1. 29 7月, 2014 11 次提交
  2. 28 7月, 2014 2 次提交
  3. 27 7月, 2014 3 次提交
  4. 26 7月, 2014 2 次提交
    • M
      Bluetooth: Fix white list handling with resolvable private addresses · 66d8e837
      Marcel Holtmann 提交于
      Devices using resolvable private addresses are required to provide
      an identity resolving key. These devices can not be found using
      the current controller white list support. This means if the kernel
      knows about any devices with an identity resolving key, the white
      list filtering must be disabled.
      
      However so far the kernel kept identity resolving keys around even
      for devices that are not using resolvable private addresses. The
      notification to userspace clearly hints to not store the key and
      so it is best to just remove the key from the kernel as well at
      that point.
      
      With this it easy now to detect when using the white list is
      possible or when kernel side resolving of addresses is required.
      Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
      66d8e837
    • M
      Bluetooth: Add support for using controller white list filtering · 8540f6c0
      Marcel Holtmann 提交于
      The Bluetooth controller can use a white list filter when scanning
      to avoid waking up the host for devices that are of no interest.
      
      Devices marked as reporting, direct connection (incoming) or general
      connection are now added to the controller white list. The update of
      the white list happens just before enabling passive scanning.
      
      In case the white list is full and can not hold all devices, the
      white list is not used and the filter policy set to accept all
      advertisements.
      
      Using the white list for scanning allows for power saving with
      controllers that do not handle the duplicate filtering correctly.
      Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
      8540f6c0
  5. 25 7月, 2014 5 次提交
    • J
      9a244409
    • J
      ath10k: handle attention flags correctly when using A-MSDU · 0ccb7a34
      Janusz Dziedzic 提交于
      In case of A-MSDU RX we should check attention flags
      correctly to be sure we report correct FCS status for
      A-MSDU subframes. Without a patch we could report A-MSDU
      subframes with wrong FCS as a correct to the stack, next
      get a lot of DUP ACK TCP packets. Finally TP drop is seen
      and this drop depends on FCS errors ratio for A-MSDU frame.
      
      Example test case when TP drop is seen:
      - ath10k configured as an AP
      - used ath10k station
      - forced A-MSDU (7 frames) on STA
      - other traffic on channel (often FCS errors)
      - monitor iface added on AP
      - TCP STA -> AP traffic (iperf)
      
      a) Iperf logs for case without the patch:
      
      echo "1 64" > htt_max_amsdu_ampdu // disable A-MSDU
      [ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
      [  3]  0.0- 5.0 sec  56.6 MBytes  95.0 Mbits/sec
      [  3]  5.0-10.0 sec  60.4 MBytes   101 Mbits/sec
      [  3] 10.0-15.0 sec  60.2 MBytes   101 Mbits/sec
      [  3] 15.0-20.0 sec  60.2 MBytes   101 Mbits/sec
      [  3] 20.0-25.0 sec  63.8 MBytes   107 Mbits/sec
      [  3] 25.0-30.0 sec  64.9 MBytes   109 Mbits/sec
      
      echo "7 64" > htt_max_amsdu_ampdu  // set 7 A-MSDU subframes
      [  3] 30.0-35.0 sec  40.0 MBytes  67.1 Mbits/sec
      [  3] 35.0-40.0 sec  35.9 MBytes  60.2 Mbits/sec
      [  3] 40.0-45.0 sec  36.9 MBytes  61.9 Mbits/sec
      [  3] 45.0-50.0 sec  37.9 MBytes  63.5 Mbits/sec
      [  3] 50.0-55.0 sec  34.5 MBytes  57.9 Mbits/sec
      [  3] 55.0-60.0 sec  25.4 MBytes  42.6 Mbits/sec
      [  3] 60.0-65.0 sec  48.2 MBytes  81.0 Mbits/sec
      [  3] 65.0-70.0 sec  28.8 MBytes  48.2 Mbits/sec
      [  3] 70.0-75.0 sec  29.2 MBytes  49.1 Mbits/sec
      [  3] 75.0-80.0 sec  22.9 MBytes  38.4 Mbits/sec
      [  3] 80.0-85.0 sec  26.4 MBytes  44.2 Mbits/sec
      [  3] 85.0-90.0 sec  31.5 MBytes  52.8 Mbits/sec
      
      b) Iperf logs for case with patch:
      
      echo "1 64" > htt_max_amsdu_ampdu // disable A-MSDU
      [  3] local 192.168.12.2 port 57512 connected with 192.168.12.1 port 5001
      [ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
      [  3]  0.0- 5.0 sec  60.8 MBytes   102 Mbits/sec
      [  3]  5.0-10.0 sec  62.2 MBytes   104 Mbits/sec
      [  3] 10.0-15.0 sec  60.9 MBytes   102 Mbits/sec
      
      echo "7 64" > htt_max_amsdu_ampdu  // set 7 A-MSDU subframes
      [  3] 15.0-20.0 sec  68.1 MBytes   114 Mbits/sec
      [  3] 20.0-25.0 sec  80.5 MBytes   135 Mbits/sec
      [  3] 25.0-30.0 sec  83.0 MBytes   139 Mbits/sec
      [  3] 30.0-35.0 sec  79.1 MBytes   133 Mbits/sec
      [  3] 35.0-40.0 sec  77.1 MBytes   129 Mbits/sec
      [  3] 40.0-45.0 sec  77.4 MBytes   130 Mbits/sec
      Reported-by: NDenton Gentry <denton.gentry@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJanusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com>
      Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
      0ccb7a34
    • M
      ath10k: don't advertise IBSS iftype for 10.x · cf850d1d
      Michal Kazior 提交于
      The 10.x firmware does not support IBSS mode at
      all. It can't beacon and it crashes when trying to
      scan.
      Signed-off-by: NMichal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
      Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
      cf850d1d
    • M
      ath10k: fix Rx aggregation reordering · aa5b4fbc
      Michal Kazior 提交于
      Firmware doesn't perform Rx reordering so it is
      left to the host driver to do that.
      
      Use mac80211 to perform reordering instead of
      re-inventing the wheel.
      
      This fixes TCP throughput issues in some
      environments.
      Reported-by: NDenton Gentry <denton.gentry@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMichal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
      Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
      aa5b4fbc
    • K
      30d88ce3
  6. 24 7月, 2014 13 次提交
  7. 23 7月, 2014 4 次提交