1. 27 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  2. 17 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  3. 26 7月, 2008 1 次提交
    • A
      coda: remove CODA_FS_OLD_API · de0ca06a
      Adrian Bunk 提交于
      While fixing CONFIG_ leakages to the userspace kernel headers I ran into
      CODA_FS_OLD_API.
      
      After five years, are there still people using the old API left?
      Especially considering that you have to choose at compile time which API
      to support in the kernel (and distributions tend to offer the new API for
      some time).
      
      Jan: "The old API can definitely go.  Around the time the new
            interface went in there were some non-Coda userspace file system
            implementations that took a while longer to convert to the new API,
            but by now they all switched to the new interface or in some cases
            to a FUSE-based solution."
      Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NJan Harkes <jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      de0ca06a
  4. 22 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  5. 25 1月, 2008 1 次提交
  6. 20 7月, 2007 5 次提交
  7. 27 6月, 2006 5 次提交
  8. 29 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  9. 24 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  10. 29 10月, 2005 1 次提交
  11. 21 6月, 2005 1 次提交
  12. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4