Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 15 1月, 2021 1 次提交
  3. 13 1月, 2021 1 次提交
  5. 12 1月, 2021 7 次提交
    • V
      net: dsa: remove obsolete comments about switchdev transactions · 417b99bf
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      Now that all port object notifiers were converted to be non-transactional,
we can remove the comments that say otherwise.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      417b99bf
    • V
      net: dsa: remove the transactional logic from VLAN objects · 1958d581
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      It should be the driver's business to logically separate its VLAN
offloading into a preparation and a commit phase, and some drivers don't
need / can't do this.

So remove the transactional shim from DSA and let drivers propagate
errors directly from the .port_vlan_add callback.

It would appear that the code has worse error handling now than it had
before. DSA is the only in-kernel user of switchdev that offloads one
switchdev object to more than one port: for every VLAN object offloaded
to a user port, that VLAN is also offloaded to the CPU port. So the
"prepare for user port -> check for errors -> prepare for CPU port ->
check for errors -> commit for user port -> commit for CPU port"
sequence appears to make more sense than the one we are using now:
"offload to user port -> check for errors -> offload to CPU port ->
check for errors", but it is really a compromise. In the new way, we can
catch errors from the commit phase that we previously had to ignore.
But we have our hands tied and cannot do any rollback now: if we add a
VLAN on the CPU port and it fails, we can't do the rollback by simply
deleting it from the user port, because the switchdev API is not so nice
with us: it could have simply been there already, even with the same
flags. So we don't even attempt to rollback anything on addition error,
just leave whatever VLANs managed to get offloaded right where they are.
This should not be a problem at all in practice.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      1958d581
    • V
      net: dsa: remove the transactional logic from MDB entries · a52b2da7
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      For many drivers, the .port_mdb_prepare callback was not a good opportunity
to avoid any error condition, and they would suppress errors found during
the actual commit phase.

Where a logical separation between the prepare and the commit phase
existed, the function that used to implement the .port_mdb_prepare
callback still exists, but now it is called directly from .port_mdb_add,
which was modified to return an int code.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de> # hellcreek
Reviewed-by: Linus Wallei <linus.walleij@linaro.org> # RTL8366
Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      a52b2da7
    • V
      net: dsa: remove the transactional logic from ageing time notifiers · 77b61365
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      Remove the shim introduced in DSA for offloading the bridge ageing time
from switchdev, by first checking whether the ageing time is within the
range limits requested by the driver.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      77b61365
    • V
      net: switchdev: remove the transaction structure from port attributes · bae33f2b
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      Since the introduction of the switchdev API, port attributes were
transmitted to drivers for offloading using a two-step transactional
model, with a prepare phase that was supposed to catch all errors, and a
commit phase that was supposed to never fail.

Some classes of failures can never be avoided, like hardware access, or
memory allocation. In the latter case, merely attempting to move the
memory allocation to the preparation phase makes it impossible to avoid
memory leaks, since commit 91cf8ece ("switchdev: Remove unused
transaction item queue") which has removed the unused mechanism of
passing on the allocated memory between one phase and another.

It is time we admit that separating the preparation from the commit
phase is something that is best left for the driver to decide, and not
something that should be baked into the API, especially since there are
no switchdev callers that depend on this.

This patch removes the struct switchdev_trans member from switchdev port
attribute notifier structures, and converts drivers to not look at this
member.

In part, this patch contains a revert of my previous commit 2e554a7a
("net: dsa: propagate switchdev vlan_filtering prepare phase to
drivers").

For the most part, the conversion was trivial except for:
- Rocker's world implementation based on Broadcom OF-DPA had an odd
  implementation of ofdpa_port_attr_bridge_flags_set. The conversion was
  done mechanically, by pasting the implementation twice, then only
  keeping the code that would get executed during prepare phase on top,
  then only keeping the code that gets executed during the commit phase
  on bottom, then simplifying the resulting code until this was obtained.
- DSA's offloading of STP state, bridge flags, VLAN filtering and
  multicast router could be converted right away. But the ageing time
  could not, so a shim was introduced and this was left for a further
  commit.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de> # hellcreek
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> # RTL8366RB
Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      bae33f2b
    • V
      net: switchdev: remove the transaction structure from port object notifiers · ffb68fc5
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      Since the introduction of the switchdev API, port objects were
transmitted to drivers for offloading using a two-step transactional
model, with a prepare phase that was supposed to catch all errors, and a
commit phase that was supposed to never fail.

Some classes of failures can never be avoided, like hardware access, or
memory allocation. In the latter case, merely attempting to move the
memory allocation to the preparation phase makes it impossible to avoid
memory leaks, since commit 91cf8ece ("switchdev: Remove unused
transaction item queue") which has removed the unused mechanism of
passing on the allocated memory between one phase and another.

It is time we admit that separating the preparation from the commit
phase is something that is best left for the driver to decide, and not
something that should be baked into the API, especially since there are
no switchdev callers that depend on this.

This patch removes the struct switchdev_trans member from switchdev port
object notifier structures, and converts drivers to not look at this
member.

Where driver conversion is trivial (like in the case of the Marvell
Prestera driver, NXP DPAA2 switch, TI CPSW, and Rocker drivers), it is
done in this patch.

Where driver conversion needs more attention (DSA, Mellanox Spectrum),
the conversion is left for subsequent patches and here we only fake the
prepare/commit phases at a lower level, just not in the switchdev
notifier itself.

Where the code has a natural structure that is best left alone as a
preparation and a commit phase (as in the case of the Ocelot switch),
that structure is left in place, just made to not depend upon the
switchdev transactional model.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      ffb68fc5
    • V
      net: switchdev: remove vid_begin -> vid_end range from VLAN objects · b7a9e0da
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      The call path of a switchdev VLAN addition to the bridge looks something
like this today:

        nbp_vlan_init
        |  __br_vlan_set_default_pvid
        |  |                       |
        |  |    br_afspec          |
        |  |        |              |
        |  |        v              |
        |  | br_process_vlan_info  |
        |  |        |              |
        |  |        v              |
        |  |   br_vlan_info        |
        |  |       / \            /
        |  |      /   \          /
        |  |     /     \        /
        |  |    /       \      /
        v  v   v         v    v
      nbp_vlan_add   br_vlan_add ------+
       |              ^      ^ |       |
       |             /       | |       |
       |            /       /  /       |
       \ br_vlan_get_master/  /        v
        \        ^        /  /  br_vlan_add_existing
         \       |       /  /          |
          \      |      /  /          /
           \     |     /  /          /
            \    |    /  /          /
             \   |   /  /          /
              v  |   | v          /
              __vlan_add         /
                 / |            /
                /  |           /
               v   |          /
   __vlan_vid_add  |         /
               \   |        /
                v  v        v
      br_switchdev_port_vlan_add

The ranges UAPI was introduced to the bridge in commit bdced7ef
("bridge: support for multiple vlans and vlan ranges in setlink and
dellink requests") (Jan 10 2015). But the VLAN ranges (parsed in br_afspec)
have always been passed one by one, through struct bridge_vlan_info
tmp_vinfo, to br_vlan_info. So the range never went too far in depth.

Then Scott Feldman introduced the switchdev_port_bridge_setlink function
in commit 47f8328b ("switchdev: add new switchdev bridge setlink").
That marked the introduction of the SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_VLAN, which made
full use of the range. But switchdev_port_bridge_setlink was called like
this:

br_setlink
-> br_afspec
-> switchdev_port_bridge_setlink

Basically, the switchdev and the bridge code were not tightly integrated.
Then commit 41c498b9 ("bridge: restore br_setlink back to original")
came, and switchdev drivers were required to implement
.ndo_bridge_setlink = switchdev_port_bridge_setlink for a while.

In the meantime, commits such as 0944d6b5 ("bridge: try switchdev op
first in __vlan_vid_add/del") finally made switchdev penetrate the
br_vlan_info() barrier and start to develop the call path we have today.
But remember, br_vlan_info() still receives VLANs one by one.

Then Arkadi Sharshevsky refactored the switchdev API in 2017 in commit
29ab586c ("net: switchdev: Remove bridge bypass support from
switchdev") so that drivers would not implement .ndo_bridge_setlink any
longer. The switchdev_port_bridge_setlink also got deleted.
This refactoring removed the parallel bridge_setlink implementation from
switchdev, and left the only switchdev VLAN objects to be the ones
offloaded from __vlan_vid_add (basically RX filtering) and  __vlan_add
(the latter coming from commit 9c86ce2c ("net: bridge: Notify about
bridge VLANs")).

That is to say, today the switchdev VLAN object ranges are not used in
the kernel. Refactoring the above call path is a bit complicated, when
the bridge VLAN call path is already a bit complicated.

Let's go off and finish the job of commit 29ab586c by deleting the
bogus iteration through the VLAN ranges from the drivers. Some aspects
of this feature never made too much sense in the first place. For
example, what is a range of VLANs all having the BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_PVID
flag supposed to mean, when a port can obviously have a single pvid?
This particular configuration _is_ denied as of commit 6623c60d
("bridge: vlan: enforce no pvid flag in vlan ranges"), but from an API
perspective, the driver still has to play pretend, and only offload the
vlan->vid_end as pvid. And the addition of a switchdev VLAN object can
modify the flags of another, completely unrelated, switchdev VLAN
object! (a VLAN that is PVID will invalidate the PVID flag from whatever
other VLAN had previously been offloaded with switchdev and had that
flag. Yet switchdev never notifies about that change, drivers are
supposed to guess).

Nonetheless, having a VLAN range in the API makes error handling look
scarier than it really is - unwinding on errors and all of that.
When in reality, no one really calls this API with more than one VLAN.
It is all unnecessary complexity.

And despite appearing pretentious (two-phase transactional model and
all), the switchdev API is really sloppy because the VLAN addition and
removal operations are not paired with one another (you can add a VLAN
100 times and delete it just once). The bridge notifies through
switchdev of a VLAN addition not only when the flags of an existing VLAN
change, but also when nothing changes. There are switchdev drivers out
there who don't like adding a VLAN that has already been added, and
those checks don't really belong at driver level. But the fact that the
API contains ranges is yet another factor that prevents this from being
addressed in the future.

Of the existing switchdev pieces of hardware, it appears that only
Mellanox Spectrum supports offloading more than one VLAN at a time,
through mlxsw_sp_port_vlan_set. I have kept that code internal to the
driver, because there is some more bookkeeping that makes use of it, but
I deleted it from the switchdev API. But since the switchdev support for
ranges has already been de facto deleted by a Mellanox employee and
nobody noticed for 4 years, I'm going to assume it's not a biggie.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> # switchdev and mlxsw
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de> # hellcreek
Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      b7a9e0da
  7. 10 1月, 2021 1 次提交
  9. 08 1月, 2021 8 次提交
    • V
      net: dsa: remove the DSA specific notifiers · 1dbb1302
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      This effectively reverts commit 60724d4b ("net: dsa: Add support for
DSA specific notifiers"). The reason is that since commit 2f1e8ea7
("net: dsa: link interfaces with the DSA master to get rid of lockdep
warnings"), it appears that there is a generic way to achieve the same
purpose. The only user thus far, the Broadcom SYSTEMPORT driver, was
converted to use the generic notifiers.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Acked-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      1dbb1302
    • V
      net: dsa: export dsa_slave_dev_check · a5e3c9ba
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      Using the NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER notifications, drivers can be aware when
they are enslaved to e.g. a bridge by calling netif_is_bridge_master().

Export this helper from DSA to get the equivalent functionality of
determining whether the upper interface of a CHANGEUPPER notifier is a
DSA switch interface or not.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Acked-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      a5e3c9ba
    • V
      net: dsa: move the Broadcom tag information in a separate header file · f46b9b8e
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      It is a bit strange to see something as specific as Broadcom SYSTEMPORT
bits in the main DSA include file. Move these away into a separate
header, and have the tagger and the SYSTEMPORT driver include them.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Acked-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      f46b9b8e
    • V
      net: dsa: listen for SWITCHDEV_{FDB,DEL}_ADD_TO_DEVICE on foreign bridge neighbors · d5f19486
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      Some DSA switches (and not only) cannot learn source MAC addresses from
packets injected from the CPU. They only perform hardware address
learning from inbound traffic.

This can be problematic when we have a bridge spanning some DSA switch
ports and some non-DSA ports (which we'll call "foreign interfaces" from
DSA's perspective).

There are 2 classes of problems created by the lack of learning on
CPU-injected traffic:
- excessive flooding, due to the fact that DSA treats those addresses as
  unknown
- the risk of stale routes, which can lead to temporary packet loss

To illustrate the second class, consider the following situation, which
is common in production equipment (wireless access points, where there
is a WLAN interface and an Ethernet switch, and these form a single
bridging domain).

 AP 1:
 +------------------------------------------------------------------------+
 |                                          br0                           |
 +------------------------------------------------------------------------+
 +------------+ +------------+ +------------+ +------------+ +------------+
 |    swp0    | |    swp1    | |    swp2    | |    swp3    | |    wlan0   |
 +------------+ +------------+ +------------+ +------------+ +------------+
       |                                                       ^        ^
       |                                                       |        |
       |                                                       |        |
       |                                                    Client A  Client B
       |
       |
       |
 +------------+ +------------+ +------------+ +------------+ +------------+
 |    swp0    | |    swp1    | |    swp2    | |    swp3    | |    wlan0   |
 +------------+ +------------+ +------------+ +------------+ +------------+
 +------------------------------------------------------------------------+
 |                                          br0                           |
 +------------------------------------------------------------------------+
 AP 2

- br0 of AP 1 will know that Clients A and B are reachable via wlan0
- the hardware fdb of a DSA switch driver today is not kept in sync with
  the software entries on other bridge ports, so it will not know that
  clients A and B are reachable via the CPU port UNLESS the hardware
  switch itself performs SA learning from traffic injected from the CPU.
  Nonetheless, a substantial number of switches don't.
- the hardware fdb of the DSA switch on AP 2 may autonomously learn that
  Client A and B are reachable through swp0. Therefore, the software br0
  of AP 2 also may or may not learn this. In the example we're
  illustrating, some Ethernet traffic has been going on, and br0 from AP
  2 has indeed learnt that it can reach Client B through swp0.

One of the wireless clients, say Client B, disconnects from AP 1 and
roams to AP 2. The topology now looks like this:

 AP 1:
 +------------------------------------------------------------------------+
 |                                          br0                           |
 +------------------------------------------------------------------------+
 +------------+ +------------+ +------------+ +------------+ +------------+
 |    swp0    | |    swp1    | |    swp2    | |    swp3    | |    wlan0   |
 +------------+ +------------+ +------------+ +------------+ +------------+
       |                                                            ^
       |                                                            |
       |                                                         Client A
       |
       |
       |                                                         Client B
       |                                                            |
       |                                                            v
 +------------+ +------------+ +------------+ +------------+ +------------+
 |    swp0    | |    swp1    | |    swp2    | |    swp3    | |    wlan0   |
 +------------+ +------------+ +------------+ +------------+ +------------+
 +------------------------------------------------------------------------+
 |                                          br0                           |
 +------------------------------------------------------------------------+
 AP 2

- br0 of AP 1 still knows that Client A is reachable via wlan0 (no change)
- br0 of AP 1 will (possibly) know that Client B has left wlan0. There
  are cases where it might never find out though. Either way, DSA today
  does not process that notification in any way.
- the hardware FDB of the DSA switch on AP 1 may learn autonomously that
  Client B can be reached via swp0, if it receives any packet with
  Client 1's source MAC address over Ethernet.
- the hardware FDB of the DSA switch on AP 2 still thinks that Client B
  can be reached via swp0. It does not know that it has roamed to wlan0,
  because it doesn't perform SA learning from the CPU port.

Now Client A contacts Client B.
AP 1 routes the packet fine towards swp0 and delivers it on the Ethernet
segment.
AP 2 sees a frame on swp0 and its fdb says that the destination is swp0.
Hairpinning is disabled => drop.

This problem comes from the fact that these switches have a 'blind spot'
for addresses coming from software bridging. The generic solution is not
to assume that hardware learning can be enabled somehow, but to listen
to more bridge learning events. It turns out that the bridge driver does
learn in software from all inbound frames, in __br_handle_local_finish.
A proper SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_DEVICE notification is emitted for the
addresses serviced by the bridge on 'foreign' interfaces. The software
bridge also does the right thing on migration, by notifying that the old
entry is deleted, so that does not need to be special-cased in DSA. When
it is deleted, we just need to delete our static FDB entry towards the
CPU too, and wait.

The problem is that DSA currently only cares about SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_DEVICE
events received on its own interfaces, such as static FDB entries.

Luckily we can change that, and DSA can listen to all switchdev FDB
add/del events in the system and figure out if those events were emitted
by a bridge that spans at least one of DSA's own ports. In case that is
true, DSA will also offload that address towards its own CPU port, in
the eventuality that there might be bridge clients attached to the DSA
switch who want to talk to the station connected to the foreign
interface.

In terms of implementation, we need to keep the fdb_info->added_by_user
check for the case where the switchdev event was targeted directly at a
DSA switch port. But we don't need to look at that flag for snooped
events. So the check is currently too late, we need to move it earlier.
This also simplifies the code a bit, since we avoid uselessly allocating
and freeing switchdev_work.

We could probably do some improvements in the future. For example,
multi-bridge support is rudimentary at the moment. If there are two
bridges spanning a DSA switch's ports, and both of them need to service
the same MAC address, then what will happen is that the migration of one
of those stations will trigger the deletion of the FDB entry from the
CPU port while it is still used by other bridge. That could be improved
with reference counting but is left for another time.

This behavior needs to be enabled at driver level by setting
ds->assisted_learning_on_cpu_port = true. This is because we don't want
to inflict a potential performance penalty (accesses through
MDIO/I2C/SPI are expensive) to hardware that really doesn't need it
because address learning on the CPU port works there.
Reported-by: NDENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      d5f19486
    • V
      net: dsa: exit early in dsa_slave_switchdev_event if we can't program the FDB · 5fb4a451
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      Right now, the following would happen for a switch driver that does not
implement .port_fdb_add or .port_fdb_del.

dsa_slave_switchdev_event returns NOTIFY_OK and schedules:
-> dsa_slave_switchdev_event_work
   -> dsa_port_fdb_add
      -> dsa_port_notify(DSA_NOTIFIER_FDB_ADD)
         -> dsa_switch_fdb_add
            -> if (!ds->ops->port_fdb_add) return -EOPNOTSUPP;
   -> an error is printed with dev_dbg, and
      dsa_fdb_offload_notify(switchdev_work) is not called.

We can avoid scheduling the worker for nothing and say NOTIFY_DONE.
Because we don't call dsa_fdb_offload_notify, the static FDB entry will
remain just in the software bridge.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      5fb4a451
    • V
      net: dsa: move switchdev event implementation under the same switch/case statement · 447d290a
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      We'll need to start listening to SWITCHDEV_FDB_{ADD,DEL}_TO_DEVICE
events even for interfaces where dsa_slave_dev_check returns false, so
we need that check inside the switch-case statement for SWITCHDEV_FDB_*.

This movement also avoids a useless allocation / free of switchdev_work
on the untreated "default event" case.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      447d290a
    • V
      net: dsa: don't use switchdev_notifier_fdb_info in dsa_switchdev_event_work · c4bb76a9
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      Currently DSA doesn't add FDB entries on the CPU port, because it only
does so through switchdev, which is associated with a net_device, and
there are none of those for the CPU port.

But actually FDB addresses on the CPU port have some use cases of their
own, if the switchdev operations are initiated from within the DSA
layer. There is just one problem with the existing code: it passes a
structure in dsa_switchdev_event_work which was retrieved directly from
switchdev, so it contains a net_device. We need to generalize the
contents to something that covers the CPU port as well: the "ds, port"
tuple is fine for that.

Note that the new procedure for notifying the successful FDB offload is
inspired from the rocker model.

Also, nothing was being done if added_by_user was false. Let's check for
that a lot earlier, and don't actually bother to schedule the worker
for nothing.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      c4bb76a9
    • V
      net: dsa: be louder when a non-legacy FDB operation fails · 2fd18650
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      The dev_close() call was added in commit c9eb3e0f ("net: dsa: Add
support for learning FDB through notification") "to indicate inconsistent
situation" when we could not delete an FDB entry from the port.

bridge fdb del d8:58:d7:00:ca:6d dev swp0 self master

It is a bit drastic and at the same time not helpful if the above fails
to only print with netdev_dbg log level, but on the other hand to bring
the interface down.

So increase the verbosity of the error message, and drop dev_close().
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      2fd18650
  11. 07 1月, 2021 1 次提交
  13. 09 12月, 2020 1 次提交
  15. 24 11月, 2020 1 次提交
  17. 21 11月, 2020 1 次提交
  19. 18 11月, 2020 3 次提交
  21. 10 11月, 2020 1 次提交
  23. 06 11月, 2020 2 次提交
  25. 03 11月, 2020 12 次提交