1. 02 10月, 2011 4 次提交
    • A
      btrfs: hooks for readahead · 4bb31e92
      Arne Jansen 提交于
      This adds the hooks needed for readahead. In the readpage_end_io_hook,
      the extent state is checked for the EXTENT_READAHEAD flag. Only in this
      case the readahead hook is called, to keep the impact on non-ra as low
      as possible.
      Additionally, a hook for a failed IO is added, otherwise readahead would
      wait indefinitely for the extent to finish.
      
      Changes for v2:
       - eliminate race condition
      Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
      4bb31e92
    • A
      btrfs: state information for readahead · 90519d66
      Arne Jansen 提交于
      Add state information for readahead to btrfs_fs_info and btrfs_device
      
      Changes v2:
       - don't wait in radix_trees
       - add own set of workers for readahead
      Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
      90519d66
    • A
      btrfs: add READAHEAD extent buffer flag · ab0fff03
      Arne Jansen 提交于
      Add a READAHEAD extent buffer flag.
      Add a function to trigger a read with this flag set.
      
      Changes v2:
       - use extent buffer flags instead of extent state flags
      
      Changes v5:
       - adapt to changed read_extent_buffer_pages interface
       - don't return eb from reada_tree_block_flagged if it has CORRUPT flag set
      Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
      ab0fff03
    • A
      btrfs: add an extra wait mode to read_extent_buffer_pages · bb82ab88
      Arne Jansen 提交于
      read_extent_buffer_pages currently has two modes, either trigger a read
      without waiting for anything, or wait for the I/O to finish. The former
      also bails when it's unable to lock the page. This patch now adds an
      additional parameter to allow it to block on page lock, but don't wait
      for completion.
      
      Changes v5:
       - merge the 2 wait parameters into one and define WAIT_NONE, WAIT_COMPLETE and
         WAIT_PAGE_LOCK
      
      Change v6:
       - fix bug introduced in v5
      Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
      bb82ab88
  2. 28 7月, 2011 3 次提交
    • C
      Btrfs: make a lockdep class for each root · 85d4e461
      Chris Mason 提交于
      This patch was originally from Tejun Heo.  lockdep complains about the btrfs
      locking because we sometimes take btree locks from two different trees at the
      same time.  The current classes are based only on level in the btree, which
      isn't enough information for lockdep to figure out if the lock is safe.
      
      This patch makes a class for each type of tree, and lumps all the FS trees that
      actually have files and directories into the same class.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      85d4e461
    • C
      Btrfs: stop using highmem for extent_buffers · a6591715
      Chris Mason 提交于
      The extent_buffers have a very complex interface where
      we use HIGHMEM for metadata and try to cache a kmap mapping
      to access the memory.
      
      The next commit adds reader/writer locks, and concurrent use
      of this kmap cache would make it even more complex.
      
      This commit drops the ability to use HIGHMEM with extent buffers,
      and rips out all of the related code.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      a6591715
    • J
      Btrfs: use a worker thread to do caching · bab39bf9
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      A user reported a deadlock when copying a bunch of files.  This is because they
      were low on memory and kthreadd got hung up trying to migrate pages for an
      allocation when starting the caching kthread.  The page was locked by the person
      starting the caching kthread.  To fix this we just need to use the async thread
      stuff so that the threads are already created and we don't have to worry about
      deadlocks.  Thanks,
      Reported-by: NRoman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.ru>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      bab39bf9
  3. 20 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  4. 18 6月, 2011 3 次提交
  5. 13 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  6. 11 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  7. 10 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  8. 27 5月, 2011 2 次提交
  9. 24 5月, 2011 5 次提交
    • X
      Btrfs: using rcu lock in the reader side of devices list · 1f78160c
      Xiao Guangrong 提交于
      fs_devices->devices is only updated on remove and add device paths, so we can
      use rcu to protect it in the reader side
      Signed-off-by: NXiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      1f78160c
    • X
      Btrfs: fix the race between reading and updating devices · c9513edb
      Xiao Guangrong 提交于
      On btrfs_congested_fn and __unplug_io_fn paths, we should hold
      device_list_mutex to avoid remove/add device path to
      update fs_devices->devices
      
      On __btrfs_close_devices and btrfs_prepare_sprout paths, the devices in
      fs_devices->devices or fs_devices->devices is updated, so we should hold
      the mutex to avoid the reader side to reach them
      Signed-off-by: NXiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      c9513edb
    • A
      BTRFS: Remove unused node_lock · 0956c798
      Andi Kleen 提交于
      240f62c8 replaced the node_lock with rcu_read_lock, but forgot
      to remove the actual lock in the data structure. Remove it here.
      Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      0956c798
    • J
      Btrfs: kill trans_mutex · a4abeea4
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      We use trans_mutex for lots of things, here's a basic list
      
      1) To serialize trans_handles joining the currently running transaction
      2) To make sure that no new trans handles are started while we are committing
      3) To protect the dead_roots list and the transaction lists
      
      Really the serializing trans_handles joining is not too hard, and can really get
      bogged down in acquiring a reference to the transaction.  So replace the
      trans_mutex with a trans_lock spinlock and use it to do the following
      
      1) Protect fs_info->running_transaction.  All trans handles have to do is check
      this, and then take a reference of the transaction and keep on going.
      2) Protect the fs_info->trans_list.  This doesn't get used too much, basically
      it just holds the current transactions, which will usually just be the currently
      committing transaction and the currently running transaction at most.
      3) Protect the dead roots list.  This is only ever processed by splicing the
      list so this is relatively simple.
      4) Protect the fs_info->reloc_ctl stuff.  This is very lightweight and was using
      the trans_mutex before, so this is a pretty straightforward change.
      5) Protect fs_info->no_trans_join.  Because we don't hold the trans_lock over
      the entirety of the commit we need to have a way to block new people from
      creating a new transaction while we're doing our work.  So we set no_trans_join
      and in join_transaction we test to see if that is set, and if it is we do a
      wait_on_commit.
      6) Make the transaction use count atomic so we don't need to take locks to
      modify it when we're dropping references.
      7) Add a commit_lock to the transaction to make sure multiple people trying to
      commit the same transaction don't race and commit at the same time.
      8) Make open_ioctl_trans an atomic so we don't have to take any locks for ioctl
      trans.
      
      I have tested this with xfstests, but obviously it is a pretty hairy change so
      lots of testing is greatly appreciated.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      a4abeea4
    • J
      Btrfs: take away the num_items argument from btrfs_join_transaction · 7a7eaa40
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      I keep forgetting that btrfs_join_transaction() just ignores the num_items
      argument, which leads me to sending pointless patches and looking stupid :).  So
      just kill the num_items argument from btrfs_join_transaction and
      btrfs_start_ioctl_transaction, since neither of them use it.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      7a7eaa40
  10. 21 5月, 2011 1 次提交
    • M
      btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation · 16cdcec7
      Miao Xie 提交于
      Changelog V5 -> V6:
      - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the
        root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go.
      
      Changelog V4 -> V5:
      - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by
        Chris Mason.
      - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch.
      - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by
        Itaru Kitayama.
      
      Changelog V3 -> V4:
      - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache
        inode in time.
      
      Changelog V2 -> V3:
      - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items
        balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh.
      - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment.
      - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason
      
      Changelog V1 -> V2:
      - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes,
        which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the
        delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item.
      - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes.
      
      Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs
      is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions,
      such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on.
      
      If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the
      performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name
      index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update.
      
      Implementation:
      - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to
        manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory.
        One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the
        other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with
        by the work thread.
      - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name
        index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to
        manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree.
      - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used
        to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion
        and deletion and the delayed inode update.
        When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some
        delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then
        go back.
        When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all
        the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work
        queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some
        threshold value.
      - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the
        information into the delayed inserting rb-tree.
        And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items
        balance. (The balance policy is above.)
      - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it
        in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not,
        add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree.
        Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the
        delayed items and do delayed items balance.
        (The same to inserting manipulation)
      - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the
        inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after
        dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion.
      - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the
        delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more
        inode updates.
      - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node.
      - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode.
      - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items
        and the delayed inode update.
      
      I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the
      performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%.
      
      Before applying this patch:
      Create files:
              Total files: 50000
              Total time: 1.096108
              Average time: 0.000022
      Delete files:
              Total files: 50000
              Total time: 1.510403
              Average time: 0.000030
      
      After applying this patch:
      Create files:
              Total files: 50000
              Total time: 0.932899
              Average time: 0.000019
      Delete files:
              Total files: 50000
              Total time: 1.215732
              Average time: 0.000024
      
      [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3
      
      Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help!
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dave@jikos.cz>
      Tested-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Tested-by: NItaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      16cdcec7
  11. 13 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  12. 12 5月, 2011 1 次提交
    • A
      btrfs: scrub · a2de733c
      Arne Jansen 提交于
      This adds an initial implementation for scrub. It works quite
      straightforward. The usermode issues an ioctl for each device in the
      fs. For each device, it enumerates the allocated device chunks. For
      each chunk, the contained extents are enumerated and the data checksums
      fetched. The extents are read sequentially and the checksums verified.
      If an error occurs (checksum or EIO), a good copy is searched for. If
      one is found, the bad copy will be rewritten.
      All enumerations happen from the commit roots. During a transaction
      commit, the scrubs get paused and afterwards continue from the new
      roots.
      
      This commit is based on the series originally posted to linux-btrfs
      with some improvements that resulted from comments from David Sterba,
      Ilya Dryomov and Jan Schmidt.
      Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
      a2de733c
  13. 06 5月, 2011 2 次提交
  14. 02 5月, 2011 7 次提交
  15. 26 4月, 2011 1 次提交
  16. 25 4月, 2011 2 次提交
    • L
      Btrfs: Support reading/writing on disk free ino cache · 82d5902d
      Li Zefan 提交于
      This is similar to block group caching.
      
      We dedicate a special inode in fs tree to save free ino cache.
      
      At the very first time we create/delete a file after mount, the free ino
      cache will be loaded from disk into memory. When the fs tree is commited,
      the cache will be written back to disk.
      
      To keep compatibility, we check the root generation against the generation
      of the special inode when loading the cache, so the loading will fail
      if the btrfs filesystem was mounted in an older kernel before.
      Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
      82d5902d
    • L
      Btrfs: Cache free inode numbers in memory · 581bb050
      Li Zefan 提交于
      Currently btrfs stores the highest objectid of the fs tree, and it always
      returns (highest+1) inode number when we create a file, so inode numbers
      won't be reclaimed when we delete files, so we'll run out of inode numbers
      as we keep create/delete files in 32bits machines.
      
      This fixes it, and it works similarly to how we cache free space in block
      cgroups.
      
      We start a kernel thread to read the file tree. By scanning inode items,
      we know which chunks of inode numbers are free, and we cache them in
      an rb-tree.
      
      Because we are searching the commit root, we have to carefully handle the
      cross-transaction case.
      
      The rb-tree is a hybrid extent+bitmap tree, so if we have too many small
      chunks of inode numbers, we'll use bitmaps. Initially we allow 16K ram
      of extents, and a bitmap will be used if we exceed this threshold. The
      extents threshold is adjusted in runtime.
      Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
      581bb050
  17. 12 4月, 2011 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: avoid taking the trans_mutex in btrfs_end_transaction · 13c5a93e
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      I've been working on making our O_DIRECT latency not suck and I noticed we were
      taking the trans_mutex in btrfs_end_transaction.  So to do this we convert
      num_writers and use_count to atomic_t's and just decrement them in
      btrfs_end_transaction.  Instead of deleting the transaction from the trans list
      in put_transaction we do that in btrfs_commit_transaction() since that's the
      only time it actually needs to be removed from the list.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      13c5a93e
  18. 05 4月, 2011 1 次提交
  19. 28 3月, 2011 2 次提交