Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 14 6月, 2022 2 次提交
  3. 28 5月, 2022 3 次提交
  5. 28 4月, 2022 1 次提交
  7. 27 4月, 2022 6 次提交
  9. 19 10月, 2021 1 次提交
  11. 15 10月, 2021 4 次提交
  13. 13 10月, 2021 3 次提交
  15. 26 4月, 2021 6 次提交
  17. 09 2月, 2021 3 次提交
    • V
      xfrm: Fix wraparound in xfrm_policy_addr_delta() · 87a4e388
      由 Visa Hankala 提交于 
      stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.13
commit 6daa52884c3fd8f534b7ebfd784111cea69daa9d
bugzilla: 47995

--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit da64ae2d ]

Use three-way comparison for address components to avoid integer
wraparound in the result of xfrm_policy_addr_delta(). This ensures
that the search trees are built and traversed correctly.

Treat IPv4 and IPv6 similarly by returning 0 when prefixlen == 0.
Prefix /0 has only one equivalence class.

Fixes: 9cf545eb ("xfrm: policy: store inexact policies in a tree ordered by destination address")
Signed-off-by: NVisa Hankala <visa@hankala.org>
Acked-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NXie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
      87a4e388
    • E
      xfrm: fix disable_xfrm sysctl when used on xfrm interfaces · 2aa7cdb6
      由 Eyal Birger 提交于 
      stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.13
commit 2f7ecc841daac6394bdd9b3bea69a87c25226c50
bugzilla: 47995

--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit 9f8550e4 ]

The disable_xfrm flag signals that xfrm should not be performed during
routing towards a device before reaching device xmit.

For xfrm interfaces this is usually desired as they perform the outbound
policy lookup as part of their xmit using their if_id.

Before this change enabling this flag on xfrm interfaces prevented them
from xmitting as xfrm_lookup_with_ifid() would not perform a policy lookup
in case the original dst had the DST_NOXFRM flag.

This optimization is incorrect when the lookup is done by the xfrm
interface xmit logic.

Fix by performing policy lookup when invoked by xfrmi as if_id != 0.

Similarly it's unlikely for the 'no policy exists on net' check to yield
any performance benefits when invoked from xfrmi.

Fixes: f203b76d ("xfrm: Add virtual xfrm interfaces")
Signed-off-by: NEyal Birger <eyal.birger@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NXie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
      2aa7cdb6
    • S
      xfrm: Fix oops in xfrm_replay_advance_bmp · bb053814
      由 Shmulik Ladkani 提交于 
      stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.13
commit f632d34091e645266fb435240cda3dada8464d1b
bugzilla: 47995

--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit 56ce7c25 ]

When setting xfrm replay_window to values higher than 32, a rare
page-fault occurs in xfrm_replay_advance_bmp:

  BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffff8af350ad7920
  #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
  #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
  PGD ad001067 P4D ad001067 PUD 0
  Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP PTI
  CPU: 3 PID: 30 Comm: ksoftirqd/3 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.4.52-050452-generic #202007160732
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014
  RIP: 0010:xfrm_replay_advance_bmp+0xbb/0x130
  RSP: 0018:ffffa1304013ba40 EFLAGS: 00010206
  RAX: 000000000000010d RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 00000000ffffff4b
  RDX: 0000000000000018 RSI: 00000000004c234c RDI: 00000000ffb3dbff
  RBP: ffffa1304013ba50 R08: ffff8af330ad7920 R09: 0000000007fffffa
  R10: 0000000000000800 R11: 0000000000000010 R12: ffff8af29d6258c0
  R13: ffff8af28b95c700 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8af29d6258fc
  FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8af339ac0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: ffff8af350ad7920 CR3: 0000000015ee4000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
  Call Trace:
   xfrm_input+0x4e5/0xa10
   xfrm4_rcv_encap+0xb5/0xe0
   xfrm4_udp_encap_rcv+0x140/0x1c0

Analysis revealed offending code is when accessing:

	replay_esn->bmp[nr] |= (1U << bitnr);

with 'nr' being 0x07fffffa.

This happened in an SMP system when reordering of packets was present;
A packet arrived with a "too old" sequence number (outside the window,
i.e 'diff > replay_window'), and therefore the following calculation:

			bitnr = replay_esn->replay_window - (diff - pos);

yields a negative result, but since bitnr is u32 we get a large unsigned
quantity (in crash dump above: 0xffffff4b seen in ecx).

This was supposed to be protected by xfrm_input()'s former call to:

		if (x->repl->check(x, skb, seq)) {

However, the state's spinlock x->lock is *released* after '->check()'
is performed, and gets re-acquired before '->advance()' - which gives a
chance for a different core to update the xfrm state, e.g. by advancing
'replay_esn->seq' when it encounters more packets - leading to a
'diff > replay_window' situation when original core continues to
xfrm_replay_advance_bmp().

An attempt to fix this issue was suggested in commit bcf66bf5
("xfrm: Perform a replay check after return from async codepaths"),
by calling 'x->repl->recheck()' after lock is re-acquired, but fix
applied only to asyncronous crypto algorithms.

Augment the fix, by *always* calling 'recheck()' - irrespective if we're
using async crypto.

Fixes: 0ebea8ef ("[IPSEC]: Move state lock into x->type->input")
Signed-off-by: NShmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NXie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
      bb053814
  19. 10 11月, 2020 1 次提交
  21. 09 11月, 2020 3 次提交
    • D
      xfrm/compat: Don't allocate memory with __GFP_ZERO · ad37f77f
      由 Dmitry Safonov 提交于 
      32-bit to 64-bit messages translator zerofies needed paddings in the
translation, the rest is the actual payload.
Don't allocate zero pages as they are not needed.

Fixes: 5106f4a8 ("xfrm/compat: Add 32=>64-bit messages translator")
Signed-off-by: NDmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
      ad37f77f
    • D
      xfrm/compat: memset(0) 64-bit padding at right place · d1949d04
      由 Dmitry Safonov 提交于 
      32-bit messages translated by xfrm_compat can have attributes attached.
For all, but XFRMA_SA, XFRMA_POLICY the size of payload is the same
in 32-bit UABI and 64-bit UABI. For XFRMA_SA (struct xfrm_usersa_info)
and XFRMA_POLICY (struct xfrm_userpolicy_info) it's only tail-padding
that is present in 64-bit payload, but not in 32-bit.
The proper size for destination nlattr is already calculated by
xfrm_user_rcv_calculate_len64() and allocated with kvmalloc().

xfrm_attr_cpy32() copies 32-bit copy_len into 64-bit attribute
translated payload, zero-filling possible padding for SA/POLICY.
Due to a typo, *pos already has 64-bit payload size, in a result next
memset(0) is called on the memory after the translated attribute, not on
the tail-padding of it.

Fixes: 5106f4a8 ("xfrm/compat: Add 32=>64-bit messages translator")
Reported-by: syzbot+c43831072e7df506a646@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: NDmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
      d1949d04
    • D
      xfrm/compat: Translate by copying XFRMA_UNSPEC attribute · dbd7ae51
      由 Dmitry Safonov 提交于 
      xfrm_xlate32() translates 64-bit message provided by kernel to be sent
for 32-bit listener (acknowledge or monitor). Translator code doesn't
expect XFRMA_UNSPEC attribute as it doesn't know its payload.
Kernel never attaches such attribute, but a user can.

I've searched if any opensource does it and the answer is no.
Nothing on github and google finds only tfcproject that has such code
commented-out.

What will happen if a user sends a netlink message with XFRMA_UNSPEC
attribute? Ipsec code ignores this attribute. But if there is a
monitor-process or 32-bit user requested ack - kernel will try to
translate such message and will hit WARN_ONCE() in xfrm_xlate64_attr().

Deal with XFRMA_UNSPEC by copying the attribute payload with
xfrm_nla_cpy(). In result, the default switch-case in xfrm_xlate64_attr()
becomes an unused code. Leave those 3 lines in case a new xfrm attribute
will be added.

Fixes: 5461fc0c ("xfrm/compat: Add 64=>32-bit messages translator")
Reported-by: syzbot+a7e701c8385bd8543074@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: NDmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
      dbd7ae51
  23. 23 10月, 2020 1 次提交
    • Z
      net: xfrm: fix a race condition during allocing spi · a779d913
      由 zhuoliang zhang 提交于 
      we found that the following race condition exists in
xfrm_alloc_userspi flow:

user thread                                    state_hash_work thread
----                                           ----
xfrm_alloc_userspi()
 __find_acq_core()
   /*alloc new xfrm_state:x*/
   xfrm_state_alloc()
   /*schedule state_hash_work thread*/
   xfrm_hash_grow_check()   	               xfrm_hash_resize()
 xfrm_alloc_spi                                  /*hold lock*/
      x->id.spi = htonl(spi)                     spin_lock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_lock)
      /*waiting lock release*/                     xfrm_hash_transfer()
      spin_lock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_lock)      /*add x into hlist:net->xfrm.state_byspi*/
	                                                hlist_add_head_rcu(&x->byspi)
                                                 spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_lock)

    /*add x into hlist:net->xfrm.state_byspi 2 times*/
    hlist_add_head_rcu(&x->byspi)

1. a new state x is alloced in xfrm_state_alloc() and added into the bydst hlist
in  __find_acq_core() on the LHS;
2. on the RHS, state_hash_work thread travels the old bydst and tranfers every xfrm_state
(include x) into the new bydst hlist and new byspi hlist;
3. user thread on the LHS gets the lock and adds x into the new byspi hlist again.

So the same xfrm_state (x) is added into the same list_hash
(net->xfrm.state_byspi) 2 times that makes the list_hash become
an inifite loop.

To fix the race, x->id.spi = htonl(spi) in the xfrm_alloc_spi() is moved
to the back of spin_lock_bh, sothat state_hash_work thread no longer add x
which id.spi is zero into the hash_list.

Fixes: f034b5d4 ("[XFRM]: Dynamic xfrm_state hash table sizing.")
Signed-off-by: Nzhuoliang zhang <zhuoliang.zhang@mediatek.com>
Acked-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
      a779d913
  25. 14 10月, 2020 1 次提交
  27. 09 10月, 2020 1 次提交
    • X
      xfrm: interface: fix the priorities for ipip and ipv6 tunnels · 7fe94612
      由 Xin Long 提交于 
      As Nicolas noticed in his case, when xfrm_interface module is installed
the standard IP tunnels will break in receiving packets.

This is caused by the IP tunnel handlers with a higher priority in xfrm
interface processing incoming packets by xfrm_input(), which would drop
the packets and return 0 instead when anything wrong happens.

Rather than changing xfrm_input(), this patch is to adjust the priority
for the IP tunnel handlers in xfrm interface, so that the packets would
go to xfrmi's later than the others', as the others' would not drop the
packets when the handlers couldn't process them.

Note that IPCOMP also defines its own IPIP tunnel handler and it calls
xfrm_input() as well, so we must make its priority lower than xfrmi's,
which means having xfrmi loaded would still break IPCOMP. We may seek
another way to fix it in xfrm_input() in the future.
Reported-by: NNicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Tested-by: NNicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Fixes: da9bbf05 ("xfrm: interface: support IPIP and IPIP6 tunnels processing with .cb_handler")
FIxes: d7b360c2 ("xfrm: interface: support IP6IP6 and IP6IP tunnels processing with .cb_handler")
Signed-off-by: NXin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
      7fe94612
  29. 06 10月, 2020 1 次提交
  31. 25 9月, 2020 1 次提交
    • H
      xfrm: Use correct address family in xfrm_state_find · e94ee171
      由 Herbert Xu 提交于 
      The struct flowi must never be interpreted by itself as its size
depends on the address family.  Therefore it must always be grouped
with its original family value.

In this particular instance, the original family value is lost in
the function xfrm_state_find.  Therefore we get a bogus read when
it's coupled with the wrong family which would occur with inter-
family xfrm states.

This patch fixes it by keeping the original family value.

Note that the same bug could potentially occur in LSM through
the xfrm_state_pol_flow_match hook.  I checked the current code
there and it seems to be safe for now as only secid is used which
is part of struct flowi_common.  But that API should be changed
so that so that we don't get new bugs in the future.  We could
do that by replacing fl with just secid or adding a family field.

Reported-by: syzbot+577fbac3145a6eb2e7a5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 48b8d783 ("[XFRM]: State selection update to use inner...")
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
      e94ee171
  33. 24 9月, 2020 2 次提交