1. 28 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  2. 26 1月, 2012 1 次提交
    • B
      drm/ttm: fix two regressions since move_notify changes · 9f1feed2
      Ben Skeggs 提交于
      Both changes in dc97b340 cause serious
      regressions in the nouveau driver.
      
      move_notify() was originally able to presume that bo->mem is the old node,
      and new_mem is the new node.  The above commit moves the call to
      move_notify() to after move() has been done, which means that now, sometimes,
      new_mem isn't the new node at all, bo->mem is, and new_mem points at a
      stale, possibly-just-been-killed-by-move node.
      
      This is clearly not a good situation.  This patch reverts this change, and
      replaces it with a cleanup in the move() failure path instead.
      
      The second issue is that the call to move_notify() from cleanup_memtype_use()
      causes the TTM ghost objects to get passed into the driver.  This is clearly
      bad as the driver knows nothing about these "fake" TTM BOs, and ends up
      accessing uninitialised memory.
      
      I worked around this in nouveau's move_notify() hook by ensuring the BO
      destructor was nouveau's.  I don't particularly like this solution, and
      would rather TTM never pass the driver these objects.  However, I don't
      clearly understand the reason why we're calling move_notify() here anyway
      and am happy to work around the problem in nouveau instead of breaking the
      behaviour expected by other drivers.
      Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
      Cc: Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      9f1feed2
  3. 25 1月, 2012 18 次提交
  4. 24 1月, 2012 20 次提交