1. 20 1月, 2013 6 次提交
    • D
      drm/nouveau: protect evo_wait/evo_kick sections with a channel mutex · 59ad1465
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      With per-crtc locks modeset operations can run in parallel, and the
      cursor code uses the device-global evo master channel for hw frobbing.
      But the pageflip code can also sync with the master under some
      circumstances. Hence just wrap things up in a mutex to ensure that
      pushbuf access doesn't intermingle.
      
      The approach here is a bit overkill since the per-crtc channels used
      to schedule the pageflips could probably be used without this pushbuf
      locking, but I'm not familiar enough with the nouveau codebase to be
      sure of that.
      
      v2: Add missing mutex_init to avoid angering lockdep.
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      59ad1465
    • D
      drm/gma500: move fbcon restore to lastclose · 7147573a
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      Doing this within the fb->destroy callback leads to a locking
      nightmare. And all other drm drivers that restore the fbcon do
      it in lastclose, too.
      
      With this adjustments all fb->destroy callbacks optionally drop
      references to any gem objects used as backing storage, call
      drm_framebuffer_cleanup and then kfree the struct. Which nicely
      simplifies the locking for framebuffer unreferencing and freeing,
      since this doesn't require that we hold the mode_config lock. A
      slight exception is the vmwgfx surface backed framebuffer, it also
      calls drm_master_put and removes the object from a device-private
      framebuffer list. Both seem to have solid locking in place already.
      
      Conclusion is that now it is no longer required to hold the
      mode_config lock while freeing a framebuffer.
      
      v2: Drop the corresponding mutex_lock WARN check from
      drm_framebuffer_unreference.
      
      v3: Use just the mode_config lock not modeset_lock_all, due to patch
      reordering.
      Acked-by: NAlan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      7147573a
    • D
      drm/vmwgfx: reorder framebuffer init sequence · 80f0b5af
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      vmwgfx has an oddity, when failing to reference the surface it'll
      return 0, since that's what the successfull drm_framebuffer_init will
      leave behind in ret. Fix this up by returning -EINVAL.
      
      Split out from all the other driver updates due to the above tiny
      semantic change. Shouldn't matter though since the reference grabbing
      seemingly can't fail.
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      80f0b5af
    • D
      drm/<drivers>: reorder framebuffer init sequence · c7d73f6a
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      With more fine-grained locking we can no longer rely on the big
      mode_config lock to prevent concurrent access to mode resources
      like framebuffers. Instead a framebuffer becomes accessible to
      other threads as soon as it is added to the relevant lookup
      structures. Hence it needs to be fully set up by the time drivers
      call drm_framebuffer_init.
      
      This patch here is the drivers part of that reorg. Nothing really fancy
      going on safe for three special cases.
      
      - exynos needs to be careful to properly unref all handles.
      - nouveau gets a resource leak fixed for free: one of the error
        cases didn't cleanup the framebuffer, which is now moot since
        the framebuffer is only registered once it is fully set up.
      - vmwgfx requires a slight reordering of operations, I'm hoping I didn't
        break anything (but it's refcount management only, so should be safe).
      
      v2: Split out exynos, since it's a bit more hairy than expected.
      
      v3: Drop bogus cirrus hunk noticed by Richard Wilbur.
      
      v4: Split out vmwgfx since there's a small change in return values.
      
      Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <rob@ti.com> (core + omapdrm)
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      c7d73f6a
    • D
      drm/doc: integrate drm_crtc.c kerneldoc · 065a50ed
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      And do a quick pass to adjust them to the last few (years?) of changes
      ...
      
      This time actually compile-tested ;-)
      Reviewed-by: NRob Clark <rob@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      065a50ed
    • D
      drm: review locking rules in drm_crtc.c · 8faf6b18
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      - config_cleanup was confused: It claimed that callers need to hold
        the modeset lock, but the connector|encoder_cleanup helpers grabbed
        that themselves (note that crtc_cleanup did _not_ grab the modeset
        lock). Which resulted in all drivers _not_ hodling the lock. Since
        this is for single-threaded cleanup code, drop the requirement from
        docs and also drop the lock_grabbing from all _cleanup functions.
      
      - Kill the LOCKING section in the doctype, since clearly we're not
        good enough to keep them up-to-date. And misleading locking
        documentation is worse than useless (see e.g. the comment in the
        vmgfx driver about the cleanup mess). And since for most functions
        the very first line either grabs the lock or has a WARN_ON(!locked)
        the documentation doesn't really add anything.
      
      - Instead put in some effort into explaining the only two special
        cases a bit better: config_init and config_cleanup are both called
        from single-threaded setup/teardown code, so don't do any locking.
        It's the driver's job though to enforce this.
      
      - Where lacking, add a WARN_ON(!is_locked). Not many places though,
        since locking around fbdev setup/teardown is through-roughly screwed
        up, and so will break almost every single WARN annotation I've tried
        to add.
      
      - Add a drm_modeset_is_locked helper - the Grate Modset Locking Rework
        will use the compiler to assist in the big reorg by renaming the
        mode lock, so start encapsulating things. Unfortunately this ended
        up in the "wrong" header file since it needs the definition of
        struct drm_device.
      
      v2: Drop most WARNS again - we hit them all over the place, mostly in
      the setup and teardown sequences. And trying to fix it up leads to
      nice deadlocks, since the locking in the setup code is really
      inconsistent.
      Reviewed-by: NRob Clark <rob@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      8faf6b18
  2. 17 1月, 2013 3 次提交
  3. 16 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  4. 15 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 14 1月, 2013 5 次提交
  6. 13 1月, 2013 12 次提交
  7. 12 1月, 2013 12 次提交