- 25 2月, 2020 5 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Rename function mlxsw_core_trap_action_set() to mlxsw_core_trap_state_set() and pass bool enabled instead of action. Figure out the action according to the enabled state there. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
The listener fields en_action and dis_action now contain the actions to be used for TRAP and DROP devlink trap actions. Use them directly instead of the hard-coded values. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Introduce a new macro MLXSW_RXL_DIS that allows to register listeners as disabled. That allows that from now on, the "action" can be understood always as "enabled action" and "unreg_action" as "disabled action". Rename them and treat them accordingly. Use the new macro for defining drops in spectrum_trap.c. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Currently it does not really matter if it is set to DISCARD or SET_FW_DEFAULT because it is set only during unregister of the listener. The unreg_action is going to be used for disabling the listener too, so change to SET_FW_DEFAULT and ensure the HW is going to behave correctly. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Colin Ian King 提交于
There is a spelling mistake in a literal string. Fix it. Signed-off-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 24 2月, 2020 12 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Since commit f3a52c61 ("mlxsw: pci: Utilize MRSR register to perform FW reset") the driver no longer issues a reset via the PCI BAR, so the offset of the reset bit is unused. Remove it. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
During packet receive, only the first matching RX listener in rx_listener_list is going to get the packet. So there is no meaning in registering two equal listeners with different privs. Remove priv from equality comparison and disable possibility of doing it. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
There are couple of places where block pointer as a function argument can be const. So make those const. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
The global arrays are treated as const, they should be const, so make them const. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
No need to initialize to false, so remove it. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
No need for these two flags to be bool. Covert them to bits of u8. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
The dummy name for union is no longer needed, remove it. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Commit 0791051c ("mlxsw: core: Create a generic function to register / unregister traps") moved this field to struct mlxsw_listener, but forgot to remove it from struct mlxsw_rx_listener. Remove the unused field. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
No need to initialize a single policer multiple times for each group. So move the initialization to be done from mlxsw_sp_trap_init(), making the function much simpler. Also, rename it so it is with sync with spectrum.c policers initialization. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
The Trap / Discard Action action got renamed in PRM, so rename it in the code as well. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
No need to have forward declarations for mlxsw_sp_rx_drop_listener() and mlxsw_sp_rx_exception_listener(). Just move them up and avoid it. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
When calling mlxsw_sp_rx_listener(), use err variable instead of directly checking func return value. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 23 2月, 2020 12 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
After introducing the router lock in previous patches and making sure it protects internal router structures, we no longer need to rely on RTNL to serialize access to these structures. Remove RTNL from call sites that no longer require it. Two calls sites that keep taking the lock are mlxsw_sp_router_fibmr_event_work() and mlxsw_sp_inet6addr_event_work(). The first calls into ACL code that still assumes RTNL is taken. The second potentially calls into the FID code that also relies on RTNL. Removing RTNL from these two call sites is the subject of future work. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The routing code exports some helper functions that can be called from other driver modules such as the bridge. These helpers are never called with the router lock already held and therefore need to take it in order to serialize access to shared router structures. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Another entry point into the routing code is from inetaddr listeners. The driver registers listeners to IPv4 and IPv6 inetaddr notification chains in order to understand when a RIF needs to be created or destroyed. Serialize access to shared router structures from these listeners by taking the router lock when processing inetaddr events. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
One entry point into the routing code is from the netdev listener block. Some netdev events require access to internal router structures. For example, changing the MTU of a netdev requires looking-up the backing RIF and adjusting its MTU. In order to serialize access to shared router structures, take the router lock when processing netdev events that require access to it. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The dpipe code traverses internal router structures such as neighbours and adjacency entries and dumps them to user space via netlink. Up until now the routing code did not have its own locks and relied on RTNL lock to serialize access. This is going to change with the introduction of the router lock. Take the router lock in the code paths where RTNL lock is currently taken so that the latter could be removed by subsequent patches. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
There are several work items in the routing code that currently rely on RTNL lock to guard against concurrent changes. Have these work items acquire the router lock in preparation for the removal for RTNL lock from the routing code. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Introduce a mutex to protect the internal structure of the routing code. A single lock is added instead of a more fine-grained and complicated locking scheme because there is not a lot of concurrency in the routing code. The main motivation is remove the dependence on RTNL lock, which is currently used by both the process pushing routes to the kernel and the workqueue pushing the routes to the underlying device. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
When a host route is added, the driver checks if the route needs to be promoted to perform NVE decapsulation based on the current NVE configuration. If so, the index of the decapsulation entry is retrieved and associated with the route. Currently, this information is stored in the NVE module which the router module consults. Since the information is protected under RTNL and since route insertion happens with RTNL held, there is no problem to retrieve the information from the NVE module. However, this is going to change and route insertion will no longer happen under RTNL. Instead, a dedicated lock will be introduced for the router module. Therefore, store this information in the router module and change the router module to consult this copy. The validity of the information is set / cleared whenever an NVE tunnel is initialized / de-initialized. When this happens the NVE module calls into the router module to promote / demote the relevant host route. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The dpipe code accesses internal router data structures and acquires RTNL to protect against their changes. Subsequent patches will remove reliance on RTNL and introduce a dedicated lock to protect router data structures. Publish the router struct to internal users such as the dpipe, so that they could acquire it instead of RTNL. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Protect the per-table multicast route list with a lock and remove RTNL from the delayed work that periodically updates the kernel about packets and bytes statistics from each multicast route. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The multicast table list is traversed from a delayed work that periodically updates the kernel about packets and bytes statistics from each multicast route. The list is currently protected by RTNL, but subsequent patches will remove the driver's dependence on this contended lock. In order to be able to remove dependence on RTNL in the next patch, guard this list with a dedicated mutex. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The driver periodically traverses the linked list of multicast routes and updates the kernel about packets and bytes statistics from each multicast route. These statistics are read from a counter associated with the route when it is written to the device. Currently, multicast routes are published via this linked list before they are associated with a counter. Despite that, it is not possible for the driver to access an invalid counter because the delayed work that reads the statistics and multicast route addition / deletion are mutually exclusive using RTNL. In order to be able to remove RTNL, the list needs to be protected by a dedicated lock, but any route published via the list must have an associated counter, otherwise the driver will access an invalid counter. Solve this by re-ordering the operations during multicast route addition so that the route is only added to the linked list after it was written to the device. Similarly, during deletion the route is first removed from the linked list before its deletion from the device. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 22 2月, 2020 7 次提交
-
-
由 Eran Ben Elisha 提交于
Add support for fsm reactivate via MIRC (Management Image Re-activation Control) set and query commands. For re-activation flow, driver shall first run MIRC set, and then wait until FW is done (via querying MIRC status). Signed-off-by: NEran Ben Elisha <eranbe@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Eran Ben Elisha 提交于
Expose fsm_reactivate callback to the mlxfw_dev_ops struct. FSM reactivate is needed before flashing the new image in order to flush the old flashed but not running firmware image. In case mlxfw_dev do not support the reactivation, this step will be skipped. But if later image flash will fail, a hint will be provided by the extack to advise the user that the failure might be related to it. Signed-off-by: NEran Ben Elisha <eranbe@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Saeed Mahameed 提交于
Instead of always calling both mlxfw_err and NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD with the same message, use the dedicated macro instead. Signed-off-by: NSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Saeed Mahameed 提交于
Introduce mlxfw_{info, err, dbg} macros and make them call corresponding dev_* macros, then convert all instances of pr_* to mlxfw_*. This will allow printing the device name mlxfw is operating on. Signed-off-by: NSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Saeed Mahameed 提交于
Make sure mlxfw_firmware_flash reports a detailed user readable error message in every possible error path, basically every time mlxfw_dev->ops->*() is called and an error is returned, or when image initialization is failed. Signed-off-by: NSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Saeed Mahameed 提交于
Report unique and standard error codes corresponding to the specific FW flash error. In addition, add a more detailed error messages to netlink. Before: $ devlink dev flash pci/0000:05:00.0 file ... Error: mlxfw: Firmware flash failed. devlink answers: Invalid argument After: $ devlink dev flash pci/0000:05:00.0 file ... Error: mlxfw: Firmware flash failed: pending reset. devlink answers: Device busy Signed-off-by: NSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Saeed Mahameed 提交于
FW flash status notify is currently implemented via a callback to the caller mlx module, and all it is doing is to call devlink_flash_update_status_notify with the specific module devlink instance. Instead of repeating the whole process for all mlx modules and re-implement the status_notify callback again and again. Just provide the devlink instance as part of mlxfw_dev when calling mlxfw_firmware_flash and let mlxfw do the devlink status updates directly. This will be very useful for adding status notify support to mlx5, as already done in this patch, with a simple one line of just providing the devlink instance to mlxfw_firmware_flash. mlxfw now depends on NET_DEVLINK as all other mlx modules. Signed-off-by: NSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 2月, 2020 4 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The device supports a single VTEP whose configuration is shared between all VXLAN tunnels. While the shared configuration is cleared upon the destruction of the last tunnel - in mlxsw_sp_nve_tunnel_fini() - it is set in mlxsw_sp_nve_fid_enable(), after calling mlxsw_sp_nve_tunnel_init(). Make tunnel initialization and destruction symmetric and set the configuration in mlxsw_sp_nve_tunnel_init(). This will later allow us to protect the shared configuration with a lock. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
After the previous patch, all the callers of mlxsw_sp_rif_find_by_dev() outside of the routing code use it to understand if a RIF exists for the passed netdev. Therefore, export a function to check if a RIF exists and make mlxsw_sp_rif_find_by_dev() internal to the routing code. This will later allow us to more easily introduce the router lock which will also protect the RIFs. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
There are currently 5 users of mlxsw_sp_rif_find_by_dev() outside of the routing code. Only one call site actually needs to dereference the router interface (RIF). The rest merely need to know if a RIF exists for the provided netdev. Convert this call site to query the needed information directly from the routing code instead of dereferencing the RIF. This will later allow us to replace mlxsw_sp_rif_find_by_dev() with a function that checks if a RIF exist. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The function de-associates the port-vlan from its router interface (RIF). It is called both from the netdev notifier block and the inetaddr notifier block that will soon hold the router lock. Make sure that router code calls the internal version, as it will already have the router lock held when the function is called. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-