Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 06 11月, 2019 3 次提交
  3. 21 10月, 2019 2 次提交
    • T
      jbd2: Free journal head outside of locked region · 7855a57d
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      On PREEMPT_RT bit-spinlocks have the same semantics as on PREEMPT_RT=n,
i.e. they disable preemption. That means functions which are not safe to be
called in preempt disabled context on RT trigger a might_sleep() assert.

The journal head bit spinlock is mostly held for short code sequences with
trivial RT safe functionality, except for one place:

jbd2_journal_put_journal_head() invokes __journal_remove_journal_head()
with the journal head bit spinlock held. __journal_remove_journal_head()
invokes kmem_cache_free() which must not be called with preemption disabled
on RT.

Jan suggested to rework the removal function so the actual free happens
outside the bit-spinlocked region.

Split it into two parts:

  - Do the sanity checks and the buffer head detach under the lock

  - Do the actual free after dropping the lock

There is error case handling in the free part which needs to dereference
the b_size field of the now detached buffer head. Due to paranoia (caused
by ignorance) the size is retrieved in the detach function and handed into
the free function. Might be over-engineered, but better safe than sorry.

This makes the journal head bit-spinlock usage RT compliant and also avoids
nested locking which is not covered by lockdep.
Suggested-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809124233.13277-8-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      7855a57d
    • T
      jbd2: Make state lock a spinlock · 46417064
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      Bit-spinlocks are problematic on PREEMPT_RT if functions which might sleep
on RT, e.g. spin_lock(), alloc/free(), are invoked inside the lock held
region because bit spinlocks disable preemption even on RT.

A first attempt was to replace state lock with a spinlock placed in struct
buffer_head and make the locking conditional on PREEMPT_RT and
DEBUG_BIT_SPINLOCKS.

Jan pointed out that there is a 4 byte hole in struct journal_head where a
regular spinlock fits in and he would not object to convert the state lock
to a spinlock unconditionally.

Aside of solving the RT problem, this also gains lockdep coverage for the
journal head state lock (bit-spinlocks are not covered by lockdep as it's
hard to fit a lockdep map into a single bit).

The trivial change would have been to convert the jbd_*lock_bh_state()
inlines, but that comes with the downside that these functions take a
buffer head pointer which needs to be converted to a journal head pointer
which adds another level of indirection.

As almost all functions which use this lock have a journal head pointer
readily available, it makes more sense to remove the lock helper inlines
and write out spin_*lock() at all call sites.

Fixup all locking comments as well.
Suggested-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809124233.13277-7-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      46417064
  5. 25 9月, 2019 1 次提交
  7. 21 6月, 2019 2 次提交
    • T
      jbd2: drop declaration of journal_sync_buffer() · 9382cde8
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      The journal_sync_buffer() function was never carried over from jbd to
jbd2.  So get rid of the vestigal declaration of this (non-existent)
function.
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      9382cde8
    • R
      jbd2: introduce jbd2_inode dirty range scoping · 6ba0e7dc
      由 Ross Zwisler 提交于 
      Currently both journal_submit_inode_data_buffers() and
journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() operate on the entire address space
of each of the inodes associated with a given journal entry.  The
consequence of this is that if we have an inode where we are constantly
appending dirty pages we can end up waiting for an indefinite amount of
time in journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() while we wait for all the
pages under writeback to be written out.

The easiest way to cause this type of workload is do just dd from
/dev/zero to a file until it fills the entire filesystem.  This can
cause journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() to wait for the duration of
the entire dd operation.

We can improve this situation by scoping each of the inode dirty ranges
associated with a given transaction.  We do this via the jbd2_inode
structure so that the scoping is contained within jbd2 and so that it
follows the lifetime and locking rules for that structure.

This allows us to limit the writeback & wait in
journal_submit_inode_data_buffers() and
journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() respectively to the dirty range for
a given struct jdb2_inode, keeping us from waiting forever if the inode
in question is still being appended to.
Signed-off-by: NRoss Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      6ba0e7dc
  9. 31 5月, 2019 1 次提交
  11. 11 5月, 2019 1 次提交
  13. 07 4月, 2019 1 次提交
  15. 15 2月, 2019 2 次提交
    • T
      jbd2: fold jbd2_superblock_csum_{verify,set} into their callers · a58ca992
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      The functions jbd2_superblock_csum_verify() and
jbd2_superblock_csum_set() only get called from one location, so to
simplify things, fold them into their callers.
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      a58ca992
    • T
      jbd2: fix race when writing superblock · 538bcaa6
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      The jbd2 superblock is lockless now, so there is probably a race
condition between writing it so disk and modifing contents of it, which
may lead to checksum error. The following race is the one case that we
have captured.

jbd2                                fsstress
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
 jbd2_journal_update_sb_log_tail
  jbd2_write_superblock
   jbd2_superblock_csum_set         jbd2_journal_revoke
                                     jbd2_journal_set_features(revork)
                                     modify superblock
   submit_bh(checksum incorrect)

Fix this by locking the buffer head before modifing it.  We always
write the jbd2 superblock after we modify it, so this just means
calling the lock_buffer() a little earlier.

This checksum corruption problem can be reproduced by xfstests
generic/475.
Reported-by: Nzhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      538bcaa6
  17. 01 2月, 2019 1 次提交
    • X
      jbd2: fix deadlock while checkpoint thread waits commit thread to finish · 53cf9784
      由 Xiaoguang Wang 提交于 
      This issue was found when I tried to put checkpoint work in a separate thread,
the deadlock below happened:
         Thread1                                |   Thread2
__jbd2_log_wait_for_space                       |
jbd2_log_do_checkpoint (hold j_checkpoint_mutex)|
  if (jh->b_transaction != NULL)                |
    ...                                         |
    jbd2_log_start_commit(journal, tid);        |jbd2_update_log_tail
                                                |  will lock j_checkpoint_mutex,
                                                |  but will be blocked here.
                                                |
    jbd2_log_wait_commit(journal, tid);         |
    wait_event(journal->j_wait_done_commit,     |
     !tid_gt(tid, journal->j_commit_sequence)); |
     ...                                        |wake_up(j_wait_done_commit)
  }                                             |

then deadlock occurs, Thread1 will never be waken up.

To fix this issue, drop j_checkpoint_mutex in jbd2_log_do_checkpoint()
when we are going to wait for transaction commit.
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      53cf9784
  19. 21 5月, 2018 2 次提交
  21. 20 2月, 2018 1 次提交
  23. 19 2月, 2018 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: pass -ESHUTDOWN code to jbd2 layer · fb7c0244
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      Previously the jbd2 layer assumed that a file system check would be
required after a journal abort.  In the case of the deliberate file
system shutdown, this should not be necessary.  Allow the jbd2 layer
to distinguish between these two cases by using the ESHUTDOWN errno.

Also add proper locking to __journal_abort_soft().
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      fb7c0244
  25. 18 12月, 2017 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: fix up remaining files with SPDX cleanups · f5166768
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      A number of ext4 source files were skipped due because their copyright
permission statements didn't match the expected text used by the
automated conversion utilities.  I've added SPDX tags for the rest.

While looking at some of these files, I've noticed that we have quite
a bit of variation on the licenses that were used --- in particular
some of the Red Hat licenses on the jbd2 files use a GPL2+ license,
and we have some files that have a LGPL-2.1 license (which was quite
surprising).

I've not attempted to do any license changes.  Even if it is perfectly
legal to relicense to GPL 2.0-only for consistency's sake, that should
be done with ext4 developer community discussion.
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      f5166768
  27. 03 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • J
      ext4: Support for synchronous DAX faults · b8a6176c
      由 Jan Kara 提交于 
      We return IOMAP_F_DIRTY flag from ext4_iomap_begin() when asked to
prepare blocks for writing and the inode has some uncommitted metadata
changes. In the fault handler ext4_dax_fault() we then detect this case
(through VM_FAULT_NEEDDSYNC return value) and call helper
dax_finish_sync_fault() to flush metadata changes and insert page table
entry. Note that this will also dirty corresponding radix tree entry
which is what we want - fsync(2) will still provide data integrity
guarantees for applications not using userspace flushing. And
applications using userspace flushing can avoid calling fsync(2) and
thus avoid the performance overhead.
Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      b8a6176c
  29. 19 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  31. 20 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  33. 04 5月, 2017 2 次提交
  35. 30 4月, 2017 2 次提交
    • J
      jbd2: fix dbench4 performance regression for 'nobarrier' mounts · 5052b069
      由 Jan Kara 提交于 
      Commit b685d3d6 "block: treat REQ_FUA and REQ_PREFLUSH as
synchronous" removed REQ_SYNC flag from WRITE_FUA implementation. Since
JBD2 strips REQ_FUA and REQ_FLUSH flags from submitted IO when the
filesystem is mounted with nobarrier mount option, journal superblock
writes ended up being async writes after this patch and that caused
heavy performance regression for dbench4 benchmark with high number of
processes. In my test setup with HP RAID array with non-volatile write
cache and 32 GB ram, dbench4 runs with 8 processes regressed by ~25%.

Fix the problem by making sure journal superblock writes are always
treated as synchronous since they generally block progress of the
journalling machinery and thus the whole filesystem.

Fixes: b685d3d6
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      5052b069
    • J
      jbd2: Fix lockdep splat with generic/270 test · c52c47e4
      由 Jan Kara 提交于 
      I've hit a lockdep splat with generic/270 test complaining that:

3216.fsstress.b/3533 is trying to acquire lock:
 (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff813152e0>] jbd2_log_wait_commit+0x0/0x150

but task is already holding lock:
 (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff8130bd3b>] start_this_handle+0x35b/0x850

The underlying problem is that jbd2_journal_force_commit_nested()
(called from ext4_should_retry_alloc()) may get called while a
transaction handle is started. In such case it takes care to not wait
for commit of the running transaction (which would deadlock) but only
for a commit of a transaction that is already committing (which is safe
as that doesn't wait for any filesystem locks).

In fact there are also other callers of jbd2_log_wait_commit() that take
care to pass tid of a transaction that is already committing and for
those cases, the lockdep instrumentation is too restrictive and leading
to false positive reports. Fix the problem by calling
jbd2_might_wait_for_commit() from jbd2_log_wait_commit() only if the
transaction isn't already committing.

Fixes: 1eaa566dSigned-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      c52c47e4
  37. 19 4月, 2017 1 次提交
    • P
      mm: Rename SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU to SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU · 5f0d5a3a
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      A group of Linux kernel hackers reported chasing a bug that resulted
from their assumption that SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU provided an existence
guarantee, that is, that no block from such a slab would be reallocated
during an RCU read-side critical section.  Of course, that is not the
case.  Instead, SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU only prevents freeing of an entire
slab of blocks.

However, there is a phrase for this, namely "type safety".  This commit
therefore renames SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU to SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU in order
to avoid future instances of this sort of confusion.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
[ paulmck: Add comments mentioning the old name, as requested by Eric
  Dumazet, in order to help people familiar with the old name find
  the new one. ]
Acked-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
      5f0d5a3a
  39. 16 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  41. 02 2月, 2017 1 次提交
    • S
      jbd2: fix use after free in kjournald2() · dbfcef6b
      由 Sahitya Tummala 提交于 
      Below is the synchronization issue between unmount and kjournald2
contexts, which results into use after free issue in kjournald2().
Fix this issue by using journal->j_state_lock to synchronize the
wait_event() done in journal_kill_thread() and the wake_up() done
in kjournald2().

TASK 1:
umount cmd:
   |--jbd2_journal_destroy() {
       |--journal_kill_thread() {
            write_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
	    journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;
	    ...
	    write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
	    wake_up(&journal->j_wait_commit);	   TASK 2 wakes up here:
	    					   kjournald2() {
						     ...
						     checks JBD2_UNMOUNT flag and calls goto end-loop;
						     ...
						     end_loop:
						       write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
						       journal->j_task = NULL; --> If this thread gets
						       pre-empted here, then TASK 1 wait_event will
						       exit even before this thread is completely
						       done.
	    wait_event(journal->j_wait_done_commit, journal->j_task == NULL);
	    ...
	    write_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
	    write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
	  }
       |--kfree(journal);
     }
}
						       wake_up(&journal->j_wait_done_commit); --> this step
						       now results into use after free issue.
						   }
Signed-off-by: NSahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      dbfcef6b
  43. 14 1月, 2017 1 次提交
    • T
      fs/jbd2, locking/mutex, sched/wait: Use mutex_lock_io() for journal->j_checkpoint_mutex · 6fa7aa50
      由 Tejun Heo 提交于 
      When an ext4 fs is bogged down by a lot of metadata IOs (in the
reported case, it was deletion of millions of files, but any massive
amount of journal writes would do), after the journal is filled up,
tasks which try to access the filesystem and aren't currently
performing the journal writes end up waiting in
__jbd2_log_wait_for_space() for journal->j_checkpoint_mutex.

Because those mutex sleeps aren't marked as iowait, this condition can
lead to misleadingly low iowait and /proc/stat:procs_blocked.  While
iowait propagation is far from strict, this condition can be triggered
fairly easily and annotating these sleeps correctly helps initial
diagnosis quite a bit.

Use the new mutex_lock_io() for journal->j_checkpoint_mutex so that
these sleeps are properly marked as iowait.
Reported-by: NMingbo Wan <mingbo@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1477673892-28940-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      6fa7aa50
  45. 25 12月, 2016 1 次提交
  47. 01 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  49. 16 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  51. 30 6月, 2016 2 次提交
    • J
      jbd2: track more dependencies on transaction commit · 1eaa566d
      由 Jan Kara 提交于 
      So far we were tracking only dependency on transaction commit due to
starting a new handle (which may require commit to start a new
transaction). Now add tracking also for other cases where we wait for
transaction commit. This way lockdep can catch deadlocks e. g. because we
call jbd2_journal_stop() for a synchronous handle with some locks held
which rank below transaction start.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      1eaa566d
    • J
      jbd2: move lockdep tracking to journal_s · ab714aff
      由 Jan Kara 提交于 
      Currently lockdep map is tracked in each journal handle. To be able to
expand lockdep support to cover also other cases where we depend on
transaction commit and where handle is not available, move lockdep map
into struct journal_s. Since this makes the lockdep map shared for all
handles, we have to use rwsem_acquire_read() for acquisitions now.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      ab714aff
  53. 25 6月, 2016 1 次提交
    • M
      jbd2: get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPEAT · f2db1971
      由 Michal Hocko 提交于 
      jbd2_alloc is explicit about its allocation preferences wrt.  the
allocation size.  Sub page allocations go to the slab allocator and
larger are using either the page allocator or vmalloc.  This is all good
but the logic is unnecessarily complex.

1) as per Ted, the vmalloc fallback is a left-over:

 : jbd2_alloc is only passed in the bh->b_size, which can't be PAGE_SIZE, so
 : the code path that calls vmalloc() should never get called.  When we
 : conveted jbd2_alloc() to suppor sub-page size allocations in commit
 : d2eecb03, there was an assumption that it could be called with a size
 : greater than PAGE_SIZE, but that's certaily not true today.

Moreover vmalloc allocation might even lead to a deadlock because the
callers expect GFP_NOFS context while vmalloc is GFP_KERNEL.

2) __GFP_REPEAT for requests <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER is ignored
   since the flag was introduced.

Let's simplify the code flow and use the slab allocator for sub-page
requests and the page allocator for others.  Even though order > 0 is
not currently used as per above leave that option open.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464599699-30131-18-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      f2db1971
  55. 08 6月, 2016 3 次提交
  57. 24 4月, 2016 1 次提交
    • J
      jbd2: add support for avoiding data writes during transaction commits · 41617e1a
      由 Jan Kara 提交于 
      Currently when filesystem needs to make sure data is on permanent
storage before committing a transaction it adds inode to transaction's
inode list. During transaction commit, jbd2 writes back all dirty
buffers that have allocated underlying blocks and waits for the IO to
finish. However when doing writeback for delayed allocated data, we
allocate blocks and immediately submit the data. Thus asking jbd2 to
write dirty pages just unnecessarily adds more work to jbd2 possibly
writing back other redirtied blocks.

Add support to jbd2 to allow filesystem to ask jbd2 to only wait for
outstanding data writes before committing a transaction and thus avoid
unnecessary writes.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      41617e1a