1. 07 11月, 2007 1 次提交
    • M
      ocfs2: Re-order iput in ocfs2_drop_dentry_lock · 9f70968a
      Mark Fasheh 提交于
      Do this to avoid a theoretical (I haven't seen this in practice) race where
      the downconvert thread might drop the dentry lock, allowing a remote unlink
      to proceed before dropping the inode locks. This could bounce access to the
      orphan dir between nodes.
      
      There doesn't seem to be a need to do the same in ocfs2_dentry_iput() as
      that's never called for the last ref drop from the downconvert thread.
      Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
      9f70968a
  2. 20 10月, 2007 1 次提交
  3. 25 9月, 2006 4 次提交
    • M
      ocfs2: Remove special casing for inode creation in ocfs2_dentry_attach_lock() · 0027dd5b
      Mark Fasheh 提交于
      We can't use LKM_LOCAL for new dentry locks because an unlink and subsequent
      re-create of a name/inode pair may result in the lock still being mastered
      somewhere in the cluster.
      Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
      0027dd5b
    • M
      ocfs2: manually d_move() during ocfs2_rename() · 1ba9da2f
      Mark Fasheh 提交于
      Make use of FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE to avoid a race condition that can occur
      during ->rename() if we d_move() outside of the parent directory cluster
      locks, and another node discovers the new name (created during the rename)
      and unlinks it. d_move() will unconditionally rehash a dentry - which will
      leave stale data in the system.
      Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
      1ba9da2f
    • M
      ocfs2: Add dentry tracking API · 80c05846
      Mark Fasheh 提交于
      Replace the dentry vote mechanism with a cluster lock which covers a set
      of dentries. This allows us to force d_delete() only on nodes which actually
      care about an unlink.
      
      Every node that does a ->lookup() gets a read only lock on the dentry, until
      an unlink during which the unlinking node, will request an exclusive lock,
      forcing the other nodes who care about that dentry to d_delete() it. The
      effect is that we retain a very lightweight ->d_revalidate(), and at the
      same time get to make large improvements to the average case performance of
      the ocfs2 unlink and rename operations.
      
      This patch adds the higher level API and the dentry manipulation code.
      Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
      80c05846
    • M
      ocfs2: Add new cluster lock type · d680efe9
      Mark Fasheh 提交于
      Replace the dentry vote mechanism with a cluster lock which covers a set
      of dentries. This allows us to force d_delete() only on nodes which actually
      care about an unlink.
      
      Every node that does a ->lookup() gets a read only lock on the dentry, until
      an unlink during which the unlinking node, will request an exclusive lock,
      forcing the other nodes who care about that dentry to d_delete() it. The
      effect is that we retain a very lightweight ->d_revalidate(), and at the
      same time get to make large improvements to the average case performance of
      the ocfs2 unlink and rename operations.
      
      This patch adds the cluster lock type which OCFS2 can attach to
      dentries.  A small number of fs/ocfs2/dcache.c functions are stubbed
      out so that this change can compile.
      Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
      d680efe9
  4. 25 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  5. 04 1月, 2006 1 次提交