When an aggregation session is being cleaned up, while the tx status
for some frames is being processed, the TID is flushed and its buffers
are sent out.

Unfortunately that left the pending un-acked frames unprocessed, thus
leaking buffers. Fix this by reordering the code so that those frames
are processed first, before the TID is flushed.
Signed-off-by: NFelix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Negate has precedence over comparison so the original test was always
false.  (Neither 0 nor 1 are equal to NL80211_IFTYPE_MONITOR).
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NDan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Sometimes txq state(txq->stopped) can be marked as started but the actual
queue may not be started (in ATH_WIPHY_SCAN state, for example). Fix this.
Signed-off-by: NVasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vasanth@atheros.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

snprintf() returns the number of characters that would have been written
(not counting the NUL character).  So we can't use it as the limiter to
simple_read_from_buffer() without capping it first at sizeof(buf).
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The snprintf() function returns the number of characters that would have
been written (not counting the NUL character on the end).  It could
potentially be larger than the size of the buffer.
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Use kmemdup when some other buffer is immediately copied into the
allocated region.

A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this change is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
expression from,to,size,flag;
statement S;
@@

-  to = \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\)(size,flag);
+  to = kmemdup(from,size,flag);
   if (to==NULL || ...) S
-  memcpy(to, from, size);
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The current practice of checking vif for NULL in one place but not
another seems to confuse some static checkers, smatch in particular.
Since vif will only be NULL in the case of internal scans, adjust the
checks accordingly.
Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

  CHECK   drivers/net/wireless/rtl818x/rtl8180_rtl8225.c
drivers/net/wireless/rtl818x/rtl8180_rtl8225.c:53:33: warning: dubious: x | !y

The existing code is clever and works fine, but it's not worth even a
single line of Sparse warning SPAM...
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Adapted from Realtek-provided driver...
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Tested-by: NPauli Nieminen <suokkos@gmail.com>

  CHECK   drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_tx.c
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_tx.c:118:32: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_tx.c:118:32:    expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] frag_threshold
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_tx.c:118:32:    got restricted __le16 [usertype] <noident>
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_tx.c:164:24: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_tx.c:164:24:    expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] length
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_tx.c:164:24:    got restricted __le16 [usertype] <noident>
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_tx.c:166:22: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_tx.c:166:22:    expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] rate
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_tx.c:166:22:    got restricted __le16 [usertype] <noident>
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_tx.c:167:29: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_tx.c:167:29:    expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] expiry_time
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_tx.c:167:29:    got restricted __le32 [usertype] <noident>
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_tx.c:200:43: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_tx.c:200:43:    expected restricted __le16 [usertype] fc
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_tx.c:200:43:    got unsigned short [unsigned] [assigned] [usertype] fc
  CHECK   drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_cmd.c
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_cmd.c:428:39: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_cmd.c:428:39:    expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] rx_config_options
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_cmd.c:428:39:    got restricted __le32 [usertype] <noident>
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_cmd.c:429:39: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_cmd.c:429:39:    expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] rx_filter_options
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_cmd.c:429:39:    got restricted __le32 [usertype] <noident>
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_cmd.c:435:29: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_cmd.c:435:29:    expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] tx_rate
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_cmd.c:435:29:    got restricted __le16 [usertype] <noident>
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_cmd.c:439:47: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_cmd.c:439:47:    expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] min_duration
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_cmd.c:439:47:    got restricted __le32 [usertype] <noident>
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_cmd.c:441:47: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_cmd.c:441:47:    expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] max_duration
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_cmd.c:441:47:    got restricted __le32 [usertype] <noident>
  CHECK   drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_boot.c
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_boot.c:228:22: warning: symbol 'interrupt' shadows an earlier one
/home/linville/git/wireless-next-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h:132:13: originally declared here
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

"iwlagn: add statistic notification structure for WiFi/BT devices" added
several new '__attribute__ ((packed))' lines.  Change them to the
generic __packed.
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

defines shouldn't be terminated with a
semicolon, the code using them should
supply it. Luckily these are not used
in a context where it matters.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

Since the ibss_beacon variable will only be
filled in the appropriate modes, there's no
reason to be checking the mode again.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

Some devices may have multiple MAC
addresses in their EEPROM, read them
and advertise them to cfg80211.
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

This function is only needed in the same
file it is defined in, i.e. iwl-core.c
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

gcc complains about the firmware loading:

iwl-agn.c: In function ‘iwlagn_load_firmware’:
iwl-agn.c:1860: warning: ‘tlv_len’ may be used uninitialized in this function
iwl-agn.c:1861: warning: ‘tlv_type’ may be used uninitialized in this function
iwl-agn.c:1862: warning: ‘tlv_data’ may be used uninitialized in this function

This is almost correct but we do do break out of the TLV
parsing loop when setting ret. However, the code is hard
to follow, and clearly even the compiler is having issues
with it too.

Additionally, however, the current code is wrong. If there
is a TLV length check error, the code will report
	invalid TLV after parsing: ...
because "len" will still be non-zero as we broke out of
the loop.

So to remove the warning and fix that issue, make the code
easier to read by doing length checking with an error label.
As a result, we can completely remove the "ret" variable.

Also, while at it, remove the "fixed_tlv_size" variable
since each TLV type has its own specified length, it just
happens that we have only variable length, flags (0 length)
and u32 TLVs right now. It should still be checked with more
explicit length checks to make it easier to understand.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

Different devices have different size of phy calibration table; add
new TLV to specify the size. If the TLV is not part of uCode header, the
default table size will be used to make sure the backward
compatibilities.
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

For WiFi/BT combo devices, add bluetooth statistics counter
read function to debugfs.
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

WiFi/BT combo devices has different statistics notification
structure, adding the support here to make sure the structure
align correctly.
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

Only WiFi/BT combo devices need to use bluetooth version of statistics
notification; adding the flag in .cfg file to indicate the need for
using different data structure.
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

If its WiFi/BT combo device, the statistics notification sent by
uCode will include the additional BT related statistics counters.

Adding new data structure to support the new layout.
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c:512:53: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffff0fff becomes fff)
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c:765:66: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffff7fff becomes 7fff)
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c:1012:38: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffff00ff becomes ff)
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c:1119:38: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffff0fff becomes fff)
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c:2458:56: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffff7fff becomes 7fff)
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c:2933:38: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffff0fff becomes fff)
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c:3294:57: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffff3fff becomes 3fff)
Signed-off-by: NLarry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

  CHECK   drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c
drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c:111:5: warning: symbol 'b43_modparam_pio' was not declared. Should it be static?
  CHECK   drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_g.c
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_g.c:975:56: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffff7fff becomes 7fff)
  CHECK   drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c:2701:6: warning: symbol 'b43_lpphy_op_switch_analog' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c:1148:30: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffff1fff becomes 1fff)
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c:1525:30: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffff1fff becomes 1fff)
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c:1529:30: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffff1fff becomes 1fff)
  CHECK   drivers/net/wireless/b43/wa.c
drivers/net/wireless/b43/wa.c:385:60: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffff00ff becomes ff)
drivers/net/wireless/b43/wa.c:403:55: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffff00ff becomes ff)
drivers/net/wireless/b43/wa.c:405:55: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffff00ff becomes ff)
drivers/net/wireless/b43/wa.c:415:71: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffff0fff becomes fff)

AFAICT, none of these amount to real bugs.  But this reduces warning
spam from sparse w/o significantly affecting readability of the code (IMHO).
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The existing code seemed to be somewhat based on the datasheet, but
varied substantially from the vendor-provided driver.  This mirrors the
handling of the rtl8185 case from that driver, but still neglects the
specifics for the rtl8180 hardware.  Those details are a bit muddled...
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1541:21: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1541:21:    expected restricted __le16 [usertype] result
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1541:21:    got int
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1575:42:    expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] cmd
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1575:42:    got restricted __le16 [usertype] code
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1587:50: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1587:50:    expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] cmd
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1587:50:    got restricted __le16 [usertype] code
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1592:50: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1592:50:    expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] cmd
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1592:50:    got restricted __le16 [usertype] code
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1845:27: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1845:27:    expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] <noident>
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1845:27:    got restricted __le32 [usertype] <noident>
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1848:27: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1848:27:    expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] <noident>
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1848:27:    got restricted __le32 [usertype] <noident>
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1851:27: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1851:27:    expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] <noident>
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1851:27:    got restricted __le32 [usertype] <noident>
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1854:27: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1854:27:    expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] <noident>
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1854:27:    got restricted __le32 [usertype] <noident>
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1857:27: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1857:27:    expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] <noident>
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1857:27:    got restricted __le32 [usertype] <noident>
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1860:27: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1860:27:    expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] <noident>
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:1860:27:    got restricted __le32 [usertype] <noident>
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:3055:20: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:3055:20:    expected restricted __le16 [usertype] ht_caps
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:3055:20:    got unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] cap

At least the last one looks like a real bug...
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Acked-by: NLennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>

  CHECK   drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00debug.c
drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00debug.c:193:28: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00debug.c:193:28:    expected restricted __le32 [usertype] chip_rev
drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00debug.c:193:28:    got restricted __le16 [usertype] <noident>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>

  CHECK   drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/libipw_module.c
drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/libipw_module.c:65:21: warning: symbol 'libipw_config_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/libipw_module.c:66:6: warning: symbol 'libipw_wiphy_privid' was not declared. Should it be static?
  CHECK   drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/libipw_wx.c
drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/libipw_wx.c:415:17: warning: symbol 'ssid' shadows an earlier one
drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/libipw_wx.c:324:9: originally declared here
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

  CHECK   drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2100.c
drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2100.c:177:28: warning: symbol 'ipw2100_pm_qos_req' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c:282:26: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c:282:26:    expected restricted __le16 [usertype] duration_id
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c:282:26:    got int
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Ever since

commit e1b3ec1a
Author: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Mar 29 12:18:34 2010 +0200

    mac80211: explicitly disable/enable QoS

mac80211 is telling drivers, in particular
iwlwifi, whether QoS is enabled or not.

However, this is only relevant for station mode,
since only then will any device send nullfunc
frames and need to know whether they should be
QoS frames or not. In other modes, there are
(currently) no frames the device is supposed to
send.

When you now consider virtual interfaces, it
becomes apparent that the current mechanism is
inadequate since it enables/disables QoS on a
global scale, where for nullfunc frames it has
to be on a per-interface scale.

Due to the above considerations, we can change
the way mac80211 advertises the QoS state to
drivers to only ever advertise it as "off" in
station mode, and make it a per-BSS setting.
Tested-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

"Recover from tx stall" function is available for all devices except
4965, here add the functionality to 4965.
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

Display "wait_for_silence_timeout_cnt" for _agn devices
in debugfs as part of uCode statistics
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

Add wait_for_silence_timeout_cnt to statistics_dbg structure
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

Smatch complains that "upriv->read_urb" gets dereferenced before
checking for NULL.  It turns out that it's possible for
"upriv->read_urb" to be NULL so I added checks around the dereferences.

Also I remove an "if (upriv->bap_buf != NULL)" check because
"kfree(NULL) is OK.
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

An A-MPDU may contain several subframes each containing its own
CRC for the data. Each subframe also has a respective CRC for the
MPDU length and 4 reserved bits (aka delimeter CRC). AR9003 will
ACK frames that have a valid data CRC but have failed to pass the
CRC for the MPDU length, if and only if the subframe is not the
last subframe in an A-MPDU and if an OFDM phy OFDM reset error has
been caught. Discarding those subframes results in packet loss under
heavy stress conditions, an example being UDP video. Since the
frames are ACK'd by hardware we need to let these frames through
and process them as valid frames.

Cc: Tushit Jain <tushit.jain@atheros.com>
Cc: Kyungwan Nam <kyungwan.nam@atheros.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

This fixes this sparse complaint:

  CHECK   drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_main.c
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_main.c:441:5:
	warning: symbol 'ath9k_htc_tx_aggr_oper'
		 was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

There were a few places where the sc->rxlink pointer was set to NULL "just in
case". This helps nothing - quite to the contrary it is problematic since it
can create self-linked rx descriptors in the middle of the list of receive
buffers.

Here is an example how this could happen (thanks Bob!):

cpu 0:                                      cpu 1:

ath5k_rx_stop
                                            ath5k_tasklet_rx
sc->rxlink = NULL;   /* just in case */
                                              // following doesn't link used
                                              // buffer to prev.
                                              ath5k_rxbuf_setup()

In the case of ath5k_rx_stop() and ath5k_stop_locked() buffers/descriptors are
not changed so rxlink should not be changed as well.

In ath5k_intr() we seem to  try to work around a hardware bug, as the comment
(which is copied 1:1 from the HAL) suggests. I don't see how this could help.
Also the HAL does not set rxlink in this case (So where does this code come
from? It has been there since the first import of ath5k). Changed to just
increment a statistics counter.

After this patch rxlink is only set to NULL before we initialize rx descriptors
and updated when the descriptors are linked together.
Signed-off-by: NBruno Randolf <br1@einfach.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>