Fix following sparse warnings:
arch/sparc/prom/bootstr_32.c:32:35: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
arch/sparc/prom/memory.c:61:13: warning: symbol 'prom_meminit' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/sparc/prom/misc_32.c:74:1: error: symbol 'prom_halt' redeclared with different type (originally declared at arch/sparc/include/asm/oplib_32.h:67) - different modifiers
arch/sparc/prom/ranges.c:16:26: warning: symbol 'promlib_obio_ranges' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/sparc/prom/ranges.c:17:5: warning: symbol 'num_obio_ranges' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/sparc/prom/ranges.c:39:1: warning: symbol 'prom_adjust_ranges' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/sparc/prom/ranges.c:69:13: warning: symbol 'prom_ranges_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/sparc/prom/tree_32.c:286:22: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
arch/sparc/prom/tree_32.c:286:38: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer

None of the warnings indicated any serious issues.

We are now sparse clean for 32 bit build in arch/sparc/prom.
Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

- rename files where sparc64 uses identical names to *_32.c
- refactor Makefile (but keep linking order)
Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

While doing some easy cleanups on the sparc code I noticed that the
CONFIG_SUN4 code seems to be worse than the rest - there were some
"I don't know how it should work, but the current code definitely cannot
work." places.

And while I have seen people running Linux on machines like a
SPARCstation 5 a few years ago I don't recall having seen sun4
machines, even less ones running Linux.
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This patch removes the CVS keywords that weren't updated for a long time
from comments.
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!