XDP adoption by
offering easy-to-use higher level interfaces of XDP
functionality. Hopefully this will facilitate adoption of AF_XDP, make
applications using it simpler and smaller, and finally also make it
possible for applications to benefit from optimizations in the AF_XDP
user space access code. Previously, people just copied and pasted the
code from the sample application into their application, which is not
desirable.

The interface is composed of two parts:

* Low-level access interface to the four rings and the packet
* High-level control plane interface for creating and setting
  up umems and af_xdp sockets as well as a simple XDP program.
Tested-by: NBjörn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMagnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      1cad0788
    • S
      selftests/bpf: make sure signal interrupts BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN · 740f8a65
      由 Stanislav Fomichev 提交于 
      Simple test that I used to reproduce the issue in the previous commit:
Do BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with max iterations, each program is 4096 simple
move instructions. File alarm in 0.1 second and check that
bpf_prog_test_run is interrupted (i.e. test doesn't hang).

Note: reposting this for bpf-next to avoid linux-next conflict. In this
version I test both BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER (which uses generic
bpf_test_run implementation) and BPF_PROG_TYPE_FLOW_DISSECTOR (which has
it own loop with preempt handling in bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector).
Signed-off-by: NStanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      740f8a65
    • S
      bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN for flow dissector · a439184d
      由 Stanislav Fomichev 提交于 
      Syzbot found out that running BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with repeat=0xffffffff
makes process unkillable. The problem is that when CONFIG_PREEMPT is
enabled, we never see need_resched() return true. This is due to the
fact that preempt_enable() (which we do in bpf_test_run_one on each
iteration) now handles resched if it's needed.

Let's disable preemption for the whole run, not per test. In this case
we can properly see whether resched is needed.
Let's also properly return -EINTR to the userspace in case of a signal
interrupt.

This is a follow up for a recently fixed issue in bpf_test_run, see
commit df1a2cb7 ("bpf/test_run: fix unkillable
BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN").
Reported-by: Nsyzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: NStanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      a439184d
    • A
      bpf: test_bpf: turn off preemption in function __run_once · fd92d664
      由 Anders Roxell 提交于 
      When running BPF test suite the following splat occurs:

[  415.930950] test_bpf: #0 TAX jited:0
[  415.931067] BUG: assuming atomic context at lib/test_bpf.c:6674
[  415.946169] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 11556, name: modprobe
[  415.953176] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[  415.957207] CPU: 1 PID: 11556 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G        W         5.0.0-rc7-next-20190220 #1
[  415.966328] Hardware name: HiKey Development Board (DT)
[  415.971592] Call trace:
[  415.974069]  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x160
[  415.977761]  show_stack+0x24/0x30
[  415.981104]  dump_stack+0xc8/0x114
[  415.984534]  __cant_sleep+0xf0/0x108
[  415.988145]  test_bpf_init+0x5e0/0x1000 [test_bpf]
[  415.992971]  do_one_initcall+0x90/0x428
[  415.996837]  do_init_module+0x60/0x1e4
[  416.000614]  load_module+0x1de0/0x1f50
[  416.004391]  __se_sys_finit_module+0xc8/0xe0
[  416.008691]  __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x24/0x30
[  416.013255]  el0_svc_common+0x78/0x130
[  416.017031]  el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78
[  416.020806]  el0_svc+0x8/0xc

Rework so that preemption is disabled when we loop over function
'BPF_PROG_RUN(...)'.

Fixes: 568f1967 ("bpf: check that BPF programs run with preemption disabled")
Suggested-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NAnders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      fd92d664
  5. 22 2月, 2019 2 次提交
  7. 20 2月, 2019 3 次提交
  9. 19 2月, 2019 12 次提交
  11. 18 2月, 2019 14 次提交