Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 09 12月, 2006 5 次提交
  3. 08 12月, 2006 2 次提交
  5. 22 11月, 2006 1 次提交
  7. 09 11月, 2006 3 次提交
  9. 04 11月, 2006 1 次提交
    • S
      [PATCH] NFS4: fix for recursive locking problem · 7ef55b8a
      由 Srinivasa Ds 提交于 
      When I was performing some operations on NFS, I got below error on server
side.

  =============================================
  [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
  2.6.19-prep #1
  ---------------------------------------------
  nfsd4/3525 is trying to acquire lock:
   (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [<c0611e5a>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24

  but task is already holding lock:
   (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [<c0611e5a>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24

  other info that might help us debug this:
  2 locks held by nfsd4/3525:
   #0:  (client_mutex){--..}, at: [<c0611e5a>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24
   #1:  (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [<c0611e5a>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24

  stack backtrace:
   [<c04051ed>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x58/0x16a
   [<c04057fa>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
   [<c0405913>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
   [<c043b6f1>] __lock_acquire+0x778/0x99c
   [<c043be86>] lock_acquire+0x4b/0x6d
   [<c0611ceb>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xbc/0x20a
   [<c0611e5a>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24
   [<c047fd7e>] vfs_rmdir+0x76/0xf8
   [<f94b7ce9>] nfsd4_clear_clid_dir+0x2c/0x41 [nfsd]
   [<f94b7de9>] nfsd4_remove_clid_dir+0xb1/0xe8 [nfsd]
   [<f94b307b>] laundromat_main+0x9b/0x1c3 [nfsd]
   [<c04333d6>] run_workqueue+0x7a/0xbb
   [<c0433d0b>] worker_thread+0xd2/0x107
   [<c0436285>] kthread+0xc3/0xf2
   [<c0402005>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb
  ===================================================================

Cause for this problem was,2 successive mutex_lock calls on 2 diffrent inodes ,as shown below

	static int
	nfsd4_clear_clid_dir(struct dentry *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
	{
	        int status;

	        /* For now this directory should already be empty, but we empty it of
        	 * any regular files anyway, just in case the directory was created by
	         * a kernel from the future.... */
        	nfsd4_list_rec_dir(dentry, nfsd4_remove_clid_file);
	        mutex_lock(&dir->d_inode->i_mutex);
	        status = vfs_rmdir(dir->d_inode, dentry);
	...

	int vfs_rmdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
	{
	        int error = may_delete(dir, dentry, 1);

	        if (error)
	                return error;

	        if (!dir->i_op || !dir->i_op->rmdir)
        	        return -EPERM;

	        DQUOT_INIT(dir);

	        mutex_lock(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
	...

So I have developed the patch to overcome this problem.
Signed-off-by: NSrinivasa DS <srinivasa@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      7ef55b8a
  11. 21 10月, 2006 15 次提交
  13. 17 10月, 2006 4 次提交
  15. 06 10月, 2006 1 次提交
    • N
      [PATCH] knfsd: tidy up up meaning of 'buffer size' in nfsd/sunrpc · c6b0a9f8
      由 NeilBrown 提交于 
      There is some confusion about the meaning of 'bufsz' for a sunrpc server.
In some cases it is the largest message that can be sent or received.  In
other cases it is the largest 'payload' that can be included in a NFS
message.

In either case, it is not possible for both the request and the reply to be
this large.  One of the request or reply may only be one page long, which
fits nicely with NFS.

So we remove 'bufsz' and replace it with two numbers: 'max_payload' and
'max_mesg'.  Max_payload is the size that the server requests.  It is used
by the server to check the max size allowed on a particular connection:
depending on the protocol a lower limit might be used.

max_mesg is the largest single message that can be sent or received.  It is
calculated as the max_payload, rounded up to a multiple of PAGE_SIZE, and
with PAGE_SIZE added to overhead.  Only one of the request and reply may be
this size.  The other must be at most one page.

Cc: Greg Banks <gnb@sgi.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      c6b0a9f8
  17. 04 10月, 2006 8 次提交