1. 21 2月, 2019 3 次提交
  2. 20 2月, 2019 1 次提交
  3. 15 2月, 2019 1 次提交
  4. 13 2月, 2019 1 次提交
  5. 09 2月, 2019 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Revoke mmaps and prevent access to fence registers across reset · 2caffbf1
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      Previously, we were able to rely on the recursive properties of
      struct_mutex to allow us to serialise revoking mmaps and reacquiring the
      FENCE registers with them being clobbered over a global device reset.
      I then proceeded to throw out the baby with the bath water in order to
      pursue a struct_mutex-less reset.
      
      Perusing LWN for alternative strategies, the dilemma on how to serialise
      access to a global resource on one side was answered by
      https://lwn.net/Articles/202847/ -- Sleepable RCU:
      
          1  int readside(void) {
          2      int idx;
          3      rcu_read_lock();
          4	   if (nomoresrcu) {
          5          rcu_read_unlock();
          6	       return -EINVAL;
          7      }
          8	   idx = srcu_read_lock(&ss);
          9	   rcu_read_unlock();
          10	   /* SRCU read-side critical section. */
          11	   srcu_read_unlock(&ss, idx);
          12	   return 0;
          13 }
          14
          15 void cleanup(void)
          16 {
          17     nomoresrcu = 1;
          18     synchronize_rcu();
          19     synchronize_srcu(&ss);
          20     cleanup_srcu_struct(&ss);
          21 }
      
      No more worrying about stop_machine, just an uber-complex mutex,
      optimised for reads, with the overhead pushed to the rare reset path.
      
      However, we do run the risk of a deadlock as we allocate underneath the
      SRCU read lock, and the allocation may require a GPU reset, causing a
      dependency cycle via the in-flight requests. We resolve that by declaring
      the driver wedged and cancelling all in-flight rendering.
      
      v2: Use expedited rcu barriers to match our earlier timing
      characteristics.
      v3: Try to annotate locking contexts for sparse
      v4: Reduce selftest lock duration to avoid a reset deadlock with fences
      v5: s/srcu/reset_backoff_srcu/
      v6: Remove more stale comments
      
      Testcase: igt/gem_mmap_gtt/hang
      Fixes: eb8d0f5a ("drm/i915: Remove GPU reset dependence on struct_mutex")
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190208153708.20023-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      2caffbf1
  6. 08 2月, 2019 4 次提交
  7. 06 2月, 2019 1 次提交
  8. 05 2月, 2019 1 次提交
  9. 02 2月, 2019 1 次提交
  10. 31 1月, 2019 1 次提交
  11. 30 1月, 2019 2 次提交
  12. 29 1月, 2019 3 次提交
  13. 25 1月, 2019 2 次提交
  14. 21 1月, 2019 1 次提交
  15. 17 1月, 2019 1 次提交
  16. 16 1月, 2019 1 次提交
  17. 15 1月, 2019 8 次提交
  18. 11 1月, 2019 1 次提交
  19. 09 1月, 2019 1 次提交
  20. 08 1月, 2019 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Return immediately if trylock fails for direct-reclaim · d25f71a1
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      Ignore trying to shrink from i915 if we fail to acquire the struct_mutex
      in the shrinker while performing direct-reclaim. The trade-off being
      (much) lower latency for non-i915 clients at an increased risk of being
      unable to obtain a page from direct-reclaim without hitting the
      oom-notifier. The proviso being that we still keep trying to hard
      obtain the lock for kswapd so that we can reap under heavy memory
      pressure.
      
      v2: Taint all mutexes taken within the shrinker with the struct_mutex
      subclass as an early warning system, and drop I915_SHRINK_ACTIVE from
      vmap to reduce the number of dangerous paths. We also have to drop
      I915_SHRINK_ACTIVE from oom-notifier to be able to make the same claim
      that ACTIVE is only used from outside context, which fits in with a
      longer strategy of avoiding stalls due to scanning active during
      shrinking.
      
      The danger in using the subclass struct_mutex is that we declare
      ourselves more knowledgable than lockdep and deprive ourselves of
      automatic coverage. Instead, we require ourselves to mark up any mutex
      taken inside the shrinker in order to detect lock-inversion, and if we
      miss any we are doomed to a deadlock at the worst possible moment.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190107115509.12523-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      d25f71a1
  21. 02 1月, 2019 3 次提交
  22. 31 12月, 2018 1 次提交