1. 03 5月, 2012 8 次提交
  2. 01 5月, 2012 1 次提交
    • E
      tcp: makes tcp_try_coalesce aware of skb->head_frag · 329033f6
      Eric Dumazet 提交于
      TCP coalesce can check if skb to be merged has its skb->head mapped to a
      page fragment, instead of a kmalloc() area.
      
      We had to disable coalescing in this case, for performance reasons.
      
      We 'upgrade' skb->head as a fragment in itself.
      
      This reduces number of cache misses when user makes its copies, since a
      less sk_buff are fetched.
      
      This makes receive and ofo queues shorter and thus reduce cache line
      misses in TCP stack.
      
      This is a followup of patch "net: allow skb->head to be a page fragment"
      
      Tested with tg3 nic, with GRO on or off. We can see "TCPRcvCoalesce"
      counter being incremented.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
      Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      Cc: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com>
      Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
      Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
      Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
      Cc: Matt Carlson <mcarlson@broadcom.com>
      Cc: Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      329033f6
  3. 24 4月, 2012 2 次提交
  4. 22 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  5. 18 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  6. 16 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  7. 15 4月, 2012 2 次提交
  8. 11 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  9. 06 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  10. 20 3月, 2012 2 次提交
    • E
      tcp: reduce out_of_order memory use · c8628155
      Eric Dumazet 提交于
      With increasing receive window sizes, but speed of light not improved
      that much, out of order queue can contain a huge number of skbs, waiting
      to be moved to receive_queue when missing packets can fill the holes.
      
      Some devices happen to use fat skbs (truesize of 4096 + sizeof(struct
      sk_buff)) to store regular (MTU <= 1500) frames. This makes highly
      probable sk_rmem_alloc hits sk_rcvbuf limit, which can be 4Mbytes in
      many cases.
      
      When limit is hit, tcp stack calls tcp_collapse_ofo_queue(), a true
      latency killer and cpu cache blower.
      
      Doing the coalescing attempt each time we add a frame in ofo queue
      permits to keep memory use tight and in many cases avoid the
      tcp_collapse() thing later.
      
      Tested on various wireless setups (b43, ath9k, ...) known to use big skb
      truesize, this patch removed the "packets collapsed in receive queue due
      to low socket buffer" I had before.
      
      This also reduced average memory used by tcp sockets.
      
      With help from Neal Cardwell.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
      Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Cc: H.K. Jerry Chu <hkchu@google.com>
      Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
      Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
      Acked-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      c8628155
    • E
      tcp: introduce tcp_data_queue_ofo · e86b2919
      Eric Dumazet 提交于
      Split tcp_data_queue() in two parts for better readability.
      
      tcp_data_queue_ofo() is responsible for queueing incoming skb into out
      of order queue.
      
      Change code layout so that the skb_set_owner_r() is performed only if
      skb is not dropped.
      
      This is a preliminary patch before "reduce out_of_order memory use"
      following patch.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
      Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Cc: H.K. Jerry Chu <hkchu@google.com>
      Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
      Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
      Acked-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      e86b2919
  11. 13 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  12. 12 3月, 2012 1 次提交
    • J
      net: Convert printks to pr_<level> · 058bd4d2
      Joe Perches 提交于
      Use a more current kernel messaging style.
      
      Convert a printk block to print_hex_dump.
      Coalesce formats, align arguments.
      Use %s, __func__ instead of embedding function names.
      
      Some messages that were prefixed with <foo>_close are
      now prefixed with <foo>_fini.  Some ah4 and esp messages
      are now not prefixed with "ip ".
      
      The intent of this patch is to later add something like
        #define pr_fmt(fmt) "IPv4: " fmt.
      to standardize the output messages.
      
      Text size is trivially reduced. (x86-32 allyesconfig)
      
      $ size net/ipv4/built-in.o*
         text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
       887888	  31558	 249696	1169142	 11d6f6	net/ipv4/built-in.o.new
       887934	  31558	 249800	1169292	 11d78c	net/ipv4/built-in.o.old
      Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      058bd4d2
  13. 07 3月, 2012 1 次提交
    • N
      tcp: fix tcp_shift_skb_data() to not shift SACKed data below snd_una · 4648dc97
      Neal Cardwell 提交于
      This commit fixes tcp_shift_skb_data() so that it does not shift
      SACKed data below snd_una.
      
      This fixes an issue whose symptoms exactly match reports showing
      tp->sacked_out going negative since 3.3.0-rc4 (see "WARNING: at
      net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:3418" thread on netdev).
      
      Since 2008 (832d11c5)
      tcp_shift_skb_data() had been shifting SACKed ranges that were below
      snd_una. It checked that the *end* of the skb it was about to shift
      from was above snd_una, but did not check that the end of the actual
      shifted range was above snd_una; this commit adds that check.
      
      Shifting SACKed ranges below snd_una is problematic because for such
      ranges tcp_sacktag_one() short-circuits: it does not declare anything
      as SACKed and does not increase sacked_out.
      
      Before the fixes in commits cc9a672e
      and daef52ba, shifting SACKed ranges
      below snd_una happened to work because tcp_shifted_skb() was always
      (incorrectly) passing in to tcp_sacktag_one() an skb whose end_seq
      tcp_shift_skb_data() had already guaranteed was beyond snd_una. Hence
      tcp_sacktag_one() never short-circuited and always increased
      tp->sacked_out in this case.
      
      After those two fixes, my testing has verified that shifting SACKed
      ranges below snd_una could cause tp->sacked_out to go negative with
      the following sequence of events:
      
      (1) tcp_shift_skb_data() sees an skb whose end_seq is beyond snd_una,
          then shifts a prefix of that skb that is below snd_una
      
      (2) tcp_shifted_skb() increments the packet count of the
          already-SACKed prev sk_buff
      
      (3) tcp_sacktag_one() sees the end of the new SACKed range is below
          snd_una, so it short-circuits and doesn't increase tp->sacked_out
      
      (5) tcp_clean_rtx_queue() sees the SACKed skb has been ACKed,
          decrements tp->sacked_out by this "inflated" pcount that was
          missing a matching increase in tp->sacked_out, and hence
          tp->sacked_out underflows to a u32 like 0xFFFFFFFF, which casted
          to s32 is negative.
      
      (6) this leads to the warnings seen in the recent "WARNING: at
          net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:3418" thread on the netdev list; e.g.:
          tcp_input.c:3418  WARN_ON((int)tp->sacked_out < 0);
      
      More generally, I think this bug can be tickled in some cases where
      two or more ACKs from the receiver are lost and then a DSACK arrives
      that is immediately above an existing SACKed skb in the write queue.
      
      This fix changes tcp_shift_skb_data() to abort this sequence at step
      (1) in the scenario above by noticing that the bytes are below snd_una
      and not shifting them.
      Signed-off-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4648dc97
  14. 04 3月, 2012 1 次提交
    • N
      tcp: don't fragment SACKed skbs in tcp_mark_head_lost() · c0638c24
      Neal Cardwell 提交于
      In tcp_mark_head_lost() we should not attempt to fragment a SACKed skb
      to mark the first portion as lost. This is for two primary reasons:
      
      (1) tcp_shifted_skb() coalesces adjacent regions of SACKed skbs. When
      doing this, it preserves the sum of their packet counts in order to
      reflect the real-world dynamics on the wire. But given that skbs can
      have remainders that do not align to MSS boundaries, this packet count
      preservation means that for SACKed skbs there is not necessarily a
      direct linear relationship between tcp_skb_pcount(skb) and
      skb->len. Thus tcp_mark_head_lost()'s previous attempts to fragment
      off and mark as lost a prefix of length (packets - oldcnt)*mss from
      SACKed skbs were leading to occasional failures of the WARN_ON(len >
      skb->len) in tcp_fragment() (which used to be a BUG_ON(); see the
      recent "crash in tcp_fragment" thread on netdev).
      
      (2) there is no real point in fragmenting off part of a SACKed skb and
      calling tcp_skb_mark_lost() on it, since tcp_skb_mark_lost() is a NOP
      for SACKed skbs.
      Signed-off-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Acked-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
      Acked-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Acked-by: NNandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      c0638c24
  15. 29 2月, 2012 1 次提交
    • N
      tcp: fix false reordering signal in tcp_shifted_skb · 4c90d3b3
      Neal Cardwell 提交于
      When tcp_shifted_skb() shifts bytes from the skb that is currently
      pointed to by 'highest_sack' then the increment of
      TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq implicitly advances tcp_highest_sack_seq(). This
      implicit advancement, combined with the recent fix to pass the correct
      SACKed range into tcp_sacktag_one(), caused tcp_sacktag_one() to think
      that the newly SACKed range was before the tcp_highest_sack_seq(),
      leading to a call to tcp_update_reordering() with a degree of
      reordering matching the size of the newly SACKed range (typically just
      1 packet, which is a NOP, but potentially larger).
      
      This commit fixes this by simply calling tcp_sacktag_one() before the
      TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq advancement that can advance our notion of the
      highest SACKed sequence.
      
      Correspondingly, we can simplify the code a little now that
      tcp_shifted_skb() should update the lost_cnt_hint in all cases where
      skb == tp->lost_skb_hint.
      Signed-off-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4c90d3b3
  16. 15 2月, 2012 1 次提交
  17. 13 2月, 2012 2 次提交
  18. 23 1月, 2012 1 次提交
    • Y
      tcp: detect loss above high_seq in recovery · 974c1236
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      Correctly implement a loss detection heuristic: New sequences (above
      high_seq) sent during the fast recovery are deemed lost when higher
      sequences are SACKed.
      
      Current code does not catch these losses, because tcp_mark_head_lost()
      does not check packets beyond high_seq. The fix is straight-forward by
      checking packets until the highest sacked packet. In addition, all the
      FLAG_DATA_LOST logic are in-effective and redundant and can be removed.
      
      Update the loss heuristic comments. The algorithm above is documented
      as heuristic B, but it is redundant too because heuristic A already
      covers B.
      
      Note that this change only marks some forward-retransmitted packets LOST.
      It does NOT forbid TCP performing further CWR on new losses. A potential
      follow-up patch under preparation is to perform another CWR on "new"
      losses such as
      1) sequence above high_seq is lost (by resetting high_seq to snd_nxt)
      2) retransmission is lost.
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      974c1236
  19. 21 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  20. 13 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  21. 12 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  22. 04 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  23. 28 11月, 2011 5 次提交
  24. 21 10月, 2011 2 次提交