Allow a bit of leniency for the CPU scheduler to be distracted while we
flush the tasklet and so ensure that we always check the status of the
request once more before timing out.

v2: Wait until the HW acked the submit, and we do any secondary actions
for the submit (e.g. timeslices)
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200330121644.25277-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Throw in the inverse patterns to create more examples of poison to use
against the LRC state.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200313102812.30173-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Static code analysis tool identified struct lrc_timestamp data as being
uninitialized and then data.ce[] is being checked for NULL/negative
value in the error path. Initializing data variable fixes the issue.

Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NAditya Swarup <aditya.swarup@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200303142347.15696-1-aditya.swarup@intel.com

Give the reset worker a kick before losing help when waiting for hang
recovery, as the CPU scheduler is a little unreliable.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200227085723.1961649-15-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

As we require a context switch to ensure that the current context is
switched out and saved to memory, perform an explicit switch to the
kernel context and wait for it.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1336Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200228082330.2411941-18-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Check that we can recover if the LRC is totally corrupted. Based on a
very simple theory that anything that can be adjusted via the context
(i.e. on behalf of the user), should be under the purview of the
per-engine-reset.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200227085723.1961649-13-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Record the LRC registers before/after a preemption event to ensure that
the first context sees nothing from the second client; at least in the
normal per-context register state.

References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1233Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200227085723.1961649-12-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

use intel_uc_uses_guc_submission() directly instead, to be consistent in
the way we check what we want to do with the GuC.

v2: do not go through ctx->vm->gt, use i915->gt instead
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> #v1
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

Currently, we check that a new context has a clear set of general
purpose registers. Add a little bit of hostility by preempting our new
context and re-poisoning the GPR to ensure that there is no context
leakage from preemption.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NRamalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200219123418.1447428-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Check that the CTX_TIMESTAMP is monotonic across context save/restore
and upon preemption.

References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1233Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NRamalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200219112004.1412791-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Always flush the tasklet if we have pending submissions in
wait_for_submit(), so that even if we see the HW has started before we
process its ack, when we return the execlists state is well defined.

Fixes: 06289949 ("drm/i915/selftests: Check for any sign of request starting in wait_for_submit()")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218211215.1336341-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We only want to wait until the request has been submitted at least once;
that is it is either in flight, or has been.

References: fcf7df7a ("drm/i915/selftests: Check for the error interrupt before we wait!")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218141305.1258394-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

GPU saves accumulated context runtime (in CS timestamp units) in PPHWSP
which will be useful for us in cases when we are not able to track context
busyness ourselves (like with GuC). Keep a copy of this in struct
intel_context from where it can be easily read even if the context is not
pinned.

v2:
 (Chris)
 * Do not store pphwsp address in intel_context.
 * Log CS wrap-around.
 * Simplify calculation by relying on integer wraparound.
v3:
 * Include total/avg in traces and error state for debugging
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200216133620.394962-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Sometimes the error interrupt can fire even before we have seen the
request go active -- in which case, we end up waiting until the timeout
as the request is already completed. Double check for this case!
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200214120659.3888735-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Originally, I did not expect having to rewind a context upon
timeslicing: the point was to replace the executing context with a
non-executing one! However, given a second context that depends on
requests from the first, we may have to split the requests along the
first context to execute the second, causing us to partially replay the
first context and so have to rewind its RING_TAIL.

References: 5ba32c7b ("drm/i915/execlists: Always force a context reload when rewinding RING_TAIL")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200213140150.3639027-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

If we encounter a hang on a virtual engine, as we process the hang the
request may already have been moved back to the virtual engine (we are
processing the hang on the physical engine). We need to reclaim the
request from the virtual engine so that the locking is consistent and
local to the real engine on which we will hold the request for error
state capturing.

v2: Pull the reclamation into execlists_hold() and assert that cannot be
called from outside of the reset (i.e. with the tasklet disabled).
v3: Added selftest
v4: Drop the reference owned by the virtual engine

Fixes: ad18ba7b ("drm/i915/execlists: Offline error capture")
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_balancer/hang
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122140243.495621-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 989df3a7)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Thanks to preempt-to-busy, we leave the request on the HW as we submit
the preemption request. This means that the request may complete at any
moment as we process HW events, and in particular the request may be
retired as we are planning to capture it for a preemption timeout.

Be more careful while obtaining the request to capture after a
preemption timeout, and check to see if it completed before we were able
to put it on the on-hold list. If we do see it did complete just before
we capture the request, proclaim the preemption-timeout a false positive
and pardon the reset as we should hit an arbitration point momentarily
and so be able to process the preemption.

Note that even after we move the request to be on hold it may be retired
(as the reset to stop the HW comes after), so we do require to hold our
own reference as we work on the request for capture (and all of the
peeking at state within the request needs to be carefully protected).

Fixes: c3f1ed90 ("drm/i915/gt: Allow temporary suspension of inflight requests")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/997Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122140243.495621-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 4ba5c086)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

In order to support out-of-line error capture, we need to remove the
active request from HW and put it to one side while a worker compresses
and stores all the details associated with that request. (As that
compression may take an arbitrary user-controlled amount of time, we
want to let the engine continue running on other workloads while the
hanging request is dumped.) Not only do we need to remove the active
request, but we also have to remove its context and all requests that
were dependent on it (both in flight, queued and future submission).

Finally once the capture is complete, we need to be able to resubmit the
request and its dependents and allow them to execute.

v2: Replace stack recursion with a simple list.
v3: Check all the parents, not just the first, when searching for a
stuck ancestor!

References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/738Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116184754.2860848-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 32ff621f)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Apply vast quantities of poison and not tell anyone to see if we fall
for the trap of using a stale RING_HEAD.

References: 42827350 ("drm/i915/gt: Avoid resetting ring->head outside of its timeline mutex")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200211205615.1190127-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Currently on execlists, we use a local hwsp for the kernel_context,
rather than the engine's HWSP, as this is the default for execlists.
However, seqno wrap requires allocating a new HWSP cacheline, and may
require pinning a new HWSP page in the GGTT. This operation requiring
pinning in the GGTT is not allowed within the kernel_context timeline,
as doing so may require re-entering the kernel_context in order to evict
from the GGTT. As we want to avoid requiring a new HWSP for the
kernel_context, we can use the permanently pinned engine's HWSP instead.
However to do so we must prevent the use of semaphores reading the
kernel_context's HWSP, as the use of semaphores do not support rollover
onto the same cacheline. Fortunately, the kernel_context is mostly
isolated, so unlikely to give benefit to semaphores.
Reported-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200210205722.794180-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We can not require that the system process a tasklet in reasonable time
(thanks be to ksoftirqd), but we can insist that having waited
sufficiently for the error interrupt to have been raised and having
kicked the tasklet, the reset has begun and the request will be marked
as in error (if not already completed).
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200210205722.794180-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We manipulate ring->head while active in i915_request_retire underneath
the timeline manipulation. We cannot rely on a stable ring->head outside
of the timeline->mutex, in particular while setting up the context for
resume and reset.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1126
Fixes: 08819549 ("drm/i915: Introduce intel_context.pin_mutex for pin management")
Fixes: e5dadff4 ("drm/i915: Protect request retirement with timeline->mutex")
References: f3c0efc9 ("drm/i915/execlists: Leave resetting ring to intel_ring")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200211120131.958949-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

live_preempt_hang's use of hang injection has been superseded by
live_preempt_reset's use of an non-preemptible spinner. The latter does
not require intrusive hacks into the code.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200209230838.361154-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

If the heartbeat fires in the middle of the preempt-hang test, it
consumes our forced hang disrupting the test.
Reported-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200131130319.2998318-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Since PIN_GLOBAL is no longer guaranteed to be synchronous, we must not
forget to include a wait-for-vma prior to execution.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200131142610.3100998-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Now that we have offline error capture and can reset an engine from
inside an atomic context while also preserving the GPU state for
post-mortem analysis, it is time to handle error interrupts thrown by
the command parser.

This provides a much, much faster mechanism for us to detect known
problems than using heartbeats/hangchecks, and also provides a mechanism
for when those are disabled. However, it is limited to problems the HW
can detect in the CS and so not a complete solution for detecting lockups.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200128204318.4182039-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

If we encounter a hang on a virtual engine, as we process the hang the
request may already have been moved back to the virtual engine (we are
processing the hang on the physical engine). We need to reclaim the
request from the virtual engine so that the locking is consistent and
local to the real engine on which we will hold the request for error
state capturing.

v2: Pull the reclamation into execlists_hold() and assert that cannot be
called from outside of the reset (i.e. with the tasklet disabled).
v3: Added selftest
v4: Drop the reference owned by the virtual engine

Fixes: 74831738 ("drm/i915/execlists: Offline error capture")
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_balancer/hang
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122140243.495621-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Thanks to preempt-to-busy, we leave the request on the HW as we submit
the preemption request. This means that the request may complete at any
moment as we process HW events, and in particular the request may be
retired as we are planning to capture it for a preemption timeout.

Be more careful while obtaining the request to capture after a
preemption timeout, and check to see if it completed before we were able
to put it on the on-hold list. If we do see it did complete just before
we capture the request, proclaim the preemption-timeout a false positive
and pardon the reset as we should hit an arbitration point momentarily
and so be able to process the preemption.

Note that even after we move the request to be on hold it may be retired
(as the reset to stop the HW comes after), so we do require to hold our
own reference as we work on the request for capture (and all of the
peeking at state within the request needs to be carefully protected).

Fixes: 32ff621f ("drm/i915/gt: Allow temporary suspension of inflight requests")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/997Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122140243.495621-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

In order to support out-of-line error capture, we need to remove the
active request from HW and put it to one side while a worker compresses
and stores all the details associated with that request. (As that
compression may take an arbitrary user-controlled amount of time, we
want to let the engine continue running on other workloads while the
hanging request is dumped.) Not only do we need to remove the active
request, but we also have to remove its context and all requests that
were dependent on it (both in flight, queued and future submission).

Finally once the capture is complete, we need to be able to resubmit the
request and its dependents and allow them to execute.

v2: Replace stack recursion with a simple list.
v3: Check all the parents, not just the first, when searching for a
stuck ancestor!

References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/738Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116184754.2860848-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

As we already have a flags field buried within i915_request, reuse it!
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200106114234.2529613-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Avoid spinning indefinitely waiting for the request to be submitted, and
instead apply a timeout. A secondary benefit is that the error message
will show which suspect is blocked.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200106114234.2529613-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

When creating the initial LRC image, we also want to clear the MI_NOOPs
and register values. Rather than use a blanket memset beforehand, apply
the clears inline, close the context image and force inhibition of the
uninitialised reminder.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200102131707.1463945-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Empirically the minimal context image we use for rcs is insufficient to
state the engine. This is demonstrated if we poison the context image
such that any uninitialised state is invalid, and so if the engine
samples beyond our defined region, will fail to start.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200102131707.1463945-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Allocate only an internal intel_context for the kernel_context, forgoing
a global GEM context for internal use as we only require a separate
address space (for our own protection).

Now having weaned GT from requiring ce->gem_context, we can stop
referencing it entirely. This also means we no longer have to create random
and unnecessary GEM contexts for internal use.

GEM contexts are now entirely for tracking GEM clients, and intel_context
the execution environment on the GPU.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Acked-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191221160324.1073045-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Keep the intel_context as being the primary state for i915_request, with
the GEM context a backpointer from the low level state for the rarer
cases we need client information. Our goal is to remove such references
to clients from the backend, and leave the HW submission agnostic to
client interfaces and self-contained.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191220101230.256839-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

As the engine->kernel_context is used within the engine-pm barrier, we
have to be careful when emitting requests outside of the barrier, as the
strict timeline locking rules do not apply. Instead, we must ensure the
engine_park() cannot be entered as we build the request, which is
simplest by taking an explicit engine-pm wakeref around the request
construction.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191125105858.1718307-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Bonded request submission is designed to allow requests to execute in
parallel as laid out by the user. If the master request is already
finished before its bonded pair is submitted, the pair were not destined
to run in parallel and we lose the information about the master engine
to dictate selection of the secondary. If the second request was
required to be run on a particular engine in a virtual set, that should
have been specified, rather than left to the whims of a random
unconnected requests!

In the selftest, I made the mistake of not ensuring the master would
overlap with its bonded pairs, meaning that it could indeed complete
before we submitted the bonds. Those bonds were then free to select any
available engine in their virtual set, and not the one expected by the
test.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191122112152.660743-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Whenever we wait on a request, make sure we actually hold a reference to
it and that it cannot be retired/freed on another CPU!
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191121071044.97798-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Verify that we can execute a long chain of dependent requests from
userspace, each one slightly more important than the last.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191114225736.616885-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Check that the context's ring register state still matches our
expectations prior to execution.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191102125739.24626-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk