1. 18 7月, 2012 3 次提交
  2. 15 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  3. 14 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  4. 13 7月, 2012 3 次提交
  5. 12 7月, 2012 7 次提交
  6. 11 7月, 2012 11 次提交
  7. 10 7月, 2012 2 次提交
  8. 09 7月, 2012 10 次提交
  9. 08 7月, 2012 2 次提交
    • T
      OMAPDSS: fix warnings if CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME=n · 373b4365
      Tomi Valkeinen 提交于
      If runtime PM is not enabled in the kernel config, pm_runtime_get_sync()
      will always return 1 and pm_runtime_put_sync() will always return
      -ENOSYS. pm_runtime_get_sync() returning 1 presents no problem to the
      driver, but -ENOSYS from pm_runtime_put_sync() causes the driver to
      print a warning.
      
      One option would be to ignore errors returned by pm_runtime_put_sync()
      totally, as they only say that the call was unable to put the hardware
      into suspend mode.
      
      However, I chose to ignore the returned -ENOSYS explicitly, and print a
      warning for other errors, as I think we should get notified if the HW
      failed to go to suspend properly.
      Signed-off-by: NTomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
      Cc: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
      Cc: Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NArchit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NFlorian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
      373b4365
    • T
      OMAPDSS: Use PM notifiers for system suspend · 736f29cd
      Tomi Valkeinen 提交于
      The current way how omapdss handles system suspend and resume is that
      omapdss device (a platform device, which is not part of the device
      hierarchy of the DSS HW devices, like DISPC and DSI, or panels.) uses
      the suspend and resume callbacks from platform_driver to handle system
      suspend. It does this by disabling all enabled panels on suspend, and
      resuming the previously disabled panels on resume.
      
      This presents a few problems.
      
      One is that as omapdss device is not related to the panel devices or the
      DSS HW devices, there's no ordering in the suspend process. This means
      that suspend could be first ran for DSS HW devices and panels, and only
      then for omapdss device. Currently this is not a problem, as DSS HW
      devices and panels do not handle suspend.
      
      Another, more pressing problem, is that when suspending or resuming, the
      runtime PM functions return -EACCES as runtime PM is disabled during
      system suspend. This causes the driver to print warnings, and operations
      to fail as they think that they failed to bring up the HW.
      
      This patch changes the omapdss suspend handling to use PM notifiers,
      which are called before suspend and after resume. This way we have a
      normally functioning system when we are suspending and resuming the
      panels.
      
      This patch, I believe, creates a problem that somebody could enable or
      disable a panel between PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE and the system suspend, and
      similarly the other way around in resume. I choose to ignore the problem
      for now, as it sounds rather unlikely, and if it happens, it's not
      fatal.
      
      In the long run the system suspend handling of omapdss and panels should
      be thought out properly. The current approach feels rather hacky.
      Perhaps the panel drivers should handle system suspend, or the users of
      omapdss (omapfb, omapdrm) should handle system suspend.
      
      Note that after this patch we could probably revert
      0eaf9f52 (OMAPDSS: use sync versions of
      pm_runtime_put). But as I said, this patch may be temporary, so let's
      leave the sync version still in place.
      Signed-off-by: NTomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
      Reported-by: NJassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
      Tested-by: NJassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
      Tested-by: NJoe Woodward <jw@terrafix.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NArchit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
      [fts: fixed 2 brace coding style issues]
      Signed-off-by: NFlorian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
      736f29cd