Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 30 5月, 2012 27 次提交
  3. 22 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  5. 12 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  7. 11 5月, 2012 3 次提交
    • A
      ARM: clps711x: Using a single definition for the PHYS and VIRT registers offset · 304b2c68
      由 Alexander Shiyan 提交于 
      Using a single definition for the physical and virtual address register for all
variants boards clps711x. This patch also includes the use of a single function
clps_read/write in some units.
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      304b2c68
    • E
      connector/userns: replace netlink uses of cap_raised() with capable() · 38bf1953
      由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于 
      In 2009 Philip Reiser notied that a few users of netlink connector
interface needed a capability check and added the idiom
cap_raised(nsp->eff_cap, CAP_SYS_ADMIN) to a few of them, on the premise
that netlink was asynchronous.

In 2011 Patrick McHardy noticed we were being silly because netlink is
synchronous and removed eff_cap from the netlink_skb_params and changed
the idiom to cap_raised(current_cap(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN).

Looking at those spots with a fresh eye we should be calling
capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN).  The only reason I can see for not calling capable
is that it once appeared we were not in the same task as the caller which
would have made calling capable() impossible.

In the initial user_namespace the only difference between between
cap_raised(current_cap(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN) and capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) are a
few sanity checks and the fact that capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) sets
PF_SUPERPRIV if we use the capability.

Since we are going to be using root privilege setting PF_SUPERPRIV seems
the right thing to do.

The motivation for this that patch is that in a child user namespace
cap_raised(current_cap(),...) tests your capabilities with respect to that
child user namespace not capabilities in the initial user namespace and
thus will allow processes that should be unprivielged to use the kernel
services that are only protected with cap_raised(current_cap(),..).

To fix possible user_namespace issues and to just clean up the code
replace cap_raised(current_cap(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN) with
capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN).
Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Acked-by: NSerge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Acked-by: NAndrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>
Cc: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NJames Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      38bf1953
    • R
      parisc: move definition of PAGE0 to asm/page.h · 4a8a0788
      由 Rolf Eike Beer 提交于 
      This was defined in asm/pdc.h which needs to include asm/page.h for
__PAGE_OFFSET. This leads to an include loop so that page.h eventually will
include pdc.h again. While this is no problem because of header guards, it is
a problem because some symbols may be undefined. Such an error is this:

In file included from include/linux/bitops.h:35:0,
                 from include/asm-generic/getorder.h:7,
                 from arch/parisc/include/asm/page.h:162,
                 from arch/parisc/include/asm/pdc.h:346,
                 from arch/parisc/include/asm/processor.h:16,
                 from arch/parisc/include/asm/spinlock.h:6,
                 from arch/parisc/include/asm/atomic.h:20,
                 from include/linux/atomic.h:4,
                 from include/linux/sysfs.h:20,
                 from include/linux/kobject.h:21,
                 from include/linux/device.h:17,
                 from include/linux/eisa.h:5,
                 from arch/parisc/kernel/pci.c:11:
arch/parisc/include/asm/bitops.h: In function ‘set_bit’:
arch/parisc/include/asm/bitops.h:82:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘_atomic_spin_lock_irqsave’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
arch/parisc/include/asm/bitops.h:84:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘_atomic_spin_unlock_irqrestore’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Signed-off-by: NRolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      4a8a0788
  9. 09 5月, 2012 6 次提交
  11. 07 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  13. 27 4月, 2012 1 次提交