- 15 10月, 2018 5 次提交
-
-
由 Misono Tomohiro 提交于
There are two members in struct btrfs_root which indicate root's objectid: objectid and root_key.objectid. They are both set to the same value in __setup_root(): static void __setup_root(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 objectid) { ... root->objectid = objectid; ... root->root_key.objectid = objecitd; ... } and not changed to other value after initialization. grep in btrfs directory shows both are used in many places: $ grep -rI "root->root_key.objectid" | wc -l 133 $ grep -rI "root->objectid" | wc -l 55 (4.17, inc. some noise) It is confusing to have two similar variable names and it seems that there is no rule about which should be used in a certain case. Since ->root_key itself is needed for tree reloc tree, let's remove 'objecitd' member and unify code to use ->root_key.objectid in all places. Signed-off-by: NMisono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Lu Fengqi 提交于
Since ret must be 0 here, don't have to return. No functional change and code readability is not hurt. Signed-off-by: NLu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Lu Fengqi 提交于
All callers pass the root tree of dir, we can push that down to the function itself. Signed-off-by: NLu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Lu Fengqi 提交于
Using true and false here is closer to the expected semantic than using 0 and 1. No functional change. Signed-off-by: NLu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Lu Fengqi 提交于
Only when send_in_progress, we have to do something different such as btrfs_warn() and return -EPERM. Therefore, we could check send_in_progress first and process error handling, after the root_item_lock has been got. Just for better readability. No functional change. Signed-off-by: NLu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 24 8月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Misono Tomohiro 提交于
Commit 672d5990 ("btrfs: Use wrapper macro for rcu string to remove duplicate code") replaces some open coded RCU string handling with macro. It turns out that btrfs_debug_in_rcu() is used for the first time and the macro lacks lock/unlock of RCU string for non-debug case (i.e. when the message is not printed), leading to suspicious RCU usage warning when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is on. Fix this by adding a wrapper to call lock/unlock for the non-debug case too. Fixes: 672d5990 ("btrfs: Use wrapper macro for rcu string to remove duplicate code") Reported-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMisono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 23 8月, 2018 5 次提交
-
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
The issue here is that btrfs_commit_transaction() frees "trans" on both the error and the success path. So the problem would be if btrfs_commit_transaction() succeeds, and then qgroup_rescan_init() fails. That means that "ret" is non-zero and "trans" is non-NULL and it leads to a use after free inside the btrfs_end_transaction() macro. Fixes: 340f1aa2 ("btrfs: qgroups: Move transaction management inside btrfs_quota_enable/disable") Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Test case btrfs/164 reports use-after-free: [ 6712.084324] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP .. [ 6712.195423] btrfs_update_commit_device_size+0x75/0xf0 [btrfs] [ 6712.201424] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x57d/0xa90 [btrfs] [ 6712.206999] btrfs_rm_device+0x627/0x850 [btrfs] [ 6712.211800] btrfs_ioctl+0x2b03/0x3120 [btrfs] Reason for this is that btrfs_shrink_device adds the resized device to the fs_devices::resized_devices after it has called the last commit transaction. So the list fs_devices::resized_devices is not empty when btrfs_shrink_device returns. Now the parent function btrfs_rm_device calls: btrfs_close_bdev(device); call_rcu(&device->rcu, free_device_rcu); and then does the transactio ncommit. It goes through the fs_devices::resized_devices in btrfs_update_commit_device_size and leads to use-after-free. Fix this by making sure btrfs_shrink_device calls the last needed btrfs_commit_transaction before the return. This is consistent with what the grow counterpart does and this makes sure the on-disk state is persistent when the function returns. Reported-by: NLu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: NLu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ update changelog ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Lu Fengqi 提交于
After btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta_prealloc(), num_bytes will be assigned again by btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size(). Once block_rsv fails, we can't properly free the num_bytes of the previous qgroup_reserve. Use a separate variable to store the num_bytes of the qgroup_reserve. Delete the comment for the qgroup_reserved that does not exist and add a comment about use_global_rsv. Fixes: c4c129db ("btrfs: drop unused parameter qgroup_reserved") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.18+ Signed-off-by: NLu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
If we deduplicate extents between two different files we can end up corrupting data if the source range ends at the size of the source file, the source file's size is not aligned to the filesystem's block size and the destination range does not go past the size of the destination file size. Example: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0x6b 0 2518890" /mnt/foo # The first byte with a value of 0xae starts at an offset (2518890) # which is not a multiple of the sector size. $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xae 2518890 102398" /mnt/foo # Confirm the file content is full of bytes with values 0x6b and 0xae. $ od -t x1 /mnt/foo 0000000 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b * 11467540 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b ae ae ae ae ae ae 11467560 ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae * 11777540 ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae 11777550 # Create a second file with a length not aligned to the sector size, # whose bytes all have the value 0x6b, so that its extent(s) can be # deduplicated with the first file. $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0x6b 0 557771" /mnt/bar # Now deduplicate the entire second file into a range of the first file # that also has all bytes with the value 0x6b. The destination range's # end offset must not be aligned to the sector size and must be less # then the offset of the first byte with the value 0xae (byte at offset # 2518890). $ xfs_io -c "dedupe /mnt/bar 0 1957888 557771" /mnt/foo # The bytes in the range starting at offset 2515659 (end of the # deduplication range) and ending at offset 2519040 (start offset # rounded up to the block size) must all have the value 0xae (and not # replaced with 0x00 values). In other words, we should have exactly # the same data we had before we asked for deduplication. $ od -t x1 /mnt/foo 0000000 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b * 11467540 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b ae ae ae ae ae ae 11467560 ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae * 11777540 ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae 11777550 # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This guarantees any file # data in the page cache is dropped. $ umount /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ od -t x1 /mnt/foo 0000000 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b * 11461300 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 00 00 00 00 00 11461320 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 * 11470000 ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae * 11777540 ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae 11777550 # The bytes in range 2515659 to 2519040 have a value of 0x00 and not a # value of 0xae, data corruption happened due to the deduplication # operation. So fix this by rounding down, to the sector size, the length used for the deduplication when the following conditions are met: 1) Source file's range ends at its i_size; 2) Source file's i_size is not aligned to the sector size; 3) Destination range does not cross the i_size of the destination file. Fixes: e1d227a4 ("btrfs: Handle unaligned length in extent_same") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.2+ Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
When we add a new name for an inode which was logged in the current transaction, we update the inode in the log so that its new name and ancestors are added to the log. However when we do this we do not persist the log, so the changes remain in memory only, and as a consequence, any ancestors that were created in the current transaction are updated such that future calls to btrfs_inode_in_log() return true. This leads to a subsequent fsync against such new ancestor directories returning immediately, without persisting the log, therefore after a power failure the new ancestor directories do not exist, despite fsync being called against them explicitly. Example: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/A $ mkdir /mnt/B $ mkdir /mnt/A/C $ touch /mnt/B/foo $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/B/foo $ ln /mnt/B/foo /mnt/A/C/foo $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/A <power failure> After the power failure, directory "A" does not exist, despite the explicit fsync on it. Instead of fixing this by changing the behaviour of the explicit fsync on directory "A" to persist the log instead of doing nothing, make the logging of the new file name (which happens when creating a hard link or renaming) persist the log. This approach not only is simpler, not requiring addition of new fields to the inode in memory structure, but also gives us the same behaviour as ext4, xfs and f2fs (possibly other filesystems too). A test case for fstests follows soon. Fixes: 12fcfd22 ("Btrfs: tree logging unlink/rename fixes") Reported-by: NVijay Chidambaram <vvijay03@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 18 8月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
a_ops->readpages() is only ever used for read-ahead. Ensure that we pass this information down to the block layer. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180621010725.17813-4-axboe@kernel.dkSigned-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Robbie Ko 提交于
Commit e9894fd3 ("Btrfs: fix snapshot vs nocow writting") forced nocow writes to fallback to COW, during writeback, when a snapshot is created. This resulted in writes made before creating the snapshot to unexpectedly fail with ENOSPC during writeback when success (0) was returned to user space through the write system call. The steps leading to this problem are: 1. When it's not possible to allocate data space for a write, the buffered write path checks if a NOCOW write is possible. If it is, it will not reserve space and success (0) is returned to user space. 2. Then when a snapshot is created, the root's will_be_snapshotted atomic is incremented and writeback is triggered for all inode's that belong to the root being snapshotted. Incrementing that atomic forces all previous writes to fallback to COW during writeback (running delalloc). 3. This results in the writeback for the inodes to fail and therefore setting the ENOSPC error in their mappings, so that a subsequent fsync on them will report the error to user space. So it's not a completely silent data loss (since fsync will report ENOSPC) but it's a very unexpected and undesirable behaviour, because if a clean shutdown/unmount of the filesystem happens without previous calls to fsync, it is expected to have the data present in the files after mounting the filesystem again. So fix this by adding a new atomic named snapshot_force_cow to the root structure which prevents this behaviour and works the following way: 1. It is incremented when we start to create a snapshot after triggering writeback and before waiting for writeback to finish. 2. This new atomic is now what is used by writeback (running delalloc) to decide whether we need to fallback to COW or not. Because we incremented this new atomic after triggering writeback in the snapshot creation ioctl, we ensure that all buffered writes that happened before snapshot creation will succeed and not fallback to COW (which would make them fail with ENOSPC). 3. The existing atomic, will_be_snapshotted, is kept because it is used to force new buffered writes, that start after we started snapshotting, to reserve data space even when NOCOW is possible. This makes these writes fail early with ENOSPC when there's no available space to allocate, preventing the unexpected behaviour of writeback later failing with ENOSPC due to a fallback to COW mode. Fixes: e9894fd3 ("Btrfs: fix snapshot vs nocow writting") Signed-off-by: NRobbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 06 8月, 2018 27 次提交
-
-
由 Naohiro Aota 提交于
When btrfs hits error after modifying fs_devices in btrfs_init_new_device() (such as btrfs_add_dev_item() returns error), it leaves everything as is, but frees allocated btrfs_device. As a result, fs_devices->devices and fs_devices->alloc_list contain already freed btrfs_device, leading to later use-after-free bug. Error path also messes the things like ->num_devices. While they go back to the original value by unscanning btrfs devices, it is safe to revert them here. Fixes: 79787eaa ("btrfs: replace many BUG_ONs with proper error handling") Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naota@elisp.net> Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
It's entirely possible that a crafted btrfs image contains overlapping chunks. Although we can't detect such problem by tree-checker, it's not a catastrophic problem, current extent map can already detect such problem and return -EEXIST. We just only need to exit gracefully and fail the mount. Reported-by: NXu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200409Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
This patch will introduce chunk <-> dev extent mapping check, to protect us against invalid dev extents or chunks. Since chunk mapping is the fundamental infrastructure of btrfs, extra check at mount time could prevent a lot of unexpected behavior (BUG_ON). Reported-by: NXu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200403 Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200407Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NSu Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
If a crafted image has missing block group items, it could cause unexpected behavior and breaks the assumption of 1:1 chunk<->block group mapping. Although we have the block group -> chunk mapping check, we still need chunk -> block group mapping check. This patch will do extra check to ensure each chunk has its corresponding block group. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199847Reported-by: NXu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu> Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NGu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
A crafted btrfs image with incorrect chunk<->block group mapping will trigger a lot of unexpected things as the mapping is essential. Although the problem can be caught by block group item checker added in "btrfs: tree-checker: Verify block_group_item", it's still not sufficient. A sufficiently valid block group item can pass the check added by the mentioned patch but could fail to match the existing chunk. This patch will add extra block group -> chunk mapping check, to ensure we have a completely matching (start, len, flags) chunk for each block group at mount time. Here we reuse the original helper find_first_block_group(), which is already doing the basic bg -> chunk checks, adding further checks of the start/len and type flags. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199837Reported-by: NXu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu> Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NSu Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
When doing an incremental send, if we have a file in the parent snapshot that has prealloc extents beyond EOF and in the send snapshot it got a hole punch that partially covers the prealloc extents, the send stream, when replayed by a receiver, can result in a file that has a size bigger than it should and filled with zeroes past the correct EOF. For example: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ xfs_io -f -c "falloc -k 0 4M" /mnt/foobar $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xea 0 1M" /mnt/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send -f /tmp/1.send /mnt/snap1 $ xfs_io -c "fpunch 1M 2M" /mnt/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -f /tmp/2.send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 $ stat --format %s /mnt/snap2/foobar 1048576 $ md5sum /mnt/snap2/foobar d31659e82e87798acd4669a1e0a19d4f /mnt/snap2/foobar $ umount /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt $ btrfs receive -f /mnt/1.snap /mnt $ btrfs receive -f /mnt/2.snap /mnt $ stat --format %s /mnt/snap2/foobar 3145728 # --> should be 1Mb and not 3Mb (which was the end offset of hole # punch operation) $ md5sum /mnt/snap2/foobar 117baf295297c2a995f92da725b0b651 /mnt/snap2/foobar # --> should be d31659e82e87798acd4669a1e0a19d4f as in the original fs This issue actually happens only since commit ffa7c429 ("Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operations"), but before that commit we were issuing a write operation full of zeroes (to "punch" a hole) which was extending the file size beyond the correct value and then immediately issue a truncate operation to the correct size and undoing the previous write operation. Since the send protocol does not support fallocate, for extent preallocation and hole punching, fix this by not even attempting to send a "hole" (regular write full of zeroes) if it starts at an offset greater then or equals to the file's size. This approach, besides being much more simple then making send issue the truncate operation, adds the benefit of avoiding the useless pair of write of zeroes and truncate operations, saving time and IO at the receiver and reducing the size of the send stream. A test case for fstests follows soon. Fixes: ffa7c429 ("Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operations") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.17+ Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Misono Tomohiro 提交于
Cleanup patch and no functional changes. Signed-off-by: NMisono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Don't open-code iget_failed(), don't bother with btrfs_free_path(NULL), move handling of positive return values of btrfs_lookup_inode() from btrfs_read_locked_inode() to btrfs_iget() and kill now obviously pointless ASSERT() in there. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
We don't need to check is_bad_inode() after the call of btrfs_read_locked_inode() - it's exactly the same as checking return value for being non-zero. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
IS_ERR(p) && PTR_ERR(p) == n is a weird way to spell p == ERR_PTR(n). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> [ update changelog ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Just get rid of pointless checks. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Misono Tomohiro 提交于
on-disk devs stats value is updated in btrfs_run_dev_stats(), which is called during commit transaction, if device->dev_stats_ccnt is not zero. Since current replace operation does not touch dev_stats_ccnt, on-disk dev stats value is not updated. Therefore "btrfs device stats" may return old device's value after umount/mount (Example: See "btrfs ins dump-t -t DEV $DEV" after btrfs/100 finish). Fix this by just incrementing dev_stats_ccnt in btrfs_dev_replace_finishing() when replace is succeeded and this will update the values. Signed-off-by: NMisono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Misono Tomohiro 提交于
There is no user of this function anymore. This was forgotten to be removed in commit a575ceeb ("Btrfs: get rid of unused orphan infrastructure"). Signed-off-by: NMisono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Misono Tomohiro 提交于
Use ERR_CAST() instead of void * to make meaning clear. Signed-off-by: NMisono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Lu Fengqi 提交于
Although it is safe to call this on already released paths with no locks held or extent buffers, removing the redundant btrfs_release_path is reasonable. Signed-off-by: NLu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Lu Fengqi 提交于
All callers pass the root tree of dir, we can push that down to the function itself. Signed-off-by: NLu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Lu Fengqi 提交于
It can be referenced from the passed transaction handle. Signed-off-by: NLu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Lu Fengqi 提交于
It can be referenced from the passed transaction handle. Signed-off-by: NLu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Lu Fengqi 提交于
It can be referenced from the passed transaction handle. Signed-off-by: NLu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Lu Fengqi 提交于
It can be referenced from the passed transaction handle. Signed-off-by: NLu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Lu Fengqi 提交于
It can be referenced from the passed transaction handle. Signed-off-by: NLu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Leftover after fix e339a6b0 ("Btrfs: __btrfs_mod_ref should always use no_quota"), that removed it from the function calls but not the structure. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
The more common use case of send involves creating a RO snapshot and then use it for a send operation. In this case it's not possible to have inodes in the snapshot that have a link count of zero (inode with an orphan item) since during snapshot creation we do the orphan cleanup. However, other less common use cases for send can end up seeing inodes with a link count of zero and in this case the send operation fails with a ENOENT error because any attempt to generate a path for the inode, with the purpose of creating it or updating it at the receiver, fails since there are no inode reference items. One use case it to use a regular subvolume for a send operation after turning it to RO mode or turning a RW snapshot into RO mode and then using it for a send operation. In both cases, if a file gets all its hard links deleted while there is an open file descriptor before turning the subvolume/snapshot into RO mode, the send operation will encounter an inode with a link count of zero and then fail with errno ENOENT. Example using a full send with a subvolume: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv1 $ touch /mnt/sv1/foo $ touch /mnt/sv1/bar # keep an open file descriptor on file bar $ exec 73</mnt/sv1/bar $ unlink /mnt/sv1/bar # Turn the subvolume to RO mode and use it for a full send, while # holding the open file descriptor. $ btrfs property set /mnt/sv1 ro true $ btrfs send -f /tmp/full.send /mnt/sv1 At subvol /mnt/sv1 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory Example using an incremental send with snapshots: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv1 $ touch /mnt/sv1/foo $ touch /mnt/sv1/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sv1 /mnt/snap1 $ echo "hello world" >> /mnt/sv1/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sv1 /mnt/snap2 # Turn the second snapshot to RW mode and delete file foo while # holding an open file descriptor on it. $ btrfs property set /mnt/snap2 ro false $ exec 73</mnt/snap2/foo $ unlink /mnt/snap2/foo # Set the second snapshot back to RO mode and do an incremental send. $ btrfs property set /mnt/snap2 ro true $ btrfs send -f /tmp/inc.send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 At subvol /mnt/snap2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory So fix this by ignoring inodes with a link count of zero if we are either doing a full send or if they do not exist in the parent snapshot (they are new in the send snapshot), and unlink all paths found in the parent snapshot when doing an incremental send (and ignoring all other inode items, such as xattrs and extents). A test case for fstests follows soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reported-by: NMartin Wilck <martin.wilck@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
If we end up with logging an inode reference item which has the same name but different index from the one we have persisted, we end up failing when replaying the log with an errno value of -EEXIST. The error comes from btrfs_add_link(), which is called from add_inode_ref(), when we are replaying an inode reference item. Example scenario where this happens: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ touch /mnt/foo $ ln /mnt/foo /mnt/bar $ sync # Rename the first hard link (foo) to a new name and rename the second # hard link (bar) to the old name of the first hard link (foo). $ mv /mnt/foo /mnt/qwerty $ mv /mnt/bar /mnt/foo # Create a new file, in the same parent directory, with the old name of # the second hard link (bar) and fsync this new file. # We do this instead of calling fsync on foo/qwerty because if we did # that the fsync resulted in a full transaction commit, not triggering # the problem. $ touch /mnt/bar $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/bar <power fail> $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt mount: mount /dev/sdb on /mnt failed: File exists So fix this by checking if a conflicting inode reference exists (same name, same parent but different index), removing it (and the associated dir index entries from the parent inode) if it exists, before attempting to add the new reference. A test case for fstests follows soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
If we're trying to make a data reservation and we have to allocate a data chunk we could leak ret == 1, as do_chunk_alloc() will return 1 if it allocated a chunk. Since the end of the function is the success path just return 0. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The exported helper just calls the static one. There's no obvious reason to have them separate eg. for performance reasons where the static one could be better optimized in the same unit. There's a slight decrease in code size and stack consumption. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-