In cluster_pages_for_defrag(), we have complex code block inside one
for() loop.

The code block is to prepare one page for defrag, this will ensure:

- The page is locked and set up properly.
- No ordered extent exists in the page range.
- The page is uptodate.

This behavior is pretty common and will be reused by later defrag
rework.

So factor out the code into its own helper, defrag_prepare_one_page(),
for later usage, and cleanup the code by a little.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

When testing subpage defrag support, I always find some strange inode
nbytes error, after a lot of debugging, it turns out that
defrag_lookup_extent() is using PAGE_SIZE as size for
lookup_extent_mapping().

Since lookup_extent_mapping() is calling __lookup_extent_mapping() with
@strict == 1, this means any extent map smaller than one page will be
ignored, prevent subpage defrag to grab a correct extent map.

There are quite some PAGE_SIZE usage in ioctl.c, but most of them are
correct usages, and can be one of the following cases:

- ioctl structure size check
  We want ioctl structure to be contained inside one page.

- real page operations

The remaining cases in defrag_lookup_extent() and
check_defrag_in_cache() will be addressed in this patch.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

In function cluster_pages_for_defrag() we have a window where we unlock
page, either start the ordered range or read the content from disk.

When we re-lock the page, we need to make sure it still has the correct
page->private for subpage.

Thus add the extra PagePrivate check here to handle subpage cases
properly.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Currently btrfs_defrag_file() accepts both "struct inode" and "struct
file" as parameter.  We can easily grab "struct inode" from "struct
file" using file_inode() helper.

The reason why we need "struct file" is just to re-use its f_ra.

Change this to pass "struct file_ra_state" parameter, so that it's more
clear what we really want.  Since we're here, also add some comments on
the function btrfs_defrag_file().
Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

btrfs_chunk_readonly() checks if the given chunk is writeable. It
returns 1 for readonly, and 0 for writeable. So the return argument type
bool shall suffice instead of the current type int.

Also, rename btrfs_chunk_readonly() to btrfs_chunk_writeable() as we
check if the bg is writeable, and helps to keep the logic at the parent
function simpler to understand.
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Fix a warning reported by smatch that ret could be returned without
initialized.  The dedupe operations are supposed to to return 0 for a 0
length range but the caller does not pass olen == 0. To keep this
behaviour and also fix the warning initialize ret to 0.
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NSidong Yang <realwakka@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Currently we use u16 bitmap to make 4k sectorsize work for 64K page
size.

But this u16 bitmap is not large enough to contain larger page size like
128K, nor is space efficient for 16K page size.

To handle both cases, here we pack all subpage bitmaps into a larger
bitmap, now btrfs_subpage::bitmaps[] will be the ultimate bitmap for
subpage usage.

Each sub-bitmap will has its start bit number recorded in
btrfs_subpage_info::*_start, and its bitmap length will be recorded in
btrfs_subpage_info::bitmap_nr_bits.

All subpage bitmap operations will be converted from using direct u16
operations to bitmap operations, with above *_start calculated.

For 64K page size with 4K sectorsize, this should not cause much
difference.

While for 16K page size, we will only need 1 unsigned long (u32) to
store all the bitmaps, which saves quite some space.

Furthermore, this allows us to support larger page size like 128K and
258K.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Currently we use fixed size u16 bitmap for subpage bitmap.  This is fine
for 4K sectorsize with 64K page size.

But for 4K sectorsize and larger page size, the bitmap is too small,
while for smaller page size like 16K, u16 bitmaps waste too much space.

Here we introduce a new helper structure, btrfs_subpage_bitmap_info, to
record the proper bitmap size, and where each bitmap should start at.

By this, we can later compact all subpage bitmaps into one u32 bitmap.
This patch is the first step.
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The existing calling convention of btrfs_alloc_subpage() is pretty
awful.  Change it to a more common pattern by returning struct
btrfs_subpage directly and let the caller to determine if the call
succeeded.
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

There are two call sites of btrfs_alloc_subpage():

- btrfs_attach_subpage()
  We have ensured sectorsize is smaller than PAGE_SIZE

- alloc_extent_buffer()
  We call btrfs_alloc_subpage() unconditionally.

The alloc_extent_buffer() forces us to check the sectorsize size against
page size inside btrfs_alloc_subpage().

Since the function name, btrfs_alloc_subpage(), already indicates it
should only get called for subpage cases, do the check in
alloc_extent_buffer() and add an ASSERT() in btrfs_alloc_subpage().
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Update it since commit 944d3f9f ("btrfs: switch seed device to
list api") did conversion from fs_devices::seed to fs_devices::seed_list.
Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NSu Yue <l@damenly.su>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

There is no need for the variable ret after d66105cfa873 ("btrfs:
allocate btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan_args on stack"), remove it.
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The out label is being overused, we can simply return if the condition
permits.

No functional changes.
Reviewed-by: NSu Yue <l@damenly.su>
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The user facing function used to allocate new chunks is
btrfs_chunk_alloc, unfortunately there is yet another similar sounding
function - btrfs_alloc_chunk. This creates confusion, especially since
the latter function can be considered "private" in the sense that it
implements the first stage of chunk creation and as such is called by
btrfs_chunk_alloc.

To avoid the awkwardness that comes with having similarly named but
distinctly different in their purpose function rename btrfs_alloc_chunk
to btrfs_create_chunk, given that the main purpose of this function is
to orchestrate the whole process of allocating a chunk - reserving space
into devices, deciding on characteristics of the stripe size and
creating the in-memory structures.
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Error injection testing uncovered a case where we'd end up with a
corrupt file system with a missing extent in the middle of a file.  This
occurs because the if statement to decide if we should abort is wrong.

The only way we would abort in this case is if we got a ret !=
-EOPNOTSUPP and we called from the file clone code.  However the
prealloc code uses this path too.  Instead we need to abort if there is
an error, and the only error we _don't_ abort on is -EOPNOTSUPP and only
if we came from the clone file code.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

At replay_one_name(), we are treating any error from btrfs_lookup_inode()
as if the inode does not exists. Fix this by checking for an error and
returning it to the caller.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() and btrfs_lookup_dir_item() lookup for dir
entries and both are used during log replay or when updating a log tree
during an unlink.

However when the dir item does not exists, btrfs_lookup_dir_item() returns
NULL while btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() returns PTR_ERR(-ENOENT), and if
the dir item exists but there is no matching entry for a given name or
index, both return NULL. This makes the call sites during log replay to
be more verbose than necessary and it makes it easy to miss this slight
difference. Since we don't need to distinguish between those two cases,
make btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() always return NULL when there is no
matching directory entry - either because there isn't any dir entry or
because there is one but it does not match the given name and index.

Also rename the argument 'objectid' of btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() to
'index' since it is supposed to match an index number, and the name
'objectid' is not very good because it can easily be confused with an
inode number (like the inode number a dir entry points to).

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

At __inode_add_ref(), we treating any error returned from
btrfs_lookup_dir_item() or from btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() as meaning
that there is no existing directory entry in the fs/subvolume tree.
This is not correct since we can get errors such as, for example, -EIO
when reading extent buffers while searching the fs/subvolume's btree.

So fix that and return the error to the caller when it is not -ENOENT.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

At replay_one_one(), we are treating any error returned from
btrfs_lookup_dir_item() or from btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() as meaning
that there is no existing directory entry in the fs/subvolume tree.
This is not correct since we can get errors such as, for example, -EIO
when reading extent buffers while searching the fs/subvolume's btree.

So fix that and return the error to the caller when it is not -ENOENT.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Currently inode_in_dir() ignores errors returned from
btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() and from btrfs_lookup_dir_item(), treating
any errors as if the directory entry does not exists in the fs/subvolume
tree, which is obviously not correct, as we can get errors such as -EIO
when reading extent buffers while searching the fs/subvolume's tree.

Fix that by making inode_in_dir() return the errors and making its only
caller, add_inode_ref(), deal with returned errors as well.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

I hit a stuck relocation on btrfs/061 during my overnight testing.  This
turned out to be because we had left over extent entries in our extent
root for a data reloc inode that no longer existed.  This happened
because in btrfs_drop_extents() we only update refs if we have SHAREABLE
set or we are the tree_root.  This regression was introduced by
aeb935a4 ("btrfs: don't set SHAREABLE flag for data reloc tree")
where we stopped setting SHAREABLE for the data reloc tree.

The problem here is we actually do want to update extent references for
data extents in the data reloc tree, in fact we only don't want to
update extent references if the file extents are in the log tree.
Update this check to only skip updating references in the case of the
log tree.

This is relatively rare, because you have to be running scrub at the
same time, which is what btrfs/061 does.  The data reloc inode has its
extents pre-allocated, and then we copy the extent into the
pre-allocated chunks.  We theoretically should never be calling
btrfs_drop_extents() on a data reloc inode.  The exception of course is
with scrub, if our pre-allocated extent falls inside of the block group
we are scrubbing, then the block group will be marked read only and we
will be forced to cow that extent.  This means we will call
btrfs_drop_extents() on that range when we COW that file extent.

This isn't really problematic if we do this, the data reloc inode
requires that our extent lengths match exactly with the extent we are
copying, thankfully we validate the extent is correct with
get_new_location(), so if we happen to COW only part of the extent we
won't link it in when we do the relocation, so we are safe from any
other shenanigans that arise because of this interaction with scrub.

Fixes: aeb935a4 ("btrfs: don't set SHAREABLE flag for data reloc tree")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.8+
Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

[BUG]
There is a bug report that injected ENOMEM error could leave a tree
block locked while we return to user-space:

  BTRFS info (device loop0): enabling ssd optimizations
  FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure.
  name failslab, interval 1, probability 0, space 0, times 0
  CPU: 0 PID: 7579 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 5.15.0-rc1 #16
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
  rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
   dump_stack_lvl+0x8d/0xcf lib/dump_stack.c:106
   fail_dump lib/fault-inject.c:52 [inline]
   should_fail+0x13c/0x160 lib/fault-inject.c:146
   should_failslab+0x5/0x10 mm/slab_common.c:1328
   slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.99+0x4e/0xc0 mm/slab.h:494
   slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3120 [inline]
   slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3214 [inline]
   kmem_cache_alloc+0x44/0x280 mm/slub.c:3219
   btrfs_alloc_delayed_extent_op fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.h:299 [inline]
   btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x38c/0x670 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4833
   __btrfs_cow_block+0x16f/0x7d0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415
   btrfs_cow_block+0x12a/0x300 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570
   btrfs_search_slot+0x6b0/0xee0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768
   btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x80/0xf0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:3905
   btrfs_new_inode+0x311/0xa60 fs/btrfs/inode.c:6530
   btrfs_create+0x12b/0x270 fs/btrfs/inode.c:6783
   lookup_open+0x660/0x780 fs/namei.c:3282
   open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3352 [inline]
   path_openat+0x465/0xe20 fs/namei.c:3557
   do_filp_open+0xe3/0x170 fs/namei.c:3588
   do_sys_openat2+0x357/0x4a0 fs/open.c:1200
   do_sys_open+0x87/0xd0 fs/open.c:1216
   do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
   do_syscall_64+0x34/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
  RIP: 0033:0x46ae99
  Code: f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48
  89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d
  01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
  RSP: 002b:00007f46711b9c48 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000055
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000078c0a0 RCX: 000000000046ae99
  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000000a1 RDI: 0000000020005800
  RBP: 00007f46711b9c80 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000017
  R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000000000078c0a0 R15: 00007ffc129da6e0

  ================================================
  WARNING: lock held when returning to user space!
  5.15.0-rc1 #16 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------
  syz-executor/7579 is leaving the kernel with locks still held!
  1 lock held by syz-executor/7579:
   #0: ffff888104b73da8 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
  __btrfs_tree_lock+0x2e/0x1a0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:112

[CAUSE]
In btrfs_alloc_tree_block(), after btrfs_init_new_buffer(), the new
extent buffer @buf is locked, but if later operations like adding
delayed tree ref fail, we just free @buf without unlocking it,
resulting above warning.

[FIX]
Unlock @buf in out_free_buf: label.
Reported-by: NHao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsZ9O6Zr0KK1yGn=1rQi6Crh1yeCRdTSBxx9R99L4xdn-Q@mail.gmail.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

It's not uncommon where __btrfs_dump_space_info() gets called
under over-commit situations.

In that case free space would underflow as total allocated space is not
enough to handle all the over-committed space.

Such underflow values can sometimes cause confusion for users enabled
enospc_debug mount option, and takes some seconds for developers to
convert the underflow value to signed result.

Just output the free space as s64 to avoid such problem.
Reported-by: NEli V <eliventer@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAJtFHUSy4zgyhf-4d9T+KdJp9w=UgzC2A0V=VtmaeEpcGgm1-Q@mail.gmail.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

When we get an error flushing one device, during a super block commit, we
record the error in the device structure, in the field 'last_flush_error'.
This is used to later check if we should error out the super block commit,
depending on whether the number of flush errors is greater than or equals
to the maximum tolerated device failures for a raid profile.

However if we get a transient device flush error, unmount the filesystem
and later try to mount it, we can fail the mount because we treat that
past error as critical and consider the device is missing. Even if it's
very likely that the error will happen again, as it's probably due to a
hardware related problem, there may be cases where the error might not
happen again. One example is during testing, and a test case like the
new generic/648 from fstests always triggers this. The test cases
generic/019 and generic/475 also trigger this scenario, but very
sporadically.

When this happens we get an error like this:

  $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt
  mount: /mnt wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdc, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.

  $ dmesg
  (...)
  [12918.886926] BTRFS warning (device sdc): chunk 13631488 missing 1 devices, max tolerance is 0 for writable mount
  [12918.888293] BTRFS warning (device sdc): writable mount is not allowed due to too many missing devices
  [12918.890853] BTRFS error (device sdc): open_ctree failed

The failure happens because when btrfs_check_rw_degradable() is called at
mount time, or at remount from RO to RW time, is sees a non zero value in
a device's ->last_flush_error attribute, and therefore considers that the
device is 'missing'.

Fix this by setting a device's ->last_flush_error to zero when we close a
device, making sure the error is not seen on the next mount attempt. We
only need to track flush errors during the current mount, so that we never
commit a super block if such errors happened.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

During a verity rollback, if we fail to update the inode or delete the
orphan, we abort the transaction and return without releasing our
transaction handle. Fix that by releasing the handle.

Fixes: 14605409 ("btrfs: initial fsverity support")
Fixes: 70524253 ("btrfs: verity metadata orphan items")
Reviewed-by: NBoris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

There is a BUG_ON() in btrfs_csum_one_bio() to catch code logic error.
It has indeed caught several bugs during subpage development.
But the BUG_ON() itself will bring down the whole system which is
an overkill.

Replace it with a WARN() and exit gracefully, so that it won't crash the
whole system while we can still catch the code logic error.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

btrfs_add_ordered_extent_*() add num_bytes to fs_info->ordered_bytes.
Then, splitting an ordered extent will call btrfs_add_ordered_extent_*()
again for split extents, leading to double counting of the region of
a split extent. These leaked bytes are finally reported at unmount time
as follow:

  BTRFS info (device dm-1): at unmount dio bytes count 364544

Fix the double counting by subtracting split extent's size from
fs_info->ordered_bytes.

Fixes: d22002fd ("btrfs: zoned: split ordered extent when bio is sent")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+
Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Following test case reproduces lockdep warning.

  Test case:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f <dev1>
  $ btrfstune -S 1 <dev1>
  $ mount <dev1> <mnt>
  $ btrfs device add <dev2> <mnt> -f
  $ umount <mnt>
  $ mount <dev2> <mnt>
  $ umount <mnt>

The warning claims a possible ABBA deadlock between the threads
initiated by [#1] btrfs device add and [#0] the mount.

  [ 540.743122] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  [ 540.743129] 5.11.0-rc7+ #5 Not tainted
  [ 540.743135] ------------------------------------------------------
  [ 540.743142] mount/2515 is trying to acquire lock:
  [ 540.743149] ffffa0c5544c2ce0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: clone_fs_devices+0x6d/0x210 [btrfs]
  [ 540.743458] but task is already holding lock:
  [ 540.743461] ffffa0c54a7932b8 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs]
  [ 540.743541] which lock already depends on the new lock.
  [ 540.743543] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  [ 540.743546] -> #1 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}:
  [ 540.743566] down_read_nested+0x48/0x2b0
  [ 540.743585] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs]
  [ 540.743650] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x70/0x200 [btrfs]
  [ 540.743733] btrfs_search_slot+0x6c6/0xe00 [btrfs]
  [ 540.743785] btrfs_update_device+0x83/0x260 [btrfs]
  [ 540.743849] btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc+0x13f/0x660 [btrfs] <--- device_list_mutex
  [ 540.743911] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x18d/0x3f0 [btrfs]
  [ 540.743982] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x86/0x1260 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744037] btrfs_init_new_device+0x1600/0x1dd0 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744101] btrfs_ioctl+0x1c77/0x24c0 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744166] __x64_sys_ioctl+0xe4/0x140
  [ 540.744170] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x80
  [ 540.744174] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  [ 540.744180] -> #0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
  [ 540.744184] __lock_acquire+0x155f/0x2360
  [ 540.744188] lock_acquire+0x10b/0x5c0
  [ 540.744190] __mutex_lock+0xb1/0xf80
  [ 540.744193] mutex_lock_nested+0x27/0x30
  [ 540.744196] clone_fs_devices+0x6d/0x210 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744270] btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x3c7/0xbb0 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744336] open_ctree+0xf6e/0x2074 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744406] btrfs_mount_root.cold.72+0x16/0x127 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744472] legacy_get_tree+0x38/0x90
  [ 540.744475] vfs_get_tree+0x30/0x140
  [ 540.744478] fc_mount+0x16/0x60
  [ 540.744482] vfs_kern_mount+0x91/0x100
  [ 540.744484] btrfs_mount+0x1e6/0x670 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744536] legacy_get_tree+0x38/0x90
  [ 540.744537] vfs_get_tree+0x30/0x140
  [ 540.744539] path_mount+0x8d8/0x1070
  [ 540.744541] do_mount+0x8d/0xc0
  [ 540.744543] __x64_sys_mount+0x125/0x160
  [ 540.744545] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x80
  [ 540.744547] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  [ 540.744551] other info that might help us debug this:
  [ 540.744552] Possible unsafe locking scenario:

  [ 540.744553] CPU0 				CPU1
  [ 540.744554] ---- 				----
  [ 540.744555] lock(btrfs-chunk-00);
  [ 540.744557] 					lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
  [ 540.744560] 					lock(btrfs-chunk-00);
  [ 540.744562] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
  [ 540.744564]
   *** DEADLOCK ***

  [ 540.744565] 3 locks held by mount/2515:
  [ 540.744567] #0: ffffa0c56bf7a0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#42/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: alloc_super.isra.16+0xdf/0x450
  [ 540.744574] #1: ffffffffc05a9628 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x63/0xbb0 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744640] #2: ffffa0c54a7932b8 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744708]
   stack backtrace:
  [ 540.744712] CPU: 2 PID: 2515 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.11.0-rc7+ #5

But the device_list_mutex in clone_fs_devices() is redundant, as
explained below.  Two threads [1]  and [2] (below) could lead to
clone_fs_device().

  [1]
  open_ctree <== mount sprout fs
   btrfs_read_chunk_tree()
    mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex) <== global lock
    read_one_dev()
     open_seed_devices()
      clone_fs_devices() <== seed fs_devices
       mutex_lock(&orig->device_list_mutex) <== seed fs_devices

  [2]
  btrfs_init_new_device() <== sprouting
   mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex); <== global lock
   btrfs_prepare_sprout()
     lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex)
     clone_fs_devices(seed_fs_device) <== seed fs_devices

Both of these threads hold uuid_mutex which is sufficient to protect
getting the seed device(s) freed while we are trying to clone it for
sprouting [2] or mounting a sprout [1] (as above). A mounted seed device
can not free/write/replace because it is read-only. An unmounted seed
device can be freed by btrfs_free_stale_devices(), but it needs
uuid_mutex.  So this patch removes the unnecessary device_list_mutex in
clone_fs_devices().  And adds a lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex) in
clone_fs_devices().
Reported-by: NSu Yue <l@damenly.su>
Tested-by: NSu Yue <l@damenly.su>
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

When removing the device we call blkdev_put() on the device once we've
removed it, and because we have an EXCL open we need to take the
->open_mutex on the block device to clean it up.  Unfortunately during
device remove we are holding the sb writers lock, which results in the
following lockdep splat:

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.14.0-rc2+ #407 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
losetup/11595 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff973ac35dd138 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0

but task is already holding lock:
ffff973ac9812c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop]

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750
       lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop]
       blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0
       blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0
       blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0
       do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390
       path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20
       do_filp_open+0x96/0x120
       do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130
       __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70
       do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

-> #3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750
       blkdev_put+0x3a/0x220
       btrfs_rm_device.cold+0x62/0xe5
       btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0
       do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

-> #2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}:
       lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop]
       loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop]
       process_one_work+0x26b/0x560
       worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
       kthread+0x140/0x160
       ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

-> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       process_one_work+0x245/0x560
       worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
       kthread+0x140/0x160
       ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

-> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90
       lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
       flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0
       drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110
       destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250
       __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop]
       block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0
       do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
                               lock(&disk->open_mutex);
                               lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
  lock((wq_completion)loop0);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by losetup/11595:
 #0: ffff973ac9812c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop]

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 11595 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #407
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72
 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0
 ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50
 __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90
 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0
 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220
 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0
 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0
 ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100
 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110
 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250
 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop]
 ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0
 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50
 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7fc21255d4cb

So instead save the bdev and do the put once we've dropped the sb
writers lock in order to avoid the lockdep recursion.
Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

We update the ctime/mtime of a block device when we remove it so that
blkid knows the device changed.  However we do this by re-opening the
block device and calling filp_update_time.  This is more correct because
it'll call the inode->i_op->update_time if it exists, but the block dev
inodes do not do this.  Instead call generic_update_time() on the
bd_inode in order to avoid the blkdev_open path and get rid of the
following lockdep splat:

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.14.0-rc2+ #406 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
losetup/11596 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff939640d2f538 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0

but task is already holding lock:
ffff939655510c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop]

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750
       lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop]
       blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0
       blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0
       blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0
       do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390
       path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20
       do_filp_open+0x96/0x120
       do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130
       __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70
       do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

-> #3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750
       blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x56/0x3c0
       blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0
       do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390
       path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20
       do_filp_open+0x96/0x120
       file_open_name+0xc7/0x170
       filp_open+0x2c/0x50
       btrfs_scratch_superblocks.part.0+0x10f/0x170
       btrfs_rm_device.cold+0xe8/0xed
       btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0
       do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

-> #2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}:
       lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop]
       loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop]
       process_one_work+0x26b/0x560
       worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
       kthread+0x140/0x160
       ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

-> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       process_one_work+0x245/0x560
       worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
       kthread+0x140/0x160
       ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

-> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90
       lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
       flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0
       drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110
       destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250
       __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop]
       block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0
       do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
                               lock(&disk->open_mutex);
                               lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
  lock((wq_completion)loop0);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by losetup/11596:
 #0: ffff939655510c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop]

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 11596 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #406
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72
 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0
 ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50
 __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90
 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0
 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220
 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0
 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0
 ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100
 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110
 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250
 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop]
 ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0
 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50
 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

asm/do_div.h is for div_u64, but it is found in math64.h. This change
will make compiler job easier and prevent compiler errors in situation
where compiler will not find math64.h from another paths.
Signed-off-by: NKari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The mount option max_inline ranges from 0 to the sectorsize (which is
now equal to page size). But we parse the mount options too early and
before the actual sectorsize is read from the superblock. So the upper
limit of max_inline is unaware of the actual sectorsize and is limited
by the temporary sectorsize 4096, even on a system where the default
sectorsize is 64K.

Fix this by reading the superblock sectorsize before the mount option
parse.
Reported-by: NAlexander Tsvetkov <alexander.tsvetkov@oracle.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

This reverts commit f2165627.

[BUG]
It's no longer possible to create compressed inline extent after commit
f2165627 ("btrfs: compression: don't try to compress if we don't
have enough pages").

[CAUSE]
For compression code, there are several possible reasons we have a range
that needs to be compressed while it's no more than one page.

- Compressed inline write
  The data is always smaller than one sector and the test lacks the
  condition to properly recognize a non-inline extent.

- Compressed subpage write
  For the incoming subpage compressed write support, we require page
  alignment of the delalloc range.
  And for 64K page size, we can compress just one page into smaller
  sectors.

For those reasons, the requirement for the data to be more than one page
is not correct, and is already causing regression for compressed inline
data writeback.  The idea of skipping one page to avoid wasting CPU time
could be revisited in the future.

[FIX]
Fix it by reverting the offending commit.
Reported-by: NZygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/afa2742.c084f5d6.17b6b08dffc@tnonline.net
Fixes: f2165627 ("btrfs: compression: don't try to compress if we don't have enough pages")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

This crash was observed with a failed assertion on device close:

  BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28)
  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3902 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2150 btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x1d2/0x1e0 [btrfs]
  Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic libcrc32c crc32c_intel xor zstd_decompress zstd_compress xxhash lzo_compress lzo_decompress raid6_pq loop
  CPU: 1 PID: 3902 Comm: kworker/u8:4 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc5-default+ #1532
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
  Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space [btrfs]
  RIP: 0010:btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x1d2/0x1e0 [btrfs]
  RSP: 0018:ffffb7a5452d7d80 EFLAGS: 00010282
  RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 0000000000000000
  RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffffabee13c4 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
  RBP: ffff97834176a378 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff97835195d388
  R13: 0000000005b08000 R14: ffff978385484000 R15: 000000000000016c
  FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9783bd800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 000056190d003fe8 CR3: 000000002a81e005 CR4: 0000000000170ea0
  Call Trace:
   flush_space+0x197/0x2f0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x139/0x300 [btrfs]
   process_one_work+0x262/0x5e0
   worker_thread+0x4c/0x320
   ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0
   kthread+0x144/0x170
   ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
  irq event stamp: 19334989
  hardirqs last  enabled at (19334997): [<ffffffffab0e0c87>] console_unlock+0x2b7/0x400
  hardirqs last disabled at (19335006): [<ffffffffab0e0d0d>] console_unlock+0x33d/0x400
  softirqs last  enabled at (19334900): [<ffffffffaba0030d>] __do_softirq+0x30d/0x574
  softirqs last disabled at (19334893): [<ffffffffab0721ec>] irq_exit_rcu+0x12c/0x140
  ---[ end trace 45939e308e0dd3c7 ]---
  BTRFS: error (device vdd) in btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2150: errno=-28 No space left
  BTRFS info (device vdd): forced readonly
  BTRFS warning (device vdd): failed setting block group ro: -30
  BTRFS info (device vdd): suspending dev_replace for unmount
  assertion failed: !test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT, &device->dev_state), in fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1150
  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3431!
  invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
  CPU: 1 PID: 3982 Comm: umount Tainted: G        W         5.14.0-rc5-default+ #1532
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
  RIP: 0010:assertfail.constprop.0+0x18/0x1a [btrfs]
  RSP: 0018:ffffb7a5454c7db8 EFLAGS: 00010246
  RAX: 0000000000000068 RBX: ffff978364b91c00 RCX: 0000000000000000
  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffffabee13c4 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
  RBP: ffff9783523a4c00 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9783523a4d18
  R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000004 R15: 0000000000000003
  FS:  00007f61c8f42800(0000) GS:ffff9783bd800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 000056190cffa810 CR3: 0000000030b96002 CR4: 0000000000170ea0
  Call Trace:
   btrfs_close_one_device.cold+0x11/0x55 [btrfs]
   close_fs_devices+0x44/0xb0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_close_devices+0x48/0x160 [btrfs]
   generic_shutdown_super+0x69/0x100
   kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30
   btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs]
   deactivate_locked_super+0x2c/0xa0
   cleanup_mnt+0x144/0x1b0
   task_work_run+0x59/0xa0
   exit_to_user_mode_loop+0xe7/0xf0
   exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xaf/0xf0
   syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x19/0x50
   do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x90
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

This happens when close_ctree is called while a dev_replace hasn't
completed. In close_ctree, we suspend the dev_replace, but keep the
replace target around so that we can resume the dev_replace procedure
when we mount the root again. This is the call trace:

  close_ctree():
    btrfs_dev_replace_suspend_for_unmount();
    btrfs_close_devices():
      btrfs_close_fs_devices():
        btrfs_close_one_device():
          ASSERT(!test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT,
                 &device->dev_state));

However, since the replace target sticks around, there is a device
with BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT set on close, and we fail the
assertion in btrfs_close_one_device.

To fix this, if we come across the replace target device when
closing, we should properly reset it back to allocation state. This
fix also ensures that if a non-target device has a corrupted state and
has the BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT bit set, the assertion will still
catch the error.
Reported-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Fixes: b2a61667 ("btrfs: fix rw device counting in __btrfs_free_extra_devids")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDesmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

btrfs_lookup_ordered_extent() is supposed to query the offset in a file
instead of the logical address. Pass the file offset from
submit_extent_page() to calc_bio_boundaries().

Also, calc_bio_boundaries() relies on the bio's operation flag, so move
the call site after setting it.

Fixes: 390ed29b ("btrfs: refactor submit_extent_page() to make bio and its flag tracing easier")
Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

A common characteristic of the bug report where preemptive flushing was
going full tilt was the fact that the vast majority of the free metadata
space was used up by the global reserve.  The hard 90% threshold would
cover the majority of these cases, but to be even smarter we should take
into account how much of the outstanding reservations are covered by the
global block reserve.  If the global block reserve accounts for the vast
majority of outstanding reservations, skip preemptive flushing, as it
will likely just cause churn and pain.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212185Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The preemptive flushing code was added in order to avoid needing to
synchronously wait for ENOSPC flushing to recover space.  Once we're
almost full however we can essentially flush constantly.  We were using
98% as a threshold to determine if we were simply full, however in
practice this is a really high bar to hit.  For example reports of
systems running into this problem had around 94% usage and thus
continued to flush.  Fix this by lowering the threshold to 90%, which is
a more sane value, especially for smaller file systems.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212185
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+
Fixes: 576fa348 ("btrfs: improve preemptive background space flushing")
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Function btrfs_lookup_data_extent calls btrfs_search_slot to verify if
the EXTENT_ITEM exists in the extent tree. btrfs_search_slot can return
values bellow zero if an error happened.

Function replay_one_extent currently checks if the search found
something (0 returned) and increments the reference, and if not, it
seems to evaluate as 'not found'.

Fix the condition by checking if the value was bellow zero and return
early.
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

There are several cases where when logging an inode we need to log its
parent directories or logging subdirectories when logging a directory.

There are cases however where we end up logging a directory even if it was
not changed in the current transaction, no dentries added or removed since
the last transaction. While this is harmless from a functional point of
view, it is a waste time as it brings no advantage.

One example where this is triggered is the following:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
  $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt

  $ mkdir /mnt/A
  $ mkdir /mnt/B
  $ mkdir /mnt/C

  $ touch /mnt/A/foo
  $ ln /mnt/A/foo /mnt/B/bar
  $ ln /mnt/A/foo /mnt/C/baz

  $ sync

  $ rm -f /mnt/A/foo
  $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/B/bar

This last fsync ends up logging directories A, B and C, however we only
need to log directory A, as B and C were not changed since the last
transaction commit.

So fix this by changing need_log_inode(), to return false in case the
given inode is a directory and has a ->last_trans value smaller than the
current transaction's ID.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Now that we converted btrfs internally to account for idmapped mounts
allow the creation of idmapped mounts on by setting the FS_ALLOW_IDMAP
flag.  We only need to raise this flag on the btrfs_root_fs_type
filesystem since btrfs_mount_root() is ultimately responsible for
allocating the superblock and is called into from btrfs_mount()
associated with btrfs_fs_type.

The conversion of the btrfs inode operations was straightforward.
Regarding btrfs specific ioctls that perform checks based on inode
permissions only those have been allowed that are not filesystem wide
operations and hence can be reasonably charged against a specific mount.
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>