Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 01 12月, 2021 3 次提交
  3. 26 11月, 2021 1 次提交
    • T
      drm/i915: Use __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM in the capture code · 8b91cdd4
      由 Thomas Hellström 提交于 
      The capture code is typically run entirely in the fence signalling
critical path. We're about to add lockdep annotation in an upcoming patch
which reveals a lockdep splat similar to the below one.

Fix the associated potential deadlocks using __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM
(which is the same as GFP_WAIT, but open-coded for clarity) rather than
GFP_KERNEL for memory allocation in the capture path. This has the
potential drawback that capture might fail in situations with memory
pressure.

[  234.842048] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[  234.842050] 5.15.0-rc7+ #20 Tainted: G     U  W
[  234.842052] ------------------------------------------------------
[  234.842054] gem_exec_captur/1180 is trying to acquire lock:
[  234.842056] ffffffffa3e51c00 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x4d/0x330
[  234.842063]
               but task is already holding lock:
[  234.842064] ffffffffa3f57620 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: i915_vma_snapshot_resource_pin+0x27/0x30 [i915]
[  234.842138]
               which lock already depends on the new lock.

[  234.842140]
               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[  234.842142]
               -> #2 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}:
[  234.842145]        __dma_fence_might_wait+0x41/0xa0
[  234.842149]        dma_resv_lockdep+0x1dc/0x28f
[  234.842151]        do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2d0
[  234.842154]        kernel_init_freeable+0x273/0x2bf
[  234.842157]        kernel_init+0x16/0x120
[  234.842160]        ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
[  234.842163]
               -> #1 (mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start){+.+.}-{0:0}:
[  234.842166]        fs_reclaim_acquire+0x6d/0xd0
[  234.842168]        __kmalloc_node+0x51/0x3a0
[  234.842171]        alloc_cpumask_var_node+0x1b/0x30
[  234.842174]        native_smp_prepare_cpus+0xc7/0x292
[  234.842177]        kernel_init_freeable+0x160/0x2bf
[  234.842179]        kernel_init+0x16/0x120
[  234.842181]        ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
[  234.842184]
               -> #0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
[  234.842186]        __lock_acquire+0x1161/0x1dc0
[  234.842189]        lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
[  234.842192]        fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
[  234.842193]        __kmalloc+0x4d/0x330
[  234.842196]        i915_vma_coredump_create+0x78/0x5b0 [i915]
[  234.842253]        intel_engine_coredump_add_vma+0x36/0xe0 [i915]
[  234.842307]        __i915_gpu_coredump+0x290/0x5e0 [i915]
[  234.842365]        i915_capture_error_state+0x57/0xa0 [i915]
[  234.842415]        intel_gt_handle_error+0x348/0x3e0 [i915]
[  234.842462]        intel_gt_debugfs_reset_store+0x3c/0x90 [i915]
[  234.842504]        simple_attr_write+0xc1/0xe0
[  234.842507]        full_proxy_write+0x53/0x80
[  234.842509]        vfs_write+0xbc/0x350
[  234.842513]        ksys_write+0x58/0xd0
[  234.842514]        do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
[  234.842516]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[  234.842519]
               other info that might help us debug this:

[  234.842521] Chain exists of:
                 fs_reclaim --> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start --> dma_fence_map

[  234.842526]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[  234.842528]        CPU0                    CPU1
[  234.842529]        ----                    ----
[  234.842531]   lock(dma_fence_map);
[  234.842532]                                lock(mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start);
[  234.842535]                                lock(dma_fence_map);
[  234.842537]   lock(fs_reclaim);
[  234.842539]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

[  234.842540] 4 locks held by gem_exec_captur/1180:
[  234.842543]  #0: ffff9007812d9460 (sb_writers#17){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x58/0xd0
[  234.842547]  #1: ffff900781d9ecb8 (&attr->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: simple_attr_write+0x3a/0xe0
[  234.842552]  #2: ffffffffc11913a8 (capture_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_capture_error_state+0x1a/0xa0 [i915]
[  234.842602]  #3: ffffffffa3f57620 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: i915_vma_snapshot_resource_pin+0x27/0x30 [i915]
[  234.842656]
               stack backtrace:
[  234.842658] CPU: 0 PID: 1180 Comm: gem_exec_captur Tainted: G     U  W         5.15.0-rc7+ #20
[  234.842661] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 0403 01/26/2021
[  234.842664] Call Trace:
[  234.842666]  dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72
[  234.842669]  check_noncircular+0xde/0x100
[  234.842672]  ? __lock_acquire+0x3bf/0x1dc0
[  234.842675]  __lock_acquire+0x1161/0x1dc0
[  234.842678]  lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
[  234.842680]  ? __kmalloc+0x4d/0x330
[  234.842683]  ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0xf2/0x360
[  234.842686]  ? i915_vma_coredump_create+0x78/0x5b0 [i915]
[  234.842734]  fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
[  234.842737]  ? __kmalloc+0x4d/0x330
[  234.842739]  __kmalloc+0x4d/0x330
[  234.842742]  i915_vma_coredump_create+0x78/0x5b0 [i915]
[  234.842793]  ? capture_vma+0xbe/0x110 [i915]
[  234.842844]  intel_engine_coredump_add_vma+0x36/0xe0 [i915]
[  234.842892]  __i915_gpu_coredump+0x290/0x5e0 [i915]
[  234.842939]  i915_capture_error_state+0x57/0xa0 [i915]
[  234.842985]  intel_gt_handle_error+0x348/0x3e0 [i915]
[  234.843032]  ? __mutex_lock+0x81/0x830
[  234.843035]  ? simple_attr_write+0x3a/0xe0
[  234.843038]  ? __lock_acquire+0x3bf/0x1dc0
[  234.843041]  intel_gt_debugfs_reset_store+0x3c/0x90 [i915]
[  234.843083]  ? _copy_from_user+0x45/0x80
[  234.843086]  simple_attr_write+0xc1/0xe0
[  234.843089]  full_proxy_write+0x53/0x80
[  234.843091]  vfs_write+0xbc/0x350
[  234.843094]  ksys_write+0x58/0xd0
[  234.843096]  do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
[  234.843098]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[  234.843101] RIP: 0033:0x7fa467480877
[  234.843103] Code: 75 05 48 83 c4 58 c3 e8 37 4e ff ff 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24
[  234.843108] RSP: 002b:00007ffd14d79b08 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
[  234.843112] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffd14d79b60 RCX: 00007fa467480877
[  234.843114] RDX: 0000000000000014 RSI: 00007ffd14d79b60 RDI: 0000000000000007
[  234.843116] RBP: 0000000000000007 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffd14d79ab0
[  234.843119] R10: ffffffffffffffff R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000014
[  234.843121] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007ffd14d79b60 R15: 0000000000000005

v5:
- Use __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM rather than __GFP_NOWAIT for clarity.
  (Daniel Vetter)
v6:
- Include an instance in execlists_capture_work().
- Rework the commit message due to patch reordering.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRamalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211108174547.979714-3-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
      8b91cdd4
  5. 25 11月, 2021 1 次提交
  7. 24 11月, 2021 2 次提交
    • T
      drm/i915/gt: Hold RPM wakelock during PXP suspend · d22d446f
      由 Tejas Upadhyay 提交于 
      selftest --r live shows failure in suspend tests when
RPM wakelock is not acquired during suspend.

This changes addresses below error :
<4> [154.177535] RPM wakelock ref not held during HW access
<4> [154.177575] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 5772 at
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h:113
fwtable_write32+0x240/0x320 [i915]
<4> [154.177974] Modules linked in: i915(+) vgem drm_shmem_helper
fuse snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic
ledtrig_audio mei_hdcp mei_pxp x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp
crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel snd_intel_dspcfg
snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep igc snd_hda_core ttm mei_me ptp
snd_pcm prime_numbers mei i2c_i801 pps_core i2c_smbus intel_lpss_pci
btusb btrtl btbcm btintel bluetooth ecdh_generic ecc [last unloaded: i915]
<4> [154.178143] CPU: 4 PID: 5772 Comm: i915_selftest Tainted: G
U            5.15.0-rc6-CI-Patchwork_21432+ #1
<4> [154.178154] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/TUF GAMING
Z590-PLUS WIFI, BIOS 0811 04/06/2021
<4> [154.178160] RIP: 0010:fwtable_write32+0x240/0x320 [i915]
<4> [154.178604] Code: 15 7b e1 0f 0b e9 34 fe ff ff 80 3d a9 89 31
00 00 0f 85 31 fe ff ff 48 c7 c7 88 9e 4f a0 c6 05 95 89 31 00 01 e8
c0 15 7b e1 <0f> 0b e9 17 fe ff ff 8b 05 0f 83 58 e2 85 c0 0f 85 8d
00 00 00 48
<4> [154.178614] RSP: 0018:ffffc900016279f0 EFLAGS: 00010286
<4> [154.178626] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888204fe0ee0
RCX: 0000000000000001
<4> [154.178634] RDX: 0000000080000001 RSI: ffffffff823142b5
RDI: 00000000ffffffff
<4> [154.178641] RBP: 00000000000320f0 R08: 0000000000000000
R09: c0000000ffffcd5a
<4> [154.178647] R10: 00000000000f8c90 R11: ffffc90001627808
R12: 0000000000000000
<4> [154.178654] R13: 0000000040000000 R14: ffffffffa04d12e0
R15: 0000000000000000
<4> [154.178660] FS:  00007f7390aa4c00(0000) GS:ffff88844f000000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
<4> [154.178669] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
<4> [154.178675] CR2: 000055bc40595028 CR3: 0000000204474005
CR4: 0000000000770ee0
<4> [154.178682] PKRU: 55555554
<4> [154.178687] Call Trace:
<4> [154.178706]  intel_pxp_fini_hw+0x23/0x30 [i915]
<4> [154.179284]  intel_pxp_suspend+0x1f/0x30 [i915]
<4> [154.179807]  live_gt_resume+0x5b/0x90 [i915]

Changes since V2 :
	- Remove boolean in intel_pxp_runtime_preapre for
	  non-pxp configs. Solves build error
Changes since V2 :
	- Open-code intel_pxp_runtime_suspend - Daniele
	- Remove boolean in intel_pxp_runtime_preapre - Daniele
Changes since V1 :
	- split the HW access parts in gt_suspend_late - Daniele
	- Remove default PXP configs
Signed-off-by: NTejas Upadhyay <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Fixes: 0cfab4cb ("drm/i915/pxp: Enable PXP power management")
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211117060321.3729343-1-tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com
      d22d446f
    • U
      drm/i915/pmu: Increase the live_engine_busy_stats sample period · 5979873e
      由 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa 提交于 
      Irrespective of the backend for request submissions, busyness for an
engine with an active context is calculated using:

busyness = total + (current_time - context_switch_in_time)

In execlists mode of operation, the context switch events are handled
by the CPU. Context switch in/out time and current_time are captured
in CPU time domain using ktime_get().

In GuC mode of submission, context switch events are handled by GuC and
the times in the above formula are captured in GT clock domain. This
information is shared with the CPU through shared memory. This results
in 2 caveats:

1) The time taken between start of a batch and the time that CPU is able
to see the context_switch_in_time in shared memory is dependent on GuC
and memory bandwidth constraints.

2) Determining current_time requires an MMIO read that can take anywhere
between a few us to a couple ms. A reference CPU time is captured soon
after reading the MMIO so that the caller can compare the cpu delta
between 2 busyness samples. The issue here is that the CPU delta and the
busyness delta can be skewed because of the time taken to read the
register.

These 2 factors affect the accuracy of the selftest -
live_engine_busy_stats. For (1) the selftest waits until busyness stats
are visible to the CPU. The effects of (2) are more prominent for the
current busyness sample period of 100 us. Increase the busyness sample
period from 100 us to 10 ms to overccome (2).

v2: Fix checkpatch issues
Signed-off-by: NUmesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211115221640.30793-1-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com
      5979873e
  9. 22 11月, 2021 1 次提交
  11. 20 11月, 2021 4 次提交
  13. 17 11月, 2021 2 次提交
  15. 16 11月, 2021 2 次提交
  17. 13 11月, 2021 1 次提交
  19. 12 11月, 2021 3 次提交
  21. 10 11月, 2021 3 次提交
  23. 09 11月, 2021 1 次提交
  25. 05 11月, 2021 1 次提交
  27. 04 11月, 2021 3 次提交
  29. 03 11月, 2021 1 次提交
  31. 01 11月, 2021 1 次提交
  33. 29 10月, 2021 4 次提交
    • M
      drm/i915/gtt: stop caching the scratch page · b0cc4dca
      由 Matthew Auld 提交于 
      Normal users shouldn't be hitting this, likely this would indicate a
userspace bug. So don't bother caching, which should be safe now that we
manually flush the page.
Suggested-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211028092638.3142258-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
      b0cc4dca
    • M
      drm/i915/gtt: flush the scratch page · 2ca77606
      由 Matthew Auld 提交于 
      The scratch page is directly visible in the users address space, and
while this is forced as CACHE_LLC, by the kernel, we still have to
contend with things like "Bypass-LLC" MOCS. So just flush no matter
what.

v2(Thomas):
  - Make sure we use drm_clflush_virt_range here, in case clflush support
    is missing.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211028092638.3142258-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
      2ca77606
    • U
      drm/i915/pmu: Connect engine busyness stats from GuC to pmu · 77cdd054
      由 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa 提交于 
      With GuC handling scheduling, i915 is not aware of the time that a
context is scheduled in and out of the engine. Since i915 pmu relies on
this info to provide engine busyness to the user, GuC shares this info
with i915 for all engines using shared memory. For each engine, this
info contains:

- total busyness: total time that the context was running (total)
- id: id of the running context (id)
- start timestamp: timestamp when the context started running (start)

At the time (now) of sampling the engine busyness, if the id is valid
(!= ~0), and start is non-zero, then the context is considered to be
active and the engine busyness is calculated using the below equation

	engine busyness = total + (now - start)

All times are obtained from the gt clock base. For inactive contexts,
engine busyness is just equal to the total.

The start and total values provided by GuC are 32 bits and wrap around
in a few minutes. Since perf pmu provides busyness as 64 bit
monotonically increasing values, there is a need for this implementation
to account for overflows and extend the time to 64 bits before returning
busyness to the user. In order to do that, a worker runs periodically at
frequency = 1/8th the time it takes for the timestamp to wrap. As an
example, that would be once in 27 seconds for a gt clock frequency of
19.2 MHz.

Note:
There might be an over-accounting of busyness due to the fact that GuC
may be updating the total and start values while kmd is reading them.
(i.e kmd may read the updated total and the stale start). In such a
case, user may see higher busyness value followed by smaller ones which
would eventually catch up to the higher value.

v2: (Tvrtko)
- Include details in commit message
- Move intel engine busyness function into execlist code
- Use union inside engine->stats
- Use natural type for ping delay jiffies
- Drop active_work condition checks
- Use for_each_engine if iterating all engines
- Drop seq locking, use spinlock at GuC level to update engine stats
- Document worker specific details

v3: (Tvrtko/Umesh)
- Demarcate GuC and execlist stat objects with comments
- Document known over-accounting issue in commit
- Provide a consistent view of GuC state
- Add hooks to gt park/unpark for GuC busyness
- Stop/start worker in gt park/unpark path
- Drop inline
- Move spinlock and worker inits to GuC initialization
- Drop helpers that are called only once

v4: (Tvrtko/Matt/Umesh)
- Drop addressed opens from commit message
- Get runtime pm in ping, remove from the park path
- Use cancel_delayed_work_sync in disable_submission path
- Update stats during reset prepare
- Skip ping if reset in progress
- Explicitly name execlists and GuC stats objects
- Since disable_submission is called from many places, move resetting
  stats to intel_guc_submission_reset_prepare

v5: (Tvrtko)
- Add a trylock helper that does not sleep and synchronize PMU event
  callbacks and worker with gt reset

v6: (CI BAT failures)
- DUTs using execlist submission failed to boot since __gt_unpark is
  called during i915 load. This ends up calling the GuC busyness unpark
  hook and results in kick-starting an uninitialized worker. Let
  park/unpark hooks check if GuC submission has been initialized.
- drop cant_sleep() from trylock helper since rcu_read_lock takes care
  of that.

v7: (CI) Fix igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_engines
- For GuC mode of submission the engine busyness is derived from gt time
  domain. Use gt time elapsed as reference in the selftest.
- Increase busyness calculation to 10ms duration to ensure batch runs
  longer and falls within the busyness tolerances in selftest.

v8:
- Use ktime_get in selftest as before
- intel_reset_trylock_no_wait results in a lockdep splat that is not
  trivial to fix since the PMU callback runs in irq context and the
  reset paths are tightly knit into the driver. The test that uncovers
  this is igt@perf_pmu@faulting-read. Drop intel_reset_trylock_no_wait,
  instead use the reset_count to synchronize with gt reset during pmu
  callback. For the ping, continue to use intel_reset_trylock since ping
  is not run in irq context.

- GuC PM timestamp does not tick when GuC is idle. This can potentially
  result in wrong busyness values when a context is active on the
  engine, but GuC is idle. Use the RING TIMESTAMP as GPU timestamp to
  process the GuC busyness stats. This works since both GuC timestamp and
  RING timestamp are synced with the same clock.

- The busyness stats may get updated after the batch starts running.
  This delay causes the busyness reported for 100us duration to fall
  below 95% in the selftest. The only option at this time is to wait for
  GuC busyness to change from idle to active before we sample busyness
  over a 100us period.
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NUmesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Acked-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211027004821.66097-2-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com
      77cdd054
    • U
      drm/i915/pmu: Add a name to the execlists stats · 344e6947
      由 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa 提交于 
      In preparation for GuC pmu stats, add a name to the execlists stats
structure so that it can be differentiated from the GuC stats.
Signed-off-by: NUmesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211027004821.66097-1-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com
      344e6947
  35. 27 10月, 2021 1 次提交
    • M
      drm/i915/guc: Fix recursive lock in GuC submission · 9ca8bb7a
      由 Matthew Brost 提交于 
      Use __release_guc_id (lock held) rather than release_guc_id (acquires
lock), add lockdep annotations.

213.280129] i915: Running i915_perf_live_selftests/live_noa_gpr
[ 213.283459] ============================================
[ 213.283462] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
{{[ 213.283466] 5.15.0-rc6+ #18 Tainted: G U W }}
[ 213.283470] --------------------------------------------
[ 213.283472] kworker/u24:0/8 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 213.283475] ffff8ffc4f6cc1e8 (&guc->submission_state.lock){....}-{2:2}, at: destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915]
{{[ 213.283618] }}
{{ but task is already holding lock:}}
[ 213.283621] ffff8ffc4f6cc1e8 (&guc->submission_state.lock){....}-{2:2}, at: destroyed_worker_func+0x4f/0x350 [i915]
{{[ 213.283720] }}
{{ other info that might help us debug this:}}
[ 213.283724] Possible unsafe locking scenario:[ 213.283727] CPU0
[ 213.283728] ----
[ 213.283730] lock(&guc->submission_state.lock);
[ 213.283734] lock(&guc->submission_state.lock);
{{[ 213.283737] }}
{{ *** DEADLOCK ***}}[ 213.283740] May be due to missing lock nesting notation[ 213.283744] 3 locks held by kworker/u24:0/8:
[ 213.283747] #0: ffff8ffb80059d38 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){..}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1f3/0x550
[ 213.283757] #1: ffffb509000e3e78 ((work_completion)(&guc->submission_state.destroyed_worker)){..}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1f3/0x550
[ 213.283766] #2: ffff8ffc4f6cc1e8 (&guc->submission_state.lock){....}-{2:2}, at: destroyed_worker_func+0x4f/0x350 [i915]
{{[ 213.283860] }}
{{ stack backtrace:}}
[ 213.283863] CPU: 8 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/u24:0 Tainted: G U W 5.15.0-rc6+ #18
[ 213.283868] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 0403 01/26/2021
[ 213.283873] Workqueue: events_unbound destroyed_worker_func [i915]
[ 213.283957] Call Trace:
[ 213.283960] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72
[ 213.283966] __lock_acquire.cold+0x191/0x2d3
[ 213.283972] lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
[ 213.283978] ? destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915]
[ 213.284059] ? destroyed_worker_func+0x2d7/0x350 [i915]
[ 213.284139] ? lock_release+0xb9/0x280
[ 213.284143] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0x60
[ 213.284148] ? destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915]
[ 213.284226] destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915]
[ 213.284310] process_one_work+0x270/0x550
[ 213.284315] worker_thread+0x52/0x3b0
[ 213.284319] ? process_one_work+0x550/0x550
[ 213.284322] kthread+0x135/0x160
[ 213.284326] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
[ 213.284331] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

and a bit later in the trace:

{{ 227.499864] do_raw_spin_lock+0x94/0xa0}}
[ 227.499868] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x60
[ 227.499871] ? guc_flush_destroyed_contexts+0x4f/0xf0 [i915]
[ 227.499995] guc_flush_destroyed_contexts+0x4f/0xf0 [i915]
[ 227.500104] intel_guc_submission_reset_prepare+0x99/0x4b0 [i915]
[ 227.500209] ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70
[ 227.500212] intel_uc_reset_prepare+0x46/0x50 [i915]
[ 227.500320] reset_prepare+0x78/0x90 [i915]
[ 227.500412] __intel_gt_set_wedged.part.0+0x13/0xe0 [i915]
[ 227.500485] intel_gt_set_wedged.part.0+0x54/0x100 [i915]
[ 227.500556] intel_gt_set_wedged_on_fini+0x1a/0x30 [i915]
[ 227.500622] intel_gt_driver_unregister+0x1e/0x60 [i915]
[ 227.500694] i915_driver_remove+0x4a/0xf0 [i915]
[ 227.500767] i915_pci_probe+0x84/0x170 [i915]
[ 227.500838] local_pci_probe+0x42/0x80
[ 227.500842] pci_device_probe+0xd9/0x190
[ 227.500844] really_probe+0x1f2/0x3f0
[ 227.500847] __driver_probe_device+0xfe/0x180
[ 227.500848] driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90
[ 227.500850] __driver_attach+0xc4/0x1d0
[ 227.500851] ? __device_attach_driver+0xe0/0xe0
[ 227.500853] ? __device_attach_driver+0xe0/0xe0
[ 227.500854] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0x90
[ 227.500856] bus_add_driver+0x12e/0x1f0
[ 227.500857] driver_register+0x8f/0xe0
[ 227.500859] i915_init+0x1d/0x8f [i915]
[ 227.500934] ? 0xffffffffc144a000
[ 227.500936] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2d0
[ 227.500938] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80
[ 227.500940] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x238/0x2d0
[ 227.500944] do_init_module+0x5c/0x270
[ 227.500946] __do_sys_finit_module+0x95/0xe0
[ 227.500949] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
[ 227.500951] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 227.500953] RIP: 0033:0x7ffa59d2ae0d
[ 227.500954] Code: c8 0c 00 0f 05 eb a9 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 3b 80 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[ 227.500955] RSP: 002b:00007fff320bbf48 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139
[ 227.500956] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000022ea710 RCX: 00007ffa59d2ae0d
[ 227.500957] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000022e1d90 RDI: 0000000000000004
[ 227.500958] RBP: 0000000000000020 R08: 00007ffa59df3a60 R09: 0000000000000070
[ 227.500958] R10: 00000000022e1d90 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000022e1d90
[ 227.500959] R13: 00000000022e58e0 R14: 0000000000000043 R15: 00000000022e42c0

v2:
 (CI build)
  - Fix build error

Fixes: 1a52faed ("drm/i915/guc: Take GT PM ref when deregistering context")
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211020192147.8048-1-matthew.brost@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 12a9917e)
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
      9ca8bb7a
  37. 26 10月, 2021 2 次提交
  39. 23 10月, 2021 1 次提交
    • M
      drm/i915/guc: Fix recursive lock in GuC submission · 12a9917e
      由 Matthew Brost 提交于 
      Use __release_guc_id (lock held) rather than release_guc_id (acquires
lock), add lockdep annotations.

213.280129] i915: Running i915_perf_live_selftests/live_noa_gpr
[ 213.283459] ============================================
[ 213.283462] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
{{[ 213.283466] 5.15.0-rc6+ #18 Tainted: G U W }}
[ 213.283470] --------------------------------------------
[ 213.283472] kworker/u24:0/8 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 213.283475] ffff8ffc4f6cc1e8 (&guc->submission_state.lock){....}-{2:2}, at: destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915]
{{[ 213.283618] }}
{{ but task is already holding lock:}}
[ 213.283621] ffff8ffc4f6cc1e8 (&guc->submission_state.lock){....}-{2:2}, at: destroyed_worker_func+0x4f/0x350 [i915]
{{[ 213.283720] }}
{{ other info that might help us debug this:}}
[ 213.283724] Possible unsafe locking scenario:[ 213.283727] CPU0
[ 213.283728] ----
[ 213.283730] lock(&guc->submission_state.lock);
[ 213.283734] lock(&guc->submission_state.lock);
{{[ 213.283737] }}
{{ *** DEADLOCK ***}}[ 213.283740] May be due to missing lock nesting notation[ 213.283744] 3 locks held by kworker/u24:0/8:
[ 213.283747] #0: ffff8ffb80059d38 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){..}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1f3/0x550
[ 213.283757] #1: ffffb509000e3e78 ((work_completion)(&guc->submission_state.destroyed_worker)){..}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1f3/0x550
[ 213.283766] #2: ffff8ffc4f6cc1e8 (&guc->submission_state.lock){....}-{2:2}, at: destroyed_worker_func+0x4f/0x350 [i915]
{{[ 213.283860] }}
{{ stack backtrace:}}
[ 213.283863] CPU: 8 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/u24:0 Tainted: G U W 5.15.0-rc6+ #18
[ 213.283868] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 0403 01/26/2021
[ 213.283873] Workqueue: events_unbound destroyed_worker_func [i915]
[ 213.283957] Call Trace:
[ 213.283960] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72
[ 213.283966] __lock_acquire.cold+0x191/0x2d3
[ 213.283972] lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
[ 213.283978] ? destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915]
[ 213.284059] ? destroyed_worker_func+0x2d7/0x350 [i915]
[ 213.284139] ? lock_release+0xb9/0x280
[ 213.284143] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0x60
[ 213.284148] ? destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915]
[ 213.284226] destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915]
[ 213.284310] process_one_work+0x270/0x550
[ 213.284315] worker_thread+0x52/0x3b0
[ 213.284319] ? process_one_work+0x550/0x550
[ 213.284322] kthread+0x135/0x160
[ 213.284326] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
[ 213.284331] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

and a bit later in the trace:

{{ 227.499864] do_raw_spin_lock+0x94/0xa0}}
[ 227.499868] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x60
[ 227.499871] ? guc_flush_destroyed_contexts+0x4f/0xf0 [i915]
[ 227.499995] guc_flush_destroyed_contexts+0x4f/0xf0 [i915]
[ 227.500104] intel_guc_submission_reset_prepare+0x99/0x4b0 [i915]
[ 227.500209] ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70
[ 227.500212] intel_uc_reset_prepare+0x46/0x50 [i915]
[ 227.500320] reset_prepare+0x78/0x90 [i915]
[ 227.500412] __intel_gt_set_wedged.part.0+0x13/0xe0 [i915]
[ 227.500485] intel_gt_set_wedged.part.0+0x54/0x100 [i915]
[ 227.500556] intel_gt_set_wedged_on_fini+0x1a/0x30 [i915]
[ 227.500622] intel_gt_driver_unregister+0x1e/0x60 [i915]
[ 227.500694] i915_driver_remove+0x4a/0xf0 [i915]
[ 227.500767] i915_pci_probe+0x84/0x170 [i915]
[ 227.500838] local_pci_probe+0x42/0x80
[ 227.500842] pci_device_probe+0xd9/0x190
[ 227.500844] really_probe+0x1f2/0x3f0
[ 227.500847] __driver_probe_device+0xfe/0x180
[ 227.500848] driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90
[ 227.500850] __driver_attach+0xc4/0x1d0
[ 227.500851] ? __device_attach_driver+0xe0/0xe0
[ 227.500853] ? __device_attach_driver+0xe0/0xe0
[ 227.500854] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0x90
[ 227.500856] bus_add_driver+0x12e/0x1f0
[ 227.500857] driver_register+0x8f/0xe0
[ 227.500859] i915_init+0x1d/0x8f [i915]
[ 227.500934] ? 0xffffffffc144a000
[ 227.500936] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2d0
[ 227.500938] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80
[ 227.500940] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x238/0x2d0
[ 227.500944] do_init_module+0x5c/0x270
[ 227.500946] __do_sys_finit_module+0x95/0xe0
[ 227.500949] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
[ 227.500951] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 227.500953] RIP: 0033:0x7ffa59d2ae0d
[ 227.500954] Code: c8 0c 00 0f 05 eb a9 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 3b 80 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[ 227.500955] RSP: 002b:00007fff320bbf48 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139
[ 227.500956] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000022ea710 RCX: 00007ffa59d2ae0d
[ 227.500957] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000022e1d90 RDI: 0000000000000004
[ 227.500958] RBP: 0000000000000020 R08: 00007ffa59df3a60 R09: 0000000000000070
[ 227.500958] R10: 00000000022e1d90 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000022e1d90
[ 227.500959] R13: 00000000022e58e0 R14: 0000000000000043 R15: 00000000022e42c0

v2:
 (CI build)
  - Fix build error

Fixes: 1a52faed ("drm/i915/guc: Take GT PM ref when deregistering context")
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211020192147.8048-1-matthew.brost@intel.com
      12a9917e
  41. 22 10月, 2021 1 次提交
  43. 18 10月, 2021 1 次提交