1. 03 2月, 2010 14 次提交
  2. 02 2月, 2010 20 次提交
  3. 01 2月, 2010 6 次提交
    • M
      regulator: Specify REGULATOR_CHANGE_STATUS for WM835x LED constraints · a2fad9bf
      Mark Brown 提交于
      The WM8350 LED driver needs to be able to enable and disable the
      regulators it is using. Previously the core wasn't properly enforcing
      status change constraints so the driver was able to function but this
      has always been intended to be required.
      Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
      Cc: stable@kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
      a2fad9bf
    • S
      GFS2: Use GFP_NOFS for alloc structure · ea8d62da
      Steven Whitehouse 提交于
      This is called under a glock, so its a good plan to use GFP_NOFS
      Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
      ea8d62da
    • S
      GFS2: Fix previous patch · 7fe3ec6f
      Steven Whitehouse 提交于
      The do_div() call needs to remain.
      Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
      7fe3ec6f
    • B
      GFS2: Don't withdraw on partial rindex entries · 55f0b4c5
      Benjamin Marzinski 提交于
      ince gfs2 writes the rindex file a block at a time, and releases the
      exclusive lock after each block, it is possible that another process
      will grab the lock in the middle of the write.  Since rindex entries are
      not an even divisor of blocks, that other process may see partial
      entries.  On grows, this is fine.  The process can simply ignore the the
      partial entires. Previously, the code withdrew when it saw partial
      entries. Now it simply ignores them.
      Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
      55f0b4c5
    • G
      blk-cgroup: Fix potential deadlock in blk-cgroup · bcf4dd43
      Gui Jianfeng 提交于
      I triggered a lockdep warning as following.
      
      =======================================================
      [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
      2.6.33-rc2 #1
      -------------------------------------------------------
      test_io_control/7357 is trying to acquire lock:
       (blkio_list_lock){+.+...}, at: [<c053a990>] blkiocg_weight_write+0x82/0x9e
      
      but task is already holding lock:
       (&(&blkcg->lock)->rlock){......}, at: [<c053a949>] blkiocg_weight_write+0x3b/0x9e
      
      which lock already depends on the new lock.
      
      the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
      
      -> #2 (&(&blkcg->lock)->rlock){......}:
             [<c04583b7>] validate_chain+0x8bc/0xb9c
             [<c0458dba>] __lock_acquire+0x723/0x789
             [<c0458eb0>] lock_acquire+0x90/0xa7
             [<c0692b0a>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x27/0x5a
             [<c053a4e1>] blkiocg_add_blkio_group+0x1a/0x6d
             [<c053cac7>] cfq_get_queue+0x225/0x3de
             [<c053eec2>] cfq_set_request+0x217/0x42d
             [<c052c8a6>] elv_set_request+0x17/0x26
             [<c0532a0f>] get_request+0x203/0x2c5
             [<c0532ae9>] get_request_wait+0x18/0x10e
             [<c0533470>] __make_request+0x2ba/0x375
             [<c0531985>] generic_make_request+0x28d/0x30f
             [<c0532da7>] submit_bio+0x8a/0x8f
             [<c04d827a>] submit_bh+0xf0/0x10f
             [<c04d91d2>] ll_rw_block+0xc0/0xf9
             [<f86e9705>] ext3_find_entry+0x319/0x544 [ext3]
             [<f86eae58>] ext3_lookup+0x2c/0xb9 [ext3]
             [<c04c3e1b>] do_lookup+0xd3/0x172
             [<c04c56c8>] link_path_walk+0x5fb/0x95c
             [<c04c5a65>] path_walk+0x3c/0x81
             [<c04c5b63>] do_path_lookup+0x21/0x8a
             [<c04c66cc>] do_filp_open+0xf0/0x978
             [<c04c0c7e>] open_exec+0x1b/0xb7
             [<c04c1436>] do_execve+0xbb/0x266
             [<c04081a9>] sys_execve+0x24/0x4a
             [<c04028a2>] ptregs_execve+0x12/0x18
      
      -> #1 (&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock){..-.-.}:
             [<c04583b7>] validate_chain+0x8bc/0xb9c
             [<c0458dba>] __lock_acquire+0x723/0x789
             [<c0458eb0>] lock_acquire+0x90/0xa7
             [<c0692b0a>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x27/0x5a
             [<c053dd2a>] cfq_unlink_blkio_group+0x17/0x41
             [<c053a6eb>] blkiocg_destroy+0x72/0xc7
             [<c0467df0>] cgroup_diput+0x4a/0xb2
             [<c04ca473>] dentry_iput+0x93/0xb7
             [<c04ca4b3>] d_kill+0x1c/0x36
             [<c04cb5c5>] dput+0xf5/0xfe
             [<c04c6084>] do_rmdir+0x95/0xbe
             [<c04c60ec>] sys_rmdir+0x10/0x12
             [<c04027cc>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32
      
      -> #0 (blkio_list_lock){+.+...}:
             [<c0458117>] validate_chain+0x61c/0xb9c
             [<c0458dba>] __lock_acquire+0x723/0x789
             [<c0458eb0>] lock_acquire+0x90/0xa7
             [<c06929fd>] _raw_spin_lock+0x1e/0x4e
             [<c053a990>] blkiocg_weight_write+0x82/0x9e
             [<c0467f1e>] cgroup_file_write+0xc6/0x1c0
             [<c04bd2f3>] vfs_write+0x8c/0x116
             [<c04bd7c6>] sys_write+0x3b/0x60
             [<c04027cc>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32
      
      other info that might help us debug this:
      
      1 lock held by test_io_control/7357:
       #0:  (&(&blkcg->lock)->rlock){......}, at: [<c053a949>] blkiocg_weight_write+0x3b/0x9e
      stack backtrace:
      Pid: 7357, comm: test_io_control Not tainted 2.6.33-rc2 #1
      Call Trace:
       [<c045754f>] print_circular_bug+0x91/0x9d
       [<c0458117>] validate_chain+0x61c/0xb9c
       [<c0458dba>] __lock_acquire+0x723/0x789
       [<c0458eb0>] lock_acquire+0x90/0xa7
       [<c053a990>] ? blkiocg_weight_write+0x82/0x9e
       [<c06929fd>] _raw_spin_lock+0x1e/0x4e
       [<c053a990>] ? blkiocg_weight_write+0x82/0x9e
       [<c053a990>] blkiocg_weight_write+0x82/0x9e
       [<c0467f1e>] cgroup_file_write+0xc6/0x1c0
       [<c0454df5>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd
       [<c044d93a>] ? cpu_clock+0x2e/0x44
       [<c050e6ec>] ? security_file_permission+0xf/0x11
       [<c04bcdda>] ? rw_verify_area+0x8a/0xad
       [<c0467e58>] ? cgroup_file_write+0x0/0x1c0
       [<c04bd2f3>] vfs_write+0x8c/0x116
       [<c04bd7c6>] sys_write+0x3b/0x60
       [<c04027cc>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32
      
      To prevent deadlock, we should take locks as following sequence:
      
      blkio_list_lock -> queue_lock ->  blkcg_lock.
      
      The following patch should fix this bug.
      Signed-off-by: NGui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
      bcf4dd43
    • A
      powerpc: TIF_ABI_PENDING bit removal · 94f28da8
      Andreas Schwab 提交于
      Here are the powerpc bits to remove TIF_ABI_PENDING now that
      set_personality() is called at the appropriate place in exec.
      Signed-off-by: NAndreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
      Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      94f28da8