Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
大约 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 21 6月, 2023 1 次提交
  3. 14 2月, 2023 2 次提交
  5. 26 1月, 2023 1 次提交
  7. 25 1月, 2023 1 次提交
  9. 16 12月, 2022 3 次提交
  11. 22 11月, 2022 1 次提交
  13. 17 11月, 2022 1 次提交
  15. 09 9月, 2022 1 次提交
    • I
      drm/dp_mst: Avoid deleting payloads for connectors staying enabled · 5d832b66
      由 Imre Deak 提交于 
      When an MST connector stays enabled during a commit the connector's MST
state needs to be added to the atomic state, but the corresponding MST
payload allocation shouldn't be set for deletion; fix such modesets by
ensuring the above even if the connector was already enabled before the
modeset.

The issue led to the following:
[  761.992923] i915 0000:00:02.0: drm_WARN_ON(payload->delete)
[  761.992949] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 1401 at drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:4221 drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots+0x236/0x280 [drm_display_helper]
[  761.992955] Modules linked in: snd_hda_intel i915 drm_buddy drm_display_helper drm_kms_helper ttm drm snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_intel_dspcfg snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_hda_core snd_pcm prime_numbers i2c_algo_bit syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops x86_pkg_temp_thermal cdc_ether coretemp crct10dif_pclmul usbnet crc32_pclmul mii ghash_clmulni_intel e1000e mei_me ptp i2c_i801 pps_core mei i2c_smbus intel_lpss_pci fuse [last unloaded: drm]
[  761.992986] CPU: 6 PID: 1401 Comm: testdisplay Tainted: G     U             6.0.0-rc4-imre+ #565
[  761.992989] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Alder Lake Client Platform/AlderLake-P DDR5 RVP, BIOS ADLPFWI1.R00.3135.A00.2203251419 03/25/2022
[  761.992990] RIP: 0010:drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots+0x236/0x280 [drm_display_helper]
[  761.992994] Code: 4c 8b 67 50 4d 85 e4 75 03 4c 8b 27 e8 03 28 4e e1 48 c7 c1 8b 26 2c a0 4c 89 e2 48 c7 c7 a8 26 2c a0 48 89 c6 e8 31 d5 88 e1 <0f> 0b 49 8b 85 d0 00 00 00 4c 89 fa 48 c7 c6 a0 41 2c a0 48 8b 78
[  761.992995] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000177ba60 EFLAGS: 00010286
[  761.992998] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88810d2f1540 RCX: 0000000000000000
[  761.992999] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff82368a25 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
[  761.993000] RBP: ffff888142299d80 R08: ffff8884adbfdfe8 R09: 00000000ffefffff
[  761.993001] R10: ffff8884a6bfe000 R11: ffff8884ac443c30 R12: ffff888102972f90
[  761.993002] R13: ffff8881163e2cf0 R14: 00000000000003ac R15: ffff88810c501000
[  761.993003] FS:  00007f81e4c459c0(0000) GS:ffff888496500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  761.993004] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  761.993005] CR2: 0000555dac962a98 CR3: 0000000123a34006 CR4: 0000000000770ee0
[  761.993006] PKRU: 55555554
[  761.993007] Call Trace:
[  761.993009]  <TASK>
[  761.993012]  intel_dp_mst_compute_config+0x19a/0x350 [i915]
[  761.993090]  intel_atomic_check+0xf37/0x3180 [i915]
[  761.993168]  drm_atomic_check_only+0x5d3/0xa60 [drm]
[  761.993182]  drm_atomic_commit+0x56/0xc0 [drm]
[  761.993192]  ? drm_plane_get_damage_clips.cold+0x1c/0x1c [drm]
[  761.993204]  drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x78/0xc0 [drm_kms_helper]
[  761.993214]  drm_mode_setcrtc+0x1ed/0x750 [drm]
[  761.993232]  ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [drm]
[  761.993241]  drm_ioctl_kernel+0xb5/0x150 [drm]
[  761.993252]  drm_ioctl+0x203/0x3d0 [drm]
[  761.993261]  ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [drm]
[  761.993276]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xb0
[  761.993281]  do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
[  761.993285]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
[  761.993287] RIP: 0033:0x7f81e551aaff
[  761.993288] Code: 00 48 89 44 24 18 31 c0 48 8d 44 24 60 c7 04 24 10 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 08 48 8d 44 24 20 48 89 44 24 10 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <41> 89 c0 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 1f 48 8b 44 24 18 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00
[  761.993290] RSP: 002b:00007fff4304af10 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[  761.993292] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fff4304afa0 RCX: 00007f81e551aaff
[  761.993293] RDX: 00007fff4304afa0 RSI: 00000000c06864a2 RDI: 0000000000000004
[  761.993294] RBP: 00000000c06864a2 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000555dac8a9c68
[  761.993294] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000008c4
[  761.993295] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000555dac8a9c68 R15: 00007fff4304b098
[  761.993301]  </TASK>

Fixes: 083351e9 ("drm/display/dp_mst: Fix modeset tracking in drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots()")
Testcase: igt@testdisplay
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220907142542.1681994-1-imre.deak@intel.com
      5d832b66
  17. 24 8月, 2022 11 次提交
    • L
      drm/display/dp_mst: Move all payload info into the atomic state · 4d07b0bc
      由 Lyude Paul 提交于 
      Now that we've finally gotten rid of the non-atomic MST users leftover in
the kernel, we can finally get rid of all of the legacy payload code we
have and move as much as possible into the MST atomic state structs. The
main purpose of this is to make the MST code a lot less confusing to work
on, as there's a lot of duplicated logic that doesn't really need to be
here. As well, this should make introducing features like fallback link
retraining and DSC support far easier.

Since the old payload code was pretty gnarly and there's a Lot of changes
here, I expect this might be a bit difficult to review. So to make things
as easy as possible for reviewers, I'll sum up how both the old and new
code worked here (it took me a while to figure this out too!).

The old MST code basically worked by maintaining two different payload
tables - proposed_vcpis, and payloads. proposed_vcpis would hold the
modified payload we wanted to push to the topology, while payloads held the
payload table that was currently programmed in hardware. Modifications to
proposed_vcpis would be handled through drm_dp_allocate_vcpi(),
drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi(), and drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots(). Then, they
would be pushed via drm_dp_mst_update_payload_step1() and
drm_dp_mst_update_payload_step2().

Furthermore, it's important to note how adding and removing VC payloads
actually worked with drm_dp_mst_update_payload_step1(). When a VC payload
is removed from the VC table, all VC payloads which come after the removed
VC payload's slots must have their time slots shifted towards the start of
the table. The old code handles this by looping through the entire payload
table and recomputing the start slot for every payload in the topology from
scratch. While very much overkill, this ends up doing the right thing
because we always order the VCPIs for payloads from first to last starting
timeslot.

It's important to also note that drm_dp_mst_update_payload_step2() isn't
actually limited to updating a single payload - the driver can use it to
queue up multiple payload changes so that as many of them can be sent as
possible before waiting for the ACT. This is -technically- not against
spec, but as Wayne Lin has pointed out it's not consistently implemented
correctly in hubs - so it might as well be.

drm_dp_mst_update_payload_step2() is pretty self explanatory and basically
the same between the old and new code, save for the fact we don't have a
second step for deleting payloads anymore -and thus rename it to
drm_dp_mst_add_payload_step2().

The new payload code stores all of the current payload info within the MST
atomic state and computes as much of the state as possible ahead of time.
This has the one exception of the starting timeslots for payloads, which
can't be determined at atomic check time since the starting time slots will
vary depending on what order CRTCs are enabled in the atomic state - which
varies from driver to driver. These are still stored in the atomic MST
state, but are only copied from the old MST state during atomic commit
time. Likewise, this is when new start slots are determined.

Adding/removing payloads now works much more closely to how things are
described in the spec. When we delete a payload, we loop through the
current list of payloads and update the start slots for any payloads whose
time slots came after the payload we just deleted. Determining the starting
time slots for new payloads being added is done by simply keeping track of
where the end of the VC table is in
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr->next_start_slot. Additionally, it's worth noting
that we no longer have a single update_payload() function. Instead, we now
have drm_dp_mst_add_payload_step1|2() and drm_dp_mst_remove_payload(). As
such, it's now left it up to the driver to figure out when to add or remove
payloads. The driver already knows when it's disabling/enabling CRTCs, so
it also already knows when payloads should be added or removed.

Changes since v1:
* Refactor around all of the completely dead code changes that are
  happening in amdgpu for some reason when they really shouldn't even be
  there in the first place… :\
* Remove mention of sending one ACT per series of payload updates. As Wayne
  Lin pointed out, there are apparently hubs on the market that don't work
  correctly with this scheme and require a separate ACT per payload update.
* Fix accidental drop of mst_mgr.lock - Wayne Lin
* Remove mentions of allowing multiple ACT updates per payload change,
  mention that this is a result of vendors not consistently supporting this
  part of the spec and requiring a unique ACT for each payload change.
* Get rid of reference to drm_dp_mst_port in DC - turns out I just got
  myself confused by DC and we don't actually need this.
Changes since v2:
* Get rid of fix for not sending payload deallocations if ddps=0 and just
  go back to wayne's fix
Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-18-lyude@redhat.com
      4d07b0bc
    • L
      drm/display/dp_mst: Maintain time slot allocations when deleting payloads · 6366fc70
      由 Lyude Paul 提交于 
      Currently, we set drm_dp_atomic_payload->time_slots to 0 in order to
indicate that we're about to delete a payload in the current atomic state.
Since we're going to be dropping all of the legacy code for handling the
payload table however, we need to be able to ensure that we still keep
track of the current time slot allocations for each payload so we can reuse
this info when asking the root MST hub to delete payloads. We'll also be
using it to recalculate the start slots of each VC.

So, let's keep track of the intent of a payload in drm_dp_atomic_payload by
adding ->delete, which we set whenever we're planning on deleting a payload
during the current atomic commit.
Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-16-lyude@redhat.com
      6366fc70
    • L
      drm/display/dp_mst: Drop all ports from topology on CSNs before queueing link address work · 2482fcee
      由 Lyude Paul 提交于 
      We want to start cutting down on all of the places that we use port
validation, so that ports may be removed from the topology as quickly as
possible to minimize the number of errors we run into as a result of being
out of sync with the current topology status. This isn't a very typical
scenario and I don't think I've ever even run into it - but since the next
commit is going to make some changes to payload updates depending on their
hotplug status I think it's a probably good idea to take precautions.

Let's do this with CSNs by moving some code around so that we only queue
link address probing work at the end of handling all CSNs - allowing us to
make sure we drop as many topology references as we can beforehand.
Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-15-lyude@redhat.com
      2482fcee
    • L
      drm/display/dp_mst: Add helpers for serializing SST <-> MST transitions · a76eb429
      由 Lyude Paul 提交于 
      There's another kind of situation where we could potentially race with
nonblocking modesets and MST, especially if we were to only use the locking
provided by atomic modesetting:

* Display 1 begins as enabled on DP-1 in SST mode
* Display 1 switches to MST mode, exposes one sink in MST mode
* Userspace does non-blocking modeset to disable the SST display
* Userspace does non-blocking modeset to enable the MST display with a
  different CRTC, but the SST display hasn't been fully taken down yet
* Execution order between the last two commits isn't guaranteed since they
  share no drm resources

We can fix this however, by ensuring that we always pull in the atomic
topology state whenever a connector capable of driving an MST display
performs its atomic check - and then tracking CRTC commits happening on the
SST connector in the MST topology state. So, let's add some simple helpers
for doing that and hook them up in various drivers.

v2:
* Use intel_dp_mst_source_support() to check for MST support in i915, fixes
  CI failures
Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-14-lyude@redhat.com
      a76eb429
    • L
      drm/display/dp_mst: Fix modeset tracking in drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots() · 083351e9
      由 Lyude Paul 提交于 
      Currently with the MST helpers we avoid releasing payloads _and_ avoid
pulling in the MST state if there aren't any actual payload changes. While
we want to keep the first step, we need to now make sure that we're always
pulling in the MST state on all modesets that can modify payloads - even if
the resulting payloads in the atomic state are identical to the previous
ones.

This is mainly to make it so that if a CRTC is still assigned to a
connector but is set to DPMS off, the CRTC still holds it's payload
allocation in the atomic state and still appropriately pulls in the MST
state for commit tracking. Otherwise, we'll occasionally forget to update
MST payloads from changes caused by non-atomic DPMS changes. Doing this
also allows us to track bandwidth limitations in a state correctly even
between DPMS changes, so that there's no chance of a simple ->active change
being rejected by the atomic check.
Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-11-lyude@redhat.com
      083351e9
    • L
      drm/display/dp_mst: Don't open code modeset checks for releasing time slots · ffac9721
      由 Lyude Paul 提交于 
      I'm not sure why, but at the time I originally wrote the find/release time
slot helpers I thought we should avoid keeping modeset tracking out of the
MST helpers. In retrospect though there's no actual good reason to do
this, and the logic has ended up being identical across all the drivers
using the helpers. Also, it needs to be fixed anyway so we don't break
things when going atomic-only with MST.

So, let's just move this code into drm_dp_atomic_release_time_slots() and
stop open coding it.
Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-10-lyude@redhat.com
      ffac9721
    • L
      drm/display/dp_mst: Add nonblocking helpers for DP MST · a5c2c0d1
      由 Lyude Paul 提交于 
      As Daniel Vetter pointed out, if we only use the atomic modesetting locks
with MST it's technically possible for a driver with non-blocking modesets
to race when it comes to MST displays - as we make the mistake of not doing
our own CRTC commit tracking in the topology_state object.

This could potentially cause problems if something like this happens:

* User starts non-blocking commit to disable CRTC-1 on MST topology 1
* User starts non-blocking commit to enable CRTC-2 on MST topology 1

There's no guarantee here that the commit for disabling CRTC-2 will only
occur after CRTC-1 has finished, since neither commit shares a CRTC - only
the private modesetting object for MST. Keep in mind this likely isn't a
problem for blocking modesets, only non-blocking.

So, begin fixing this by keeping track of which CRTCs on a topology have
changed by keeping track of which CRTCs we release or allocate timeslots
on. As well, add some helpers for:

* Setting up the drm_crtc_commit structs in the ->commit_setup hook
* Waiting for any CRTC dependencies from the previous topology state

v2:
* Use drm_dp_mst_atomic_setup_commit() directly - Jani
Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-9-lyude@redhat.com
      a5c2c0d1
    • L
      drm/display/dp_mst: Add helper for finding payloads in atomic MST state · 0b4e477e
      由 Lyude Paul 提交于 
      We already open-code this quite often, and will be iterating through
payloads even more once we've moved all of the payload tracking into the
atomic state. So, let's add a helper for doing this.
Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-8-lyude@redhat.com
      0b4e477e
    • L
      drm/display/dp_mst: Fix confusing docs for drm_dp_atomic_release_time_slots() · 946c7014
      由 Lyude Paul 提交于 
      For some reason we mention returning 0 if "slots have been added back to
drm_dp_mst_topology_state->avail_slots". This is totally misleading,
avail_slots is simply for figuring out the total number of slots available
in total on the topology and has no relation to the current payload
allocations.

So, let's get rid of that comment.
Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-6-lyude@redhat.com
      946c7014
    • L
      drm/display/dp_mst: Call them time slots, not VCPI slots · df78f7f6
      由 Lyude Paul 提交于 
      VCPI is only sort of the correct term here, originally the majority of this
code simply referred to timeslots vaguely as "slots" - and since I started
working on it and adding atomic functionality, the name "VCPI slots" has
been used to represent time slots.

Now that we actually have consistent access to the DisplayPort spec thanks
to VESA, I now know this isn't actually the proper term - as the
specification refers to these as time slots.

Since we're trying to make this code as easy to figure out as possible,
let's take this opportunity to correct this nomenclature and call them by
their proper name - timeslots. Likewise, we rename various functions
appropriately, along with replacing references in the kernel documentation
and various debugging messages.

It's important to note that this patch series leaves the legacy MST code
untouched for the most part, which is fine since we'll be removing it soon
anyhow. There should be no functional changes in this series.

v2:
* Add note that Wayne Lin from AMD suggested regarding slots being between
  the source DP Tx and the immediate downstream DP Rx
Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-5-lyude@redhat.com
      df78f7f6
    • L
      drm/display/dp_mst: Rename drm_dp_mst_vcpi_allocation · 48b6b372
      由 Lyude Paul 提交于 
      In retrospect, the name I chose for this originally is confusing, as
there's a lot more info in here then just the VCPI. This really should be
called a payload. Let's make it more obvious that this is meant to be
related to the atomic state and is about payloads by renaming it to
drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload. Also, rename various variables throughout the
code that use atomic payloads.
Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-4-lyude@redhat.com
      48b6b372
  19. 17 8月, 2022 1 次提交
  21. 29 7月, 2022 1 次提交
  23. 22 6月, 2022 2 次提交
  25. 21 6月, 2022 1 次提交
  27. 17 6月, 2022 1 次提交
  29. 29 4月, 2022 1 次提交
  31. 25 4月, 2022 1 次提交
  33. 17 1月, 2022 4 次提交
  35. 11 1月, 2022 1 次提交
  37. 10 11月, 2021 1 次提交
  39. 26 10月, 2021 2 次提交
  41. 28 7月, 2021 1 次提交
  43. 17 6月, 2021 1 次提交