1. 21 11月, 2014 1 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: make xattr replace operations atomic · 5f5bc6b1
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      Replacing a xattr consists of doing a lookup for its existing value, delete
      the current value from the respective leaf, release the search path and then
      finally insert the new value. This leaves a time window where readers (getxattr,
      listxattrs) won't see any value for the xattr. Xattrs are used to store ACLs,
      so this has security implications.
      
      This change also fixes 2 other existing issues which were:
      
      *) Deleting the old xattr value without verifying first if the new xattr will
         fit in the existing leaf item (in case multiple xattrs are packed in the
         same item due to name hash collision);
      
      *) Returning -EEXIST when the flag XATTR_CREATE is given and the xattr doesn't
         exist but we have have an existing item that packs muliple xattrs with
         the same name hash as the input xattr. In this case we should return ENOSPC.
      
      A test case for xfstests follows soon.
      
      Thanks to Alexandre Oliva for reporting the non-atomicity of the xattr replace
      implementation.
      Reported-by: NAlexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org>
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      5f5bc6b1
  2. 18 9月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 29 1月, 2014 2 次提交
  4. 12 11月, 2013 2 次提交
  5. 07 5月, 2013 3 次提交
  6. 18 12月, 2012 1 次提交
    • C
      Btrfs: fix hash overflow handling · 9c52057c
      Chris Mason 提交于
      The handling for directory crc hash overflows was fairly obscure,
      split_leaf returns EOVERFLOW when we try to extend the item and that is
      supposed to bubble up to userland.  For a while it did so, but along the
      way we added better handling of errors and forced the FS readonly if we
      hit IO errors during the directory insertion.
      
      Along the way, we started testing only for EEXIST and the EOVERFLOW case
      was dropped.  The end result is that we may force the FS readonly if we
      catch a directory hash bucket overflow.
      
      This fixes a few problem spots.  First I add tests for EOVERFLOW in the
      places where we can safely just return the error up the chain.
      
      btrfs_rename is harder though, because it tries to insert the new
      directory item only after it has already unlinked anything the rename
      was going to overwrite.  Rather than adding very complex logic, I added
      a helper to test for the hash overflow case early while it is still safe
      to bail out.
      
      Snapshot and subvolume creation had a similar problem, so they are using
      the new helper now too.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      Reported-by: NPascal Junod <pascal@junod.info>
      9c52057c
  7. 22 3月, 2012 2 次提交
  8. 02 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  9. 11 7月, 2011 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: try to only do one btrfs_search_slot in do_setxattr · fa09200b
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      I've been watching how many btrfs_search_slot()'s we do and I noticed that when
      we create a file with selinux enabled we were doing 2 each time we initialize
      the security context.  That's because we lookup the xattr first so we can delete
      it if we're setting a new value to an existing xattr.  But in the create case we
      don't have any xattrs, so it is completely useless to have the extra lookup.  So
      re-arrange things so that we only lookup first if we specifically have
      XATTR_REPLACE.  That way in the basic case we only do 1 search, and in the more
      complicated case we do the normal 2 lookups.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      fa09200b
  10. 24 5月, 2011 2 次提交
  11. 22 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  12. 21 5月, 2011 1 次提交
    • M
      btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation · 16cdcec7
      Miao Xie 提交于
      Changelog V5 -> V6:
      - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the
        root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go.
      
      Changelog V4 -> V5:
      - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by
        Chris Mason.
      - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch.
      - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by
        Itaru Kitayama.
      
      Changelog V3 -> V4:
      - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache
        inode in time.
      
      Changelog V2 -> V3:
      - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items
        balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh.
      - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment.
      - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason
      
      Changelog V1 -> V2:
      - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes,
        which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the
        delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item.
      - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes.
      
      Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs
      is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions,
      such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on.
      
      If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the
      performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name
      index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update.
      
      Implementation:
      - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to
        manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory.
        One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the
        other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with
        by the work thread.
      - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name
        index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to
        manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree.
      - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used
        to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion
        and deletion and the delayed inode update.
        When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some
        delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then
        go back.
        When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all
        the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work
        queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some
        threshold value.
      - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the
        information into the delayed inserting rb-tree.
        And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items
        balance. (The balance policy is above.)
      - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it
        in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not,
        add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree.
        Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the
        delayed items and do delayed items balance.
        (The same to inserting manipulation)
      - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the
        inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after
        dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion.
      - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the
        delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more
        inode updates.
      - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node.
      - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode.
      - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items
        and the delayed inode update.
      
      I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the
      performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%.
      
      Before applying this patch:
      Create files:
              Total files: 50000
              Total time: 1.096108
              Average time: 0.000022
      Delete files:
              Total files: 50000
              Total time: 1.510403
              Average time: 0.000030
      
      After applying this patch:
      Create files:
              Total files: 50000
              Total time: 0.932899
              Average time: 0.000019
      Delete files:
              Total files: 50000
              Total time: 1.215732
              Average time: 0.000024
      
      [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3
      
      Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help!
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dave@jikos.cz>
      Tested-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Tested-by: NItaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      16cdcec7
  13. 02 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  14. 28 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  15. 18 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  16. 30 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  17. 18 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  18. 22 9月, 2009 1 次提交
    • Y
      Btrfs: change how subvolumes are organized · 4df27c4d
      Yan, Zheng 提交于
      btrfs allows subvolumes and snapshots anywhere in the directory tree.
      If we snapshot a subvolume that contains a link to other subvolume
      called subvolA, subvolA can be accessed through both the original
      subvolume and the snapshot. This is similar to creating hard link to
      directory, and has the very similar problems.
      
      The aim of this patch is enforcing there is only one access point to
      each subvolume. Only the first directory entry (the one added when
      the subvolume/snapshot was created) is treated as valid access point.
      The first directory entry is distinguished by checking root forward
      reference. If the corresponding root forward reference is missing,
      we know the entry is not the first one.
      
      This patch also adds snapshot/subvolume rename support, the code
      allows rename subvolume link across subvolumes.
      Signed-off-by: NYan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      4df27c4d
  19. 25 3月, 2009 1 次提交
    • C
      Btrfs: leave btree locks spinning more often · b9473439
      Chris Mason 提交于
      btrfs_mark_buffer dirty would set dirty bits in the extent_io tree
      for the buffers it was dirtying.  This may require a kmalloc and it
      was not atomic.  So, anyone who called btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty had to
      set any btree locks they were holding to blocking first.
      
      This commit changes dirty tracking for extent buffers to just use a flag
      in the extent buffer.  Now that we have one and only one extent buffer
      per page, this can be safely done without losing dirty bits along the way.
      
      This also introduces a path->leave_spinning flag that callers of
      btrfs_search_slot can use to indicate they will properly deal with a
      path returned where all the locks are spinning instead of blocking.
      
      Many of the btree search callers now expect spinning paths,
      resulting in better btree concurrency overall.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      b9473439
  20. 06 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  21. 30 9月, 2008 1 次提交
    • C
      Btrfs: add and improve comments · d352ac68
      Chris Mason 提交于
      This improves the comments at the top of many functions.  It didn't
      dive into the guts of functions because I was trying to
      avoid merging problems with the new allocator and back reference work.
      
      extent-tree.c and volumes.c were both skipped, and there is definitely
      more work todo in cleaning and commenting the code.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      d352ac68
  22. 25 9月, 2008 8 次提交
  23. 11 7月, 2007 1 次提交
  24. 23 6月, 2007 1 次提交
  25. 14 6月, 2007 1 次提交
    • A
      btrfs: Code cleanup · f1ace244
      Aneesh 提交于
      Attaching below is some of the code cleanups that i came across while
      reading the code.
      
      a) alloc_path already calls init_path.
      b) Mention that btrfs_inode is the in memory copy.Ext4 have ext4_inode_info as
      the in memory copy ext4_inode as the disk copy
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      f1ace244
  26. 12 6月, 2007 1 次提交
  27. 24 5月, 2007 1 次提交