Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 30 3月, 2020 1 次提交
  3. 29 3月, 2020 1 次提交
  5. 03 3月, 2020 1 次提交
    • A
      libbpf: Add bpf_link pinning/unpinning · c016b68e
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      With bpf_link abstraction supported by kernel explicitly, add
pinning/unpinning API for links. Also allow to create (open) bpf_link from BPF
FS file.

This API allows to have an "ephemeral" FD-based BPF links (like raw tracepoint
or fexit/freplace attachments) surviving user process exit, by pinning them in
a BPF FS, which is an important use case for long-running BPF programs.

As part of this, expose underlying FD for bpf_link. While legacy bpf_link's
might not have a FD associated with them (which will be expressed as
a bpf_link with fd=-1), kernel's abstraction is based around FD-based usage,
so match it closely. This, subsequently, allows to have a generic
pinning/unpinning API for generalized bpf_link. For some types of bpf_links
kernel might not support pinning, in which case bpf_link__pin() will return
error.

With FD being part of generic bpf_link, also get rid of bpf_link_fd in favor
of using vanialla bpf_link.
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200303043159.323675-3-andriin@fb.com
      c016b68e
  7. 21 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  9. 25 1月, 2020 1 次提交
    • A
      libbpf: Improve handling of failed CO-RE relocations · d7a25270
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      Previously, if libbpf failed to resolve CO-RE relocation for some
instructions, it would either return error immediately, or, if
.relaxed_core_relocs option was set, would replace relocatable offset/imm part
of an instruction with a bogus value (-1). Neither approach is good, because
there are many possible scenarios where relocation is expected to fail (e.g.,
when some field knowingly can be missing on specific kernel versions). On the
other hand, replacing offset with invalid one can hide programmer errors, if
this relocation failue wasn't anticipated.

This patch deprecates .relaxed_core_relocs option and changes the approach to
always replacing instruction, for which relocation failed, with invalid BPF
helper call instruction. For cases where this is expected, BPF program should
already ensure that that instruction is unreachable, in which case this
invalid instruction is going to be silently ignored. But if instruction wasn't
guarded, BPF program will be rejected at verification step with verifier log
pointing precisely to the place in assembly where the problem is.
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200124053837.2434679-1-andriin@fb.com
      d7a25270
  11. 23 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  13. 10 1月, 2020 1 次提交
    • M
      bpf: libbpf: Add STRUCT_OPS support · 590a0088
      由 Martin KaFai Lau 提交于 
      This patch adds BPF STRUCT_OPS support to libbpf.

The only sec_name convention is SEC(".struct_ops") to identify the
struct_ops implemented in BPF,
e.g. To implement a tcp_congestion_ops:

SEC(".struct_ops")
struct tcp_congestion_ops dctcp = {
	.init           = (void *)dctcp_init,  /* <-- a bpf_prog */
	/* ... some more func prts ... */
	.name           = "bpf_dctcp",
};

Each struct_ops is defined as a global variable under SEC(".struct_ops")
as above.  libbpf creates a map for each variable and the variable name
is the map's name.  Multiple struct_ops is supported under
SEC(".struct_ops").

In the bpf_object__open phase, libbpf will look for the SEC(".struct_ops")
section and find out what is the btf-type the struct_ops is
implementing.  Note that the btf-type here is referring to
a type in the bpf_prog.o's btf.  A "struct bpf_map" is added
by bpf_object__add_map() as other maps do.  It will then
collect (through SHT_REL) where are the bpf progs that the
func ptrs are referring to.  No btf_vmlinux is needed in
the open phase.

In the bpf_object__load phase, the map-fields, which depend
on the btf_vmlinux, are initialized (in bpf_map__init_kern_struct_ops()).
It will also set the prog->type, prog->attach_btf_id, and
prog->expected_attach_type.  Thus, the prog's properties do
not rely on its section name.
[ Currently, the bpf_prog's btf-type ==> btf_vmlinux's btf-type matching
  process is as simple as: member-name match + btf-kind match + size match.
  If these matching conditions fail, libbpf will reject.
  The current targeting support is "struct tcp_congestion_ops" which
  most of its members are function pointers.
  The member ordering of the bpf_prog's btf-type can be different from
  the btf_vmlinux's btf-type. ]

Then, all obj->maps are created as usual (in bpf_object__create_maps()).

Once the maps are created and prog's properties are all set,
the libbpf will proceed to load all the progs.

bpf_map__attach_struct_ops() is added to register a struct_ops
map to a kernel subsystem.
Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200109003514.3856730-1-kafai@fb.com
      590a0088
  15. 09 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  17. 19 12月, 2019 2 次提交
    • A
      libbpf: Allow to augment system Kconfig through extra optional config · 8601fd42
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      Instead of all or nothing approach of overriding Kconfig file location, allow
to extend it with extra values and override chosen subset of values though
optional user-provided extra config, passed as a string through open options'
.kconfig option. If same config key is present in both user-supplied config
and Kconfig, user-supplied one wins. This allows applications to more easily
test various conditions despite host kernel's real configuration. If all of
BPF object's __kconfig externs are satisfied from user-supplied config, system
Kconfig won't be read at all.

Simplify selftests by not needing to create temporary Kconfig files.
Suggested-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191219002837.3074619-3-andriin@fb.com
      8601fd42
    • A
      libbpf: Add bpf_link__disconnect() API to preserve underlying BPF resource · d6958706
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      There are cases in which BPF resource (program, map, etc) has to outlive
userspace program that "installed" it in the system in the first place.
When BPF program is attached, libbpf returns bpf_link object, which
is supposed to be destroyed after no longer necessary through
bpf_link__destroy() API. Currently, bpf_link destruction causes both automatic
detachment and frees up any resources allocated to for bpf_link in-memory
representation. This is inconvenient for the case described above because of
coupling of detachment and resource freeing.

This patch introduces bpf_link__disconnect() API call, which marks bpf_link as
disconnected from its underlying BPF resouces. This means that when bpf_link
is destroyed later, all its memory resources will be freed, but BPF resource
itself won't be detached.

This design allows to follow strict and resource-leak-free design by default,
while giving easy and straightforward way for user code to opt for keeping BPF
resource attached beyond lifetime of a bpf_link. For some BPF programs (i.e.,
FS-based tracepoints, kprobes, raw tracepoint, etc), user has to make sure to
pin BPF program to prevent kernel to automatically detach it on process exit.
This should typically be achived by pinning BPF program (or map in some cases)
in BPF FS.
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191218225039.2668205-1-andriin@fb.com
      d6958706
  19. 18 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  21. 16 12月, 2019 7 次提交
  23. 16 11月, 2019 2 次提交
  25. 11 11月, 2019 2 次提交
  27. 03 11月, 2019 2 次提交
  29. 31 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  31. 23 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  33. 21 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  35. 16 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  37. 06 10月, 2019 2 次提交
    • A
      libbpf: add bpf_object__open_{file, mem} w/ extensible opts · 2ce8450e
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      Add new set of bpf_object__open APIs using new approach to optional
parameters extensibility allowing simpler ABI compatibility approach.

This patch demonstrates an approach to implementing libbpf APIs that
makes it easy to extend existing APIs with extra optional parameters in
such a way, that ABI compatibility is preserved without having to do
symbol versioning and generating lots of boilerplate code to handle it.
To facilitate succinct code for working with options, add OPTS_VALID,
OPTS_HAS, and OPTS_GET macros that hide all the NULL, size, and zero
checks.

Additionally, newly added libbpf APIs are encouraged to follow similar
pattern of having all mandatory parameters as formal function parameters
and always have optional (NULL-able) xxx_opts struct, which should
always have real struct size as a first field and the rest would be
optional parameters added over time, which tune the behavior of existing
API, if specified by user.
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      2ce8450e
    • A
      libbpf: stop enforcing kern_version, populate it for users · 5e61f270
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      Kernel version enforcement for kprobes/kretprobes was removed from
5.0 kernel in 6c4fc209 ("bpf: remove useless version check for prog load").
Since then, BPF programs were specifying SEC("version") just to please
libbpf. We should stop enforcing this in libbpf, if even kernel doesn't
care. Furthermore, libbpf now will pre-populate current kernel version
of the host system, in case we are still running on old kernel.

This patch also removes __bpf_object__open_xattr from libbpf.h, as
nothing in libbpf is relying on having it in that header. That function
was never exported as LIBBPF_API and even name suggests its internal
version. So this should be safe to remove, as it doesn't break ABI.
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      5e61f270
  39. 08 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  41. 28 7月, 2019 1 次提交
  43. 08 7月, 2019 1 次提交
    • A
      libbpf: add perf buffer API · fb84b822
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY map is often used to send data from BPF program
to user space for additional processing. libbpf already has very low-level API
to read single CPU perf buffer, bpf_perf_event_read_simple(), but it's hard to
use and requires a lot of code to set everything up. This patch adds
perf_buffer abstraction on top of it, abstracting setting up and polling
per-CPU logic into simple and convenient API, similar to what BCC provides.

perf_buffer__new() sets up per-CPU ring buffers and updates corresponding BPF
map entries. It accepts two user-provided callbacks: one for handling raw
samples and one for get notifications of lost samples due to buffer overflow.

perf_buffer__new_raw() is similar, but provides more control over how
perf events are set up (by accepting user-provided perf_event_attr), how
they are handled (perf_event_header pointer is passed directly to
user-provided callback), and on which CPUs ring buffers are created
(it's possible to provide a list of CPUs and corresponding map keys to
update). This API allows advanced users fuller control.

perf_buffer__poll() is used to fetch ring buffer data across all CPUs,
utilizing epoll instance.

perf_buffer__free() does corresponding clean up and unsets FDs from BPF map.

All APIs are not thread-safe. User should ensure proper locking/coordination if
used in multi-threaded set up.
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      fb84b822
  45. 06 7月, 2019 5 次提交
  47. 19 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  49. 11 6月, 2019 1 次提交