1. 06 12月, 2014 1 次提交
  2. 05 12月, 2014 4 次提交
  3. 03 12月, 2014 9 次提交
  4. 19 11月, 2014 2 次提交
  5. 18 11月, 2014 2 次提交
    • J
      Bluetooth: Call drain_workqueue() before resetting state · 76727c02
      Johan Hedberg 提交于
      Doing things like hci_conn_hash_flush() while holding the hdev lock is
      risky since its synchronous pending work cancellation could cause the
      L2CAP layer to try to reacquire the hdev lock. Right now there doesn't
      seem to be any obvious places where this would for certain happen but
      it's already enough to cause lockdep to start warning against the hdev
      and the work struct locks being taken in the "wrong" order:
      
      [  +0.000373] mgmt-tester/1603 is trying to acquire lock:
      [  +0.000292]  ((&conn->pending_rx_work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<c104266d>] flush_work+0x0/0x181
      [  +0.000270]
      but task is already holding lock:
      [  +0.000000]  (&hdev->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c13b9a80>] hci_dev_do_close+0x166/0x359
      [  +0.000000]
      which lock already depends on the new lock.
      
      [  +0.000000]
      the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
      [  +0.000000]
      -> #1 (&hdev->lock){+.+.+.}:
      [  +0.000000]        [<c105ea8f>] lock_acquire+0xe3/0x156
      [  +0.000000]        [<c140c663>] mutex_lock_nested+0x54/0x375
      [  +0.000000]        [<c13d644b>] l2cap_recv_frame+0x293/0x1a9c
      [  +0.000000]        [<c13d7ca4>] process_pending_rx+0x50/0x5e
      [  +0.000000]        [<c1041a3f>] process_one_work+0x21c/0x436
      [  +0.000000]        [<c1041e3d>] worker_thread+0x1be/0x251
      [  +0.000000]        [<c1045a22>] kthread+0x94/0x99
      [  +0.000000]        [<c140f801>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x21/0x30
      [  +0.000000]
      -> #0 ((&conn->pending_rx_work)){+.+.+.}:
      [  +0.000000]        [<c105e158>] __lock_acquire+0xa07/0xc89
      [  +0.000000]        [<c105ea8f>] lock_acquire+0xe3/0x156
      [  +0.000000]        [<c1042696>] flush_work+0x29/0x181
      [  +0.000000]        [<c1042864>] __cancel_work_timer+0x76/0x8f
      [  +0.000000]        [<c104288c>] cancel_work_sync+0xf/0x11
      [  +0.000000]        [<c13d4c18>] l2cap_conn_del+0x72/0x183
      [  +0.000000]        [<c13d8953>] l2cap_disconn_cfm+0x49/0x55
      [  +0.000000]        [<c13be37a>] hci_conn_hash_flush+0x7a/0xc3
      [  +0.000000]        [<c13b9af6>] hci_dev_do_close+0x1dc/0x359
      [  +0.012038]        [<c13bbe38>] hci_unregister_dev+0x6e/0x1a3
      [  +0.000000]        [<c12d33c1>] vhci_release+0x28/0x47
      [  +0.000000]        [<c10dd6a9>] __fput+0xd6/0x154
      [  +0.000000]        [<c10dd757>] ____fput+0xd/0xf
      [  +0.000000]        [<c1044bb2>] task_work_run+0x6b/0x8d
      [  +0.000000]        [<c1001bd2>] do_notify_resume+0x3c/0x3f
      [  +0.000000]        [<c140fa70>] work_notifysig+0x29/0x31
      [  +0.000000]
      other info that might help us debug this:
      
      [  +0.000000]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      
      [  +0.000000]        CPU0                    CPU1
      [  +0.000000]        ----                    ----
      [  +0.000000]   lock(&hdev->lock);
      [  +0.000000]                                lock((&conn->pending_rx_work));
      [  +0.000000]                                lock(&hdev->lock);
      [  +0.000000]   lock((&conn->pending_rx_work));
      [  +0.000000]
       *** DEADLOCK ***
      
      Fully fixing this would require some quite heavy refactoring to change
      how the hdev lock and hci_conn instances are handled together. A simpler
      solution for now which this patch takes is to try ensure that the hdev
      workqueue is empty before proceeding with the various cleanup calls,
      including hci_conn_hash_flush().
      Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      76727c02
    • J
      Bluetooth: Use shorter "rand" name for "randomizer" · 38da1703
      Johan Hedberg 提交于
      The common short form of "randomizer" is "rand" in many places
      (including the Bluetooth specification). The shorter version also makes
      for easier to read code with less forced line breaks. This patch renames
      all occurences of "randomizer" to "rand" in the Bluetooth subsystem
      code.
      Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      38da1703
  6. 15 11月, 2014 2 次提交
  7. 03 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  8. 02 11月, 2014 2 次提交
  9. 29 10月, 2014 2 次提交
  10. 17 9月, 2014 1 次提交
  11. 15 9月, 2014 1 次提交
  12. 13 9月, 2014 1 次提交
  13. 09 9月, 2014 2 次提交
  14. 21 8月, 2014 1 次提交
    • J
      Bluetooth: Fix hci_conn reference counting for auto-connections · f161dd41
      Johan Hedberg 提交于
      Recently the LE passive scanning and auto-connections feature was
      introduced. It uses the hci_connect_le() API which returns a hci_conn
      along with a reference count to that object. All previous users would
      tie this returned reference to some existing object, such as an L2CAP
      channel, and there'd be no leaked references this way. For
      auto-connections however the reference was returned but not stored
      anywhere, leaving established connections with one higher reference
      count than they should have.
      
      Instead of playing special tricks with hci_conn_hold/drop this patch
      associates the returned reference from hci_connect_le() with the object
      that in practice does own this reference, i.e. the hci_conn_params
      struct that caused us to initiate a connection in the first place. Once
      the connection is established or fails to establish this reference is
      removed appropriately.
      
      One extra thing needed is to call hci_pend_le_actions_clear() before
      calling hci_conn_hash_flush() so that the reference is cleared before
      the hci_conn objects are fully removed.
      Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      f161dd41
  15. 14 8月, 2014 8 次提交
  16. 31 7月, 2014 1 次提交