Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 5
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 24 2月, 2020 4 次提交
  3. 20 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  5. 10 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  7. 08 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  9. 07 11月, 2019 2 次提交
    • D
      efi: Common enable/disable infrastructure for EFI soft reservation · b617c526
      由 Dan Williams 提交于 
      UEFI 2.8 defines an EFI_MEMORY_SP attribute bit to augment the
interpretation of the EFI Memory Types as "reserved for a specific
purpose".

The proposed Linux behavior for specific purpose memory is that it is
reserved for direct-access (device-dax) by default and not available for
any kernel usage, not even as an OOM fallback.  Later, through udev
scripts or another init mechanism, these device-dax claimed ranges can
be reconfigured and hot-added to the available System-RAM with a unique
node identifier. This device-dax management scheme implements "soft" in
the "soft reserved" designation by allowing some or all of the
reservation to be recovered as typical memory. This policy can be
disabled at compile-time with CONFIG_EFI_SOFT_RESERVE=n, or runtime with
efi=nosoftreserve.

As for this patch, define the common helpers to determine if the
EFI_MEMORY_SP attribute should be honored. The determination needs to be
made early to prevent the kernel from being loaded into soft-reserved
memory, or otherwise allowing early allocations to land there. Follow-on
changes are needed per architecture to leverage these helpers in their
respective mem-init paths.
Reviewed-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      b617c526
    • D
      efi: Enumerate EFI_MEMORY_SP · fe3e5e65
      由 Dan Williams 提交于 
      UEFI 2.8 defines an EFI_MEMORY_SP attribute bit to augment the
interpretation of the EFI Memory Types as "reserved for a specific
purpose". The intent of this bit is to allow the OS to identify precious
or scarce memory resources and optionally manage it separately from
EfiConventionalMemory. As defined older OSes that do not know about this
attribute are permitted to ignore it and the memory will be handled
according to the OS default policy for the given memory type.

In other words, this "specific purpose" hint is deliberately weaker than
EfiReservedMemoryType in that the system continues to operate if the OS
takes no action on the attribute. The risk of taking no action is
potentially unwanted / unmovable kernel allocations from the designated
resource that prevent the full realization of the "specific purpose".
For example, consider a system with a high-bandwidth memory pool. Older
kernels are permitted to boot and consume that memory as conventional
"System-RAM" newer kernels may arrange for that memory to be set aside
(soft reserved) by the system administrator for a dedicated
high-bandwidth memory aware application to consume.

Specifically, this mechanism allows for the elimination of scenarios
where platform firmware tries to game OS policy by lying about ACPI SLIT
values, i.e. claiming that a precious memory resource has a high
distance to trigger the OS to avoid it by default. This reservation hint
allows platform-firmware to instead tell the truth about performance
characteristics by indicate to OS memory management to put immovable
allocations elsewhere.

Implement simple detection of the bit for EFI memory table dumps and
save the kernel policy for a follow-on change.
Reviewed-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NDave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      fe3e5e65
  11. 31 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  13. 29 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  15. 07 10月, 2019 1 次提交
    • A
      efivar/ssdt: Don't iterate over EFI vars if no SSDT override was specified · c05f8f92
      由 Ard Biesheuvel 提交于 
      The kernel command line option efivar_ssdt= allows the name to be
specified of an EFI variable containing an ACPI SSDT table that should
be loaded into memory by the OS, and treated as if it was provided by
the firmware.

Currently, that code will always iterate over the EFI variables and
compare each name with the provided name, even if the command line
option wasn't set to begin with.

So bail early when no variable name was provided. This works around a
boot regression on the 2012 Mac Pro, as reported by Scott.
Tested-by: NScott Talbert <swt@techie.net>
Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>
Cc: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 475fb4e8 ("efi / ACPI: load SSTDs from EFI variables")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191002165904.8819-3-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      c05f8f92
  17. 20 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  19. 08 8月, 2019 4 次提交
  21. 25 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  23. 11 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  25. 05 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  27. 25 5月, 2019 1 次提交
  29. 16 2月, 2019 1 次提交
  31. 30 11月, 2018 2 次提交
    • A
      efi: Reduce the amount of memblock reservations for persistent allocations · 80424b02
      由 Ard Biesheuvel 提交于 
      The current implementation of efi_mem_reserve_persistent() is rather
naive, in the sense that for each invocation, it creates a separate
linked list entry to describe the reservation. Since the linked list
entries themselves need to persist across subsequent kexec reboots,
every reservation created this way results in two memblock_reserve()
calls at the next boot.

On arm64 systems with 100s of CPUs, this may result in a excessive
number of memblock reservations, and needless fragmentation.

So instead, make use of the newly updated struct linux_efi_memreserve
layout to put multiple reservations into a single linked list entry.
This should get rid of the numerous tiny memblock reservations, and
effectively cut the total number of reservations in half on arm64
systems with many CPUs.

 [ mingo: build warning fix. ]
Tested-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
Cc: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
Cc: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei1999@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181129171230.18699-11-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      80424b02
    • A
      efi: Permit multiple entries in persistent memreserve data structure · 5f0b0ecf
      由 Ard Biesheuvel 提交于 
      In preparation of updating efi_mem_reserve_persistent() to cause less
fragmentation when dealing with many persistent reservations, update
the struct definition and the code that handles it currently so it
can describe an arbitrary number of reservations using a single linked
list entry. The actual optimization will be implemented in a subsequent
patch.
Tested-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
Cc: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
Cc: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei1999@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181129171230.18699-10-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      5f0b0ecf
  33. 27 11月, 2018 1 次提交
  35. 15 11月, 2018 2 次提交
  37. 26 9月, 2018 2 次提交
  39. 17 7月, 2018 1 次提交
  41. 16 7月, 2018 2 次提交
    • A
      efi: Drop type and attribute checks in efi_mem_desc_lookup() · 7e1550b8
      由 Ard Biesheuvel 提交于 
      The current implementation of efi_mem_desc_lookup() includes the
following check on the memory descriptor it returns:

    if (!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME) &&
        md->type != EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA &&
        md->type != EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA) {
            continue;
    }

This means that only EfiBootServicesData or EfiRuntimeServicesData
regions are considered, or any other region type provided that it
has the EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME attribute set.

Given what the name of the function implies, and the fact that any
physical address can be described in the UEFI memory map only a single
time, it does not make sense to impose this condition in the body of the
loop, but instead, should be imposed by the caller depending on the value
that is returned to it.

Two such callers exist at the moment:

- The BGRT code when running on x86, via efi_mem_reserve() and
  efi_arch_mem_reserve(). In this case, the region is already known to
  be EfiBootServicesData, and so the check is redundant.

- The ESRT handling code which introduced this function, which calls it
  both directly from efi_esrt_init() and again via efi_mem_reserve() and
  efi_arch_mem_reserve() [on x86].

So let's move this check into the callers instead. This preserves the
current behavior both for BGRT and ESRT handling, and allows the lookup
routine to be reused by other [upcoming] users that don't have this
limitation.

In the ESRT case, keep the entire condition, so that platforms that
deviate from the UEFI spec and use something other than
EfiBootServicesData for the ESRT table will keep working as before.

For x86's efi_arch_mem_reserve() implementation, limit the type to
EfiBootServicesData, since it is the only type the reservation code
expects to operate on in the first place.

While we're at it, drop the __init annotation so that drivers can use it
as well.
Tested-by: NLaszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180711094040.12506-8-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      7e1550b8
    • S
      efi: Use a work queue to invoke EFI Runtime Services · 3eb420e7
      由 Sai Praneeth 提交于 
      Presently, when a user process requests the kernel to execute any
UEFI runtime service, the kernel temporarily switches to a separate
set of page tables that describe the virtual mapping of the UEFI
runtime services regions in memory. Since UEFI runtime services are
typically invoked with interrupts enabled, any code that may be called
during this time, will have an incorrect view of the process's address
space. Although it is unusual for code running in interrupt context to
make assumptions about the process context it runs in, there are cases
(such as the perf subsystem taking samples) where this causes problems.

So let's set up a work queue for calling UEFI runtime services, so that
the actual calls are made when the work queue items are dispatched by a
work queue worker running in a separate kernel thread. Such threads are
not expected to have userland mappings in the first place, and so the
additional mappings created for the UEFI runtime services can never
clash with any.

The ResetSystem() runtime service is not covered by the work queue
handling, since it is not expected to return, and may be called at a
time when the kernel is torn down to the point where we cannot expect
work queues to still be operational.

The non-blocking variants of SetVariable() and QueryVariableInfo()
are also excluded: these are intended to be used from atomic context,
which obviously rules out waiting for a completion to be signalled by
another thread. Note that these variants are currently only used for
UEFI runtime services calls that occur very early in the boot, and
for ones that occur in critical conditions, e.g., to flush kernel logs
to UEFI variables via efi-pstore.
Suggested-by: NAndy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NSai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
[ardb: exclude ResetSystem() from the workqueue treatment
       merge from 2 separate patches and rewrite commit log]
Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180711094040.12506-4-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      3eb420e7
  43. 12 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  45. 09 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  47. 08 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  49. 03 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  51. 07 12月, 2017 2 次提交
  53. 26 8月, 2017 2 次提交