- 30 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
The shared (magic) page is a data structure that contains often used supervisor privileged SPRs accessible via memory to the user to reduce the number of exits we have to take to read/write them. When we actually share this structure with the guest we have to maintain it in guest endianness, because some of the patch tricks only work with native endian load/store operations. Since we only share the structure with either host or guest in little endian on book3s_64 pr mode, we don't have to worry about booke or book3s hv. For booke, the shared struct stays big endian. For book3s_64 hv we maintain the struct in host native endian, since it never gets shared with the guest. For book3s_64 pr we introduce a variable that tells us which endianness the shared struct is in and route every access to it through helper inline functions that evaluate this variable. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
-
- 17 10月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [agraf: squash in compile fix] Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
This patch add a new callback kvmppc_ops. This will help us in enabling both HV and PR KVM together in the same kernel. The actual change to enable them together is done in the later patch in the series. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [agraf: squash in booke changes] Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
-
由 Paul Mackerras 提交于
Currently PR-style KVM keeps the volatile guest register values (R0 - R13, CR, LR, CTR, XER, PC) in a shadow_vcpu struct rather than the main kvm_vcpu struct. For 64-bit, the shadow_vcpu exists in two places, a kmalloc'd struct and in the PACA, and it gets copied back and forth in kvmppc_core_vcpu_load/put(), because the real-mode code can't rely on being able to access the kmalloc'd struct. This changes the code to copy the volatile values into the shadow_vcpu as one of the last things done before entering the guest. Similarly the values are copied back out of the shadow_vcpu to the kvm_vcpu immediately after exiting the guest. We arrange for interrupts to be still disabled at this point so that we can't get preempted on 64-bit and end up copying values from the wrong PACA. This means that the accessor functions in kvm_book3s.h for these registers are greatly simplified, and are same between PR and HV KVM. In places where accesses to shadow_vcpu fields are now replaced by accesses to the kvm_vcpu, we can also remove the svcpu_get/put pairs. Finally, on 64-bit, we don't need the kmalloc'd struct at all any more. With this, the time to read the PVR one million times in a loop went from 567.7ms to 575.5ms (averages of 6 values), an increase of about 1.4% for this worse-case test for guest entries and exits. The standard deviation of the measurements is about 11ms, so the difference is only marginally significant statistically. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
-
- 08 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
We don't emulate breakpoints yet, so just ignore reads and writes to / from DABR. This fixes booting of more recent Linux guest kernels for me. Reported-by: NNello Martuscielli <ppc.addon@gmail.com> Tested-by: NNello Martuscielli <ppc.addon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
-
- 27 4月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Bharat Bhushan 提交于
Currently the instruction emulator code returns EMULATE_EXIT_USER and common code initializes the "run->exit_reason = .." and "vcpu->arch.hcall_needed = .." with one fixed reason. But there can be different reasons when emulator need to exit to user space. To support that the "run->exit_reason = .." and "vcpu->arch.hcall_needed = .." initialization is moved a level up to emulator. Signed-off-by: NBharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
-
由 Bharat Bhushan 提交于
Instruction emulation return EMULATE_DO_PAPR when it requires exit to userspace on book3s. Similar return is required for booke. EMULATE_DO_PAPR reads out to be confusing so it is renamed to EMULATE_EXIT_USER. Signed-off-by: NBharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
-
- 10 1月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mihai Caraman 提交于
On mfspr/mtspr emulation path Book3E's MMUCFG SPR with value 1015 clashes with G4's MSSSR0 SPR. Move MSSSR0 emulation from generic part to Books3S. MSSSR0 also clashes with Book3S's DABRX SPR. DABRX was not explicitly handled so Book3S execution flow will behave as before. Signed-off-by: NMihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
When running on top of pHyp, the hypercall instruction "sc 1" goes straight into pHyp without trapping in supervisor mode. So if we want to support PAPR guest in this configuration we need to add a second way of accessing PAPR hypercalls, preferably with the exact same semantics except for the instruction. So let's overlay an officially reserved instruction and emulate PAPR hypercalls whenever we hit that one. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
-
- 06 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Mackerras 提交于
This adds basic emulation of the PURR and SPURR registers. We assume we are emulating a single-threaded core, so these advance at the same rate as the timebase. A Linux kernel running on a POWER7 expects to be able to access these registers and is not prepared to handle a program interrupt on accessing them. This also adds a very minimal emulation of the DSCR (data stream control register). Writes are ignored and reads return zero. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
-
- 06 5月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
Instructions on PPC are pretty similarly encoded. So instead of every instruction emulation code decoding the instruction fields itself, we can move that code to more generic places and rely on the compiler to optimize the unused bits away. This has 2 advantages. It makes the code smaller and it makes the code less error prone, as the instruction fields are always available, so accidental misusage is reduced. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
-
- 02 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
Add a missing include to fix build Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 05 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
When running the 64-bit Book3s PR code without CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE, we were doing a few things wrong, most notably access to PACA fields without making sure that the pointers stay stable accross the access (preempt_disable()). This patch moves to_svcpu towards a get/put model which allows us to disable preemption while accessing the shadow vcpu fields in the PACA. That way we can run preemptible and everyone's happy! Reported-by: NJörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
- 26 9月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
Recent Linux versions use the CFAR and PURR SPRs, but don't really care about their contents (yet). So for now, we can simply return 0 when the guest wants to read them. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
We have 3 privilege levels: problem state, supervisor state and hypervisor state. Each of them can access different SPRs, so we need to check on every SPR if it's accessible in the respective mode. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
-
- 24 10月, 2010 5 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
The current approach duplicates the spr->bat finding logic and makes it harder to reuse the actually used variables. So let's move everything down to the spr handler. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
The SRR0 and SRR1 registers contain cached values of the PC and MSR respectively. They get written to by the hypervisor when an interrupt occurs or directly by the kernel. They are also used to tell the rfi(d) instruction where to jump to. Because it only gets touched on defined events that, it's very simple to share with the guest. Hypervisor and guest both have full r/w access. This patch converts all users of the current field to the shared page. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
The DAR register contains the address a data page fault occured at. This register behaves pretty much like a simple data storage register that gets written to on data faults. There is no hypervisor interaction required on read or write. This patch converts all users of the current field to the shared page. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
The DSISR register contains information about a data page fault. It is fully read/write from inside the guest context and we don't need to worry about interacting based on writes of this register. This patch converts all users of the current field to the shared page. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
One of the most obvious registers to share with the guest directly is the MSR. The MSR contains the "interrupts enabled" flag which the guest has to toggle in critical sections. So in order to bring the overhead of interrupt en- and disabling down, let's put msr into the shared page. Keep in mind that even though you can fully read its contents, writing to it doesn't always update all state. There are a few safe fields that don't require hypervisor interaction. See the documentation for a list of MSR bits that are safe to be set from inside the guest. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
- 17 5月, 2010 9 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
When we're on a paired single capable host, we can just always enable paired singles and expose them to the guest directly. This approach breaks when multiple VMs run and access PS concurrently, but this should suffice until we get a proper framework for it in Linux. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
Some code we had so far required defines and had code that was completely Book3S_64 specific. Since we now opened book3s.c to Book3S_32 too, we need to take care of these pieces. So let's add some minor code where it makes sense to not go the Book3S_64 code paths and add compat defines on others. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
We already have some inline fuctions we use to access vcpu or svcpu structs, depending on whether we're on booke or book3s. Since we just put a few more registers into the svcpu, we also need to make sure the respective callbacks are available and get used. So this patch moves direct use of the now in the svcpu struct fields to inline function calls. While at it, it also moves the definition of those inline function calls to respective header files for booke and book3s, greatly improving readability. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
We have quite some code that can be used by Book3S_32 and Book3S_64 alike, so let's call it "Book3S" instead of "Book3S_64", so we can later on use it from the 32 bit port too. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
Mac OS X uses the dcba instruction. According to the specification it doesn't guarantee any functionality, so let's just emulate it as nop. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
On most systems we need to emulate dcbz when running 32 bit guests. So far we've been rather slack, not giving correct DSISR values to the guest. This patch makes the emulation more accurate, introducing a difference between "page not mapped" and "write protection fault". While at it, it also speeds up dcbz emulation by an order of magnitude by using kmap. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
Mac OS X has some applications - namely the Finder - that require alignment interrupts to work properly. So we need to implement them. But the spec for 970 and 750 also looks different. While 750 requires the DSISR and DAR fields to reflect some instruction bits (DSISR) and the fault address (DAR), the 970 declares this as an optional feature. So we need to reconstruct DSISR and DAR manually. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
BATs can't only be written to, you can also read them out! So let's implement emulation for reading BAT values again. While at it, I also made BAT setting flush the segment cache, so we're absolutely sure there's no MMU state left when writing BATs. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
We emulate the mfsrin instruction already, that passes the SR number in a register value. But we lacked support for mfsr that encoded the SR number in the opcode. So let's implement it. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
- 25 4月, 2010 5 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
The one big thing about the Gekko is paired singles. Paired singles are an extension to the instruction set, that adds 32 single precision floating point registers (qprs), some SPRs to modify the behavior of paired singled operations and instructions to deal with qprs to the instruction set. Unfortunately, it also changes semantics of existing operations that affect single values in FPRs. In most cases they get mirrored to the coresponding QPR. Thanks to that we need to emulate all FPU operations and all the new paired single operations too. In order to achieve that, we use the just introduced FPU call helpers to call the real FPU whenever the guest wants to modify an FPR. Additionally we also fix up the QPR values along the way. That way we can execute paired single FPU operations without implementing a soft fpu. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
BATs didn't work. Well, they did, but only up to BAT3. As soon as we came to BAT4 the offset calculation was screwed up and we ended up overwriting BAT0-3. Fortunately, Linux hasn't been using BAT4+. It's still a good idea to write correct code though. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
The Book3S KVM implementation contains some helper functions to load and store data from and to virtual addresses. Unfortunately, this helper used to keep the physical address it so nicely found out for us to itself. So let's change that and make it return the physical address it resolved. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
The Book3S_32 specifications allows for two instructions to modify segment registers: mtsrin and mtsr. Most normal operating systems use mtsrin, because it allows to define which segment it wants to change using a register. But since I was trying to run an embedded guest, it turned out to be using mtsr with hardcoded values. So let's also emulate mtsr. It's a valid instruction after all. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
The Gekko has some SPR values that differ from other PPC core values and also some additional ones. Let's add support for them in our mfspr/mtspr emulator. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
- 01 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
All code in PPC KVM currently accesses gprs in the vcpu struct directly. While there's nothing wrong with that wrt the current way gprs are stored and loaded, it doesn't suffice for the PACA acceleration that will follow in this patchset. So let's just create little wrapper inline functions that we call whenever a GPR needs to be read from or written to. The compiled code shouldn't really change at all for now. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
- 08 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
Currently userspace has no chance to find out which virtual address space we're in and resolve addresses. While that is a big problem for migration, it's also unpleasent when debugging, as gdb and the monitor don't work on virtual addresses. This patch exports enough of the MMU segment state to userspace to make debugging work and thus also includes the groundwork for migration. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 05 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
There are generic parts of PowerPC that can be shared across all implementations and specific parts that only apply to BookE or desktop PPCs. This patch adds emulation for desktop specific opcodes that don't apply to BookE CPUs. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-