1. 21 12月, 2018 2 次提交
  2. 20 12月, 2018 4 次提交
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Hold a reference on RIF's netdev · b61cd7c6
      Ido Schimmel 提交于
      Previous patches tried to make RIF deletion more robust and avoid
      use-after-free situations.
      
      As another precaution, hold a reference on a RIF's netdev and release it
      when the RIF is deleted.
      Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
      Reviewed-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      b61cd7c6
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Make RIF deletion more robust · 965fa8e6
      Ido Schimmel 提交于
      In the past we had multiple instances where RIFs were not properly
      deleted.
      
      One of the reasons for leaking a RIF was that at the time when IP
      addresses were flushed from the respective netdev (prompting the
      destruction of the RIF), the netdev was no longer a mlxsw upper. This
      caused the inet{,6}addr notification blocks to ignore the NETDEV_DOWN
      event and leak the RIF.
      
      Instead of checking whether the netdev is our upper when an IP address
      is removed, we can instead check if the netdev has a RIF configured.
      
      To look up a RIF we need to access mlxsw private data, so the patch
      stores the notification blocks inside a mlxsw struct. This then allows
      us to use container_of() and extract the required private data.
      Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
      Reviewed-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      965fa8e6
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Propagate 'struct mlxsw_sp' further · 21ffedb6
      Ido Schimmel 提交于
      Next patch is going to make RIF deletion more robust by removing
      reliance on fragile mlxsw_sp_lower_get(). This is because a netdev is
      not necessarily our upper anymore when its IP addresses are flushed.
      
      The inet{,6}addr notification blocks are going to resolve 'struct
      mlxsw_sp' using container_of(), but the functions they call still use
      mlxsw_sp_lower_get().
      
      As a preparation for the next patch, propagate 'struct mlxsw_sp' down to
      the functions called from the notification blocks and remove reliance on
      mlxsw_sp_lower_get().
      Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
      Reviewed-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      21ffedb6
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Do not destroy RIFs based on FID's reference count · 32fd4b49
      Ido Schimmel 提交于
      Currently, when a RIF is constructed on top of a FID, the RIF increments
      the FID's reference count and the RIF is destroyed when the FID's
      reference count drops to 1. This effectively means that when no local
      ports are member in the FID, the FID is destroyed regardless if the
      router port is a member in the FID or not.
      
      The above can lead to the unexpected behavior in which routes using a
      VLAN interface as their nexthop device are no longer offloaded after the
      last local port leaves the corresponding VLAN (FID).
      
      Example:
      # ip -4 route show dev br0.10
      192.0.2.0/24 proto kernel scope link src 192.0.2.1 offload
      # bridge vlan del vid 10 dev swp3
      # ip -4 route show dev br0.10
      192.0.2.0/24 proto kernel scope link src 192.0.2.1
      
      After the patch, the route is offloaded before and after the VLAN is
      removed from local port 'swp3', as the RIF corresponding to 'br0.10'
      continues to exists.
      
      In order to remove RIFs' reliance on the underlying FID's reference
      count, we need to add a reference count to sub-port RIFs, which are RIFs
      that correspond to physical ports and their uppers (e.g., LAG devices).
      
      In this case, each {Port, VID} ('struct mlxsw_sp_port_vlan') needs to
      hold a reference on the RIF. For example:
      
                             bond0.10
                                |
                              bond0
                                |
                            +-------+
                            |       |
                          swp1    swp2
      
      Both {Port 1, VID 10} and {Port 2, VID 10} will hold a reference on the
      RIF corresponding to 'bond0.10'. When the last reference is dropped, the
      RIF will be destroyed.
      Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
      Reviewed-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      32fd4b49
  3. 14 12月, 2018 2 次提交
  4. 07 12月, 2018 1 次提交
  5. 28 11月, 2018 2 次提交
  6. 18 10月, 2018 3 次提交
  7. 26 8月, 2018 1 次提交
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_switchdev: Do not leak RIFs when removing bridge · 602b74ed
      Ido Schimmel 提交于
      When a bridge device is removed, the VLANs are flushed from each
      configured port. This causes the ports to decrement the reference count
      on the associated FIDs (filtering identifier). If the reference count of
      a FID is 1 and it has a RIF (router interface), then this RIF is
      destroyed.
      
      However, if no port is member in the VLAN for which a RIF exists, then
      the RIF will continue to exist after the removal of the bridge. To
      reproduce:
      
      # ip link add name br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
      # ip link set dev swp1 master br0
      # ip link add link br0 name br0.10 type vlan id 10
      # ip address add 192.0.2.0/24 dev br0.10
      # ip link del dev br0
      
      The RIF associated with br0.10 continues to exist.
      
      Fix this by iterating over all the bridge device uppers when it is
      destroyed and take care of destroying their RIFs.
      
      Fixes: 99f44bb3 ("mlxsw: spectrum: Enable L3 interfaces on top of bridge devices")
      Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
      Reviewed-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      602b74ed
  8. 10 8月, 2018 1 次提交
  9. 02 8月, 2018 2 次提交
  10. 15 7月, 2018 3 次提交
  11. 10 7月, 2018 2 次提交
  12. 07 7月, 2018 1 次提交
  13. 04 7月, 2018 1 次提交
    • D
      net/ipv6: Revert attempt to simplify route replace and append · 33bd5ac5
      David Ahern 提交于
      NetworkManager likes to manage linklocal prefix routes and does so with
      the NLM_F_APPEND flag, breaking attempts to simplify the IPv6 route
      code and by extension enable multipath routes with device only nexthops.
      
      Revert f34436a4 and these followup patches:
      6eba08c3 ("ipv6: Only emit append events for appended routes").
      ce45bded ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Align with new route replace logic")
      53b562df ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Allow appending to dev-only routes")
      
      Update the fib_tests cases to reflect the old behavior.
      
      Fixes: f34436a4 ("net/ipv6: Simplify route replace and appending into multipath route")
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
      33bd5ac5
  14. 26 6月, 2018 4 次提交
  15. 16 6月, 2018 2 次提交
  16. 23 5月, 2018 1 次提交
  17. 03 5月, 2018 2 次提交
  18. 20 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  19. 18 4月, 2018 2 次提交
  20. 27 3月, 2018 3 次提交