IORING_OP_ASYNC_CANCEL tries io-wq cancellation only for current task.
If it fails go over tctx_list and try it out for every single tctx.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

1) The first problem is io_uring_cancel_sqpoll() ->
io_uring_cancel_task_requests() basically doing park(); park(); and so
hanging.

2) Another one is more subtle, when the master task is doing cancellations,
but SQPOLL task submits in-between the end of the cancellation but
before finish() requests taking a ref to the ctx, and so eternally
locking it up.

3) Yet another is a dying SQPOLL task doing io_uring_cancel_sqpoll() and
same io_uring_cancel_sqpoll() from the owner task, they race for
tctx->wait events. And there probably more of them.

Instead do SQPOLL cancellations from within SQPOLL task context via
task_work, see io_sqpoll_cancel_sync(). With that we don't need temporal
park()/unpark() during cancellation, which is ugly, subtle and anyway
doesn't allow to do io_run_task_work() properly.

io_uring_cancel_sqpoll() is called only from SQPOLL task context and
under sqd locking, so all parking is removed from there. And so,
io_sq_thread_[un]park() and io_sq_thread_stop() are not used now by
SQPOLL task, and that spare us from some headache.

Also remove ctx->sqd_list early to avoid 2). And kill tctx->sqpoll,
which is not used anymore.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

SQPOLL thread to which we're trying to attach may be going away, it's
not nice but a more serious problem is if io_sq_offload_create() sees
sqd->thread==NULL, and tries to init it with a new thread. There are
tons of ways it can be exploited or fail.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We always do complete(&sqd->startup) almost right after sqd->thread
creation, either in the success path or in io_sq_thread_finish(). It's
specifically created not started for us to be able to set some stuff
like sqd->thread and io_uring_alloc_task_context() before following
right after wake_up_new_task().
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

As io_uring_cancel_files() and others let SQO to run between
io_uring_try_cancel_requests(), SQO may generate new deferred requests,
so it's safer to try to cancel them in it.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We bypass IOPOLL completion polling (and reaping) for the SQPOLL thread,
but if it's the thread itself invoking cancelations, then we still need
to perform it or no one will.

Fixes: 9936c7c2 ("io_uring: deduplicate core cancellations sequence")
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Earlier kernels had SQPOLL threads that could share across anything, as
we grabbed the context we needed on a per-ring basis. This is no longer
the case, so only allow attaching directly if we're in the same thread
group. That is the common use case. For non-group tasks, just setup a
new context and thread as we would've done if sharing wasn't set. This
isn't 100% ideal in terms of CPU utilization for the forked and share
case, but hopefully that isn't much of a concern. If it is, there are
plans in motion for how to improve that. Most importantly, we want to
avoid app side regressions where sharing worked before and now doesn't.
With this patch, functionality is equivalent to previous kernels that
supported IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_WQ with SQPOLL.
Reported-by: NStefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We use ->ctx_new_list to notify sqo about new ctx pending, then sqo
should stop and splice it to its sqd->ctx_list, paired with
->sq_thread_comp.

The last one is broken because nobody reinitialises it, and trying to
fix it would only add more complexity and bugs. And the first isn't
really needed as is done under park(), that protects from races well.
Add ctx into sqd->ctx_list directly (under park()), it's much simpler
and allows to kill both, ctx_new_list and sq_thread_comp.

note: apparently there is no real problem at the moment, because
sq_thread_comp is used only by io_sq_thread_finish() followed by
parking, where list_del(&ctx->sqd_list) removes it well regardless
whether it's in the new or the active list.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We have to set ctx->sq_thread_idle before adding a ring to an SQ task,
otherwise sqd races for seeing zero and accounting it as such.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

The io-wq threads were already marked as no-freeze, but the manager was
not. On resume, we perpetually have signal_pending() being true, and
hence the manager will loop and spin 100% of the time.

Just mark the tasks created by create_io_thread() as PF_NOFREEZE by
default, and remove any knowledge of it in io-wq and io_uring.
Reported-by: NKevin Locke <kevin@kevinlocke.name>
Tested-by: NKevin Locke <kevin@kevinlocke.name>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We have a tiny race where io_put_sq_data() calls io_sq_thead_stop()
and finds the thread gone, but the thread has indeed not fully
exited or called complete() yet. Close it up by always having
io_sq_thread_stop() wait on completion of the exit event.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Fix the following coccicheck warning:
./fs/io_uring.c:8984:5-8: Unneeded variable: "ret". Return "0" on line
8998
Reported-by: NAbaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1615271441-33649-1-git-send-email-yang.lee@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

If we hit an error path in the function, make sure that the io_kiocb is
fully initialized at that point so that freeing the request always sees
a valid state.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Calling io_queue_next() after spin_unlock in io_req_complete_post()
races with the other side extracting and reusing this request. Hand
coded parts of io_req_find_next() considering that io_disarm_next()
and io_req_task_queue() have (and safe) to be called with
completion_lock held.

It already does io_commit_cqring() and io_cqring_ev_posted(), so just
reuse it for post io_disarm_next().
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5672a62f3150ee7c55849f40c0037655c4f2840f.1615250156.git.asml.silence@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

A preparation patch placing all preparations before extracting a next
request into a separate helper io_disarm_next().

Also, don't spuriously do ev_posted in a rare case where REQ_F_FAIL_LINK
is set but there are no requests linked (i.e. after cancelling a linked
timeout or setting IOSQE_IO_LINK on a last request of a submission
batch).
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/44ecff68d6b47e1c4e6b891bdde1ddc08cfc3590.1615250156.git.asml.silence@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Don't set IO_SQ_THREAD_SHOULD_STOP when io_sq_offload_create() has
failed on io_uring_alloc_task_context() but leave everything to
io_sq_thread_finish(), because currently io_sq_thread_finish()
hangs on trying to park it. That's great it stalls there, because
otherwise the following io_sq_thread_stop() would be skipped on
IO_SQ_THREAD_SHOULD_STOP check and the sqo would race for sqd with
freeing ctx.

A simple error injection gives something like this.

[  245.463955] INFO: task sqpoll-test-hang:523 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
[  245.463983] Call Trace:
[  245.463990]  __schedule+0x36b/0x950
[  245.464005]  schedule+0x68/0xe0
[  245.464013]  schedule_timeout+0x209/0x2a0
[  245.464032]  wait_for_completion+0x8b/0xf0
[  245.464043]  io_sq_thread_finish+0x44/0x1a0
[  245.464049]  io_uring_setup+0x9ea/0xc80
[  245.464058]  __x64_sys_io_uring_setup+0x16/0x20
[  245.464064]  do_syscall_64+0x38/0x50
[  245.464073]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

You can't call idr_remove() from within a idr_for_each() callback,
but you can call xa_erase() from an xa_for_each() loop, so switch the
entire personality_idr from the IDR to the XArray.  This manifests as a
use-after-free as idr_for_each() attempts to walk the rest of the node
after removing the last entry from it.

Fixes: 071698e1 ("io_uring: allow registering credentials")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.6+
Reported-by: Nyangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
[Pavel: rebased (creds load was moved into io_init_req())]
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7ccff36e1375f2b0ebf73d957f037b43becc0dde.1615212806.git.asml.silence@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

There are enough of problems with IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED, including the
burden of checking and kicking off the SQO task all over the codebase --
for exit/cancel/etc.

Rework it, always start the thread but don't do submit unless the flag
is gone, that's much easier.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

io-wq now is per-task, so cancellations now should match against
request's ctx.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We keep running into weird dependency issues between the sqd lock and
the parking state. Disentangle the SQPOLL thread from the last bits of
the kthread parking inheritance, and just replace the parking state,
and two associated locks, with a single rw mutex. The SQPOLL thread
keeps the mutex for read all the time, except if someone has marked us
needing to park. Then we drop/re-acquire and try again.

This greatly simplifies the parking state machine (by just getting rid
of it), and makes it a lot more obvious how it works - if you need to
modify the ctx list, then you simply park the thread which will grab
the lock for writing.

Fold in fix from Hillf Danton on not setting STOP on a fatal signal.

Fixes: e54945ae ("io_uring: SQPOLL stop error handling fixes")
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

This brings the behavior back in line with what 5.11 and earlier did,
and this is no longer needed with the improved handling of creds
not needing to do unshare().
Signed-off-by: NStefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

With IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_WQ we should let __io_sq_thread() use the
initial creds from each ctx.
Signed-off-by: NStefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

io_ring_exit_work() have to cancel all requests, including those staying
in io-wq, however it tries only cancellation of current tctx, which is
NULL. If we've got task==NULL, use the ctx-to-tctx map to go over all
tctx/io-wq and try cancellations on them.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We use system_unbound_wq to run io_ring_exit_work(), so it's hard to
monitor whether removal hang or not. Add WARN_ONCE to catch hangs.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We don't use task file notes anymore, and no need left in indexing
task->io_uring->xa by file, and replace it with ctx. It's better
design-wise, especially since we keep a dangling file, and so have to
keep an eye on not dereferencing it.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

With ->flush() gone we're now leaving all uring file notes until the
task dies/execs, so the ctx will not be freed until all tasks that have
ever submit a request die. It was nicer with flush but not much, we
could have locked as described ctx in many cases.

Now we guarantee that ctx outlives all tctx in a sense that
io_ring_exit_work() waits for all tctxs to drop their corresponding
enties in ->xa, and ctx won't go away until then. Hence, additional
io_uring file reference (a.k.a. task file notes) are not needed anymore.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Another preparation patch. When full quiesce is done on ctx exit, use
task_work infra to remove corresponding to the ctx io_uring->xa entries.
For that we use the back tctx map. Also use ->in_idle to prevent
removing it while we traversing ->xa on cancellation, just ignore it.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

For each pair tcxt-ctx create an object and chain it into ctx, so we
have a way to traverse all tctx that are using current ctx. Preparation
patch, will be used later.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Rework io_uring_del_task_file(), so it accepts an index to delete, and
it's not necessarily have to be in the ->xa. Infer file from xa_erase()
to maintain a single origin of truth.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

If we go async with a request, grab the creds that the task currently has
assigned and make sure that the async side switches to them. This is
handled in the same way that we do for registered personalities.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

45d189c6 ("io_uring: replace force_nonblock with flags") did
something strange for io_openat() slicing all issue_flags but
IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK. Not a bug for now, but better to just forward the
flags.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We have this weird true/false return from parking, and then some of the
callers decide to look at that. It can lead to unbalanced parks and
sqd locking. Have the callers check the thread status once it's parked.
We know we have the lock at that point, so it's either valid or it's NULL.

Fix race with parking on thread exit. We need to be careful here with
ordering of the sdq->lock and the IO_SQ_THREAD_SHOULD_PARK bit.

Rename sqd->completion to sqd->parked to reflect that this is the only
thing this completion event doesn.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

The callback can only be armed, if we get -EIOCBQUEUED returned. It's
important that we clear the WAITQ bit for other cases, otherwise we can
queue for async retry and filemap will assume that we're armed and
return -EAGAIN instead of just blocking for the IO.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.9+
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

It doesn't make sense to wait for more events to come in, if we can't
even flush the overflow we already have to the ring. Return -EBUSY for
that condition, just like we do for attempts to submit with overflow
pending.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.11
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

This allows us to do task creation and setup without needing to use
completions to try and synchronize with the starting thread. Get rid of
the old io_wq_fork_thread() wrapper, and the 'wq' and 'worker' startup
completion events - we can now do setup before the task is running.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Linked timeouts are fired asynchronously (i.e. soft-irq), and use
generic cancellation paths to do its stuff, including poking into io-wq.
The problem is that it's racy to access tctx->io_wq, as
io_uring_task_cancel() and others may be happening at this exact moment.
Mark linked timeouts with REQ_F_INLIFGHT for now, making sure there are
no timeouts before io-wq destraction.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Instead of going into request internals, like checking req->file->f_op,
do match them based on REQ_F_INFLIGHT, it's set only when we want it to
be reliably cancelled.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Alex reports that his system fails to suspend using 5.12-rc1, with the
following dump:

[  240.650300] PM: suspend entry (deep)
[  240.650748] Filesystems sync: 0.000 seconds
[  240.725605] Freezing user space processes ...
[  260.739483] Freezing of tasks failed after 20.013 seconds (3 tasks refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0):
[  260.739497] task:iou-mgr-446     state:S stack:    0 pid:  516 ppid:   439 flags:0x00004224
[  260.739504] Call Trace:
[  260.739507]  ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xb/0x81
[  260.739515]  ? pick_next_task_fair+0x197/0x1cde
[  260.739519]  ? sysvec_reschedule_ipi+0x2f/0x6a
[  260.739522]  ? asm_sysvec_reschedule_ipi+0x12/0x20
[  260.739525]  ? __schedule+0x57/0x6d6
[  260.739529]  ? del_timer_sync+0xb9/0x115
[  260.739533]  ? schedule+0x63/0xd5
[  260.739536]  ? schedule_timeout+0x219/0x356
[  260.739540]  ? __next_timer_interrupt+0xf1/0xf1
[  260.739544]  ? io_wq_manager+0x73/0xb1
[  260.739549]  ? io_wq_create+0x262/0x262
[  260.739553]  ? ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[  260.739557] task:iou-mgr-517     state:S stack:    0 pid:  522 ppid:   439 flags:0x00004224
[  260.739561] Call Trace:
[  260.739563]  ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xb/0x81
[  260.739566]  ? pick_next_task_fair+0x16f/0x1cde
[  260.739569]  ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xb/0x81
[  260.739571]  ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20
[  260.739574]  ? __schedule+0x5b7/0x6d6
[  260.739578]  ? del_timer_sync+0x70/0x115
[  260.739581]  ? schedule_timeout+0x211/0x356
[  260.739585]  ? __next_timer_interrupt+0xf1/0xf1
[  260.739588]  ? io_wq_check_workers+0x15/0x11f
[  260.739592]  ? io_wq_manager+0x69/0xb1
[  260.739596]  ? io_wq_create+0x262/0x262
[  260.739600]  ? ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[  260.739603] task:iou-wrk-517     state:S stack:    0 pid:  523 ppid:   439 flags:0x00004224
[  260.739607] Call Trace:
[  260.739609]  ? __schedule+0x5b7/0x6d6
[  260.739614]  ? schedule+0x63/0xd5
[  260.739617]  ? schedule_timeout+0x219/0x356
[  260.739621]  ? __next_timer_interrupt+0xf1/0xf1
[  260.739624]  ? task_thread.isra.0+0x148/0x3af
[  260.739628]  ? task_thread_unbound+0xa/0xa
[  260.739632]  ? task_thread_bound+0x7/0x7
[  260.739636]  ? ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[  260.739647] OOM killer enabled.
[  260.739648] Restarting tasks ... done.
[  260.740077] PM: suspend exit

Play nice and ensure that any thread we create will call try_to_freeze()
at an opportune time so that memory suspend can proceed. For the io-wq
worker threads, mark them as PF_NOFREEZE. They could potentially be
blocked for a long time.
Reported-by: NAlex Xu (Hello71) <alex_y_xu@yahoo.ca>
Tested-by: NAlex Xu (Hello71) <alex_y_xu@yahoo.ca>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

io_dismantle_req() is always followed by io_put_task(), which already do
proper in_idle wake ups, so we can skip waking the owner task in
io_dismantle_req(). The rules are simpler now, do io_put_task() shortly
after ending a request, and it will be fine.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

__io_queue_async_work() is only called from io_queue_async_work(),
inline it.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>