- 26 6月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
So far we got an AUX power domain reference only for the duration of DP AUX transfers. However, the following suggests that we also need these for main link functionality: - The specification doesn't state whether it's needed or not for main link functionality, but suggests that these power wells need to be enabled already during display core initialization (Sequences to Initialize Display). - For PSR we need to keep the AUX power well enabled. - On ICL combo PHY ports (non-TC) the AUX power well is needed for link training too: while the port is enabled with a DP link training test pattern trying to toggle the AUX power well will time out. - On ICL MG PHY ports (TC) the AUX power well is needed also for main link functionality (both in DP and HDMI modes). - Windows enables these power wells both for main and AUX lane functionality. Based on the above take an AUX power reference for main link functionality too. This makes a difference only on GEN10+ (GLK+) platforms, where we have separate port specific AUX power wells. For PSR we still need to distinguish between port A and the other ports, since on port A DC states must stay enabled for main link functionality, but DC states must be disabled for driver initiated AUX transfers. So re-use the corresponding helper from intel_psr.c. Since we take now a reference for main link functionality on all DP ports we can forgo taking the separate power ref for PSR functionality. v2: - Make sure DC states stay enabled when taking the ref on port A. (Ville) v3: (Ville) - Fix comment about logic for encoders without a crtc state and add FIXME note for a simplification to avoid calling get_power_domains in such cases. - Use intel_crtc_has_dp_encoder() instead !intel_crtc_has_type(HDMI). Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> [Clarified code comments in intel_ddi_main_link_aux_domain() and intel_ddi_get_power_domains() (Imre)] Reviewed-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180621184449.26634-1-imre.deak@intel.com
-
- 21 6月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Lucas De Marchi 提交于
This became dead code with commit 309bd8ed ("drm/i915: Reinstate GMBUS and AUX interrupts on gen4/g4x"). v2: Move comment about HW behavior to where decision is made to enable MSI (Ville). Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180523180435.18042-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
-
由 Dhinakaran Pandiyan 提交于
commit 5422b37c ("drm/i915/psr: Kill delays when activating psr back.") removed the call to cancel a scheduled psr_work from psr_disable() and instead added an early return in the work function. But, if the scheduled work item is executed after psr_enable(), we end up printing warnings as PSR is already enabled and active. So, put the cancel_work call back in psr_disable(). Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Fixes: 5422b37c ("drm/i915/psr: Kill delays when activating psr back.") Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106948Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@gmail.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180618220207.2778-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
-
- 15 6月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
The immediate enabling was actually not an issue for the HW perspective for core platforms that have HW tracking. HW will wait few identical idle frames before transitioning to actual psr active anyways. Now that we removed VLV/CHV out of the picture completely we can safely remove any delays. Note that this patch also remove the delayed activation on HSW and BDW introduced by commit 'd0ac896a ("drm/i915: Delay first PSR activation.")'. This was introduced to fix a blank screen on VLV/CHV and also masked some frozen screens on other core platforms. Probably the same that we are now properly hunting and fixing. v2:(DK): Remove unnecessary WARN_ONs and make some other VLV | CHV more readable. v3: Do it regardless the timer rework. v4: (DK/CI): Add VLV || CHV check on cancel work at psr_disable. v5: Kill remaining items and fully rework activation functions. v6: Rebase on top of VLV/CHV clean-up and keep the reactivation on a regular non-delayed work to avoid extra delays on exit calls and allow us to add few more safety checks before real activation. Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180613192600.3955-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
-
- 30 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dhinakaran Pandiyan 提交于
DPCD 2009h "Synchronization latency in sink" has bits that tell us the maximum number of frames sink can take to resynchronize to source timing when exiting PSR. More importantly, as per eDP 1.4b, this is the "Minimum number of frames following PSR exit that the Source device needs to wait for PSR entry." We currently use this value only to setup the number frames to wait before PSR2 selective update. But, based on the above description it makes more sense to use this to configure idle frames for both PSR1 and and PSR2. This will ensure we wait the required number of frames before activation whether it is PSR1 or PSR2. The minimum number of idle frames remains 6, while allowing sink synchronization latency and VBT to increase this value. This also solves the flip-flop between sink and source frames that I noticed on my Thinkpad X260 during PSR exit. This specific panel has a value of 8h, which according to the spec means the "Source device must wait for more than eight active frames after PSR exit before initiating PSR entry. (In this case, should be provided by the panel supplier.)" VBT however has a value of 0. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180525033047.7596-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
-
- 24 5月, 2018 7 次提交
-
-
由 Dhinakaran Pandiyan 提交于
While touching the code around this, I noticed that absence of ALPM capability does not stop us from enabling PSR2. But, the spec unambiguously states that ALPM is required for PSR2 and so does this commit that introduced this code drm/i915/psr: enable ALPM for psr2 As per edp1.4 spec , alpm is required for psr2 operation as it's used for all psr2 main link power down management and alpm enable bit must be set for psr2 operation. Cc: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NVathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTarun Vyas <tarun.vyas@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180511195145.3829-6-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
-
由 Dhinakaran Pandiyan 提交于
Noticed that we assume the best case of 0 latency when the DPCD read fails, reasonable pessimism is safer. eDP spec does say that if latency is greater than 8, the panel supplier needs to provide it. I didn't see anything specific in the VBT for this, so let's go with 8 frames as a fallback. Cc: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180511195145.3829-5-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
-
由 Dhinakaran Pandiyan 提交于
intel_dp->psr_dpcd already has the required values. Cc: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTarun Vyas <tarun.vyas@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NVathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180511195145.3829-4-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
-
由 Dhinakaran Pandiyan 提交于
By moving the check from psr_compute_config() to psr_init_dpcd(), we get to set the dev_priv->psr.sink_support flag only when the panel is capable of changing power state. An additional benefit is that the check will be performed only at init time instead of every atomic_check. This should change the psr_basic IGT failures on HSW to skips. v2: Return early when SET_POWER_CAPABLE bit is 0 (Jose) Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106217 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106346 Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180511195145.3829-2-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
-
由 Dhinakaran Pandiyan 提交于
Ville noticed that we are unncessarily reading DPCD's after knowing panel did not support PSR. Looks like this check that was present earlier got removed unintentionally, let's put it back. While we do this, add the PSR version number in the debug print. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTarun Vyas <tarun.vyas@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NVathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180511195145.3829-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
-
由 Dhinakaran Pandiyan 提交于
PSR hardware and hence the driver code for VLV and CHV deviates a lot from their DDI counterparts. While the feature has been disabled for a long time now, retaining support for these platforms is a maintenance burden. There have been multiple refactoring commits to just keep the existing code for these platforms in line with the rest. There are known issues that need to be fixed to enable PSR on these platforms, and there is no PSR capable platform in CI to ensure the code does not break again if we get around to fixing the existing issues. On account of all these reasons, let's nuke this code for now and bring it back if a need arises in the future. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180511230059.19387-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
-
由 Vathsala Nagaraju 提交于
For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without any change to vbt structure. Since spec does not mention from which VBT version this change was added to vbt.bsf file, we cannot depend on bdb->version check to change for all the platforms. There is RCR inplace for GOP team to provide the version number to make generic change. Since Kabylake with bdb version 209 is having this change, limiting this change to gen9_bc and version 209+ to unblock google. Tested on skl(bdb version 203,without options) and kabylake(bdb version 209,212) having new options. bspec 20131 v2: (Jani and Rodrigo) move the 165 version check to intel_bios.c v3: Jani Move the abstraction to intel_bios. v4: Jani Rename tp*_wakeup_time to have "us" suffix. For values outside range[0-3],default to max 2500us. Old decimal value was wake up time in multiples of 100us. v5: Jani and Rodrigo Handle option 2 in default condition. Print oustide range value. For negetive values default to 2500us. v6: Jani Handle default first and then fall through for case 2. v7: Rodrigo Apply this change for IS_GEN9_BC and vbt version > 209 v8: Puthik Add new function vbt_psr_to_us. v9: Jani Change to v7 version as it's more readable. DK add comment /*fall through*/ after case2. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Puthikorn Voravootivat <puthik@chromium.org> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMaulik V Vaghela <maulik.v.vaghela@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1526981243-2745-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
-
- 09 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dhinakaran Pandiyan 提交于
Driver features data block has a boolean flag for PSR, use this to decide whether PSR should be enabled on a platform. The module parameter can still be used to override this. Note: The feature currently remains disabled by default for all platforms irrespective of what VBT says. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180509003524.3199-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
-
- 27 4月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
This was my bad, spec says that the name of this bit is 'Y-coordinate valid' but the values for it is: 0: Include Y-coordinate valid eDP1.4a 1: Do not include Y-coordinate valid eDP 1.4 So not setting it. BSpec: 7713 Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180425212334.21109-4-jose.souza@intel.com
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
This will be helpful to debug what hardware is actually tracking and causing PSR to exit. BSpec: 7721 v4: - Using _MMIO_TRANS2() in PSR_EVENT - Cleaning events before printing Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180425212334.21109-2-jose.souza@intel.com
-
由 osé Roberto de Souza 提交于
Any write in any display register was causing HW to exit PSR, masking it to allow more power savings. Writes to pipe related registers will still cause HW to exit PSR. This is already masked for PSR2. It also do not break the Display WA #0884, writes to CURSURFLIVE are still causing hardware to exit PSR. This was tested in CNL machine by triggering a write to CURSURFLIVE when a debugfs was read by user. Bspec: 7721 and 8042 v4: Checked that it do not breaks WA #0884 and added this information to the commit message. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180425212334.21109-1-jose.souza@intel.com
-
- 21 4月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Dhinakaran Pandiyan 提交于
Timestamps are useful for IGT tests that trigger PSR exit and/or wait for PSR entry. v2: Removed seqlock (Ville) Removed erroneous warning in irq loop (Chris) Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180403212420.25007-4-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
-
由 Dhinakaran Pandiyan 提交于
Interrupts other than the one for AUX errors are required only for debug, so unmask them via debugfs when the user requests debug. User can make such a request with echo 1 > <DEBUG_FS>/dri/0/i915_edp_psr_debug There are no locks to serialize PSR debug enabling from irq_postinstall() and debugfs for simplicity. As irq_postinstall() is called only during module initialization/resume and IGT subtests aren't expected to modify PSR debug at those times, we should be safe. v2: Unroll loops (Ville) Avoid resetting error mask bits. v3: Unmask interrupts in postinstall() if debug was still enabled. Avoid RMW (Ville) v4: Avoid extra IMR write introduced in the previous version.(Jose) Style changes, renames (Jose). Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180405013717.24254-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
-
- 10 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Inside the psr work function, we want to wait for PSR to idle first and wish to do so without blocking the normal modeset path, so we do so without holding the PSR lock. However, we first have to find which pipe PSR was enabled on, which requires chasing into the PSR struct and requires locking to prevent intel_psr_disable() from concurrently setting our pointer to NULL. Fixes: 995d3047 ("drm/i915: VLV/CHV PSR Software timer mode") Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.0+ Reviewed-by: NJose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180405114915.29609-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 31 3月, 2018 7 次提交
-
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
In the 2 eDP1.4a pannels tested set or not set bit have no effect but is better set it and comply with specification. Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180328223046.16125-9-jose.souza@intel.com
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
This value do not change overtime so better cache it than fetch it every PSR enable. Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180328223046.16125-8-jose.souza@intel.com
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
Cosmetic change. Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180328223046.16125-7-jose.souza@intel.com
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
Sink can support our PSR2 requirements but userspace can request a resolution that PSR2 hardware do not support, in this case it was overwritten the PSR2 sink support. Adding another flag here, this way if requested resolution changed to a value that PSR2 hardware can handle, PSR2 can be enabled. Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180328223046.16125-6-jose.souza@intel.com
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
For Geminilake and Cannonlake+ the Y-coordinate support must be enabled in PSR2_CTL too. Spec: 7713 and 7720 Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180328223046.16125-5-jose.souza@intel.com
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
Although i915 don't implement aux sync frame through tests was findout that pannels can do selective update when the y-coordinate is also included in SDP, that is why it is required to run PSR2 in i915. So moving to only one place the sink requirements that the actual driver needs to enable PSR2. Also intel_psr2_config_valid() is called every time the crtc config is computed, wasting some time every time it was checking for Y coordinate requirement. This allow us to nuke y_cord_support and some of VSC setup code that was handling a scenario that would never happen(PSR2 without Y coordinate). Also here renaming intel_dp_get_y_cord_status() to intel_dp_get_y_coord_required() as it more accurate to the name and function of bit according to eDP spec. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180328223046.16125-4-jose.souza@intel.com
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
eDP spec states that aux frame is required to do PSR2 selective update but i915 don't fully implement it. It sends the aux frame sync messages but the value is always zero as the GTC is not enabled in driver. Through tests was findout that pannels can do selective update when the y-coordinate is also included in SDP, that is why it is required to run PSR2 in i915. A dummy value is not useful at all to sink, so removing everything related to aux frame sync, if GTC is enabled we can bring this back. Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com> Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180328223046.16125-3-jose.souza@intel.com
-
- 22 3月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Dhinakaran Pandiyan 提交于
HSW and BDW have SRD_AUX_{CTL, STATUS} registers that the driver needs to setup for the HW to use whenever exiting PSR. SKL+ hardware use hardcoded values for the same and do not need any registers to be setup. So, use drm_dp_dpcd_writeb() for a one-time write during PSR enable and setup the PSR aux registers on HSW and BDW for later use by HW. We also end up writing to reserved bits in SRD_AUX_CTL by reusing intel_dp->get_aux_send_ctl() for HSW and BDW, fix this. Since the AUX register setup is source side programming, move the call to enable_source() from enable_sink(). Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180313034646.3721-2-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
-
由 Dhinakaran Pandiyan 提交于
Non-functional change useful for the following patch. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180313034646.3721-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
-
- 14 3月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
No functional change. But let's keep definitions clean and cursor related register definitions together. v2: Fix caps x no caps on same reg. Change name to match original reg name. (by Ville). Also fix name on code s/surlive/surflive and on subject s/cur_surlife/cur surflive/. Suggested-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180312210528.7905-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
-
由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
So far we are using frontbuffer tracking for everything and ignoring that PSR has a HW capable HW tracking for many modern usages of GPU on Core platforms and newer Atom ones. One reason for that is that we were trying to keep same infrastructure in place for VLV/CHV than the rest of platforms. But also because when this infrastructure was created the front-buffer-tracking origin wasn't that good and stable how it is today after Paulo reworked it to attend FBC cases. However this PSR implementation without HW tracking died on gen8LP. And newer platforms are starting to demand more HW tracking specially with PSR2 cases in mind. By disabling and re-enabling PSR totally every time we believe someone is going to change the front buffer content we don't allow PSR HW tracking to do this job and specially compromising the whole idea of PSR2 case where the HW tracking detect only the damaged area and do a partial screen update. So, from now on, on the platforms that has hw_tracking let's rely more on HW tracking. This also is the case in used by other drivers and more validated by SV teams. So I hope that this will lead us to less misterious bugs. v2: Only do this for platform that actually has hw tracking. v3 from DK Do this only for flips, small gradual changes are better. Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com> Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307033420.3086-3-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
-
- 13 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
WA 0884:bxt:all,cnl:*:A - "When FBC is enabled with eDP PSR, the CPU host modify writes may not get updated on the Display as expected. WA: Write 0x00000000 to CUR_SURFLIVE_A with every CPU host modify write to trigger PSR exit." We can also find on spec other cases where they describe bogus writes to cursor registers to force PSR exit with HW tracking. And it was confirmed by HW engineers that this Wa can be safely applied for any frontbuffer activity. So let's use this more and more here instead of forcibly disable and re-enable PSR everytime that we have a simple reliable flush case. Other commits improve the fbcon/fbdev use a lot, but this approach is the only when where we can get a fully reliable console with no slowness or missed frames and PSR still enabled and active. v2: - Rebase on drm-tip - (DK) Add a comment to explain that WA tells about writing 0 to CUR_SURFLIVE_A but we write to CUR_SURFLIVE(pipe). v3: Wa doesn't work on PSR2. Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180309005218.26772-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
-
- 07 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dhinakaran Pandiyan 提交于
In fact, apply the Cannonlake resolution check for all >= Gen-10 platforms to be safe. v3: Update GLK too. (Ville) Longer variable names. if-else in place of ternary operator. v2: Use local variables for resolution limits and print them (Ville) Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Elio Martinez Monroy <elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180306203355.29292-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
-
- 28 2月, 2018 6 次提交
-
-
由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
We can still use PSR1 when PSR2 conditions are not met. So, let's split the check in a way that we make sure has_psr gets set independently of PSR2 criteria. v2: Duh! Handle proper return to avoid breaking PSR2. v3: (DK): - better name for psr2 conditions check function - Don't remove FIXME block and psr2.support check. - Add a debug message to show us what PSR or PSR2 is getting enabled now we have ways to enabled PSR on PSR2 panels. - s/PSR2 disabled/PSR2 not enabled Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180227212913.14083-2-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
-
由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
According to spec: "PSR2 is supported for pipe active sizes up to 3640 pixels wide and 2304 lines tall." BSpec: 7713 Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180227212913.14083-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
-
由 Dhinakaran Pandiyan 提交于
eDP spec says - "If PSR/PSR2 is supported, the SET_POWER_CAPABLE bit in the EDP_GENERAL_CAPABILITY_1 register (DPCD Address 00701h, bit d7) must be set to 1." Reject PSR on panels without this cap bit set as such panels cannot be controlled via SET_POWER & SET_DP_PWR_VOLTAGE register and the DP source needs to be able to do that for PSR. Thanks to Nathan for debugging this. Panel cap checks like this can be done just once, let's fix this when PSR dpcd init movement lands. Cc: Nathan D Ciobanu <nathan.d.ciobanu@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Tested-by: NNathan Ciobanu <nathan.d.ciobanu@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180227032723.15474-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
-
由 Dhinakaran Pandiyan 提交于
The cap check should be specifically for bit 0 instead of any bit. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Fixes: 474d1ec4 ("drm/i915/skl: Enabling PSR2 SU with frame sync") Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180223221520.18464-4-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
-
由 Dhinakaran Pandiyan 提交于
intel_edp_init_dpcd() is cluttered with PSR specific DPCD checks and intel_dp.c is huge. No functional change intended. v2: Rebased. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180223221520.18464-3-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
-
由 Dhinakaran Pandiyan 提交于
PSR on CNL requires AUX IO wells to be kept on and the existing AUX domain for AUX-A enables DC_OFF well too. This is not required, so add a new AUX_IO_A domain for AUX-A to allow DC states to remain enabled. Other AUX channels re-use the existing AUX domains. v4: Reword comment (Rodrigo and Ville) Rename _get and _put functions to include aux_io substring(Rodrigo) Remove unnecessary diff that got included. v3: Extract aux domain selection into a function (Ville) v2: Add AUX IO domain only for AUX-A Rebased on top of Ville's AUX series. Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Suggested-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180223221520.18464-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
-
- 10 2月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tvrtko Ursulin 提交于
Coccinelle patch: @@ identifier p; @@ -INTEL_INFO(p)->gen +INTEL_GEN(p) Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180208130606.15556-12-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180209215847.6660-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 20 1月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dhinakaran Pandiyan 提交于
Avoids some typo pitfalls. Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171220201021.17619-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
-