- 11 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jingoo Han 提交于
The site-specific OOM messages are unnecessary, because they duplicate the MM subsystem generic OOM message. Signed-off-by: NJingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
-
- 26 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Guillaume LECERF 提交于
Some old SST chips use 0x50 as sector erase command, instead of 0x30. Make this value variable to handle such chips. Signed-off-by: NGuillaume LECERF <glecerf@gmail.com> Acked-by: NWolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
- 02 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Guillaume LECERF 提交于
Signed-off-by: NGuillaume LECERF <glecerf@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
- 14 5月, 2010 3 次提交
-
-
由 Guillaume LECERF 提交于
SST 39VF160x and 39VF320x chips use vendorname id 0x0701 and alternative unlock addresses. Add support for them in cfi_probe.c. Signed-off-by: NGuillaume LECERF <glecerf@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NWolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 Guillaume LECERF 提交于
Make the addresses used to enter Auto Select Mode variable to leave place for handling chips using non-standard addresses. Signed-off-by: NGuillaume LECERF <glecerf@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NWolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 Guillaume LECERF 提交于
Move the code to enter Auto Select Mode down to be able to use cfi->cfiq members to add support for chips using alternative sequence / unlock addresses. Signed-off-by: NGuillaume LECERF <glecerf@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NWolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
- 07 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
They need to be exported, so let's give them less generic-sounding names while we're at it. Original export patch, along with the suggestion about the nomenclature, from Stephen Rothwell. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
- 06 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Korolev 提交于
There are some CFI chips which require non standard procedures to get into QRY mode. The possible way to support them would be trying different modes till QRY will be read. This patch introduce two new functions qry_mode_on qry_mode_off. qry_mode_on tries different commands in order switch chip into QRY mode. So if we have one more "odd" chip - we just could add several lines to qry_mode_on. Also using these functions remove unnecessary code duplicaton in porbe procedure. Currently there are two "odd" cases 1. Some old intel chips which require 0xFF before 0x98 2. ST M29DW chip which requires 0x98 to be sent at 0x555 (according to CFI should be 0x55) This patch is partialy based on the patch from Uwe (see "[PATCH 2/4] [RFC][MTD] cfi_probe: remove Intel chip workaround" thread ) Signed-off-by: NAlexey Korolev <akorolev@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Belyakov <abelyako@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
- 05 6月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Bunk 提交于
Once upon a time, the MTD repository was using CVS. This patch therefore removes all usages of the no longer updated CVS keywords from the MTD code. This also includes code that printed them to the user. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
- 23 4月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trent Piepho 提交于
AMD/Spansion use a device id of 0x7e to indicate an extended device is present at offset 0xe and 0xf in the query data. I've verified with Spansion that all their chips (mfr == 0x01) with an id of 0x7e use it to indicate an extended id is present. What's more, there are no chips with a NON-extended id that is the same as a different chip's extended id. In other words, when the extended ID is present, one can replace the normal id with the extended id without losing any information. Which is what I've done. Signed-off-by: NTrent Piepho <tpiepho@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 Paulius Zaleckas 提交于
Untested, but shouldn't break anything... Makes MTD_XIP arch independent. I guess this is why xip_iprefetch() was made for. Signed-off-by: NPaulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@teltonika.lt> Acked-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
- 11 1月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bartlomiej Sieka 提交于
According to "Common Flash Memory Interface Publication 100" dated December 1, 2001, the interface code for x16/x32 chips is 0x0005, and not 0x0004 used so far. Signed-off-by: NBartlomiej Sieka <tur@semihalf.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
- 01 7月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jörn Engel 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
-
- 14 5月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
- 30 11月, 2005 2 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Bunk 提交于
This patch contains the following possible cleanups: - every file should #include the headers containing the prototypes for it's global functions - make needlessly global functions static Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Todd Poynor 提交于
Recent models of Intel/Sharp and Spansion CFI flash now have significant bits in the upper byte of device ID codes, read via what Spansion calls "autoselect" and Intel calls "read device identifier". Currently these values are truncated to the low 8 bits in the mtd data structures, as all CFI read query info has previously been read one byte at a time. Add a new method for reading 16-bit info, currently just manufacturer and device codes; datasheets hint at future uses for upper bytes in other fields. Signed-off-by: NTodd Poynor <tpoynor@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 07 11月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-