Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 11 5月, 2015 11 次提交
  3. 10 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  5. 09 5月, 2015 2 次提交
  7. 07 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  9. 06 5月, 2015 4 次提交
    • C
      splice: sendfile() at once fails for big files · 0ff28d9f
      由 Christophe Leroy 提交于 
      Using sendfile with below small program to get MD5 sums of some files,
it appear that big files (over 64kbytes with 4k pages system) get a
wrong MD5 sum while small files get the correct sum.
This program uses sendfile() to send a file to an AF_ALG socket
for hashing.

/* md5sum2.c */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <linux/if_alg.h>

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
	int sk = socket(AF_ALG, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0);
	struct stat st;
	struct sockaddr_alg sa = {
		.salg_family = AF_ALG,
		.salg_type = "hash",
		.salg_name = "md5",
	};
	int n;

	bind(sk, (struct sockaddr*)&sa, sizeof(sa));

	for (n = 1; n < argc; n++) {
		int size;
		int offset = 0;
		char buf[4096];
		int fd;
		int sko;
		int i;

		fd = open(argv[n], O_RDONLY);
		sko = accept(sk, NULL, 0);
		fstat(fd, &st);
		size = st.st_size;
		sendfile(sko, fd, &offset, size);
		size = read(sko, buf, sizeof(buf));
		for (i = 0; i < size; i++)
			printf("%2.2x", buf[i]);
		printf("  %s\n", argv[n]);
		close(fd);
		close(sko);
	}
	exit(0);
}

Test below is done using official linux patch files. First result is
with a software based md5sum. Second result is with the program above.

root@vgoip:~# ls -l patch-3.6.*
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         64011 Aug 24 12:01 patch-3.6.2.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         94131 Aug 24 12:01 patch-3.6.3.gz

root@vgoip:~# md5sum patch-3.6.*
b3ffb9848196846f31b2ff133d2d6443  patch-3.6.2.gz
c5e8f687878457db77cb7158c38a7e43  patch-3.6.3.gz

root@vgoip:~# ./md5sum2 patch-3.6.*
b3ffb9848196846f31b2ff133d2d6443  patch-3.6.2.gz
5fd77b24e68bb24dcc72d6e57c64790e  patch-3.6.3.gz

After investivation, it appears that sendfile() sends the files by blocks
of 64kbytes (16 times PAGE_SIZE). The problem is that at the end of each
block, the SPLICE_F_MORE flag is missing, therefore the hashing operation
is reset as if it was the end of the file.

This patch adds SPLICE_F_MORE to the flags when more data is pending.

With the patch applied, we get the correct sums:

root@vgoip:~# md5sum patch-3.6.*
b3ffb9848196846f31b2ff133d2d6443  patch-3.6.2.gz
c5e8f687878457db77cb7158c38a7e43  patch-3.6.3.gz

root@vgoip:~# ./md5sum2 patch-3.6.*
b3ffb9848196846f31b2ff133d2d6443  patch-3.6.2.gz
c5e8f687878457db77cb7158c38a7e43  patch-3.6.3.gz
Signed-off-by: NChristophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
      0ff28d9f
    • J
      ocfs2: dlm: fix race between purge and get lock resource · b1432a2a
      由 Junxiao Bi 提交于 
      There is a race window in dlm_get_lock_resource(), which may return a
lock resource which has been purged.  This will cause the process to
hang forever in dlmlock() as the ast msg can't be handled due to its
lock resource not existing.

    dlm_get_lock_resource {
        ...
        spin_lock(&dlm->spinlock);
        tmpres = __dlm_lookup_lockres_full(dlm, lockid, namelen, hash);
        if (tmpres) {
             spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock);
             >>>>>>>> race window, dlm_run_purge_list() may run and purge
                              the lock resource
             spin_lock(&tmpres->spinlock);
             ...
             spin_unlock(&tmpres->spinlock);
        }
    }
Signed-off-by: NJunxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      b1432a2a
    • R
      nilfs2: fix sanity check of btree level in nilfs_btree_root_broken() · d8fd150f
      由 Ryusuke Konishi 提交于 
      The range check for b-tree level parameter in nilfs_btree_root_broken()
is wrong; it accepts the case of "level == NILFS_BTREE_LEVEL_MAX" even
though the level is limited to values in the range of 0 to
(NILFS_BTREE_LEVEL_MAX - 1).

Since the level parameter is read from storage device and used to index
nilfs_btree_path array whose element count is NILFS_BTREE_LEVEL_MAX, it
can cause memory overrun during btree operations if the boundary value
is set to the level parameter on device.

This fixes the broken sanity check and adds a comment to clarify that
the upper bound NILFS_BTREE_LEVEL_MAX is exclusive.
Signed-off-by: NRyusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      d8fd150f
    • D
      configfs: init configfs module earlier at boot time · f5b69770
      由 Daniel Baluta 提交于 
      We need this earlier in the boot process to allow various subsystems to
use configfs (e.g Industrial IIO).

Also, debugfs is at core_initcall level and configfs should be on the same
level from infrastructure point of view.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@intel.com>
Suggested-by: NLars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      f5b69770
  11. 05 5月, 2015 2 次提交
  13. 03 5月, 2015 3 次提交
    • J
      ext4: fix growing of tiny filesystems · 2c869b26
      由 Jan Kara 提交于 
      The estimate of necessary transaction credits in ext4_flex_group_add()
is too pessimistic. It reserves credit for sb, resize inode, and resize
inode dindirect block for each group added in a flex group although they
are always the same block and thus it is enough to account them only
once. Also the number of modified GDT block is overestimated since we
fit EXT4_DESC_PER_BLOCK(sb) descriptors in one block.

Make the estimation more precise. That reduces number of requested
credits enough that we can grow 20 MB filesystem (which has 1 MB
journal, 79 reserved GDT blocks, and flex group size 16 by default).
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
      2c869b26
    • D
      ext4: move check under lock scope to close a race. · 280227a7
      由 Davide Italiano 提交于 
      fallocate() checks that the file is extent-based and returns
EOPNOTSUPP in case is not. Other tasks can convert from and to
indirect and extent so it's safe to check only after grabbing
the inode mutex.
Signed-off-by: NDavide Italiano <dccitaliano@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      280227a7
    • L
      ext4: fix data corruption caused by unwritten and delayed extents · d2dc317d
      由 Lukas Czerner 提交于 
      Currently it is possible to lose whole file system block worth of data
when we hit the specific interaction with unwritten and delayed extents
in status extent tree.

The problem is that when we insert delayed extent into extent status
tree the only way to get rid of it is when we write out delayed buffer.
However there is a limitation in the extent status tree implementation
so that when inserting unwritten extent should there be even a single
delayed block the whole unwritten extent would be marked as delayed.

At this point, there is no way to get rid of the delayed extents,
because there are no delayed buffers to write out. So when a we write
into said unwritten extent we will convert it to written, but it still
remains delayed.

When we try to write into that block later ext4_da_map_blocks() will set
the buffer new and delayed and map it to invalid block which causes
the rest of the block to be zeroed loosing already written data.

For now we can fix this by simply not allowing to set delayed status on
written extent in the extent status tree. Also add WARN_ON() to make
sure that we notice if this happens in the future.

This problem can be easily reproduced by running the following xfs_io.

xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 4096 2048" \
          -c "falloc 0 131072" \
          -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 65536 2048" \
          -c "fsync" /mnt/test/fff

echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xdd 67584 2048" /mnt/test/fff

This can be theoretically also reproduced by at random by running fsx,
but it's not very reliable, though on machines with bigger page size
(like ppc) this can be seen more often (especially xfstest generic/127)
Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      d2dc317d
  15. 02 5月, 2015 4 次提交
  17. 30 4月, 2015 1 次提交
  19. 26 4月, 2015 9 次提交
    • Y
      Btrfs: fill ->last_trans for delayed inode in btrfs_fill_inode. · 6e17d30b
      由 Yang Dongsheng 提交于 
      We need to fill inode when we found a node for it in delayed_nodes_tree.
But we did not fill the ->last_trans currently, it will cause the test
of xfstest/generic/311 fail. Scenario of the 311 is shown as below:

Problem:
	(1). test_fd = open(fname, O_RDWR|O_DIRECT)
	(2). pwrite(test_fd, buf, 4096, 0)
	(3). close(test_fd)
	(4). drop_all_caches()	<-------- "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches"
	(5). test_fd = open(fname, O_RDWR|O_DIRECT)
	(6). fsync(test_fd);
				<-------- we did not get the correct log entry for the file
Reason:
	When we re-open this file in (5), we would find a node
in delayed_nodes_tree and fill the inode we are lookup with the
information. But the ->last_trans is not filled, then the fsync()
will check the ->last_trans and found it's 0 then say this inode
is already in our tree which is commited, not recording the extents
for it.

Fix:
	This patch fill the ->last_trans properly and set the
runtime_flags if needed in this situation. Then we can get the
log entries we expected after (6) and generic/311 passed.
Signed-off-by: NDongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaoxie@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      6e17d30b
    • O
      btrfs: unlock i_mutex after attempting to delete subvolume during send · 909e26dc
      由 Omar Sandoval 提交于 
      Whenever the check for a send in progress introduced in commit
521e0546 (btrfs: protect snapshots from deleting during send) is
hit, we return without unlocking inode->i_mutex. This is easy to see
with lockdep enabled:

[  +0.000059] ================================================
[  +0.000028] [ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ]
[  +0.000029] 4.0.0-rc5-00096-g3c435c1e #93 Not tainted
[  +0.000026] ------------------------------------------------
[  +0.000029] btrfs/211 is leaving the kernel with locks still held!
[  +0.000029] 1 lock held by btrfs/211:
[  +0.000023]  #0:  (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8135b8df>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy+0x2df/0x7a0

Make sure we unlock it in the error path.
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      909e26dc
    • O
      btrfs: check io_ctl_prepare_pages return in __btrfs_write_out_cache · b8605454
      由 Omar Sandoval 提交于 
      If io_ctl_prepare_pages fails, the pages in io_ctl.pages are not valid.
When we try to access them later, things will blow up in various ways.

Also fix the comment about the return value, which is an errno on error,
not -1, and update the cases where it was not.
Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      b8605454
    • O
      btrfs: fix race on ENOMEM in alloc_extent_buffer · 5ca64f45
      由 Omar Sandoval 提交于 
      Consider the following interleaving of overlapping calls to
alloc_extent_buffer:

Call 1:

- Successfully allocates a few pages with find_or_create_page
- find_or_create_page fails, goto free_eb
- Unlocks the allocated pages

Call 2:
- Calls find_or_create_page and gets a page in call 1's extent_buffer
- Finds that the page is already associated with an extent_buffer
- Grabs a reference to the half-written extent_buffer and calls
  mark_extent_buffer_accessed on it

mark_extent_buffer_accessed will then try to call mark_page_accessed on
a null page and panic.

The fix is to decrement the reference count on the half-written
extent_buffer before unlocking the pages so call 2 won't use it. We
should also set exists = NULL in the case that we don't use exists to
avoid accidentally returning a freed extent_buffer in an error case.
Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      5ca64f45
    • O
      btrfs: handle ENOMEM in btrfs_alloc_tree_block · 67b7859e
      由 Omar Sandoval 提交于 
      This is one of the first places to give out when memory is tight. Handle
it properly rather than with a BUG_ON.

Also fix the comment about the return value, which is an ERR_PTR, not
NULL, on error.
Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      67b7859e
    • F
      Btrfs: fix find_free_dev_extent() malfunction in case device tree has hole · 1b984508
      由 Forrest Liu 提交于 
      If device tree has hole, find_free_dev_extent() cannot find available
address properly.

The problem can be reproduce by following script.

    mntpath=/btrfs
    loopdev=/dev/loop0
    filepath=/home/forrest/image

    umount $mntpath
    losetup -d $loopdev
    truncate --size 100g $filepath
    losetup $loopdev $filepath
    mkfs.btrfs -f $loopdev
    mount $loopdev $mntpath

    # make device tree with one big hole
    for i in `seq 1 1 100`; do
        fallocate -l 1g $mntpath/$i
    done
    sync
    for i in `seq 1 1 95`; do
        rm $mntpath/$i
    done
    sync

    # wait cleaner thread remove unused block group
    sleep 300

    fallocate -l 1g $mntpath/aaa

    # failed to allocate new chunk
    fallocate -l 1g $mntpath/bbb

Above script will make device tree with one big hole, and can only allocate
just one chunk in a transaction, so failed to allocate new chunk for $mntpath/bbb

    item 8 key (1 DEV_EXTENT 2185232384) itemoff 15859 itemsize 48
        dev extent chunk_tree 3
        chunk objectid 256 chunk offset 106292051968 length 1073741824
    item 9 key (1 DEV_EXTENT 104190705664) itemoff 15811 itemsize 48
        dev extent chunk_tree 3
        chunk objectid 256 chunk offset 103108575232 length 1073741824
Signed-off-by: NForrest Liu <forrestl@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      1b984508
    • C
      Btrfs: don't check for delalloc_bytes in cache_save_setup · e4c88f00
      由 Chris Mason 提交于 
      Now that we're doing free space cache writeback outside the critical
section in the commit, there is a bigger window for delalloc_bytes to
be added after a cache has been written.  find_free_extent may do this
without putting the block group back into the dirty list, and also
without a transaction running.

Checking for delalloc_bytes in cache_save_setup means we might leave the
cache marked as written without invalidating it.  Consistency checks
during mount will toss the cache, but it's better to get rid of the
check in cache_save_setup and let it get invalidated by the checks
already done during cache write out.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      e4c88f00
    • F
      Btrfs: fix deadlock when starting writeback of bg caches · 24b89d08
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      While starting the writes of the dirty block group caches, if we don't
find a block group item in the extent tree we were leaving without
releasing our path, running delayed references and then looping again to
process any new dirty block groups. However this second iteration of the
loop could cause a deadlock because it tries to lock some other extent
tree node/leaf which another task already locked and it's blocked because
it's waiting for a lock on some node/leaf that is in our path that was not
released before.
We could also deadlock when running the delayed references - as we could
end up trying to lock the same nodes/leafs that we have in our local path
(with a different lock type).

Got into such case when running xfstests:

[20892.242791] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[20892.243776] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 13299 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260 __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]()
[20892.245874] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2)
(...)
[20892.269378] Call Trace:
[20892.269915]  [<ffffffff8142fa46>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
[20892.271097]  [<ffffffff8108b6a2>] ? console_unlock+0x361/0x3ad
[20892.272173]  [<ffffffff81045ea5>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[20892.273386]  [<ffffffffa0509a6d>] ? __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]
[20892.274857]  [<ffffffff81045f05>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[20892.275851]  [<ffffffffa0509a6d>] __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]
[20892.277341]  [<ffffffffa0515e10>] write_one_cache_group+0x68/0xaf [btrfs]
[20892.278628]  [<ffffffffa052088a>] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x18d/0x29b [btrfs]
[20892.280191]  [<ffffffffa052f077>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x130/0x9c9 [btrfs]
(...)
[20892.291316] ---[ end trace 597f77e664245373 ]---
[20892.293955] BTRFS: error (device sdg) in write_one_cache_group:3184: errno=-2 No such entry
[20892.297390] BTRFS info (device sdg): forced readonly
[20892.298222] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[20892.299190] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 13299 at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2683 btrfs_search_slot+0x7e/0x7d2 [btrfs]()
(...)
[20892.326253] Call Trace:
[20892.326904]  [<ffffffff8142fa46>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
[20892.329503]  [<ffffffff8108b6a2>] ? console_unlock+0x361/0x3ad
[20892.330815]  [<ffffffff81045ea5>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[20892.332556]  [<ffffffffa0510b73>] ? btrfs_search_slot+0x7e/0x7d2 [btrfs]
[20892.333955]  [<ffffffff81045f62>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c
[20892.335562]  [<ffffffffa0510b73>] btrfs_search_slot+0x7e/0x7d2 [btrfs]
[20892.336849]  [<ffffffff8107b024>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
[20892.338222]  [<ffffffffa051ad52>] ? cache_save_setup+0x43/0x2a5 [btrfs]
[20892.339823]  [<ffffffffa051ad66>] ? cache_save_setup+0x57/0x2a5 [btrfs]
[20892.341275]  [<ffffffff814351a4>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x32/0x46
[20892.342810]  [<ffffffffa0515de7>] write_one_cache_group+0x3f/0xaf [btrfs]
[20892.344184]  [<ffffffffa052088a>] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x18d/0x29b [btrfs]
[20892.347162]  [<ffffffffa052f077>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x130/0x9c9 [btrfs]
(...)
[20892.361015] ---[ end trace 597f77e664245374 ]---
[21120.688097] INFO: task kworker/u8:17:29854 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[21120.689881]       Tainted: G        W       4.0.0-rc5-btrfs-next-9+ #2
[21120.691384] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
(...)
[21120.703696] Call Trace:
[21120.704310]  [<ffffffff8143107e>] schedule+0x74/0x83
[21120.705490]  [<ffffffffa055f025>] btrfs_tree_lock+0xd7/0x236 [btrfs]
[21120.706757]  [<ffffffff81075cd6>] ? signal_pending_state+0x31/0x31
[21120.708156]  [<ffffffffa054ac1e>] lock_extent_buffer_for_io+0x3e/0x194 [btrfs]
[21120.709892]  [<ffffffffa054bb86>] ? btree_write_cache_pages+0x273/0x385 [btrfs]
[21120.711605]  [<ffffffffa054bc42>] btree_write_cache_pages+0x32f/0x385 [btrfs]
[21120.723440]  [<ffffffffa0527552>] btree_writepages+0x23/0x5c [btrfs]
[21120.724943]  [<ffffffff8110c4c8>] do_writepages+0x23/0x2c
[21120.726008]  [<ffffffff81176dde>] __writeback_single_inode+0x73/0x2fa
[21120.727230]  [<ffffffff8117714a>] ? writeback_sb_inodes+0xe5/0x38b
[21120.728526]  [<ffffffff811771fb>] ? writeback_sb_inodes+0x196/0x38b
[21120.729701]  [<ffffffff8117726a>] writeback_sb_inodes+0x205/0x38b
(...)
[21120.747853] INFO: task btrfs:13282 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[21120.749459]       Tainted: G        W       4.0.0-rc5-btrfs-next-9+ #2
[21120.751137] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
(...)
[21120.768457] Call Trace:
[21120.769039]  [<ffffffff8143107e>] schedule+0x74/0x83
[21120.770107]  [<ffffffffa052f25c>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x315/0x9c9 [btrfs]
[21120.771558]  [<ffffffff81075cd6>] ? signal_pending_state+0x31/0x31
[21120.773659]  [<ffffffffa056fd8c>] prepare_to_relocate+0xcb/0xd2 [btrfs]
[21120.776257]  [<ffffffffa05741da>] relocate_block_group+0x44/0x4a9 [btrfs]
[21120.777755]  [<ffffffffa05747a0>] ? btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x161/0x288 [btrfs]
[21120.779459]  [<ffffffffa05747a8>] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x169/0x288 [btrfs]
[21120.781153]  [<ffffffffa0550403>] btrfs_relocate_chunk.isra.29+0x3e/0xa7 [btrfs]
[21120.783918]  [<ffffffffa05518fd>] btrfs_balance+0xaa4/0xc52 [btrfs]
[21120.785436]  [<ffffffff8114306e>] ? cpu_cache_get.isra.39+0xe/0x1f
[21120.786434]  [<ffffffffa0559252>] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x23f/0x2b0 [btrfs]
(...)
[21120.889251] INFO: task fsstress:13288 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[21120.890526]       Tainted: G        W       4.0.0-rc5-btrfs-next-9+ #2
[21120.891773] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
(...)
[21120.899960] Call Trace:
[21120.900743]  [<ffffffff8143107e>] schedule+0x74/0x83
[21120.903004]  [<ffffffffa055f025>] btrfs_tree_lock+0xd7/0x236 [btrfs]
[21120.904383]  [<ffffffff81075cd6>] ? signal_pending_state+0x31/0x31
[21120.905608]  [<ffffffffa051125b>] btrfs_search_slot+0x766/0x7d2 [btrfs]
[21120.906812]  [<ffffffff8114290e>] ? virt_to_head_page+0x9/0x2c
[21120.907874]  [<ffffffff81144b7f>] ? cache_alloc_debugcheck_after.isra.42+0x16c/0x1cb
[21120.909551]  [<ffffffffa05124e0>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x5d/0xa8 [btrfs]
[21120.910914]  [<ffffffffa0512585>] btrfs_insert_item+0x5a/0xa5 [btrfs]
[21120.912181]  [<ffffffffa0520271>] ? btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x96/0x130 [btrfs]
[21120.913784]  [<ffffffffa052028a>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0xaf/0x130 [btrfs]
[21120.915374]  [<ffffffffa052ffc2>] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x84/0x366 [btrfs]
[21120.916735]  [<ffffffffa05302b4>] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x12 [btrfs]
[21120.917996]  [<ffffffffa051ab26>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x11f/0x27c [btrfs]
[21120.919478]  [<ffffffffa051ba25>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x1e/0x51 [btrfs]
[21120.921226]  [<ffffffffa05382f2>] btrfs_truncate_page+0x85/0x2c4 [btrfs]
[21120.923121]  [<ffffffffa0538572>] btrfs_cont_expand+0x41/0x3ef [btrfs]
[21120.924449]  [<ffffffffa0541091>] ? btrfs_file_write_iter+0x19a/0x431 [btrfs]
[21120.926602]  [<ffffffff8107b024>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
[21120.927769]  [<ffffffffa0541091>] ? btrfs_file_write_iter+0x19a/0x431 [btrfs]
[21120.929324]  [<ffffffffa05410a0>] ? btrfs_file_write_iter+0x1a9/0x431 [btrfs]
[21120.930723]  [<ffffffffa05410d9>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x1e2/0x431 [btrfs]
[21120.931897]  [<ffffffff81067d85>] ? get_parent_ip+0xe/0x3e
[21120.934446]  [<ffffffff811534c3>] new_sync_write+0x7c/0xa0
[21120.935528]  [<ffffffff81153b58>] vfs_write+0xb2/0x117
(...)

Fixes: 1bbc621e ("Btrfs: allow block group cache writeout
                      outside critical section in commit")
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      24b89d08
    • F
      Btrfs: fix race between start dirty bg cache writeout and bg deletion · b58d1a9e
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      While running xfstests I ran into the following:

[20892.242791] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[20892.243776] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 13299 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260 __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]()
[20892.245874] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2)
[20892.247329] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_snapshot dm_bufio dm_flakey dm_mod crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop fuse$
[20892.258488] CPU: 0 PID: 13299 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G        W       4.0.0-rc5-btrfs-next-9+ #2
[20892.262011] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
[20892.264738]  0000000000000009 ffff880427f8bc18 ffffffff8142fa46 ffffffff8108b6a2
[20892.266244]  ffff880427f8bc68 ffff880427f8bc58 ffffffff81045ea5 ffff880427f8bc48
[20892.267761]  ffffffffa0509a6d 00000000fffffffe ffff8803545d6f40 ffffffffa05a15a0
[20892.269378] Call Trace:
[20892.269915]  [<ffffffff8142fa46>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
[20892.271097]  [<ffffffff8108b6a2>] ? console_unlock+0x361/0x3ad
[20892.272173]  [<ffffffff81045ea5>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[20892.273386]  [<ffffffffa0509a6d>] ? __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]
[20892.274857]  [<ffffffff81045f05>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[20892.275851]  [<ffffffffa0509a6d>] __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]
[20892.277341]  [<ffffffffa0515e10>] write_one_cache_group+0x68/0xaf [btrfs]
[20892.278628]  [<ffffffffa052088a>] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x18d/0x29b [btrfs]
[20892.280191]  [<ffffffffa052f077>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x130/0x9c9 [btrfs]
[20892.281781]  [<ffffffff8107d33d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[20892.282873]  [<ffffffffa054163b>] btrfs_sync_file+0x313/0x387 [btrfs]
[20892.284111]  [<ffffffff8117acad>] vfs_fsync_range+0x95/0xa4
[20892.285203]  [<ffffffff810e603f>] ? time_hardirqs_on+0x15/0x28
[20892.286290]  [<ffffffff8123960b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[20892.287469]  [<ffffffff8117acd8>] vfs_fsync+0x1c/0x1e
[20892.288412]  [<ffffffff8117ae54>] do_fsync+0x34/0x4e
[20892.289348]  [<ffffffff8117b07c>] SyS_fsync+0x10/0x14
[20892.290255]  [<ffffffff81435b32>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
[20892.291316] ---[ end trace 597f77e664245373 ]---
[20892.293955] BTRFS: error (device sdg) in write_one_cache_group:3184: errno=-2 No such entry
[20892.297390] BTRFS info (device sdg): forced readonly

This happens because in btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups() we splice the
transaction's list of dirty block groups into a local list and then we
keep extracting the first element of the list without holding the
cache_write_mutex mutex. This means that before we acquire that mutex
the first block group on the list might be removed by a conurrent task
running btrfs_remove_block_group(). So make sure we extract the first
element (and test the list emptyness) while holding that mutex.

Fixes: 1bbc621e ("Btrfs: allow block group cache writeout
                      outside critical section in commit")
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      b58d1a9e
  21. 25 4月, 2015 2 次提交
    • A
      RCU pathwalk breakage when running into a symlink overmounting something · 3cab989a
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      Calling unlazy_walk() in walk_component() and do_last() when we find
a symlink that needs to be followed doesn't acquire a reference to vfsmount.
That's fine when the symlink is on the same vfsmount as the parent directory
(which is almost always the case), but it's not always true - one _can_
manage to bind a symlink on top of something.  And in such cases we end up
with excessive mntput().

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # since 2.6.39
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      3cab989a
    • J
      direct-io: only inc/dec inode->i_dio_count for file systems · fe0f07d0
      由 Jens Axboe 提交于 
      do_blockdev_direct_IO() increments and decrements the inode
->i_dio_count for each IO operation. It does this to protect against
truncate of a file. Block devices don't need this sort of protection.

For a capable multiqueue setup, this atomic int is the only shared
state between applications accessing the device for O_DIRECT, and it
presents a scaling wall for that. In my testing, as much as 30% of
system time is spent incrementing and decrementing this value. A mixed
read/write workload improved from ~2.5M IOPS to ~9.6M IOPS, with
better latencies too. Before:

clat percentiles (usec):
 |  1.00th=[   33],  5.00th=[   34], 10.00th=[   34], 20.00th=[   34],
 | 30.00th=[   34], 40.00th=[   34], 50.00th=[   35], 60.00th=[   35],
 | 70.00th=[   35], 80.00th=[   35], 90.00th=[   37], 95.00th=[   80],
 | 99.00th=[   98], 99.50th=[  151], 99.90th=[  155], 99.95th=[  155],
 | 99.99th=[  165]

After:

clat percentiles (usec):
 |  1.00th=[   95],  5.00th=[  108], 10.00th=[  129], 20.00th=[  149],
 | 30.00th=[  155], 40.00th=[  161], 50.00th=[  167], 60.00th=[  171],
 | 70.00th=[  177], 80.00th=[  185], 90.00th=[  201], 95.00th=[  270],
 | 99.00th=[  390], 99.50th=[  398], 99.90th=[  418], 99.95th=[  422],
 | 99.99th=[  438]

In other setups, Robert Elliott reported seeing good performance
improvements:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/3/557

The more applications accessing the device, the worse it gets.

Add a new direct-io flags, DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT, which tells
do_blockdev_direct_IO() that it need not worry about incrementing
or decrementing the inode i_dio_count for this caller.

Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) <elliott@hp.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      fe0f07d0