- 02 5月, 2013 40 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Compute the total number of bytes transferred for an image request--the sum across each of the request's object requests. To avoid contention do it only when all object requests are complete, in rbd_img_request_complete(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
If any image object request produces a non-zero result, preserve that as the result of the overall image request. If multiple objects have non-zero results, save only the first one. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There is a new rbd feature bit defined for "fancy striping." Add it to the ones defined in the kernel client. Change RBD_FEATURES_ALL so it represents the set of all feature bits (rather than just the ones we support). Define a new symbol RBD_FEATURES_SUPPORTED to indicate the supported ones. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Right now the data for a method call is specified via a pointer and length, and it's copied--along with the class and method name--into a pagelist data item to be sent to the osd. Instead, encode the data in a data item separate from the class and method names. This will allow large amounts of data to be supplied to methods without copying. Only rbd uses the class functionality right now, and when it really needs this it will probably need to use a page array rather than a page list. But this simple implementation demonstrates the functionality on the osd client, and that's enough for now. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4104Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Change the names of the functions that put data on a pagelist to reflect that we're adding to whatever's already there rather than just setting it to the one thing. Currently only one data item is ever added to a message, but that's about to change. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/2770Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This patch adds support to the messenger for more than one data item in its data list. A message data cursor has two more fields to support this: - a count of the number of bytes left to be consumed across all data items in the list, "total_resid" - a pointer to the head of the list (for validation only) The cursor initialization routine has been split into two parts: the outer one, which initializes the cursor for traversing the entire list of data items; and the inner one, which initializes the cursor to start processing a single data item. When a message cursor is first initialized, the outer initialization routine sets total_resid to the length provided. The data pointer is initialized to the first data item on the list. From there, the inner initialization routine finishes by setting up to process the data item the cursor points to. Advancing the cursor consumes bytes in total_resid. If the resid field reaches zero, it means the current data item is fully consumed. If total_resid indicates there is more data, the cursor is advanced to point to the next data item, and then the inner initialization routine prepares for using that. (A check is made at this point to make sure we don't wrap around the front of the list.) The type-specific init routines are modified so they can be given a length that's larger than what the data item can support. The resid field is initialized to the smaller of the provided length and the length of the entire data item. When total_resid reaches zero, we're done. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3761Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
In place of the message data pointer, use a list head which links through message data items. For now we only support a single entry on that list. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Rather than having a ceph message data item point to the cursor it's associated with, have the cursor point to a data item. This will allow a message cursor to be used for more than one data item. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
A message will only be processing a single data item at a time, so there's no need for each data item to have its own cursor. Move the cursor embedded in the message data structure into the message itself. To minimize the impact, keep the data->cursor field, but make it be a pointer to the cursor in the message. Move the definition of ceph_msg_data above ceph_msg_data_cursor so the cursor can point to the data without a forward definition rather than vice-versa. This and the upcoming patches are part of: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3761Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The bio is the only data item type that doesn't record its full length. Fix that. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
We know the length of our message buffers. If we get a message that's too long, just dump it and ignore it. If skip was set then con->in_msg won't be valid, so be careful not to dereference a null pointer in the process. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4664Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This patch: 15a0d7b libceph: record message data length did not enclose some bio-specific code inside CONFIG_BLOCK as it should have. Fix that. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Finally! Convert the osd op data pointers into real structures, and make the switch over to using them instead of having all ops share the in and/or out data structures in the osd request. Set up a new function to traverse the set of ops and release any data associated with them (pages). This and the patches leading up to it resolve: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4657Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Still using the osd request r_data_in and r_data_out pointer, but we're basically only referring to it via the data pointers in the osd ops. And we're transferring that information to the request or reply message only when the op indicates it's needed, in osd_req_encode_op(). To avoid a forward reference, ceph_osdc_msg_data_set() was moved up in the file. Don't bother calling ceph_osd_data_init(), in ceph_osd_alloc(), because the ops array will already be zeroed anyway. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This ends up being a rather large patch but what it's doing is somewhat straightforward. Basically, this is replacing two calls with one. The first of the two calls is initializing a struct ceph_osd_data with data (either a page array, a page list, or a bio list); the second is setting an osd request op so it associates that data with one of the op's parameters. In place of those two will be a single function that initializes the op directly. That means we sort of fan out a set of the needed functions: - extent ops with pages data - extent ops with pagelist data - extent ops with bio list data and - class ops with page data for receiving a response We also have define another one, but it's only used internally: - class ops with pagelist data for request parameters Note that we *still* haven't gotten rid of the osd request's r_data_in and r_data_out fields. All the osd ops refer to them for their data. For now, these data fields are pointers assigned to the appropriate r_data_* field when these new functions are called. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
All calls of ceph_osdc_start_request() are preceded (in the case of rbd, almost) immediately by a call to ceph_osdc_build_request(). Move the build calls at the top of ceph_osdc_start_request() out of there and into the ceph_osdc_build_request(). Nothing prevents moving these calls to the top of ceph_osdc_build_request(), either (and we're going to want them there in the next patch) so put them at the top. This and the next patch are related to: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4657Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This simply moves ceph_osdc_build_request() later in its source file without any change. Done as a separate patch to facilitate review of the change in the next patch. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An object class method is formatted using a pagelist which contains the class name, the method name, and the data concatenated into an osd request's outbound data. Currently when a class op is initialized in osd_req_op_cls_init(), the lengths of and pointers to these three items are recorded. Later, when the op is getting formatted into the request message, a new pagelist is created and that is when these items get copied into the pagelist. This patch makes it so the pagelist to hold these items is created when the op is initialized instead. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This patch just trivially moves around some code for consistency. In preparation for initializing osd request data fields in ceph_osdc_build_request(), I wanted to verify that rbd did in fact call that immediately before it called ceph_osdc_start_request(). It was true (although image requests are built in a group and then started as a group). But I made the changes here just to make it more obvious, by making all of the calls follow a common sequence: osd_req_op_<optype>_init(); ceph_osd_data_<type>_init() osd_req_op_<optype>_<datafield>() rbd_osd_req_format() ... ret = rbd_obj_request_submit() I moved the initialization of the callback for image object requests into rbd_img_request_fill_bio(), again, for consistency. To avoid a forward reference, I moved the definition of rbd_img_obj_callback() up in the file. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The osd data for a request is currently initialized inside rbd_osd_req_create(), but that assumes an object request's data belongs in the osd request's data in or data out field. There are only three places where requests with data are set up, and it turns out it's easier to call just the osd data init routines directly there rather than handling it in rbd_osd_req_create(). (The real motivation here is moving toward getting rid of the osd request in and out data fields.) Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Currently an object request has its osd request's data field set in rbd_osd_req_format_op(). That assumes a single osd op per object request, and that won't be the case for long. Move the code that sets this out and into the caller. Rename rbd_osd_req_format_op() to be just rbd_osd_req_format(), removing the notion that it's doing anything op-specific. This and the next patch resolve: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4658Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An osd request now holds all of its source op structures, and every place that initializes one of these is in fact initializing one of the entries in the the osd request's array. So rather than supplying the address of the op to initialize, have caller specify the osd request and an indication of which op it would like to initialize. This better hides the details the op structure (and faciltates moving the data pointers they use). Since osd_req_op_init() is a common routine, and it's not used outside the osd client code, give it static scope. Also make it return the address of the specified op (so all the other init routines don't have to repeat that code). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An extent type osd operation currently implies that there will be corresponding data supplied in the data portion of the request (for write) or response (for read) message. Similarly, an osd class method operation implies a data item will be supplied to receive the response data from the operation. Add a ceph_osd_data pointer to each of those structures, and assign it to point to eithre the incoming or the outgoing data structure in the osd message. The data is not always available when an op is initially set up, so add two new functions to allow setting them after the op has been initialized. Begin to make use of the data item pointer available in the osd operation rather than the request data in or out structure in places where it's convenient. Add some assertions to verify pointers are always set the way they're expected to be. This is a sort of stepping stone toward really moving the data into the osd request ops, to allow for some validation before making that jump. This is the first in a series of patches that resolve: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4657Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There are fields "indata" and "indata_len" defined the ceph osd request op structure. The "in" part is with from the point of view of the osd server, but is a little confusing here on the client side. Change their names to use "request" instead of "in" to indicate that it defines data provided with the request (as opposed the data returned in the response). Rename the local variable in osd_req_encode_op() to match. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An osd request keeps a pointer to the osd operations (ops) array that it builds in its request message. In order to allow each op in the array to have its own distinct data, we will need to keep track of each op's data, and that information does not go over the wire. As long as we're tracking the data we might as well just track the entire (source) op definition for each of the ops. And if we're doing that, we'll have no more need to keep a pointer to the wire-encoded version. This patch makes the array of source ops be kept with the osd request structure, and uses that instead of the version encoded in the message in places where that was previously used. The array will be embedded in the request structure, and the maximum number of ops we ever actually use is currently 2. So reduce CEPH_OSD_MAX_OP to 2 to reduce the size of the structure. The result of doing this sort of ripples back up, and as a result various function parameters and local variables become unnecessary. Make r_num_ops be unsigned, and move the definition of struct ceph_osd_req_op earlier to ensure it's defined where needed. It does not yet add per-op data, that's coming soon. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4656Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Define rbd_osd_req_format_op(), which encapsulates formatting an osd op into an object request's osd request message. Only one op is supported right now. Stop calling ceph_osdc_build_request() in rbd_osd_req_create(). Instead, call rbd_osd_req_format_op() in each of the callers of rbd_osd_req_create(). This is to prepare for the next patch, in which the source ops for an osd request will be held in the osd request itself. Because of that, we won't have the source op to work with until after the request is created, so we can't format the op until then. This an the next patch resolve: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4656Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
These are very small changes that make use osd_data local pointers as shorthands for structures being operated on. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
One more osd data helper, which returns the length of the data item, regardless of its type. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Define ceph_osd_data_init() and ceph_osd_data_release() to clean up a little code. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Define and use functions that encapsulate the initializion of a ceph_osd_data structure. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This is a simple change, extracting the number of incoming data bytes just once in handle_reply(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
When rbd creates an object request containing an object method call operation it is passing 0 for the size. I originally thought this was because the length was not needed for method calls, but I think it really should be supplied, to describe how much space is available to receive response data. So provide the supplied length. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4659Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
In prepare_message_data(), the length used to initialize the cursor is taken from the header of the message provided. I'm working toward not using the header data length field to determine length in outbound messages, and this is a step in that direction. For inbound messages this will be set to be the actual number of bytes that are arriving (which may be less than the total size of the data buffer available). This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4589Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Hold off building the osd request message in ceph_writepages_start() until just before it will be submitted to the osd client for execution. We'll still create the request and allocate the page pointer array after we learn we have at least one page to write. A local variable will be used to keep track of the allocated array of pages. Wait until just before submitting the request for assigning that page array pointer to the request message. Create ands use a new function osd_req_op_extent_update() whose purpose is to serve this one spot where the length value supplied when an osd request's op was initially formatted might need to get changed (reduced, never increased) before submitting the request. Previously, ceph_writepages_start() assigned the message header's data length because of this update. That's no longer necessary, because ceph_osdc_build_request() will recalculate the right value to use based on the content of the ops in the request. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Defer building the osd request until just before submitting it in all callers except ceph_writepages_start(). (That caller will be handed in the next patch.) Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There is a helper function alloc_page_vec() that, despite its generic sounding name depends heavily on an osd request structure being populated with certain information. There is only one place this function is used, and it ends up being a bit simpler to just open code what it does, so get rid of the helper. The real motivation for this is deferring building the of the osd request message, and this is a step in that direction. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Mostly for readability, define ceph_writepages_osd_request() and use it to allocate the osd request for ceph_writepages_start(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This patch moves the call to ceph_osdc_build_request() out of ceph_osdc_new_request() and into its caller. This is in order to defer formatting osd operation information into the request message until just before request is started. The only unusual (ab)user of ceph_osdc_build_request() is ceph_writepages_start(), where the final length of write request may change (downward) based on the current inode size or the oldest snapshot context with dirty data for the inode. The remaining callers don't change anything in the request after has been built. This means the ops array is now supplied by the caller. It also means there is no need to pass the mtime to ceph_osdc_new_request() (it gets provided to ceph_osdc_build_request()). And rather than passing a do_sync flag, have the number of ops in the ops array supplied imply adding a second STARTSYNC operation after the READ or WRITE requested. This and some of the patches that follow are related to having the messenger (only) be responsible for filling the content of the message header, as described here: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4589Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Keep track of the length of the data portion for a message in a separate field in the ceph_msg structure. This information has been maintained in wire byte order in the message header, but that's going to change soon. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
When assigning a bio pointer to an osd request, we don't have an efficient way of knowing the total length bytes in the bio list. That information is available at the point it's set up by the rbd code, so record it with the osd data when it's set. This and the next patch are related to maintaining the length of a message's data independent of the message header, as described here: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4589Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-