- 22 1月, 2020 3 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
GICv4.1 defines a new VPE table that is potentially shared between both the ITSs and the redistributors, following complicated affinity rules. To make things more confusing, the programming of this table at the redistributor level is reusing the GICv4.0 GICR_VPROPBASER register for something completely different. The code flow is somewhat complexified by the need to respect the affinities required by the HW, meaning that tables can either be inherited from a previously discovered ITS or redistributor. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NZenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191224111055.11836-6-maz@kernel.org
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
While GICv4.0 mandates 16 bit worth of VPEIDs, GICv4.1 allows smaller implementations to be built. Add the required glue to dynamically compute the limit. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NZenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191224111055.11836-3-maz@kernel.org
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
When updating an LPI configuration, get_vlpi_map() may be passed a irq_data structure relative to an ITS domain (the normal case) or one that is relative to the core GICv3 domain in the case of a GICv4 doorbell. In the latter case, special care must be take not to dereference the irq_chip data as an its_dev structure, as that isn't what is stored there. Instead, check *first* whether the IRQ is forwarded to a vcpu, and only then try to obtain the vlpi mapping. Fixes: c1d4d5cd ("irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add its_vlpi_map helpers") Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reported-by: NZenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200122085609.658-1-yuzenghui@huawei.com
-
- 11 11月, 2019 12 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
The VLPI map is currently a mutex, and that's a bad idea as this lock can be taken in non-preemptible contexts. Convert it to a raw spinlock, and turn the memory allocation of the VLPI map to be atomic. Reported-by: NHeyi Guo <guoheyi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191108165805.3071-12-maz@kernel.org
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Obtaining the mapping ivformation for a VLPI should always be done with the vlpi_lock for this device held. Otherwise, we expose ourselves to races against a concurrent unmap. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191108165805.3071-11-maz@kernel.org
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
We have so far always injected/cleared VLPIs using either INT+SYNC or CLEAR+SYNC sequences, but that's pretty wrong for two reasons: - SYNC only synchronises physical LPIs - The collection ID that for the associated LPI doesn't match the redistributor the vPE is associated with Instead, send an {INT,CLEAR}+VSYNC for forwarded LPIs, ensuring that the ITS synchronises against the virtual pending table. Reported-by: NZenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191108165805.3071-10-maz@kernel.org
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
We have so far alwways invalidated VLPIs usinc an INV+SYNC sequence, but that's pretty wrong for two reasons: - SYNC only synchronises physical LPIs - The collection ID that for the associated LPI doesn't match the redistributor the vPE is associated with Instead, send an INV+VSYNC for forwarded LPIs, ensuring that the ITS can properly synchronise the invalidation of VLPIs. Fixes: 015ec038 ("irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add VLPI configuration handling") Reported-by: NZenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191108165805.3071-9-maz@kernel.org
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Obtaining the mapping information for a VLPI is something quite common, and the GICv4.1 code is going to make even more use of it. Expose it as a separate set of helpers. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NZenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191027144234.8395-8-maz@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191108165805.3071-8-maz@kernel.org
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Now that we have a copy of TYPER in the ITS structure, rely on this to provide the same service as its->device_ids, which gets axed. Errata workarounds are now updating the cached fields instead of requiring a separate field in the ITS structure. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NZenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191027144234.8395-7-maz@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191108165805.3071-7-maz@kernel.org
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Now that we have a copy of TYPER in the ITS structure, rely on this to provide the same service as its->ite_size, which gets axed. Errata workarounds are now updating the cached fields instead of requiring a separate field in the ITS structure. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NZenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191027144234.8395-6-maz@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191108165805.3071-6-maz@kernel.org
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Instead of caching the GICv4 compatibility in a discrete way, cache the TYPER register instead, which can then be used to implement the same functionnality. This will get used more extensively in subsequent patches. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NZenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191027144234.8395-5-maz@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191108165805.3071-5-maz@kernel.org
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
We currently don't make much use of the DirectLPI feature, and it would be beneficial to do this more, if only because it becomes a mandatory feature for GICv4.1. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NZenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191027144234.8395-4-maz@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191108165805.3071-4-maz@kernel.org
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Waiting for a redistributor to have performed an operation is a common thing to do, and the idiom is already spread around. As we're going to make even more use of this, let's have a primitive that does just that. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NZenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191027144234.8395-3-maz@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191108165805.3071-3-maz@kernel.org
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
We allocate the collection mapping on device creation, but somehow free it on the irqdomain free path, which is pretty inconsistent and has led to bugs in the past. Move it to the point where we teardown the device, making the alloc/free symetric. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NZenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191108165805.3071-2-maz@kernel.org
-
由 Ben Dooks (Codethink) 提交于
The its_cmd_block struct can either have u64 or __le64 data in it, so make a anonymous union to remove the sparse warnings when converting to/from these. Signed-off-by: NBen Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191017112955.15853-1-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk
-
- 25 10月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zenghui Yu 提交于
On a system without Single VMOVP support (say GITS_TYPER.VMOVP == 0), we will map vPEs only on ITSs that will actually control interrupts for the given VM. And when moving a vPE, the VMOVP command will be issued only for those ITSs. But when issuing VMOVPs we seemed fail to present the exact ITSList to ITSs who are actually included in the synchronization operation. The its_list_map we're currently using includes all ITSs in the system, even though some of them don't have the corresponding vPE mapping at all. Introduce get_its_list() to get the per-VM its_list_map, to indicate which ITSs have vPE mappings for the given VM, and use this map as the expected ITSList when building VMOVP. This is hopefully a performance gain not to do some synchronization with those unsuspecting ITSs. And initialize the whole command descriptor to zero at beginning, since the seq_num and its_list should be RES0 when GITS_TYPER.VMOVP == 1. Signed-off-by: NZenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1571802386-2680-1-git-send-email-yuzenghui@huawei.com
-
- 05 9月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
When allocating a range of LPIs for a Multi-MSI capable device, this allocation extended to the closest power of 2. But on the release path, the interrupts are released one by one. This results in not releasing the "extra" range, leaking the its_device. Trying to reprobe the device will then fail. Fix it by releasing the LPIs the same way we allocate them. Fixes: 8208d170 ("irqchip/gic-v3-its: Align PCI Multi-MSI allocation on their size") Reported-by: NJiaxing Luo <luojiaxing@huawei.com> Tested-by: NJohn Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f5e948aa-e32f-3f74-ae30-31fee06c2a74@huawei.com
-
- 20 8月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zenghui Yu 提交于
We try to find a free LPI region in device's lpi_map and allocate them (set them to 1) when we want to allocate LPIs for this device. This is what bitmap_find_free_region() has done for us. The following set_bit is redundant and a bit confusing (since we only set_bit against the first allocated LPI idx). Remove it, and make the set_bit explicit by comment. Signed-off-by: NZenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
-
- 07 8月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Do not expose the ITS' VA (it appears in debugfs). Instead, record the PA, which at least can be used to precisely identify the associated irqchip and domain. Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
-
- 26 7月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nianyao Tang 提交于
In its_vpe_init, when its_alloc_vpe_table fails, we should free vpt_page allocated just before, instead of vpe->vpt_page. Let's fix it. Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NNianyao Tang <tangnianyao@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NShaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
-
- 10 7月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
Arguments are supposed to be ordered high then low. Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/ab5deb4fc3cd604cb620054770b7d00016d736bc.1562734889.git.joe@perches.com
-
- 19 6月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as published by the free software foundation this program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license for more details you should have received a copy of the gnu general public license along with this program if not see http www gnu org licenses extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 503 file(s). Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NAlexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAllison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Reviewed-by: NEnrico Weigelt <info@metux.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190602204653.811534538@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 05 6月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Heyi Guo 提交于
When we run several VMs with PCI passthrough and GICv4 enabled, not pinning vCPUs, we will occasionally see below warnings in dmesg: ITS queue timeout (65440 65504 480) ITS cmd its_build_vmovp_cmd failed The reason for the above issue is that in BUILD_SINGLE_CMD_FUNC: 1. Post the write command. 2. Release the lock. 3. Start to read GITS_CREADR to get the reader pointer. 4. Compare the reader pointer to the target pointer. 5. If reader pointer does not reach the target, sleep 1us and continue to try. If we have several processors running the above concurrently, other CPUs will post write commands while the 1st CPU is waiting the completion. So we may have below issue: phase 1: ---rd_idx-----from_idx-----to_idx--0--------- wait 1us: phase 2: --------------from_idx-----to_idx--0-rd_idx-- That is the rd_idx may fly ahead of to_idx, and if in case to_idx is near the wrap point, rd_idx will wrap around. So the below condition will not be met even after 1s: if (from_idx < to_idx && rd_idx >= to_idx) There is another theoretical issue. For a slow and busy ITS, the initial rd_idx may fall behind from_idx a lot, just as below: ---rd_idx---0--from_idx-----to_idx----------- This will cause the wait function exit too early. Actually, it does not make much sense to use from_idx to judge if to_idx is wrapped, but we need a initial rd_idx when lock is still acquired, and it can be used to judge whether to_idx is wrapped and the current rd_idx is wrapped. We switch to a method of calculating the delta of two adjacent reads and accumulating it to get the sum, so that we can get the real rd_idx from the wrapped value even when the queue is almost full. Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Signed-off-by: NHeyi Guo <guoheyi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 03 5月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Julien Grall 提交于
its_irq_compose_msi_msg() may be called from non-preemptible context. However, on RT, iommu_dma_map_msi_msg requires to be called from a preemptible context. A recent change split iommu_dma_map_msi_msg() in two new functions: one that should be called in preemptible context, the other does not have any requirement. The GICv3 ITS driver is reworked to avoid executing preemptible code in non-preemptible context. This can be achieved by preparing the MSI mapping when allocating the MSI interrupt. Signed-off-by: NJulien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 29 4月, 2019 4 次提交
-
-
由 Rasmus Villemoes 提交于
Using list_add + list_sort to insert an element and keeping the list sorted is a somewhat blunt instrument; one can find the right place to insert in fewer lines of code than the cmp callback uses. Moreover, walking the entire list afterwards to merge adjacent ranges is overkill, since we know that only the just-inserted element may be merged with its neighbours. Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Rasmus Villemoes 提交于
There's no reason to ask kmalloc() to zero the allocation, since all the fields get initialized immediately afterwards. Except that there's also not any reason to initialize the ->entry member, since the element gets added to the lpi_range_list immediately. Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Rasmus Villemoes 提交于
There's no reason to do the allocation of the new lpi_range inside the lpi_range_lock. One could change the code to avoid the allocation altogether in case the freed range can be merged with one or two existing ranges (in which case the allocation would naturally be done under the lock), but it's probably not worth complicating the code for that. Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Julien Grall 提交于
The word 'entirely' has been misspelt in a comment in its_msi_prepare(). Signed-off-by: NJulien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 05 4月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Keith Busch 提交于
Parsing entries in an ACPI table had assumed a generic header structure. There is no standard ACPI header, though, so less common layouts with different field sizes required custom parsers to go through their subtable entry list. Create the infrastructure for adding different table types so parsing the entries array may be more reused for all ACPI system tables and the common code doesn't need to be duplicated. Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NJonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Tested-by: NJonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NKeith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> Tested-by: NBrice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 21 3月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rasmus Villemoes 提交于
The lpi_range_list is supposed to be sorted in ascending order of ->base_id (at least if the range merging is to work), but the current comparison function returns a positive value if rb->base_id > ra->base_id, which means that list_sort() will put A after B in that case - and vice versa, of course. Fixes: 880cb3cd (irqchip/gic-v3-its: Refactor LPI allocator) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (v4.19+) Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 21 2月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shanker Donthineni 提交于
The NUMA node information is visible to ITS driver but not being used other than handling hardware errata. ITS/GICR hardware accesses to the local NUMA node is usually quicker than the remote NUMA node. How slow the remote NUMA accesses are depends on the implementation details. This patch allocates memory for ITS management tables and command queue from the corresponding NUMA node using the appropriate NUMA aware functions. This change improves the performance of the ITS tables read latency on systems where it has more than one ITS block, and with the slower inter node accesses. Apache Web server benchmarking using ab tool on a HiSilicon D06 board with multiple numa mem nodes shows Time per request and Transfer rate improvements of ~3.6% with this patch. Signed-off-by: NShanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NHanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NShameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NGanapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 14 2月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zenghui Yu 提交于
In current logic, its_parse_indirect_baser() will be invoked twice when allocating Device tables. Add a *break* to omit the unnecessary and annoying (might be ...) invoking. Fixes: 32bd44dc ("irqchip/gic-v3-its: Fix the incorrect parsing of VCPU table size") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NZenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 29 1月, 2019 3 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
In the unlikely event that we cannot find any available LPI in the system, we should gracefully return an error instead of carrying on with no LPI allocated at all. Fixes: 38dd7c49 ("irqchip/gic-v3-its: Drop chunk allocation compatibility") Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
On systems or VMs where multiple devices share a single DevID (because they sit behind a PCI bridge, or because the HW is broken in funky ways), we reuse the save its_device structure in order to reflect this. It turns out that there is a distinct lack of locking when looking up the its_device, and two device being probed concurrently can result in double allocations. That's obviously not nice. A solution for this is to have a per-ITS mutex that serializes device allocation. A similar issue exists on the freeing side, which can run concurrently with the allocation. On top of now taking the appropriate lock, we also make sure that a shared device is never freed, as we have no way to currently track the life cycle of such object. Reported-by: NZheng Xiang <zhengxiang9@huawei.com> Tested-by: NZheng Xiang <zhengxiang9@huawei.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Heyi Guo 提交于
1. In current implementation, every VLPI will temporarily be mapped to the first CPU in system (normally CPU0) and then moved to the real scheduled CPU later. 2. So there is a time window and a VLPI may be sent to CPU0 instead of the real scheduled vCPU, in a multi-CPU virtual machine. 3. However, CPU0 may have not been scheduled as a virtual CPU after system boots up, so the value of its GICR_VPROPBASER is unknown at that moment. 4. If the INTID of VLPI is larger than 2^(GICR_VPROPBASER.IDbits+1), while IDbits is also in unknown state, GIC will behave as if the VLPI is out of range and simply drop it, which results in interrupt missing in Guest. As no code will clear GICR_VPROPBASER at runtime, we can safely initialize the IDbits field at boot time for each CPU to get rid of this issue. We also clear Valid bit of GICR_VPENDBASER in case any ancient programming gets left in and causes memory corrupting. A new function its_clear_vpend_valid() is added to reuse the code in its_vpe_deschedule(). Fixes: e643d803 ("irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add VPE scheduling") Signed-off-by: NHeyi Guo <guoheyi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NHeyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 18 1月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
The way we allocate events works fine in most cases, except when multiple PCI devices share an ITS-visible DevID, and that one of them is trying to use MultiMSI allocation. In that case, our allocation is not guaranteed to be zero-based anymore, and we have to make sure we allocate it on a boundary that is compatible with the PCI Multi-MSI constraints. Fix this by allocating the full region upfront instead of iterating over the number of MSIs. MSI-X are always allocated one by one, so this shouldn't change anything on that front. Fixes: b48ac83d ("irqchip: GICv3: ITS: MSI support") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 03 10月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Julien Thierry 提交于
LPIs use the same priority value as other GIC interrupts. Make the GIC default priority definition visible to ITS implementation and use this same definition for LPI priorities. Tested-by: NDaniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NJulien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 02 10月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
If the LPI tables have been reserved with the EFI reservation mechanism, we assume that these tables are safe to use even when we find the redistributors to have LPIs enabled at boot time, meaning that kexec can now work with GICv3. You're welcome. Tested-by: NJeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Tested-by: NBhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com> Tested-by: NLei Zhang <zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Upon enabling a redistributor, let's register the allocated tables with the EFI table that tracks the memory reservations. Tested-by: NJeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Tested-by: NBhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com> Tested-by: NLei Zhang <zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
If booting with LPIs enabled, all the redistributors must have the exact same property table. No ifs, no buts. Tested-by: NJeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Tested-by: NBhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com> Tested-by: NLei Zhang <zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-