- 05 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Li Zhong 提交于
Seems we all agree that information about SECTION, e.g. section size, sections per memory block should be kept as kernel internals, and not exposed to userspace. This patch updates Documentation/memory-hotplug.txt to refer to memory blocks instead of memory sections where appropriate and added a paragraph to explain that memory blocks are made of memory sections. The documentation update is mostly provided by Nathan. Also, as end_phys_index in code is actually not the end section id, but the end memory block id, which should always be the same as phys_index. So it is removed here. Signed-off-by: NLi Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NZhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 17 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yasuaki Ishimatsu 提交于
When inserting a wrong value to /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryX/state file, following messages are shown. And device_hotplug_lock is never released. ================================================ [ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ] 3.12.0-rc4-debug+ #3 Tainted: G W ------------------------------------------------ bash/6442 is leaving the kernel with locks still held! 1 lock held by bash/6442: #0: (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8146cbb5>] lock_device_hotplug_sysfs+0x15/0x50 This issue was introdued by commit fa2be40f (drivers: base: use standard device online/offline for state change). This patch releases device_hotplug_lcok when store_mem_state returns EINVAL. Signed-off-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> CC: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 30 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
device_hotplug_lock is held around the acpi_bus_trim() call in acpi_scan_hot_remove() which generally removes devices (it removes ACPI device objects at least, but it may also remove "physical" device objects through .detach() callbacks of ACPI scan handlers). Thus, potentially, device sysfs attributes are removed under that lock and to remove those attributes it is necessary to hold the s_active references of their directory entries for writing. On the other hand, the execution of a .show() or .store() callback from a sysfs attribute is carried out with that attribute's s_active reference held for reading. Consequently, if any device sysfs attribute that may be removed from within acpi_scan_hot_remove() through acpi_bus_trim() has a .store() or .show() callback which acquires device_hotplug_lock, the execution of that callback may deadlock with the removal of the attribute. [Unfortunately, the "online" device attribute of CPUs and memory blocks is one of them.] To avoid such deadlocks, make all of the sysfs attribute callbacks that need to lock device hotplug, for example store_online(), use a special function, lock_device_hotplug_sysfs(), to lock device hotplug and return the result of that function immediately if it is not zero. This will cause the s_active reference of the directory entry in question to be released and the syscall to be restarted if device_hotplug_lock cannot be acquired. [show_online() actually doesn't need to lock device hotplug, but it is useful to serialize it with respect to device_offline() and device_online() for the same device (in case user space attempts to run them concurrently) which can be done with the help of device_lock().] Reported-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Reported-and-tested-by: NGu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Suggested-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
- 29 8月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Russ Anderson 提交于
"cat /sys/devices/system/memory/memory*/removable" crashed the system. The problem is that show_mem_removable() is passing a bad pfn to is_mem_section_removable(), which causes if (!node_online(page_to_nid(page))) to blow up. Why is it passing in a bad pfn? The reason is that show_mem_removable() will loop sections_per_block times. sections_per_block is 16, but mem->section_count is 8, indicating holes in this memory block. Checking that the memory section is present before checking to see if the memory section is removable fixes the problem. harp5-sys:~ # cat /sys/devices/system/memory/memory*/removable 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffea00c3200000 IP: [<ffffffff81117ed1>] is_pageblock_removable_nolock+0x1/0x90 PGD 83ffd4067 PUD 37bdfce067 PMD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: autofs4 binfmt_misc rdma_ucm rdma_cm iw_cm ib_addr ib_srp scsi_transport_srp scsi_tgt ib_ipoib ib_cm ib_uverbs ib_umad iw_cxgb3 cxgb3 mdio mlx4_en mlx4_ib ib_sa mlx4_core ib_mthca ib_mad ib_core fuse nls_iso8859_1 nls_cp437 vfat fat joydev loop hid_generic usbhid hid hwperf(O) numatools(O) dm_mod iTCO_wdt ipv6 iTCO_vendor_support igb i2c_i801 ioatdma i2c_algo_bit ehci_pci pcspkr lpc_ich i2c_core ehci_hcd ptp sg mfd_core dca rtc_cmos pps_core mperf button xhci_hcd sd_mod crc_t10dif usbcore usb_common scsi_dh_emc scsi_dh_hp_sw scsi_dh_alua scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh gru(O) xvma(O) xfs crc32c libcrc32c thermal sata_nv processor piix mptsas mptscsih scsi_transport_sas mptbase megaraid_sas fan thermal_sys hwmon ext3 jbd ata_piix ahci libahci libata scsi_mod CPU: 4 PID: 5991 Comm: cat Tainted: G O 3.11.0-rc5-rja-uv+ #10 Hardware name: SGI UV2000/ROMLEY, BIOS SGI UV 2000/3000 series BIOS 01/15/2013 task: ffff88081f034580 ti: ffff880820022000 task.ti: ffff880820022000 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81117ed1>] [<ffffffff81117ed1>] is_pageblock_removable_nolock+0x1/0x90 RSP: 0018:ffff880820023df8 EFLAGS: 00010287 RAX: 0000000000040000 RBX: ffffea00c3200000 RCX: 0000000000000004 RDX: ffffea00c30b0000 RSI: 00000000001c0000 RDI: ffffea00c3200000 RBP: ffff880820023e38 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffea00c33c0000 R13: 0000160000000000 R14: 6db6db6db6db6db7 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 00007ffff7fb2700(0000) GS:ffff88083fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffea00c3200000 CR3: 000000081b954000 CR4: 00000000000407e0 Call Trace: show_mem_removable+0x41/0x70 dev_attr_show+0x2a/0x60 sysfs_read_file+0xf7/0x1c0 vfs_read+0xc8/0x130 SyS_read+0x5d/0xa0 system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Signed-off-by: NRuss Anderson <rja@sgi.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Gu Zheng 提交于
Introduce help macro to_memory_block to hide the conversion(device-->memory_block), just clean up. Reviewed-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NGu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 22 8月, 2013 8 次提交
-
-
由 Seth Jennings 提交于
There are two ways to set the online/offline state for a memory block: echo 0|1 > online and echo online|online_kernel|online_movable|offline > state. The state attribute can online a memory block with extra data, the "online type", where the online attribute uses a default online type of ONLINE_KEEP, same as echo online > state. Currently there is a state_mutex that provides consistency between the memory block state and the underlying memory. The problem is that this code does a lot of things that the common device layer can do for us, such as the serialization of the online/offline handlers using the device lock, setting the dev->offline field, and calling kobject_uevent(). This patch refactors the online/offline code to allow the common device_[online|offline] functions to be used. The result is a simpler and more common code path for the two state setting mechanisms. It also removes the state_mutex from the struct memory_block as the memory block device lock provides the state consistency. No functional change is intended by this patch. Signed-off-by: NSeth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Seth Jennings 提交于
Right now memory_dev_init() maintains the memory block pointer between iterations of add_memory_section(). This is nasty. This patch refactors add_memory_section() to become add_memory_block(). The refactoring pulls the section scanning out of memory_dev_init() and simplifies the signature. Signed-off-by: NSeth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Seth Jennings 提交于
The path through add_memory_section() when the memory block already exists uses flawed refcounting logic. A get_device() is done on a memory block using a pointer that might not be valid as we dropped our previous reference and didn't obtain a new reference in the proper way. Lets stop pretending and just remove the get/put. The mem_sysfs_mutex, which we hold over the entire init loop now, will prevent the memory blocks from disappearing from under us. Signed-off-by: NSeth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Seth Jennings 提交于
Now that add_memory_section() is only called from boot time, reduce the logic and remove the enum. Signed-off-by: NSeth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Seth Jennings 提交于
add_memory_section() is currently called from both boot time and run time via hotplug and there is a lot of nastiness to allow for shared code including an enum parameter to convey the calling context to add_memory_section(). This patch is the first step in breaking up the messy code sharing by pulling the hotplug path for add_memory_section() directly into register_new_memory(). Signed-off-by: NSeth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Seth Jennings 提交于
Use the [get|put]_device functions for ref'ing the memory block device rather than the kobject functions which should be hidden away by the device layer. Signed-off-by: NSeth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Seth Jennings 提交于
The error variable is not needed. Signed-off-by: NSeth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Seth Jennings 提交于
There is no point in releasing the mutex for each section that is added during boot time. Just hold it over the entire initialization loop. Signed-off-by: NSeth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 27 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jingoo Han 提交于
The usage of strict_strto*() is not preferred, because strict_strto*() is obsolete. Thus, kstrto*() should be used. Signed-off-by: NJingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 07 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nathan Fontenot 提交于
Update the sysfs memory code to create/delete files at the time of device and subsystem registration. The current code creates files in the root memory directory explicitly through the use of init_* routines. The files for each memory block are created and deleted explicitly using the mem_[create|delete]_simple_file macros. This patch creates attribute groups for the memory root files and files in each memory block directory so that they are created and deleted implicitly at subsys and device register and unregister time. This did necessitate moving the register_memory() updating it to set the dev.groups field. Signed-off-by: NNathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 02 6月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since offline_memory_block(mem) is functionally equivalent to device_offline(&mem->dev), make the only caller of the former use the latter instead and drop offline_memory_block() entirely. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
As noted by Tang Chen, the last_online field in struct memory_block introduced by commit 4960e05e (Driver core: Introduce offline/online callbacks for memory blocks) is not really necessary, because online_pages() restores the previous state if passed ONLINE_KEEP as the last argument. Therefore, remove that field along with the code referring to it. References: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=136919777305599&w=2Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: NTang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
- 12 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Introduce .offline() and .online() callbacks for memory_subsys that will allow the generic device_offline() and device_online() to be used with device objects representing memory blocks. That, in turn, allows the ACPI subsystem to use device_offline() to put removable memory blocks offline, if possible, before removing memory modules holding them. The 'online' sysfs attribute of memory block devices will attempt to put them offline if 0 is written to it and will attempt to apply the previously used online type when onlining them (i.e. when 1 is written to it). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NVasilis Liaskovitis <vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
- 30 4月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Tang Chen 提交于
nr_pages is not used in pages_correctly_reserved(). So remove it. Signed-off-by: NTang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NWen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 David Rientjes 提交于
__remove_pages() is only necessary for CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE. PowerPC pseries will return -EOPNOTSUPP if unsupported. Adding an #ifdef causes several other functions it depends on to also become unnecessary, which saves in .text when disabled (it's disabled in most defconfigs besides powerpc, including x86). remove_memory_block() becomes static since it is not referenced outside of drivers/base/memory.c. Build tested on x86 and powerpc with CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE both enabled and disabled. Signed-off-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 24 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yasuaki Ishimatsu 提交于
We remove the memory like this: 1. lock memory hotplug 2. offline a memory block 3. unlock memory hotplug 4. repeat 1-3 to offline all memory blocks 5. lock memory hotplug 6. remove memory(TODO) 7. unlock memory hotplug All memory blocks must be offlined before removing memory. But we don't hold the lock in the whole operation. So we should check whether all memory blocks are offlined before step6. Otherwise, kernel maybe panicked. Offlining a memory block and removing a memory device can be two different operations. Users can just offline some memory blocks without removing the memory device. For this purpose, the kernel has held lock_memory_hotplug() in __offline_pages(). To reuse the code for memory hot-remove, we repeat step 1-3 to offline all the memory blocks, repeatedly lock and unlock memory hotplug, but not hold the memory hotplug lock in the whole operation. Signed-off-by: NWen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Cc: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com> Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Wu Jianguo <wujianguo@huawei.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 19 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Felipe Balbi 提交于
those two sysfs files don't have a 'show' method, so they shouldn't have a read permission. Thanks to Greg Kroah-Hartman for actually looking into the source code and figuring out we had a real bug with these two files. Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 12 12月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
Add online_movable and online_kernel for logic memory hotplug. This is the dynamic version of "movablecore" & "kernelcore". We have the same reason to introduce it as to introduce "movablecore" & "kernelcore". It has the same motive as "movablecore" & "kernelcore", but it is dynamic/running-time: o We can configure memory as kernelcore or movablecore after boot. Userspace workload is increased, we need more hugepage, we can't use "online_movable" to add memory and allow the system use more THP(transparent-huge-page), vice-verse when kernel workload is increase. Also help for virtualization to dynamic configure host/guest's memory, to save/(reduce waste) memory. Memory capacity on Demand o When a new node is physically online after boot, we need to use "online_movable" or "online_kernel" to configure/portion it as we expected when we logic-online it. This configuration also helps for physically-memory-migrate. o all benefit as the same as existed "movablecore" & "kernelcore". o Preparing for movable-node, which is very important for power-saving, hardware partitioning and high-available-system(hardware fault management). (Note, we don't introduce movable-node here.) Action behavior: When a memoryblock/memorysection is onlined by "online_movable", the kernel will not have directly reference to the page of the memoryblock, thus we can remove that memory any time when needed. When it is online by "online_kernel", the kernel can use it. When it is online by "online", the zone type doesn't changed. Current constraints: Only the memoryblock which is adjacent to the ZONE_MOVABLE can be online from ZONE_NORMAL to ZONE_MOVABLE. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use min_t, cleanups] Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NWen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Yasuaki Ishimatsu 提交于
When calling remove_memory_block(), the function shows following message at device_release(). "Device 'memory528' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed." The reason is memory_block's device struct does not have a release() function. So the patch registers memory_block_release() to the device's release() function for suppressing the warning message. Additionally, the patch moves kfree(mem) into the release function since the release function is prepared as a means to free a memory_block struct. Signed-off-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Acked-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 09 10月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Wen Congyang 提交于
remove_memory() will be called when hot removing a memory device. But even if offlining memory, we cannot notice it. So the patch updates the memory block's state and sends notification to userspace. Additionally, the memory device may contain more than one memory block. If the memory block has been offlined, __offline_pages() will fail. So we should try to offline one memory block at a time. Thus remove_memory() also check each memory block's state. So there is no need to check the memory block's state before calling remove_memory(). Signed-off-by: NWen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Wen Congyang 提交于
remove_memory() is called in two cases: 1. echo offline >/sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXX/state 2. hot remove a memory device In the 1st case, the memory block's state is changed and the notification that memory block's state changed is sent to userland after calling remove_memory(). So user can notice memory block is changed. But in the 2nd case, the memory block's state is not changed and the notification is not also sent to userspcae even if calling remove_memory(). So user cannot notice memory block is changed. For adding the notification at memory hot remove, the patch just prepare as follows: 1st case uses offline_pages() for offlining memory. 2nd case uses remove_memory() for offlining memory and changing memory block's state and notifing the information. The patch does not implement notification to remove_memory(). Signed-off-by: NWen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 03 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
One system with 2048g ram, reported soft lockup on recent kernel. [ 34.426749] cpu_dev_init done [ 61.166399] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [swapper/0:1] [ 61.166733] Modules linked in: [ 61.166904] irq event stamp: 1935610 [ 61.178431] hardirqs last enabled at (1935609): [<ffffffff81ce8c05>] mutex_lock_nested+0x299/0x2b4 [ 61.178923] hardirqs last disabled at (1935610): [<ffffffff81cf2bab>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6b/0x80 [ 61.198767] softirqs last enabled at (1935476): [<ffffffff8106e59c>] __do_softirq+0x195/0x1ab [ 61.218604] softirqs last disabled at (1935471): [<ffffffff81cf359c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 [ 61.238408] CPU 0 [ 61.238549] Modules linked in: [ 61.238744] [ 61.238825] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.3.0-rc1-tip-yh-02076-g962f689-dirty #171 [ 61.278212] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810b3e3a>] [<ffffffff810b3e3a>] lock_release+0x90/0x9c [ 61.278627] RSP: 0018:ffff883f64dbfd70 EFLAGS: 00000246 [ 61.298287] RAX: ffff883f64dc0000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 000000000000008b [ 61.298690] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 [ 61.318383] RBP: ffff883f64dbfda0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 000000000000008b [ 61.338215] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff883f64dbfd10 [ 61.338610] R13: ffff883f64dc0708 R14: ffff883f64dc0708 R15: ffffffff81095657 [ 61.358299] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff883f7d600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 61.378118] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b [ 61.378450] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 00000000024af000 CR4: 00000000000007f0 [ 61.398144] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 61.417918] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 61.418260] Process swapper/0 (pid: 1, threadinfo ffff883f64dbe000, task ffff883f64dc0000) [ 61.445358] Stack: [ 61.445511] 0000000000000002 ffff897f649ba168 ffff883f64dbfe10 ffff88ff64bb57a8 [ 61.458040] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff883f64dbfdc0 ffffffff81ceb1b4 [ 61.458491] 000000000011608c ffff88ff64bb58a8 ffff883f64dbfdf0 ffffffff81c57638 [ 61.478215] Call Trace: [ 61.478367] [<ffffffff81ceb1b4>] _raw_spin_unlock+0x21/0x2e [ 61.497994] [<ffffffff81c57638>] klist_next+0x9e/0xbc [ 61.498264] [<ffffffff8148ba99>] next_device+0xe/0x1e [ 61.517867] [<ffffffff8148c0cc>] subsys_find_device_by_id+0xb7/0xd6 [ 61.518197] [<ffffffff81498846>] find_memory_block_hinted+0x3d/0x66 [ 61.537927] [<ffffffff8149887f>] find_memory_block+0x10/0x12 [ 61.538193] [<ffffffff814988b6>] add_memory_section+0x35/0x9e [ 61.557932] [<ffffffff827fecef>] memory_dev_init+0x68/0xda [ 61.558227] [<ffffffff827fec01>] driver_init+0x97/0xa7 [ 61.577853] [<ffffffff827cdf3c>] kernel_init+0xf6/0x1c0 [ 61.578140] [<ffffffff81cf34a4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 [ 61.597850] [<ffffffff81ceb59d>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 61.598144] [<ffffffff827cde46>] ? start_kernel+0x3ab/0x3ab [ 61.617826] [<ffffffff81cf34a0>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb [ 61.618060] Code: 10 48 83 3b 00 eb e8 4c 89 f2 44 89 fe 4c 89 ef e8 e1 fe ff ff 65 48 8b 04 25 40 bc 00 00 c7 80 cc 06 00 00 00 00 00 00 41 54 9d <5e> 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d c3 55 48 89 e5 41 57 41 89 cf [ 89.285380] memory_dev_init done Finally it takes about 55s to create 16400 memory entries. Root cause: for x86_64, 2048g (with 2g hole at [2g,4g), and TOP2 will be 2050g), will have 16400 memory block. find_memory_block/subsys_find_device_by_id will be expensive with that many entries. Actually, we don't need to find that memory block for BOOT path. Skip that finding make it get back to normal. [ 34.466696] cpu_dev_init done [ 35.290080] memory_dev_init done Also solved the delay with topology_init when sections_per_block is not 1. Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@austin.ibm.com> Cc: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 13 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Holzheu 提交于
Currently no udev events for memory hotplug "online" and "offline" are generated: # udevadm monitor # echo offline > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory4/state ==> No event When kdump is loaded, kexec detects the current memory configuration and stores it in the pre-allocated ELF core header. Therefore, for kdump it is necessary to reload the kdump kernel with kexec when the memory configuration changes (e.g. for online/offline hotplug memory). In order to do this automatically, udev rules should be used. This kernel patch adds udev events for "online" and "offline". Together with this kernel patch, the following udev rules for online/offline have to be added to "/etc/udev/rules.d/98-kexec.rules": SUBSYSTEM=="memory", ACTION=="online", PROGRAM="/etc/init.d/kdump restart" SUBSYSTEM=="memory", ACTION=="offline", PROGRAM="/etc/init.d/kdump restart" [sfr@canb.auug.org.au: fixups for class to subsystem conversion] Signed-off-by: NMichael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Signed-off-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 04 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tony Luck 提交于
There is only one caller of memory_failure(), all other users call __memory_failure() and pass in the flags argument explicitly. The lone user of memory_failure() will soon need to pass flags too. Add flags argument to the callsite in mce.c. Delete the old memory_failure() function, and then rename __memory_failure() without the leading "__". Provide clearer message when action optional memory errors are ignored. Acked-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org> Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
-
- 22 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kay Sievers 提交于
This moves the 'memory sysdev_class' over to a regular 'memory' subsystem and converts the devices to regular devices. The sysdev drivers are implemented as subsystem interfaces now. After all sysdev classes are ported to regular driver core entities, the sysdev implementation will be entirely removed from the kernel. Signed-off-by: NKay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
- 19 10月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mel Gorman 提交于
(Resending as I am not seeing it in -next so maybe it got lost) mm: memory hotplug: Check if pages are correctly reserved on a per-section basis It is expected that memory being brought online is PageReserved similar to what happens when the page allocator is being brought up. Memory is onlined in "memory blocks" which consist of one or more sections. Unfortunately, the code that verifies PageReserved is currently assuming that the memmap backing all these pages is virtually contiguous which is only the case when CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP is set. As a result, memory hot-add is failing on those configurations with the message; kernel: section number XXX page number 256 not reserved, was it already online? This patch updates the PageReserved check to lookup struct page once per section to guarantee the correct struct page is being checked. [Check pages within sections properly: rientjes@google.com] [original patch by: nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com] Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Acked-by: NKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: NNathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
由 Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
This reverts commit 54f23eb7. Turns out this patch is wrong, another correct one will follow it. Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
- 27 9月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Nathan Fontenot 提交于
The check to ensure that pages of recently added memory sections are correctly marked as reserved before trying to online the memory is broken. The request to online the memory fails with the following: kernel: section number XXX page number 256 not reserved, was it already online? This updates the page reservation checking to check the pages of each memory section of the memory block being onlined individually. Signed-off-by: NNathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
由 Anton Blanchard 提交于
The sysfs memory probe interface allows unaligned regions to be added: # echo 0xffffff > /sys/devices/system/memory/probe # cat /proc/iomem 00ffffff-01fffffe : System RAM 01ffffff-02fffffe : System RAM 02ffffff-03fffffe : System RAM 03ffffff-04fffffe : System RAM 04ffffff-05fffffe : System RAM Return -EINVAL instead of creating these bad regions. Signed-off-by: NAnton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
- 27 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arun Sharma 提交于
This allows us to move duplicated code in <asm/atomic.h> (atomic_inc_not_zero() for now) to <linux/atomic.h> Signed-off-by: NArun Sharma <asharma@fb.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Acked-by: NMike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 12 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
The macro MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE is currently defined twice in two .c files, and I need it in a third one to fix a powerpc bug, so let's first move it into a header Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 13 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrew Morton 提交于
drivers/base/memory.c: fix warning due to "memory hotplug: Speed up add/remove when blocks are larger than PAGES_PER_SECTION" drivers/base/memory.c: In function 'memory_block_change_state': drivers/base/memory.c:281: warning: unused variable 'i' less beer, more testing Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
- 12 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anton Blanchard 提交于
On ppc64 the minimum memory section for hotplug is 16MB but most recent machines have a memory block size of 256MB. This means memory_block_change_state does 16 separate calls to memory_section_action. This also means we call the notifiers 16 times and the hook in the ehea network driver is quite costly. To offline one 256MB region takes: # time echo offline > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory32/state 7.9s This patch removes the loop and calls online_pages or remove_memory once for the entire region and in doing so makes the logic simpler since we don't have to back out if things fail part way through. The same test to offline one region now takes: # time echo online > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory32/state 0.67s Over 11 times faster. Signed-off-by: NAnton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
- 26 4月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wanlong Gao 提交于
Fix the line longer than 80 of memory_uevent function . Signed-off-by: NWanlong Gao <wanlong.gao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
- 10 4月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nikanth Karthikesan 提交于
sysfs-memory: Fix uninitialized variable warning and clean-up code. Signed-off-by: NNikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-