Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 19 4月, 2022 2 次提交
  3. 15 3月, 2022 3 次提交
  5. 14 3月, 2022 7 次提交
  7. 08 3月, 2022 1 次提交
  9. 02 3月, 2022 1 次提交
    • J
      btrfs: do not WARN_ON() if we have PageError set · a50e1fcb
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      Whenever we do any extent buffer operations we call
assert_eb_page_uptodate() to complain loudly if we're operating on an
non-uptodate page.  Our overnight tests caught this warning earlier this
week

  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 553508 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:6849 assert_eb_page_uptodate+0x3f/0x50
  CPU: 1 PID: 553508 Comm: kworker/u4:13 Tainted: G        W         5.17.0-rc3+ #564
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
  Workqueue: btrfs-cache btrfs_work_helper
  RIP: 0010:assert_eb_page_uptodate+0x3f/0x50
  RSP: 0018:ffffa961440a7c68 EFLAGS: 00010246
  RAX: 0017ffffc0002112 RBX: ffffe6e74453f9c0 RCX: 0000000000001000
  RDX: ffffe6e74467c887 RSI: ffffe6e74453f9c0 RDI: ffff8d4c5efc2fc0
  RBP: 0000000000000d56 R08: ffff8d4d4a224000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 00015817fa9d1ef0 R11: 000000000000000c R12: 00000000000007b1
  R13: ffff8d4c5efc2fc0 R14: 0000000001500000 R15: 0000000001cb1000
  FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8d4dbbd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00007ff31d3448d8 CR3: 0000000118be8004 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
  Call Trace:

   extent_buffer_test_bit+0x3f/0x70
   free_space_test_bit+0xa6/0xc0
   load_free_space_tree+0x1f6/0x470
   caching_thread+0x454/0x630
   ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60
   ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60
   ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60
   ? lock_release+0x1f0/0x2d0
   btrfs_work_helper+0xf2/0x3e0
   ? lock_release+0x1f0/0x2d0
   ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0xf9/0x3a0
   process_one_work+0x26d/0x580
   ? process_one_work+0x580/0x580
   worker_thread+0x55/0x3b0
   ? process_one_work+0x580/0x580
   kthread+0xf0/0x120
   ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

This was partially fixed by c2e39305 ("btrfs: clear extent buffer
uptodate when we fail to write it"), however all that fix did was keep
us from finding extent buffers after a failed writeout.  It didn't keep
us from continuing to use a buffer that we already had found.

In this case we're searching the commit root to cache the block group,
so we can start committing the transaction and switch the commit root
and then start writing.  After the switch we can look up an extent
buffer that hasn't been written yet and start processing that block
group.  Then we fail to write that block out and clear Uptodate on the
page, and then we start spewing these errors.

Normally we're protected by the tree lock to a certain degree here.  If
we read a block we have that block read locked, and we block the writer
from locking the block before we submit it for the write.  However this
isn't necessarily fool proof because the read could happen before we do
the submit_bio and after we locked and unlocked the extent buffer.

Also in this particular case we have path->skip_locking set, so that
won't save us here.  We'll simply get a block that was valid when we
read it, but became invalid while we were using it.

What we really want is to catch the case where we've "read" a block but
it's not marked Uptodate.  On read we ClearPageError(), so if we're
!Uptodate and !Error we know we didn't do the right thing for reading
the page.

Fix this by checking !Uptodate && !Error, this way we will not complain
if our buffer gets invalidated while we're using it, and we'll maintain
the spirit of the check which is to make sure we have a fully in-cache
block while we're messing with it.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      a50e1fcb
  11. 04 2月, 2022 1 次提交
  13. 02 2月, 2022 1 次提交
  15. 22 1月, 2022 1 次提交
  17. 07 1月, 2022 5 次提交
    • Y
      btrfs: fix argument list that the kdoc format and script verified · be8d1a2a
      由 Yang Li 提交于 
      The warnings were found by running scripts/kernel-doc, which is
caused by using 'make W=1'.

fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3210: warning: Function parameter or member
'bio_ctrl' not described in 'btrfs_bio_add_page'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3210: warning: Excess function parameter 'bio'
description in 'btrfs_bio_add_page'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3210: warning: Excess function parameter
'prev_bio_flags' description in 'btrfs_bio_add_page'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1602: warning: Excess function parameter 'root'
description in 'btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1602: warning: Function parameter or member
'fs_info' not described in 'btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes'

Note: this is fixing only the warnings regarding parameter list, the
first line is not strictly conforming to the kdoc format as the btrfs
codebase does not stick to that and keeps the first line more free form
(because it's only for internal use).
Reported-by: NAbaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add note ]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      be8d1a2a
    • Q
      btrfs: remove reada infrastructure · f26c9238
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      Currently there is only one user for btrfs metadata readahead, and
that's scrub.

But even for the single user, it's not providing the correct
functionality it needs, as scrub needs reada for commit root, which
current readahead can't provide. (Although it's pretty easy to add such
feature).

Despite this, there are some extra problems related to metadata
readahead:

- Duplicated feature with btrfs_path::reada

- Partly duplicated feature of btrfs_fs_info::buffer_radix
  Btrfs already caches its metadata in buffer_radix, while readahead
  tries to read the tree block no matter if it's already cached.

- Poor layer separation
  Metadata readahead works kinda at device level.
  This is definitely not the correct layer it should be, since metadata
  is at btrfs logical address space, it should not bother device at all.

  This brings extra chance for bugs to sneak in, while brings
  unnecessary complexity.

- Dead code
  In the very beginning of scrub.c we have #undef DEBUG, rendering all
  the debug related code useless and unable to test.

Thus here I purpose to remove the metadata readahead mechanism
completely.

[BENCHMARK]
There is a full benchmark for the scrub performance difference using the
old btrfs_reada_add() and btrfs_path::reada.

For the worst case (no dirty metadata, slow HDD), there could be a 5%
performance drop for scrub.
For other cases (even SATA SSD), there is no distinguishable performance
difference.

The number is reported scrub speed, in MiB/s.
The resolution is limited by the reported duration, which only has a
resolution of 1 second.

	Old		New		Diff
SSD	455.3		466.332		+2.42%
HDD	103.927 	98.012		-5.69%

Comprehensive test methodology is in the cover letter of the patch.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      f26c9238
    • J
      btrfs: zoned: drop redundant check for REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND and btrfs_is_zoned · 73672710
      由 Johannes Thumshirn 提交于 
      REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND can only work on zoned devices, so it is redundant to
check if the filesystem is zoned when REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND is set as the
bio's bio_op.
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      73672710
    • J
      btrfs: zoned: sink zone check into btrfs_repair_one_zone · 554aed7d
      由 Johannes Thumshirn 提交于 
      Sink zone check into btrfs_repair_one_zone() so we don't need to do it
in all callers.

Also as btrfs_repair_one_zone() doesn't return a sensible error, make it
a boolean function and return false in case it got called on a non-zoned
filesystem and true on a zoned filesystem.
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      554aed7d
    • J
      btrfs: zoned: encapsulate inode locking for zoned relocation · 869f4cdc
      由 Johannes Thumshirn 提交于 
      Encapsulate the inode lock needed for serializing the data relocation
writes on a zoned filesystem into a helper.

This streamlines the code reading flow and hides special casing for
zoned filesystems.
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      869f4cdc
  19. 03 1月, 2022 1 次提交
    • Q
      btrfs: remove unnecessary @nr_written parameters · 83f1b680
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      We use @nr_written to record how many pages have been started by
btrfs_run_delalloc_range().

Currently there are only two cases that would populate @nr_written:

- Inline extent creation
- Compressed write

But both cases will also set @page_started to one.

In fact, in writepage_delalloc() we have the following code, showing
that @nr_written is really only utilized for above two cases:

	/* did the fill delalloc function already unlock and start
	 * the IO?
	 */
	if (page_started) {
		/*
		 * we've unlocked the page, so we can't update
		 * the mapping's writeback index, just update
		 * nr_to_write.
		 */
		wbc->nr_to_write -= nr_written;
		return 1;
	}

But for such cases, writepage_delalloc() will return 1, and exit
__extent_writepage() without going through __extent_writepage_io().

Thus this means, inside __extent_writepage_io(), we always get
@nr_written as 0.

So this patch is going to remove the unnecessary parameter from the
following functions:

- writepage_delalloc()

  As @nr_written passed in is always the initial value 0.

  Although inside that function, we still need a local @nr_written
  to update wbc->nr_to_write.

- __extent_writepage_io()

  As explained above, @nr_written passed in can only be 0.

  This also means we can remove one update_nr_written() call.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      83f1b680
  21. 16 12月, 2021 1 次提交
    • J
      btrfs: check WRITE_ERR when trying to read an extent buffer · 651740a5
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      Filipe reported a hang when we have errors on btrfs.  This turned out to
be a side-effect of my fix c2e39305 ("btrfs: clear extent buffer
uptodate when we fail to write it") which made it so we clear
EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE on an eb when we fail to write it out.

Below is a paste of Filipe's analysis he got from using drgn to debug
the hang

"""
btree readahead code calls read_extent_buffer_pages(), sets ->io_pages to
a value while writeback of all pages has not yet completed:
   --> writeback for the first 3 pages finishes, we clear
       EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE from eb on the first page when we get an
       error.
   --> at this point eb->io_pages is 1 and we cleared Uptodate bit from the
       first 3 pages
   --> read_extent_buffer_pages() does not see EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE() so
       it continues, it's able to lock the pages since we obviously don't
       hold the pages locked during writeback
   --> read_extent_buffer_pages() then computes 'num_reads' as 3, and sets
       eb->io_pages to 3, since only the first page does not have Uptodate
       bit set at this point
   --> writeback for the remaining page completes, we ended decrementing
       eb->io_pages by 1, resulting in eb->io_pages == 2, and therefore
       never calling end_extent_buffer_writeback(), so
       EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITEBACK remains in the eb's flags
   --> of course, when the read bio completes, it doesn't and shouldn't
       call end_extent_buffer_writeback()
   --> we should clear EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE only after all pages of
       the eb finished writeback?  or maybe make the read pages code
       wait for writeback of all pages of the eb to complete before
       checking which pages need to be read, touch ->io_pages, submit
       read bio, etc

writeback bit never cleared means we can hang when aborting a
transaction, at:

    btrfs_cleanup_one_transaction()
       btrfs_destroy_marked_extents()
         wait_on_extent_buffer_writeback()
"""

This is a problem because our writes are not synchronized with reads in
any way.  We clear the UPTODATE flag and then we can easily come in and
try to read the EB while we're still waiting on other bio's to
complete.

We have two options here, we could lock all the pages, and then check to
see if eb->io_pages != 0 to know if we've already got an outstanding
write on the eb.

Or we can simply check to see if we have WRITE_ERR set on this extent
buffer.  We set this bit _before_ we clear UPTODATE, so if the read gets
triggered because we aren't UPTODATE because of a write error we're
guaranteed to have WRITE_ERR set, and in this case we can simply return
-EIO.  This will fix the reported hang.
Reported-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Fixes: c2e39305 ("btrfs: clear extent buffer uptodate when we fail to write it")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      651740a5
  23. 08 12月, 2021 2 次提交
    • J
      btrfs: call mapping_set_error() on btree inode with a write error · 68b85589
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      generic/484 fails sometimes with compression on because the write ends
up small enough that it goes into the btree.  This means that we never
call mapping_set_error() on the inode itself, because the page gets
marked as fine when we inline it into the metadata.  When the metadata
writeback happens we see it and abort the transaction properly and mark
the fs as readonly, however we don't do the mapping_set_error() on
anything.  In syncfs() we will simply return 0 if the sb is marked
read-only, so we can't check for this in our syncfs callback.  The only
way the error gets returned if we called mapping_set_error() on
something.  Fix this by calling mapping_set_error() on the btree inode
mapping.  This allows us to properly return an error on syncfs and pass
generic/484 with compression on.
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      68b85589
    • J
      btrfs: clear extent buffer uptodate when we fail to write it · c2e39305
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      I got dmesg errors on generic/281 on our overnight fstests.  Looking at
the history this happens occasionally, with errors like this

  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 673217 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:6848 assert_eb_page_uptodate+0x3f/0x50
  CPU: 0 PID: 673217 Comm: kworker/u4:13 Tainted: G        W         5.16.0-rc2+ #469
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
  Workqueue: btrfs-cache btrfs_work_helper
  RIP: 0010:assert_eb_page_uptodate+0x3f/0x50
  RSP: 0018:ffffae598230bc60 EFLAGS: 00010246
  RAX: 0017ffffc0002112 RBX: ffffebaec4100900 RCX: 0000000000001000
  RDX: ffffebaec45733c7 RSI: ffffebaec4100900 RDI: ffff9fd98919f340
  RBP: 0000000000000d56 R08: ffff9fd98e300000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0001207370a91c50 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00000000000007b0
  R13: ffff9fd98919f340 R14: 0000000001500000 R15: 0000000001cb0000
  FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9fd9fbc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00007f549fcf8940 CR3: 0000000114908004 CR4: 0000000000370ef0
  Call Trace:

   extent_buffer_test_bit+0x3f/0x70
   free_space_test_bit+0xa6/0xc0
   load_free_space_tree+0x1d6/0x430
   caching_thread+0x454/0x630
   ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60
   ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60
   ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60
   ? lock_release+0x1f0/0x2d0
   btrfs_work_helper+0xf2/0x3e0
   ? lock_release+0x1f0/0x2d0
   ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0xf9/0x3a0
   process_one_work+0x270/0x5a0
   worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
   ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0
   kthread+0x174/0x1a0
   ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

This happens because we're trying to read from a extent buffer page that
is !PageUptodate.  This happens because we will clear the page uptodate
when we have an IO error, but we don't clear the extent buffer uptodate.
If we do a read later and find this extent buffer we'll think its valid
and not return an error, and then trip over this warning.

Fix this by also clearing uptodate on the extent buffer when this
happens, so that we get an error when we do a btrfs_search_slot() and
find this block later.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      c2e39305
  25. 27 10月, 2021 14 次提交
    • Q
      btrfs: remove btrfs_bio::logical member · f4f39fc5
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      The member btrfs_bio::logical is only initialized by two call sites:

- btrfs_repair_one_sector()
  No corresponding site to utilize it.

- btrfs_submit_direct()
  The corresponding site to utilize it is btrfs_check_read_dio_bio().

However for btrfs_check_read_dio_bio(), we can grab the file_offset from
btrfs_dio_private::file_offset directly.

Thus it turns out we don't really need that btrfs_bio::logical member at
all.

For btrfs_bio, the logical bytenr can be fetched from its
bio->bi_iter.bi_sector directly.

So let's just remove the member to save 8 bytes for structure btrfs_bio.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      f4f39fc5
    • J
      btrfs: add a BTRFS_FS_ERROR helper · 84961539
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      We have a few flags that are inconsistently used to describe the fs in
different states of failure.  As of 5963ffca ("btrfs: always abort
the transaction if we abort a trans handle") we will always set
BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR if we abort, so we don't have to check both ABORTED
and ERROR to see if things have gone wrong.  Add a helper to check
BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR and then convert all checkers of FS_STATE_ERROR to
use the helper.

The TRANS_ABORTED bit check was added in af722733 ("Btrfs: clean up
resources during umount after trans is aborted") but is not actually
specific.
Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      84961539
    • Q
      btrfs: subpage: avoid potential deadlock with compression and delalloc · 2749f7ef
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      [BUG]
With experimental subpage compression enabled, a simple fsstress can
lead to self deadlock on page 720896:

        mkfs.btrfs -f -s 4k $dev > /dev/null
        mount $dev -o compress $mnt
        $fsstress -p 1 -n 100 -w -d $mnt -v -s 1625511156

[CAUSE]
If we have a file layout looks like below:

	0	32K	64K	96K	128K
	|//|		|///////////////|
	   4K

Then we run delalloc range for the inode, it will:

- Call find_lock_delalloc_range() with @delalloc_start = 0
  Then we got a delalloc range [0, 4K).

  This range will be COWed.

- Call find_lock_delalloc_range() again with @delalloc_start = 4K
  Since find_lock_delalloc_range() never cares whether the range
  is still inside page range [0, 64K), it will return range [64K, 128K).

  This range meets the condition for subpage compression, will go
  through async COW path.

  And async COW path will return @page_started.

  But that @page_started is now for range [64K, 128K), not for range
  [0, 64K).

- writepage_dellloc() returned 1 for page [0, 64K)
  Thus page [0, 64K) will not be unlocked, nor its page dirty status
  will be cleared.

Next time when we try to lock page [0, 64K) we will deadlock, as there
is no one to release page [0, 64K).

This problem will never happen for regular page size as one page only
contains one sector.  After the first find_lock_delalloc_range() call,
the @delalloc_end will go beyond @page_end no matter if we found a
delalloc range or not

Thus this bug only happens for subpage, as now we need multiple runs to
exhaust the delalloc range of a page.

[FIX]
Fix the problem by ensuring the delalloc range we ran at least started
inside @locked_page.

So that we will never get incorrect @page_started.

And to prevent such problem from happening again:

- Make find_lock_delalloc_range() return false if the found range is
  beyond @end value passed in.

  Since @end will be utilized now, add an ASSERT() to ensure we pass
  correct @end into find_lock_delalloc_range().

  This also means, for selftests we needs to populate @end before calling
  find_lock_delalloc_range().

- New ASSERT() in find_lock_delalloc_range()
  Now we will make sure the @start/@end passed in at least covers part
  of the page.

- New ASSERT() in run_delalloc_range()
  To make sure the range at least starts inside @locked page.

- Use @delalloc_start as proper cursor, while @delalloc_end is always
  reset to @page_end.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      2749f7ef
    • Q
      btrfs: rework page locking in __extent_writepage() · e55a0de1
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      Pages passed to __extent_writepage() are always locked, but they may be
locked by different functions.

There are two types of locked page for __extent_writepage():

- Page locked by plain lock_page()
  It should not have any subpage::writers count.
  Can be unlocked by unlock_page().
  This is the most common locked page for __extent_writepage() called
  inside extent_write_cache_pages() or extent_write_full_page().
  Rarer cases include the @locked_page from extent_write_locked_range().

- Page locked by lock_delalloc_pages()
  There is only one caller, all pages except @locked_page for
  extent_write_locked_range().
  In this case, we have to call subpage helper to handle the case.

So here we introduce a helper, btrfs_page_unlock_writer(), to allow
__extent_writepage() to unlock different locked pages.

And since for all other callers of __extent_writepage() their pages are
ensured to be locked by lock_page(), also add an extra check for
epd::extent_locked to unlock such pages directly.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      e55a0de1
    • Q
      btrfs: subpage: make extent_write_locked_range() compatible · 66448b9d
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      There are two sites are not subpage compatible yet for
extent_write_locked_range():

- How @nr_pages are calculated
  For subpage we can have the following range with 64K page size:

  0   32K  64K   96K 128K
  |   |////|/////|   |

  In that case, although 96K - 32K == 64K, thus it looks like one page
  is enough, but the range spans two pages, not one.

  Fix it by doing proper round_up() and round_down() to calculate
  @nr_pages.

  Also add some extra ASSERT()s to ensure the range passed in is already
  aligned.

- How the page end is calculated
  Currently we just use cur + PAGE_SIZE - 1 to calculate the page end.

  Which can't handle the above range layout, and will trigger ASSERT()
  in btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered(), as the range is no longer
  covered by the page range.

  Fix it by taking page end into consideration.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      66448b9d
    • Q
      btrfs: cleanup for extent_write_locked_range() · 2bd0fc93
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      There are several cleanups for extent_write_locked_range(), most of them
are pure cleanups, but with some preparation for future subpage support.

- Add a proper comment for which call sites are suitable
  Unlike regular synchronized extent write back, if async COW or zoned
  COW happens, we have all pages in the range still locked.

  Thus for those (only) two call sites, we need this function to submit
  page content into bios and submit them.

- Remove @mode parameter
  All the existing two call sites pass WB_SYNC_ALL. No need for @mode
  parameter.

- Better error handling
  Currently if we hit an error during the page iteration loop, we
  overwrite @ret, causing only the last error can be recorded.

  Here we add @found_error and @first_error variable to record if we hit
  any error, and the first error we hit.
  So the first error won't get lost.

- Don't reuse @start as the cursor
  We reuse the parameter @start as the cursor to iterate the range, not
  a big problem, but since we're here, introduce a proper @cur as the
  cursor.

- Remove impossible branch
  Since all pages are still locked after the ordered extent is inserted,
  there is no way that pages can get its dirty bit cleared.
  Remove the branch where page is not dirty and replace it with an
  ASSERT().
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      2bd0fc93
    • Q
      btrfs: subpage: make add_ra_bio_pages() compatible · 6a404910
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      [BUG]
If we remove the subpage limitation in add_ra_bio_pages(), then read a
compressed extent which has part of its range in next page, like the
following inode layout:

	0	32K	64K	96K	128K
	|<--------------|-------------->|

Btrfs will trigger ASSERT() in endio function:

  assertion failed: atomic_read(&subpage->readers) >= nbits
  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3431!
  Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
  Workqueue: btrfs-endio btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]
  Call trace:
   assertfail.constprop.0+0x28/0x2c [btrfs]
   btrfs_subpage_end_reader+0x148/0x14c [btrfs]
   end_page_read+0x8c/0x100 [btrfs]
   end_bio_extent_readpage+0x320/0x6b0 [btrfs]
   bio_endio+0x15c/0x1dc
   end_workqueue_fn+0x44/0x64 [btrfs]
   btrfs_work_helper+0x74/0x250 [btrfs]
   process_one_work+0x1d4/0x47c
   worker_thread+0x180/0x400
   kthread+0x11c/0x120
   ret_from_fork+0x10/0x30
  ---[ end trace c8b7b552d3bb408c ]---

[CAUSE]
When we read the page range [0, 64K), we find it's a compressed extent,
and we will try to add extra pages in add_ra_bio_pages() to avoid
reading the same compressed extent.

But when we add such page into the read bio, it doesn't follow the
behavior of btrfs_do_readpage() to properly set subpage::readers.

This means, for page [64K, 128K), its subpage::readers is still 0.

And when endio is executed on both pages, since page [64K, 128K) has 0
subpage::readers, it triggers above ASSERT()

[FIX]
Function add_ra_bio_pages() is far from subpage compatible, it always
assume PAGE_SIZE == sectorsize, thus when it skip to next range it
always just skip PAGE_SIZE.

Make it subpage compatible by:

- Skip to next page properly when needed
  If we find there is already a page cache, we need to skip to next page.
  For that case, we shouldn't just skip PAGE_SIZE bytes, but use
  @pg_index to calculate the next bytenr and continue.

- Only add the page range covered by current extent map
  We need to calculate which range is covered by current extent map and
  only add that part into the read bio.

- Update subpage::readers before submitting the bio

- Use proper cursor other than confusing @last_offset

- Calculate the missed threshold based on sector size
  It's no longer using missed pages, as for 64K page size, we have at
  most 3 pages to skip. (If aligned only 2 pages)

- Add ASSERT() to make sure our bytenr is always aligned

- Add comment for the function
  Add a special note for subpage case, as the function won't really
  work well for subpage cases.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      6a404910
    • Q
      btrfs: remove unnecessary parameter delalloc_start for writepage_delalloc() · cf3075fb
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      In function __extent_writepage() we always pass page start to
@delalloc_start for writepage_delalloc().

Thus we don't really need @delalloc_start parameter as we can extract it
from @page.

Remove @delalloc_start parameter and make __extent_writepage() to
declare @page_start and @page_end as const.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      cf3075fb
    • Q
      btrfs: rename struct btrfs_io_bio to btrfs_bio · c3a3b19b
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      Previously we had "struct btrfs_bio", which records IO context for
mirrored IO and RAID56, and "strcut btrfs_io_bio", which records extra
btrfs specific info for logical bytenr bio.

With "btrfs_bio" renamed to "btrfs_io_context", we are safe to rename
"btrfs_io_bio" to "btrfs_bio" which is a more suitable name now.

The struct btrfs_bio changes meaning by this commit. There was a
suggested name like btrfs_logical_bio but it's a bit long and we'd
prefer to use a shorter name.

This could be a concern for backports to older kernels where the
different meaning could possibly cause confusion or bugs. Comparing the
new and old structures, there's no overlap among the struct members so a
build would break in case of incorrect backport.

We haven't had many backports to bio code anyway so this is more of a
theoretical cause of bugs and a matter of precaution but we'll need to
keep the semantic change in mind.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      c3a3b19b
    • Q
      btrfs: remove btrfs_bio_alloc() helper · cd8e0cca
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      The helper btrfs_bio_alloc() is almost the same as btrfs_io_bio_alloc(),
except it's allocating using BIO_MAX_VECS as @nr_iovecs, and initializes
bio->bi_iter.bi_sector.

However the naming itself is not using "btrfs_io_bio" to indicate its
parameter is "strcut btrfs_io_bio" and can be easily confused with
"struct btrfs_bio".

Considering assigned bio->bi_iter.bi_sector is such a simple work and
there are already tons of call sites doing that manually, there is no
need to do that in a helper.

Remove btrfs_bio_alloc() helper, and enhance btrfs_io_bio_alloc()
function to provide a fail-safe value for its @nr_iovecs.

And then replace all btrfs_bio_alloc() callers with
btrfs_io_bio_alloc().
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      cd8e0cca
    • Q
      btrfs: rename btrfs_bio to btrfs_io_context · 4c664611
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      The structure btrfs_bio is used by two different sites:

- bio->bi_private for mirror based profiles
  For those profiles (SINGLE/DUP/RAID1*/RAID10), this structures records
  how many mirrors are still pending, and save the original endio
  function of the bio.

- RAID56 code
  In that case, RAID56 only utilize the stripes info, and no long uses
  that to trace the pending mirrors.

So btrfs_bio is not always bind to a bio, and contains more info for IO
context, thus renaming it will make the naming less confusing.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      4c664611
    • J
      btrfs: zoned: only allow one process to add pages to a relocation inode · 35156d85
      由 Johannes Thumshirn 提交于 
      Don't allow more than one process to add pages to a relocation inode on
a zoned filesystem, otherwise we cannot guarantee the sequential write
rule once we're filling preallocated extents on a zoned filesystem.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      35156d85
    • Q
      btrfs: unexport repair_io_failure() · 38d5e541
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      Function repair_io_failure() is no longer used out of extent_io.c since
commit 8b9b6f25 ("btrfs: scrub: cleanup the remaining nodatasum
fixup code"), which removes the last external caller.
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      38d5e541
    • A
      btrfs: convert latest_bdev type to btrfs_device and rename · d24fa5c1
      由 Anand Jain 提交于 
      In preparation to fix a bug in btrfs_show_devname().

Convert fs_devices::latest_bdev type from struct block_device to struct
btrfs_device and, rename the member to fs_devices::latest_dev.
So that btrfs_show_devname() can use fs_devices::latest_dev::name.
Tested-by: NSu Yue <l@damenly.su>
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      d24fa5c1