Rename IMA's internal filter rule functions from security_filter_rule_*()
to ima_filter_rule_*(). This avoids polluting the security_* namespace,
which is typically reserved for general security subsystem
infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Suggested-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
[zohar@linux.ibm.com: reword using the term "filter", not "audit"]
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Take the properties of the kexec kernel's inode and the current task
ownership into consideration when matching a KEXEC_CMDLINE operation to
the rules in the IMA policy. This allows for some uniformity when
writing IMA policy rules for KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK, KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK,
and KEXEC_CMDLINE operations.

Prior to this patch, it was not possible to write a set of rules like
this:

 dont_measure func=KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK obj_type=foo_t
 dont_measure func=KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK obj_type=foo_t
 dont_measure func=KEXEC_CMDLINE obj_type=foo_t
 measure func=KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK
 measure func=KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK
 measure func=KEXEC_CMDLINE

The inode information associated with the kernel being loaded by a
kexec_kernel_load(2) syscall can now be included in the decision to
measure or not

Additonally, the uid, euid, and subj_* conditionals can also now be
used in KEXEC_CMDLINE rules. There was no technical reason as to why
those conditionals weren't being considered previously other than
ima_match_rules() didn't have a valid inode to use so it immediately
bailed out for KEXEC_CMDLINE operations rather than going through the
full list of conditional comparisons.
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org
Reviewed-by: NLakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Make broader use of ima_rule_contains_lsm_cond() to check if a given
rule contains an LSM conditional. This is a code cleanup and has no
user-facing change.
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Use ima_validate_rule(), at the end of the token parsing stage, to
verify combinations of actions, hooks, and flags. This is useful to
increase readability by consolidating such checks into a single function
and also because rule conditionals can be specified in arbitrary order
making it difficult to do comprehensive rule validation until the entire
rule has been parsed.

This allows for the check that ties together the "keyrings" conditional
with the KEY_CHECK function hook to be moved into the final rule
validation.

The modsig check no longer needs to compiled conditionally because the
token parser will ensure that modsig support is enabled before accepting
"imasig|modsig" appraise type values. The final rule validation will
ensure that appraise_type and appraise_flag options are only present in
appraise rules.

Finally, this allows for the check that ties together the "pcr"
conditional with the measure action to be moved into the final rule
validation.
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Make args_p be of the char pointer type rather than have it be a void
pointer that gets casted to char pointer when it is used. It is a simple
NUL-terminated string as returned by match_strdup().
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

The args_p member is a simple string that is allocated by
ima_rule_init(). Shallow copy it like other non-LSM references in
ima_rule_entry structs.

There are no longer any necessary error path cleanups to do in
ima_lsm_copy_rule().
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Verifying that a file hash is not blacklisted is currently only
supported for files with appended signatures (modsig).  In the future,
this might change.

For now, the "appraise_flag" option is only appropriate for appraise
actions and its "blacklist" value is only appropriate when
CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG is enabled and "appraise_flag=blacklist" is
only appropriate when "appraise_type=imasig|modsig" is also present.
Make this clear at policy load so that IMA policy authors don't assume
that other uses of "appraise_flag=blacklist" are supported.

Fixes: 273df864 ("ima: Check against blacklisted hashes for files with modsig")
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Reivewed-by: NNayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: NNayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

The KEY_CHECK function only supports the uid, pcr, and keyrings
conditionals. Make this clear at policy load so that IMA policy authors
don't assume that other conditionals are supported.

Fixes: 5808611c ("IMA: Add KEY_CHECK func to measure keys")
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: NLakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

The KEXEC_CMDLINE hook function only supports the pcr conditional. Make
this clear at policy load so that IMA policy authors don't assume that
other conditionals are supported.

Since KEXEC_CMDLINE's inception, ima_match_rules() has always returned
true on any loaded KEXEC_CMDLINE rule without any consideration for
other conditionals present in the rule. Make it clear that pcr is the
only supported KEXEC_CMDLINE conditional by returning an error during
policy load.

An example of why this is a problem can be explained with the following
rule:

 dont_measure func=KEXEC_CMDLINE obj_type=foo_t

An IMA policy author would have assumed that rule is valid because the
parser accepted it but the result was that measurements for all
KEXEC_CMDLINE operations would be disabled.

Fixes: b0935123 ("IMA: Define a new hook to measure the kexec boot command line arguments")
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NLakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Buffer based hook functions, such as KEXEC_CMDLINE and KEY_CHECK, can
only measure. The process_buffer_measurement() function quietly ignores
all actions except measure so make this behavior clear at the time of
policy load.

The parsing of the keyrings conditional had a check to ensure that it
was only specified with measure actions but the check should be on the
hook function and not the keyrings conditional since
"appraise func=KEY_CHECK" is not a valid rule.

Fixes: b0935123 ("IMA: Define a new hook to measure the kexec boot command line arguments")
Fixes: 5808611c ("IMA: Add KEY_CHECK func to measure keys")
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Use ima_free_rule() to fix memory leaks of allocated ima_rule_entry
members, such as .fsname and .keyrings, when an error is encountered
during rule parsing.

Set the args_p pointer to NULL after freeing it in the error path of
ima_lsm_rule_init() so that it isn't freed twice.

This fixes a memory leak seen when loading an rule that contains an
additional piece of allocated memory, such as an fsname, followed by an
invalid conditional:

 # echo "measure fsname=tmpfs bad=cond" > /sys/kernel/security/ima/policy
 -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
 # echo scan > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
 # cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
 unreferenced object 0xffff98e7e4ece6c0 (size 8):
   comm "bash", pid 672, jiffies 4294791843 (age 21.855s)
   hex dump (first 8 bytes):
     74 6d 70 66 73 00 6b a5                          tmpfs.k.
   backtrace:
     [<00000000abab7413>] kstrdup+0x2e/0x60
     [<00000000f11ede32>] ima_parse_add_rule+0x7d4/0x1020
     [<00000000f883dd7a>] ima_write_policy+0xab/0x1d0
     [<00000000b17cf753>] vfs_write+0xde/0x1d0
     [<00000000b8ddfdea>] ksys_write+0x68/0xe0
     [<00000000b8e21e87>] do_syscall_64+0x56/0xa0
     [<0000000089ea7b98>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

Fixes: f1b08bbc ("ima: define a new policy condition based on the filesystem name")
Fixes: 2b60c0ec ("IMA: Read keyrings= option from the IMA policy")
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Create a function, ima_free_rule(), to free all memory associated with
an ima_rule_entry. Use the new function to fix memory leaks of allocated
ima_rule_entry members, such as .fsname and .keyrings, when deleting a
list of rules.

Make the existing ima_lsm_free_rule() function specific to the LSM
audit rule array of an ima_rule_entry and require that callers make an
additional call to kfree to free the ima_rule_entry itself.

This fixes a memory leak seen when loading by a valid rule that contains
an additional piece of allocated memory, such as an fsname, followed by
an invalid rule that triggers a policy load failure:

 # echo -e "dont_measure fsname=securityfs\nbad syntax" > \
    /sys/kernel/security/ima/policy
 -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
 # echo scan > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
 # cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
 unreferenced object 0xffff9bab67ca12c0 (size 16):
   comm "bash", pid 684, jiffies 4295212803 (age 252.344s)
   hex dump (first 16 bytes):
     73 65 63 75 72 69 74 79 66 73 00 6b 6b 6b 6b a5  securityfs.kkkk.
   backtrace:
     [<00000000adc80b1b>] kstrdup+0x2e/0x60
     [<00000000d504cb0d>] ima_parse_add_rule+0x7d4/0x1020
     [<00000000444825ac>] ima_write_policy+0xab/0x1d0
     [<000000002b7f0d6c>] vfs_write+0xde/0x1d0
     [<0000000096feedcf>] ksys_write+0x68/0xe0
     [<0000000052b544a2>] do_syscall_64+0x56/0xa0
     [<000000007ead1ba7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

Fixes: f1b08bbc ("ima: define a new policy condition based on the filesystem name")
Fixes: 2b60c0ec ("IMA: Read keyrings= option from the IMA policy")
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Ask the LSM to free its audit rule rather than directly calling kfree().
Both AppArmor and SELinux do additional work in their audit_rule_free()
hooks. Fix memory leaks by allowing the LSMs to perform necessary work.

Fixes: b1694245 ("ima: use the lsm policy update notifier")
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Reviewed-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

process_buffer_measurement() and ima_alloc_key_entry() functions need to
log an audit message for auditing integrity measurement failures.

Add audit message in these two functions. Remove "pr_devel" log message
in process_buffer_measurement().

Sample audit messages:

[    6.303048] audit: type=1804 audit(1592506281.627:2): pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=kernel op=measuring_key cause=ENOMEM comm="swapper/0" name=".builtin_trusted_keys" res=0 errno=-12

[    8.019432] audit: type=1804 audit(1592506283.344:10): pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 op=measuring_kexec_cmdline cause=hashing_error comm="systemd" name="kexec-cmdline" res=0 errno=-22
Signed-off-by: NLakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
Suggested-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

This patch prevents the following oops:

[   10.771813] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000
[...]
[   10.779790] RIP: 0010:ima_match_policy+0xf7/0xb80
[...]
[   10.798576] Call Trace:
[   10.798993]  ? ima_lsm_policy_change+0x2b0/0x2b0
[   10.799753]  ? inode_init_owner+0x1a0/0x1a0
[   10.800484]  ? _raw_spin_lock+0x7a/0xd0
[   10.801592]  ima_must_appraise.part.0+0xb6/0xf0
[   10.802313]  ? ima_fix_xattr.isra.0+0xd0/0xd0
[   10.803167]  ima_must_appraise+0x4f/0x70
[   10.804004]  ima_post_path_mknod+0x2e/0x80
[   10.804800]  do_mknodat+0x396/0x3c0

It occurs when there is a failure during IMA initialization, and
ima_init_policy() is not called. IMA hooks still call ima_match_policy()
but ima_rules is NULL. This patch prevents the crash by directly assigning
the ima_default_policy pointer to ima_rules when ima_rules is defined. This
wouldn't alter the existing behavior, as ima_rules is always set at the end
of ima_init_policy().

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.7.x
Fixes: 07f6a794 ("ima: add appraise action keywords and default rules")
Reported-by: NTakashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NRoberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

After adding the new add_rule() function in commit c52657d9
("ima: refactor ima_init_policy()"), all appraisal flags are added to the
temp_ima_appraise variable. Revert to the previous behavior instead of
removing build_ima_appraise, to benefit from the protection offered by
__ro_after_init.

The mentioned commit introduced a bug, as it makes all the flags
modifiable, while build_ima_appraise flags can be protected with
__ro_after_init.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.0.x
Fixes: c52657d9 ("ima: refactor ima_init_policy()")
Co-developed-by: NRoberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NRoberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NKrzysztof Struczynski <krzysztof.struczynski@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Function ima_appraise_flag() returns the flag to be set in
temp_ima_appraise depending on the hook identifier passed as an argument.
It is not necessary to set the flag again for the POLICY_CHECK hook.
Signed-off-by: NKrzysztof Struczynski <krzysztof.struczynski@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

The #define for formatting log messages, pr_fmt, is duplicated in the
files under security/integrity.

This change moves the definition to security/integrity/integrity.h and
removes the duplicate definitions in the other files under
security/integrity.

With this change, the messages in the following files will be prefixed
with 'integrity'.

     security/integrity/platform_certs/platform_keyring.c
     security/integrity/platform_certs/load_powerpc.c
     security/integrity/platform_certs/load_uefi.c
     security/integrity/iint.c

     e.g. "integrity: Error adding keys to platform keyring %s\n"

And the messages in the following file will be prefixed with 'ima'.

     security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c

     e.g. "ima: Allocating IMA blacklist keyring.\n"

For the rest of the files under security/integrity, there will be no
change in the message format.
Suggested-by: NShuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Suggested-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NTushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: NLakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Measuring keys requires a custom IMA policy to be loaded.  Keys should
be queued for measurement if a custom IMA policy is not yet loaded.
Keys queued for measurement, if any, should be processed when a custom
policy is loaded.

This patch updates the IMA hook function ima_post_key_create_or_update()
to queue the key if a custom IMA policy has not yet been loaded.  And,
ima_update_policy() function, which is called when a custom IMA policy
is loaded, is updated to process queued keys.
Signed-off-by: NLakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

ima_match_keyring() is called while holding rcu read lock. Since this
function executes in atomic context, it should not call any function
that can sleep (such as kstrdup()).

This patch pre-allocates a buffer to hold the keyrings string read from
the IMA policy and uses that to match the given keyring.
Signed-off-by: NLakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
Fixes: e9085e0a ("IMA: Add support to limit measuring keys")
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Keep the ima policy rules around from the beginning even if they appear
invalid at the time of loading, as they may become active after an lsm
policy load.  However, loading a custom IMA policy with unknown LSM
labels is only safe after we have transitioned from the "built-in"
policy rules to a custom IMA policy.

Patch also fixes the rule re-use during the lsm policy reload and makes
some prints a bit more human readable.

Changelog:
v4:
- Do not allow the initial policy load refer to non-existing lsm rules.
v3:
- Fix too wide policy rule matching for non-initialized LSMs
v2:
- Fix log prints

Fixes: b1694245 ("ima: use the lsm policy update notifier")
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Reported-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJanne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NKonsta Karsisto <konsta.karsisto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

When reading ima_policy from securityfs, there is a missing
space between output string of LSM rules and the remaining
rules.
Signed-off-by: NClay Chang <clayc@hpe.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Read "keyrings=" option, if specified in the IMA policy, and store in
the list of IMA rules when the configured IMA policy is read.

This patch defines a new policy token enum namely Opt_keyrings
and an option flag IMA_KEYRINGS for reading "keyrings=" option
from the IMA policy.

Updated ima_parse_rule() to parse "keyrings=" option in the policy.
Updated ima_policy_show() to display "keyrings=" option.

The following example illustrates how key measurement can be verified.

Sample "key" measurement rule in the IMA policy:

measure func=KEY_CHECK uid=0 keyrings=.ima|.evm template=ima-buf

Display "key" measurement in the IMA measurement list:

cat /sys/kernel/security/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements

10 faf3...e702 ima-buf sha256:27c915b8ddb9fae7214cf0a8a7043cc3eeeaa7539bcb136f8427067b5f6c3b7b .ima 308202863082...4aee

Verify "key" measurement data for a key added to ".ima" keyring:

cat /sys/kernel/security/integrity/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements | grep -m 1 "\.ima" | cut -d' ' -f 6 | xxd -r -p |tee ima-cert.der | sha256sum | cut -d' ' -f 1

The output of the above command should match the template hash
of the first "key" measurement entry in the IMA measurement list for
the key added to ".ima" keyring.

The file namely "ima-cert.der" generated by the above command
should be a valid x509 certificate (in DER format) and should match
the one that was used to import the key to the ".ima" keyring.
The certificate file can be verified using openssl tool.
Signed-off-by: NLakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Limit measuring keys to those keys being loaded onto a given set of
keyrings only and when the user id (uid) matches if uid is specified
in the policy.

This patch defines a new IMA policy option namely "keyrings=" that
can be used to specify a set of keyrings. If this option is specified
in the policy for "measure func=KEY_CHECK" then only the keys
loaded onto a keyring given in the "keyrings=" option are measured.

If uid is specified in the policy then the key is measured only if
the current user id matches the one specified in the policy.

Added a new parameter namely "keyring" (name of the keyring) to
process_buffer_measurement(). The keyring name is passed to
ima_get_action() to determine the required action.
ima_match_rules() is updated to check keyring in the policy, if
specified, for KEY_CHECK function.
Signed-off-by: NLakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Measure keys loaded onto any keyring.

This patch defines a new IMA policy func namely KEY_CHECK to
measure keys. Updated ima_match_rules() to check for KEY_CHECK
and ima_parse_rule() to handle KEY_CHECK.
Signed-off-by: NLakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Replace all the occurrences of FIELD_SIZEOF() with sizeof_field() except
at places where these are defined. Later patches will remove the unused
definition of FIELD_SIZEOF().

This patch is generated using following script:

EXCLUDE_FILES="include/linux/stddef.h|include/linux/kernel.h"

git grep -l -e "\bFIELD_SIZEOF\b" | while read file;
do

	if [[ "$file" =~ $EXCLUDE_FILES ]]; then
		continue
	fi
	sed -i  -e 's/\bFIELD_SIZEOF\b/sizeof_field/g' $file;
done
Signed-off-by: NPankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190924105839.110713-3-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.comCo-developed-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> # for net

Asymmetric private keys are used to sign multiple files. The kernel
currently supports checking against blacklisted keys. However, if the
public key is blacklisted, any file signed by the blacklisted key will
automatically fail signature verification. Blacklisting the public key
is not fine enough granularity, as we might want to only blacklist a
particular file.

This patch adds support for checking against the blacklisted hash of
the file, without the appended signature, based on the IMA policy. It
defines a new policy option "appraise_flag=check_blacklist".

In addition to the blacklisted binary hashes stored in the firmware
"dbx" variable, the Linux kernel may be configured to load blacklisted
binary hashes onto the .blacklist keyring as well. The following
example shows how to blacklist a specific kernel module hash.

  $ sha256sum kernel/kheaders.ko
  77fa889b35a05338ec52e51591c1b89d4c8d1c99a21251d7c22b1a8642a6bad3
  kernel/kheaders.ko

  $ grep BLACKLIST .config
  CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING=y
  CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST="blacklist-hash-list"

  $ cat certs/blacklist-hash-list
  "bin:77fa889b35a05338ec52e51591c1b89d4c8d1c99a21251d7c22b1a8642a6bad3"

Update the IMA custom measurement and appraisal policy
rules (/etc/ima-policy):

  measure func=MODULE_CHECK template=ima-modsig
  appraise func=MODULE_CHECK appraise_flag=check_blacklist
  appraise_type=imasig|modsig

After building, installing, and rebooting the kernel:

   545660333 ---lswrv      0     0   \_ blacklist:
  bin:77fa889b35a05338ec52e51591c1b89d4c8d1c99a21251d7c22b1a8642a6bad3

  measure func=MODULE_CHECK template=ima-modsig
  appraise func=MODULE_CHECK appraise_flag=check_blacklist
  appraise_type=imasig|modsig

  modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'kheaders': Permission denied

  10 0c9834db5a0182c1fb0cdc5d3adcf11a11fd83dd ima-sig
  sha256:3bc6ed4f0b4d6e31bc1dbc9ef844605abc7afdc6d81a57d77a1ec9407997c40
  2 /usr/lib/modules/5.4.0-rc3+/kernel/kernel/kheaders.ko

  10 82aad2bcc3fa8ed94762356b5c14838f3bcfa6a0 ima-modsig
  sha256:3bc6ed4f0b4d6e31bc1dbc9ef844605abc7afdc6d81a57d77a1ec9407997c40
  2 /usr/lib/modules/5.4.0rc3+/kernel/kernel/kheaders.ko  sha256:77fa889b3
  5a05338ec52e51591c1b89d4c8d1c99a21251d7c22b1a8642a6bad3
  3082029a06092a864886f70d010702a082028b30820287020101310d300b0609608648
  016503040201300b06092a864886f70d01070131820264....

  10 25b72217cc1152b44b134ce2cd68f12dfb71acb3 ima-buf
  sha256:8b58427fedcf8f4b20bc8dc007f2e232bf7285d7b93a66476321f9c2a3aa132
  b blacklisted-hash
  77fa889b35a05338ec52e51591c1b89d4c8d1c99a21251d7c22b1a8642a6bad3
Signed-off-by: NNayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>
[zohar@linux.ibm.com: updated patch description]
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1572492694-6520-8-git-send-email-zohar@linux.ibm.com

Systems in lockdown mode should block the kexec of untrusted kernels.
For x86 and ARM we can ensure that a kernel is trustworthy by validating
a PE signature, but this isn't possible on other architectures. On those
platforms we can use IMA digital signatures instead. Add a function to
determine whether IMA has or will verify signatures for a given event type,
and if so permit kexec_file() even if the kernel is otherwise locked down.
This is restricted to cases where CONFIG_INTEGRITY_TRUSTED_KEYRING is set
in order to prevent an attacker from loading additional keys at runtime.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>
Acked-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>

Define new "d-modsig" template field which holds the digest that is
expected to match the one contained in the modsig, and also new "modsig"
template field which holds the appended file signature.

Add a new "ima-modsig" defined template descriptor with the new fields as
well as the ones from the "ima-sig" descriptor.

Change ima_store_measurement() to accept a struct modsig * argument so that
it can be passed along to the templates via struct ima_event_data.
Suggested-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NThiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Implement the appraise_type=imasig|modsig option, allowing IMA to read and
verify modsig signatures.

In case a file has both an xattr signature and an appended modsig, IMA will
only use the appended signature if the key used by the xattr signature
isn't present in the IMA or platform keyring.

Because modsig verification needs to convert from an integrity keyring id
to the keyring itself, add an integrity_keyring_from_id() function in
digsig.c so that integrity_modsig_verify() can use it.
Signed-off-by: NThiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Introduce the modsig keyword to the IMA policy syntax to specify that
a given hook should expect the file to have the IMA signature appended
to it. Here is how it can be used in a rule:

appraise func=KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK appraise_type=imasig|modsig

With this rule, IMA will accept either a signature stored in the extended
attribute or an appended signature.

For now, the rule above will behave exactly the same as if
appraise_type=imasig was specified. The actual modsig implementation
will be introduced separately.
Suggested-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NThiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

IMA policy rules are walked sequentially.  Depending on the ordering of
the policy rules, the "template" field might be defined in one rule, but
will be replaced by subsequent, applicable rules, even if the rule does
not explicitly define the "template" field.

This patch initializes the "template" once and only replaces the
"template", when explicitly defined.

Fixes: 19453ce0 ("IMA: support for per policy rule template formats")
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Currently during soft reboot(kexec_file_load) boot command line
arguments are not measured. Define hooks needed to measure kexec
command line arguments during soft reboot(kexec_file_load).

- A new ima hook ima_kexec_cmdline is defined to be called by the
kexec code.
- A new function process_buffer_measurement is defined to measure
the buffer hash into the IMA measurement list.
- A new func policy KEXEC_CMDLINE is defined to control the
 measurement.
Signed-off-by: NPrakhar Srivastava <prsriva02@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Admins may wish to log different measurements using different IMA
templates. Add support for overriding the default template on a per-rule
basis.
Inspired-by: NRoberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Don't do lazy policy updates while running the rule matching,
run the updates as they happen.

Depends on commit f242064c5df3 ("LSM: switch to blocking policy update notifiers")
Signed-off-by: NJanne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Fix sparse warning:

security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:202:23: warning:
 symbol 'arch_policy_entry' was not declared. Should it be static?

Fixes: 61917062 ("ima: add support for arch specific policies")
Reported-by: NHulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (linux-5.0)
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):

  this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
  it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
  the free software foundation version 2 of the license

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

  GPL-2.0-only

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 315 file(s).
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: NAllison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: NArmijn Hemel <armijn@tjaldur.nl>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190531190115.503150771@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Show the '^' character when a policy rule has flag IMA_INMASK.

Fixes: 80eae209 ("IMA: allow reading back the current IMA policy")
Signed-off-by: NRoberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Kernel booted just with ima_policy=tcb (not with
ima_policy=appraise_tcb) shouldn't require signed policy.

Regression found with LTP test ima_policy.sh.

Fixes: c52657d9 ("ima: refactor ima_init_policy()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org  (linux-5.0)
Signed-off-by: NPetr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
cases where we are expecting to fall through.

This patch fixes the following warnings:

security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c:85:10: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:940:18: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:943:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:972:21: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:974:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
security/smack/smack_lsm.c:3391:9: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
security/apparmor/domain.c:569:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]

Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3

Also, add a missing break statement to fix the following warning:

security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c:116:26: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
Acked-by: NJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Acked-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Acked-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <james.morris@microsoft.com>